Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
'likely to hold a lot of potential'.....'progress in developing potential'....'a proposal for ZTEM'....'plans to obtain permitting'......anyone know definition of 'definitive'?
imo, I don't believe 10-12 drill holes can infer 'proven ore reserves' or leap to $250 mil. investments....let's be real here
777...that outcropping has the shape of a fat porkie...no inference to anything implied
ky, its the perception, LBSR has been on a downtrend in executing prs...such as 'talking with jvers' has appeared often in prs...until JB releases a dynamic pr we are in this floating range...lol
e-trade ad on this page is blocking access feature to other boards....help!
HASC may go big...
Willy, thanks, hope we get 'probable'...
someone mentioned 'proven reserves'...I don't think this limited drilling can prove that...anyone know?
MktGeo, thanks, trying to follow certain posts...yours especially
thanks...interesting chart and analysis
hmm, why the volume on FGOCQ?!
looks like NAK is bouncing on this news.....
probably another 'old' guy....lol
thanks, so at the least we're now starting the 4th week of the comparison analysis, should be almost done I would think......
thanks....I was looking for the date of the end of the 2 weeks for the analysis of the vegetation data.
what date would that be on the completion of the veggie data?
are we in JB's 'late spring' yet?
who are the 'people' in AK?
upshot here is ZTEM kicked down the road again...months away...Fall? winter? 2013? this pattern is wearysome
Is it 'late spring' yet?....
ky, if EPA has its way does that mean Pebble can no longer sue the state as you have previously posted?
I have a vague recollection that NAK's partner had an opportunity to join NAK in its endeavor with LBSR but did not act and the window closed.
my math $1.84 divided by .025=73.6x37.5m=27.6bilx.025=690m....not sure I remember (86yr old ww2 vet here)
hi, 777, I believe 37.5m @ $1.84 is equal to 690m @ .025....so most dilution appears to have come from lawsuit.
"later this spring".....what with analyzing, permitting, drill contract, work at site...etc....looks like months before we know anything to hang a dime on.
that's like going from .01 to.03....no big deal....
when can add IDVC to that list?....lol
just catching up on posts.....too late now, but perhaps a competent securities lawyer could have avoided the lawsuit
SSV.V also has a director w 45 yrs experience in corporate and SECURITIES law..... what if?
EASY there....
wondering if the recent surge in NAK has anything to do with LBSR?
whatever happened on the LBSR/SAGE deal....SAGE pps in uptrend, LBSR dowm....mkt has spoken
'promo' or whatever,I bot at .004 based on what I read about uranium exposure...may have been a mailing
right on! I repeat...I bot LBSR on a uranium promo
not good at this..finger typer...PM...don't know where to find....lol
who knows?! maybe the U play will pop first...to state the obvious until drilling this is 0.
I responded to 'Big chunk asset' my original lotto play here was as a uranium play at .008 long ago
I am here as I am in any other penny/sub penny lotto play.
asset...ha....all LBSR has is a claim that it cannot hold onto without going further into debt eroding the perceived value of its shares
sure hope JB doesn't disclose or discover more claims....the more potential the lower LBSR goes....