Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The worlds 5th largest economy. And apparently it’s sooooo great FUNN cannot open a cafe there. Crazy.
Maybe it was a good thing Glendale didn't work out.
Endless shares available, exactly zero real cost to the “company”.
Why sue many of the largest companies on Earth???? Why not just go after one/two large companies?? Keep costs down!
Yeah, only morons would do business in the world’s 5th largest economy. <sarcasm>
Good thing FUNN was forced to abandon that idea.
Too many rules, regulations and licensing in Cali. Smart decision to pull out
All they had to do was audit and franchise and sit back and watch the empire grow.
Lot of 0 trade days lately. SCARY!
How about run an actual business using their very own supposedly amazing IP. Generates revenue, turns them into a real company instead of a patent troll.
How should VPLM PAY*** for the running of VPLM,
Might as well stop talking about it now. Beast clearly will never happen. Not like it would've been earning the company millions, anyway. Seemed like yet another throw-random-shit-and-pray move.
Run an actual business with the IP. If they even know how to.
Suggestions??? M guess is VPLM would be all ears!
All management has ever had to do is successfully execute all of the shit they sling and hopes sticks.
Audits and franchising would’ve been an easy money maker. Too bad they have zero idea of how to successfully accomplish that.
Wait? You don’t want to wait another half-decade to see if these morons can make this live up to the potential?
As previous audits clearly proved.
Because if they are not audited they are probably BULLSHIT.
FUNN didn’t pull out they were denied, reportedly due to the financial mess they’re in.
Good they pulled out in Glendale…
Too bad FUNN is too incompetent to open these cafes. If only they didn’t blow franchising 5 years ago we could have 50 branded cafes funneling millions in franchise fees into the back account.
Pure opinion. FUNN never publishes customer volume data, nor revenue per location, and all financial data is unaudited and EXTREMELY SUSPECT based on past audits completely invalidating internal numbers.
Multi-year chart certainly tells the truth, though.
…still a company brining in millions of revenues…
...Customers are coming in by the thousands weekly and continues to climb...
Prove it.
…all locations packed…[/
Past 5 years have proven repeatedly that management are terrible at running a business. Same stupid mistakes over and over and over. Would've gone out of business long ago if not for shareholder and investor monies.
Surprised. Was assuming VPLM would be f9rced to pay and then shareholders would claim it as "good for VPLM" and happily accept more dilution to cover the bill.
Judge Donato ruled in VPLM’s favor to deny Twitter’s request for attorney’s fees in case 3:20-cv-02397
Ancient carrots that have never amounted to anything. We don’t even have a cafe in Cali because they blew that, too.
Comedy gold right here…
Always appreciated your honesty, even when it didn’t put FUNN and management in a positive light.
Hope your investments here turned out as well as the share price conversions made it look.
Better to assume it has not, at least based on the long list of failed and inconsequential business arrangements and partnerships.
Ancient carrots, withered on the vine already.
Been dangling "partnerships" over and over for years. Please name "partnerships" that currently exist. There are none.
What would anyone possibly get for their efforts?
I'm afraid FUNN is going to get sued...
After 5 years of failures and lies and declining PPS nobody believes management has the know-how to successfully run this business.
If it weren't for their ability to live off shareholders they would've gone bankrupt already.
Such a shame as the concept has the markings of a successful franchise opportunity. If only management had a clue as how to actually do it.
Thought VPLM dismissed the Apple case?
How can they afford to live much less buy stock? They supposedly work for no salary, remember? For years. Makes total sense.
It’s the bogeyman’s fault and definitely out of FUNN’s control, as always.
Cmon, all those lies are in the past. We only blindly look forward in FUNN Land.
My theory is they agreed not to sue VPLM for their likely millions in attourney fees if they simply went away.
“…Unified never pays any money to NPEs, whether to purchase licenses or otherwise. This ensures that Unified never incentivizes further NPE activity…”
https://www.unifiedpatents.com/faq
Surprised the info box doesn't have a table listing all of the lawsuits, their details such as filing date and venue, and their current disposition. With the original case lost, and the list of recently dismissed cases, and then new defendants sued, it's hard to keep track of what is still active and where in the process they are.
Every court case closed thus far has been against VPLM. I don't believe losing cases and dismissing cases is "holding them at bay".
VPLM has a market cap of somewhere around $35mm.....the market cap of those VPLM is battling is in the $TRLLIONS....BUT, VPLM IS HOLDING THEM AT BAY!!!!!
Same as many other claimed acquisitions. Never actually happened.
The “surface” is every case run through CA has been lost by VPLM. Hard to see how cases moved to CA now invokes thoughts of unicorns and rainbows.
Cases moved out of patent-troll-friendly Waco to CA and it's "good news" for VPLM?
I'm sure they've learned their lesson.
Market cap is still way above unaudited revenue.
Failed statistical significance over placebo.
The primary endpoint (90 day 6-category ordinal score) was not supportive (OR 1.10; 0.79 – 1.54; p=0.56), and 90-day mortality secondary endpoint was also not supportive with 37% mortality in the aviptadil group vs 36% in the placebo group; HR 1.04 (0.77-1.41); p=0.79.