Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes, you are correct. As I responded to your last post, I am exercising warrants and holding. I am not selling them when I exercise and I am sure most longs will not sell them when we are finally so close to approval.
Absolutely true. I, and I am sure others, are slowly exercising warrants I (we) held, and still hold many more to go.
I am not sure how well founded an assumption that "DCVAX" is always a reference to the NWBO treatment. On this board that is undoubtedly what is meant. But in the rest of the world, including the academic world, I am not sure that is always the case. I think that that word has been made generic to mean a vaccine (VAX) based on dendritic cells (DC) in a fairly generic way, whose process and MOA may be quite different (or not) than that of the NWBO vaccine. Now if the reference is to DCVAX-L or DCVAX-Direct that is of course another story.
Generally, i like your thinking on this, even if some of your prognostication does not come to pass.
Not quite. True that volumes are low now with only a little retail investor buying. The reason there is so little retail buying mow, is given that for now the control is in the hand of the shorts, Why would a retailer buy now when the fix is in (UNTIL NEWS) that it will drop a penny or so every day. Why would they buy now. But just wait until the NEWS starts to flow over the next 60 days or so and watch what happens to the volume and the share price.
It is my belief that what is keeping the share price down now is the short selling by the defendants and others - not so much the spoofing. Spoofing mainly works by fooling people, but when everyone knows the spoofing is going on, I doubt it is very effective. What is now working to keep the share price down very effectively is continued short selling or even worse more naked short selling. I really want to see the Posner lawsuit for the illegal naked short selling!
Do you think that DCVAX-Direct might be helpful as a preventative measure if given in the location from where the tumor was removed if there was some tiny bit of cancer not removed by the surgery?
No, my calculation is somewhat different. It is not just having to pay capital gain tax on the first $4 and then moving it into the TFSA after uplist. The much larger loss is that I will then only be able to transfer about one ninth the number of shares! That is the real sad part of the story! Thus counting the initial $4 I would have been able to protect some 10 times the shares from capital gains as I will be able to down the road. -- Really huge difference. Sorry for the sad news.
Sojo, I have no NWBO inside a TFSA, my questions were about getting NWBO into my TFSA. It was back and forth for a while, but I think the bottom line is that NWBO is OTC, and the Stuttgart trading is also just OTC there, so that CRA will not allow NWBO to qualify. Two of my brokers refused to place my NWBO into my TFSA. Therefore, if I understand things correctly, if you do have some NWBO in a TFSA I would strongly consider moving them out as soon as possible IMHO. There may be penalties involved. But please verify this on your own with your own qualified advisor, which I am not.
Thank you.
is there a link to where Hoff posts elsewhere. I do want to read him.
I find it strange that the steep down drop showed no volume change while the steep volume at the bottom of the drop showed no change in price upward. Its almost like they moved those shares from someone's left pocket to their right pocket so that the overall market showed no pressure upward.
I have seen this pattern in trading of NWBO before during our continuous manipulated downtrend. On my chart for today's trading the pattern to me is counter-intuitive during the short period from say 1:30 PM TO 2:00 PM. it starts with a slow down trend at about 0.498 at a relatively steady but low volume. As you approach about 1:45 or so a steep decline happens over maybe 5-10 minutes to about 0.483 or so, BUT THE VOLUME DOESN'T CHANGE AND SEEMS TO CONTINUE THE STEADY VOLUME just as before the decline. Then once the decline has ended you suddenly get a sharp steep momentary uptick a little short of 200K in the volume. Then the volume resumes its previous slow steady levels as before and continues horizontally at the new level it found at about 0.483 or so a little before 2:00 PM.
I would think that the sudden sharp drop in price without any volume change is strange. what is causing the drop in price? It looks as though the sharp short peak in volume is related to stropping the drop in price and starting the sidewise pattern of trading? Could this be shorts covering? This still does not explain what precipitates the sharp drop without any change in the volume pattern. anyone noticing this type of pattern and have an explanation for what is happening - spoofing or not.
But before they can be held in contempt, they have to prove they were spoofing - that means they have to go through another trial to prove they were spoofing in order that they be held in contempt - so we are back to square one!!
Assuming that the CHM takes place on the 21st or 22nd, The only possible bad news would be a rejection, which they would have to let us know! Any other outcome of the CHM would be good or neutral news which we may not be told bout right away. So no news is good news! Good news is good news - it can ONLY be bad news if we are told.
I didn't mean you Bio, I was referring to the author of the article.
In case anyone is interested, the end result seems to be, so far as I can tell, that NWBO is NOT listed on the Stuttgart exchange, it only trades there, in their version of over the counter in Stuttgart. So my broker is refusing to put my NWBO shares into my TFSA as a result. Does anyone know about the Stuttgart exchange and if they make this distinction between being listed on the exchange and only trading their "over the counter"?
That is obvious, but will the CRA see it that way?
From the NWBO PR of Dec 7, 2016:
There is one more wrinkle to this TFSA problem for Canadian NWBO share holders. Another way the CRA disqualifies a stock from being permitted in a TFSA, is if the stock was delisted from a designated stock exchange (such as NASDAQ) and moved to the OTC as a result. My question is, in the case of NWBO they left the NASDAQ voluntarily. Does that mean there was no delisting? Thus the NWBO shares are still qualified to be in a TFSA? Any Canadian ever look into this?
Thanks for that.
Hi all, I have a matter that may be of particular interest to NWBO investors in Canada. As you are all aware, Canada has what they call a TFSA account that protects its contents from capital gain taxes. So if I buy shares inside a TFSA account and it grow 100 fold and then I sell it - there are NO capital gains taxes to be paid when I remove those funds from the account.
There is one hitch. If the company is selling only on the OTC, and not a more recognized stock exchange, then those stocks are prohibited to be in a TFSA! I have been told however that this is only the case if the OTC is the ONLY exchange the stock trades on. If the SAME stock ALSO trades elsewhere on what the CRA calls a Designated Stock Exchange then that stock will nevertheless qualify to be in a TFSA. I am told that the Frankfurt and Dusseldorf exchanges in Germany qualify for this CRA designation. So can we hope to be able to put our NWBO into our TFSA? My broker refused to do so and asked that I verify with CRA. Does anyone have any valid info on this. Please only if you really know, because if you put a prohibited stock (unqualified) into the TFSA the penalties are humongous.
Based on your username, I assume you are based in Germany, True? If so, can you tell me which German stock exchanges is NWBO traded on, and what is the ticker symbol in each of these exchanges? Thank you. Anyone else who knows the answer, please feel free to chime in.
Can you provide any ibfo on this case? What is the case name, court, date, case number etc? Any documents in this case that can be provided or cited to? Such as the complaint and any of the motion practice?
you missed the main one:
Tumor and tissue agnostic = MHRA The Full Monty
While he takes billions from the budding cancer biopharmas trying to cure cancer!!
Wow! NICE wasn't being nice. That was very tough. They showed 6 month improvement whereas DCVAX-L only showed 2 month improvement aside of course from the long tail. But they have other treatments available, whereas GBM ha no advancement a long time.
Hi guys,
I didn't follow this thread, so I do not know why you started discussing intent, but if it is concerning the MTD, the only remaining element CM needs to improve on when they refile the complaint, is causation - not intent.
You do not understand what a MTD is. The plaintiff does not have to provide ANY evidence. Anything he alleges is assumed to be true. The only issue is whether he stated valid legal complaint. He will later of course have to provide evidence to support his allegations, but that come in a later phase of the case - at the trial - not now.