Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Gotcha. So you don't believe or trust DP, but you've never spoken with him. And you won't encourage shareholders to call him, only a lawyer. OK.
What I see you doing is carrying on about how investors should contact a lawyer while dismissing some that have spoken directly to Darrell because they won't tell you what he said? Am I off here?
I see that the # is gone as well.
So walk me through what's going on and whether you feel that the RM into TELA will work out for anyone holding BHUB. Thx
Explain why the company would do this?
With all of the attention that these "scammers" chose to draw to the situation, what would the chances be that they would "get away with their plan"? I understand and agree with your assertation that if DP alleges wrongdoing by SA than he should follow through with a suit. But it hasn't been very long since this whole thing took shape, has it? Furthermore, if TELA is the one that will ultimately pursue SA in court, does it not make sense to wait until the RM takes place to announce the suit? Any thoughts are appreciated.
BHUB (via TELA hopefully)
Wasn't directed at you per se, moreso the I told you so crowd. So IYO, what are the chances here of getting back any $$ we have tied up.
Don't be silly, do you think he wants to go to jail for 10 years?
yep, wtf?
So it's being done to avoid the SB2?
I can only speak for ST but if we're going to the grays they will force all orders to be called in (no BxA). That could explain why someone got that message.
Nope. Won't be trading again and that one day stat is simply based upon previous trading volumes. It's a hypothetical.
Seems to me there are a lot of unanswerable questions here, some of which are a paradox? If you accept that the company itself isn't to blame for the additional shares, then you have to ask yourself why should it stay halted? At the same time, as a shareholder, do you think it's in your best interest to be trading without the situation cleared up? I'm pretty bummed and feel totally screwed.
Really, I predict .0026 as the high for this week...
Trust me, you're missing the point but I'm done. Perhaps others want to help you out.
Maybe someone else can jump in to better explain, but the net/net is that anyone that sold shares which were not backed my certs (NSS) now needs to pay the dividend on those shares as the company will only pay it on "real" shares. There are 20MM "real" shares out there.
The company is the one that would be responsible for 20MM shares worth, think about it. Somewhere there are certs for 20MM shares, those are the one's that will get the divy from the company.
All the more reason to do it then as they would pnly be responsible for 20MM shares worth of dividends? The rest would need to be paid via the short sellers?
Interesting
Well, as much as I hesitate to play devils advocate with all of these vultures around here lately, I'm not entirely sure whether we're halted because of the short or the pissing match between the TA and the company? I happen to believe the short exists, but I also believe it was the GD dueling PR battle that was getting the attention of the wrong folks...
It reflects the number of unauthorized shares, has nothing to do with the the price IMO
Time will tell on that Art, not sure that is always the case.
I know what he's talking about, I've got 1.5mm shares I'd love to get rid of....
Buy mine...
Tough to trade on the grays though, difficult to buy and sell.
Boy that call didn't work out very well for me. I'm still stuck in a non-trading stock with no firm end-date and the stock I will own down the road is spiking down. I had slightly higher hopes for that call.....
So he did say that he expects BHUB to resume trading after the SB2 is filed? As in, it may trade while the SB2 is being reviewed?
I'm sooooo hoping that BHUB will trade as BHUB again.
The additional shares just need to be issued by TELA, look at the AS not OS.
Umm, I think they're giving you 100 pennies for a dollar...
Be great if he can get it trading as BHUB again.
OK, let me ask politely....since you've spoken to Darrell and been around for a long time, how do you expect this to play out? Specifically, if you were to guess, will BHUB trade as BHUB while we wait for the TELA SB2 or will BHUB never trade again?
Bill, we get it, you knew he was sharp...you've posted that link a few times now. If you really want to impress me tell me how you think this plays out from here? Thanks.
Curious as to your reply to those here that feel the short will not follow BHUB to TELA...thanks.
Which you would always hope for when your ceo asks for your stock to be halted...
Do you know for a fact it will tarde again next week?
It would be fascinating because with TELA trading and possibly moving up, the floor on BHUB would be constantly changing...sort of an arbitrage situation. Throw into that the fact that we HOPE there's a big short position and wow.
Question for Art and the board...
Isn't it possible that BHUB could trade during the SB2 process? There's now a PR'd plan to address the sharecount issue? And if it trades, wouldn't SA and anyone short now know that they WILL have to cover one way or another?
So you made your way over to this board... Good deal. Make sure you work it from both sides right ?
Look at the post history for this little helper...