verified pump scam?
Please share proof so my wife will let me sell!!

VERIFICATION

BUY NOW OR REGRET LATER.

JBZY IS SOOO FRUIT LOOPS!!!!!

JBZY IS the shit!!!

This stock is so AWESOME !!!!, months and months passing by
So much happening
No hype and Just Great DD

Rololol. finra approved the name and ticker change. When the company submitted all the required paperwork, and then verified the change was made. plenty of other companies have gone through the same process.

What time Friday are we going sub-penny? I need to know so I can have cash ready to buy more. Thanks for the heads-up

When I click on the link I keep getting the battery replacement video. Is it the link or my computer?

Thanks for clarifying, and thanks for the DD.

Question - for DD Kings on board.

RE:floridany post 26833

Please tell me if own Amperex and more or do we own Amperex for sure and are we waiting to see if we own more. Thanks in advance

CONGRATS LONGS..

No ticker change.

I have seen no mention of it here, but has anyone considered that the reason no word has come from the company is that there are 50mil shares in dispute at the moment? If the company were to start releasing PRs and initiated the ticker change on Monday this stock would explode. Lets say that it went to $1 and then back down to .05 cents, because the alleged owners of the 50mil shares can't sell their shares the company would potentially be on the hook for the lost profit. I think Wang has a ton of cash, but I don't think he wants to be liable for millions if he loses the lawsuit. Just a thought.

The Key in the picture both locks the steering column in order to prevent theft and turns on the electrical system. What were you expecting for 5K, a key fob and a push button start?

I'm betting Quarter, but I like it when you say dollar.

Agreed. Just to clarify, are you saying that you currently own 150 million shares?

Agreed. The new Trolly (sp?) thing to do is throw in a quote having nothing to do with the troll in order to make the troll speak seem legit. Sad, and obvious. At least Gonz pulls of trolling with flair.

Or the first rep had an I.Q. over 80 and the ones the other folks talked to were not as bright as the first. Every time I deal with Snottrade I get the slow guy.

No, and that is yet another reason Texas is the best country in the world.

Same old same old something.

I want t sell all of my shares on your recommendation, but I have no idea what you are saying. Are you saying that all patents in the world are bad, or that DOLV patents are not good. I want to panic sell but I will need clarification first.

Time to sell? The chart says it all.

I think you converted him. He's a believer now too. Go DOLV!!!

I'm at 100%. If this is a scam then the scammers have hoodwinked a whole gaggle of savvier, richer, and more experienced investors than you or I. I personally believe that we are part of something massive.

I often have to read Varok's post of the day over and over in order to keep my nerve, but I honestly believe that we are about to get PAID. And not just new Mercedes and Red Lobster money, but nasty 2 new Mercedes and start your own restaurant type cash flow. Go DOLV

I hear that, but the fact that we are waiting without news is actually comforting. If this were a normal pink the company would have already released 10 PRs about how this is going to be the investment of a lifetime. But to the contrary, this company does not seem to care in the least what you and I think which I am hoping means that they have a much larger outlook than the current pps.

I like my numbers better, but I believe yours to be more likely.

He said predict, he didn't say it had to be realistic. But I think if the other stock that many on the board refer to when measuring this stock holds true then .50 in three months would not be out of the realm of possibility. Especially with the multiple catalysts that will hit in rapid succession.

Somewhere between .50 and $50. I am hoping for the latter.

I was thinking a simple DTPA claim. It allows for attorney fees.

Thank you. Not to be nosy, but you seem to have both the acuity and grasp of facts needed to pursue a claim. Why have you not?

Also super exciting.... You are based in Houston! Yay for me as I live in Dallas. That means my 8k loss is sufficient.

You should check out this case.... Happy Cinco!!!!

Manning v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 772 F.3d 158 (3d Cir. 2014), aff'd, 136 S. Ct. 1562, 194 L. Ed. 2d 671 (2016)

"Bought more shares today. So encouraged." Me too, I bought some Amazon stock today also. Oh, unless you were talking about your own stock. But you said "so encouraged," so I am thinking you are not talking about the stock of ISBG because I own a metric schitt ton of that and I am NOT ENCOURAGED. While we are on the subject, did you rent out the two models on your bagholders, I mean shareholders dime with the bazillion shares you dumped on us, or did you pay for those useless pictures yourself.

I have finals this week and next, but after that I would like to look into filing suit. I only lost 7K so I would need a few others to join me in order to meet the AIC threshold. It would be worth the money just to see the company management squirm during deposition.

From what I can tell it does not matter as long as he is tweeting using an account used to disseminate information for the company.

"Employees acting as company representatives
cannot avoid responsibility for material misstatements
or omissions by purporting to speak in
their individual capacities. The casual and immediate
nature of tweets and the appeal of being able
to quickly disseminate information poses risk that
a statement could be made that would create a Rule 10b-5 violation."

Is Your Company Tweeting Towards
Trouble?—Twitter and Securities
Law Compliance. INSIGHTS, Volume 23, Number 9, September 2009

NICE! Has anyone filed suit? ISBG or DKTS?

I think all of the elements are met.

Headnote: Elements of a private securities fraud claim based on violations of § 10(b) and Rule 10b–5 are: (1) a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) a connection between the misrepresentation or omission and the purchase or sale of a security; (4) reliance upon the misrepresentation or omission; (5) economic loss; and (6) loss causation. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 § 10, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5(b).

Duly noted. And thank you. But what about Exchange Act Rule 10b-5? That seems on point.

Exchange Act Rule 10b-5... Does anyone else wonder if all of the tweets by the company should be accompanied by a safe harbor statement? I'm thinking that they should. Has anyone thought of suing the company? I believe that Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 applies:

"Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 prohibits untrue statements
of material fact and omissions of material
facts that make what have been said misleading.
These antifraud provisions apply to statements
made by a company via Twitter in the same way
they would apply to any other statements by the
company."

Did you forget an "if" or are you privy to unknown info?