Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SIRI used to be a risk stock just like QBID and went through as m uch or more issues (especially with the hardware problems). I was rewarded by holding it, and expect to see half the profit from QBID as I did SIRI.
SIRI is now consider a small cap in my portfolio but I carry far fewer shares going forward.
It's the opcode to set the bank pointer to default. The actual instruction would be Fbank 0. It is a specialized instruction. In order to do a a full statement you would have to have registers filled the use the cmp ops.
Was funny to me that the topic had to do with money (banks)....etc. So I threw it out there.
No. Not posting complete code just op codes. Bored so I'm entertaining myself after seeing "the there only 10" quote. Always hated that one.
Tell me about. Longhorn is still not out. Vaporware awards all over the place and don't get me started on Enron and Tyco to n ame a few.
What does July 15th have to do with anything?
I agree with that. Doesn't matter if they are pumping or bashing. I just come to this board when I need a good laugh now.
"But obviously I watched LOGO for 10 minutes last night, that clearly at least tells me it doesn't make a difference what LOGO does."
I did say if and ask for an explanation of the above statement. So if you could explain I'd appreciate it.
"But obviously I watched LOGO for 10 minutes last night, that clearly at least tells me it doesn't make a difference what LOGO does."
I did say if and ask for an explanation of the above statement. So if you could explain I'd appreciate it.
"But obviously I watched LOGO for 10 minutes last night, that clearly at least tells me it doesn't make a difference what LOGO does."
Please explain the above statement.
If you saying Q's better based on that then how can you determine he quality of LOGO if you watched 10 minutes of it? That is no differnt than the people here knocking the quality of Q's shows and not seeing them or only seeing the short clips on the sight.
Sputnik: Not sure why you posted that as a reply to my message but glad you did. It was my understanding the Q would not be airing shows like this.
In the long run LOGO will be the top channel in my opinion. That in no way should reflect badly on Q. Both channels are poised to make major break throughs for the niche market they are serving and should be supported well by the community.
For everyone thinking that because LOGO aired first means Q is dead should look at HBO (1975), Showtime (1978). Just because one is better than the other does not mean one is going to fail. In the beginning they both showed the same movies.
Just like there is room for multiple movie channels there is room for Logo, Here, and QBID. Being second best in the makret will still net investors a good gain.
If your a community supporter both channels should be backed and supported.
**Disclaimer: I have a substantial investment in Viacom and QBID. The above is my opinion and should be considered as only opinion.
Could you give a time-line for LOGO?
Would be interesting to see. Most people don't realize how long it to MTV to get on the air or that they were named differntly prior to being MTV.
Easiest way to explain is just point you to a quick link to a lot of indicators.
http://quotes.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=QBID
This link has been posted here a lot. Alhtough, things are looking up I still expected the price to be going down.
Zeus I do not believe this is Q's plan. I don't believe they are having trouble getting carriers just that the carriers do not have a place to put them yet. It will take a bandwith growth or a concession on the part of the carrier to get Q in more areas.
They will eventually be nation wide in my opinion just not anytime soon. Remember Viacom had to dump a channel to get Logo on. I believe this was the delay they had gettig on the air also. Imagine the meetings to decide what you dump to get the controvsial station on the air.
Not a problem. If you didn't see the float or stage thing in the center I was going to suggest your clear your internet cache.
Probably your cache.
So are we both seeing the website that has the Q float from the parade in a center frame?
Looks changed to me.
"There have been plans to add this channel for a while"
Seems to me they want to add it just don't know when it can be accomplished. Don't forget VIACOM DROPPED a channel to get logo on the air.
Of cource RCN has decide where to put it and when.
Sputnik: Could it be that Q doesn't already have a station to remove? They are waiting for a slot from the sound of it.
"It is replacing VH-1 MegaHits"
My thinking was more along the lines of everyone is playing here.
So technicals will never be accurate or dependable for a pink sheet. Sure each stock has it's on rhythm but it can be thrown off by a small group of players easily at these levels. That doesn't even include what rumors and news does to it. A temporary one day of excitment.
Do you think the charts are starting to show an uptrend?
The Bollinger bands are tightning but other indicators show that we should be heading down. I'm surprised that we are still setting at .0018. I didn't think your three week would work out, and don't give you credit for it since we have not closed at .0016 or lower. Although, I did agree with other market factors that we would slowly head that way. Which has not happened.
So wouldn't that rule out any technical analysis then? Why not judge them within the pink them selves?
My personal opinion is you don't see a big run. Just a slow steady almost side ways growth once Logo is up and running.
I didn't recall see a range posted just the .0016.
Do you do any analyis on a stock versus the relative performance of the market or Market and sector? If so how is QBID doing there?
Gambling is gambling. Like I said before blue-chips are the Black-Jack tables, pinks are the slots.
My point is you can not trust them one way or the other. See Enron, Tyco, etc.
I myself have stated many times here how I invest, and limit my pink sheet exposure but advise everyone to join the fun with money they can risk. But simply thinking that a company is reporting numbers makes them more trust worthy is incorrect.
So how does that pinpoint .0016? In order to do that I would assume it would be a techinal analysis algorithm. I'd rather hear from BigTips. He seems to have some knowledge of the topic.
So how did you come up with the exact .0016 number again?
Never saw a reply to my question. Might have missed it though.
You avoided the question nicely. Sure that's a fact but there are more important facts behind it that a decesion maker would look at.
So why were the dead-lines missed again? Why was your example dead-line missed?
Depends on how you look at it. I'm surprised we are sitting at .0018 pretty steady for awhile now. The market has been taking some big hits.
My other stocks did not fair as well in the same time frame. Although, they are now showing signs of life. So for the conditions i'm happy with the Q.
So why were the dead-lines missed? Facts make decesions.
Not perceptions. I have no idea on what went on behind the scences for those dead-lines to be missed. Just because they did not PR why does not mean there were not legitimate reasons for them being missed. We also don't even know if it had anything to do with Q.
So why not answer the questions?
To bad that "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" finale didn't air when it was supposed to. To bad ESPN HD didn't come to my area when they said it would.
Not a reason to get the SEC involved.
Once again. The situation could have dictacted it. So should the SEC investigate LOGO? Seems they did the same thing.
Face it. You don't have 10 facts for an SEC invstigation. You have 9 facts that you do not like. Nothing more.
Another show. Antoher no for an SEC investigation.