Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No, you played pretend, because that’s not in their language.
Tell me when Phase II begins without an RFI response. You can’t.
Not if they were going to be acquired as a wholly owned subsidiary. They’d still run the show, and still be able to run a franchise.
Trashing Les can often be confused with trashing the company. That’s fair I guess, but the reality is both the result of his behavior and your solution is to shake off small investors and move shares to larger shareholders who somehow know what his gobbledygook really means.
Read.
Or the corollary, if Les starts talking, run.
No, you’re just ignoring U.K.com.
“If necessary”
Usually, as turned out to be the case here, phase II was apparently necessary.
If necessary.
OTC doesn’t use halts.🙂 Unless something causes a halt overseas, or an emergency event occurs. Success is not an emergency event. (Nor was the May 10 2022 bear attack) They don’t constantly put on the brakes like the big stock markets.
Were Joe Isuzu, Les and Ex triplets separated at birth?
Here is what I posted earlier on that.
ChatGPT
You mean you. You’re the idiot that can’t tell Europe from the UK, and you are the idiot that can’t read NWBO added no new information to the MAA. None. No supplementary information with amendments, clarifications or additional info was added. Clarifications are considered “additional information.”
Europe EMA
Why do you guys keep mucking up that quote?
Instead, it goes like this.
The evaluation clock would still have started on date of receipt of valid maa. Aka December 21, 2023, because no supplementary request form with additional information was necessary nor provided.
Ex, you are accusing NWBO of lying in its 10q.
Noted.
That’s in Europe Ex, and NWBO did not modify their MAA. You are wronger than wrong.
Here is what Europe does
Why? It makes no regulatory sense. An maa evaluation clock day one does not default to the validation confirmation date. Ex is throwing sh_t against the wall. Evaluation starts upon receipt of a valid maa, this was a valid maa without any changes between receipt, which was on December 21, it was still valid on passing validation on January 24, and still valid at validation confirmation, March 7. In all that time, the maa was never modified.
The validation confirmation process does not delay the evaluation process.
Why was Les wrong about the 10q supposedly going to discuss a fall (aka:Autumn) timeline? One day before the 10q and Les chose to lie about its contents? I don’t think so. So why was he wrong? Stupidity? I don’t think so.
At this point Les has intentionally muddied the waters. Being wrong about the 10q just one day before it came out, but not thereafter explaining himself.
Why?
Exactly.
Good point. 🥴
I won’t yell at you. Contact MHRA. Like ChatHPT, they’ll tell you clock starts upon receipt of a valid maa. That was December 20, 2024.
Validation passed January 24. Validation confirmed March 7. They’ll tell you confirmation does not delay start of evaluation clock.
Bonus: one day before the 10q came out, Les said they’d talk about fall in May 10th 10q. They didn’t. Is Les stupid, or did something else happen?
May 9 when he spoke was exactly 80 + 60 days from December 21. It’s quite possible they thought about asking for a 60 day extension to further respond to an RFI, but instead, they got it in at first 60 day deadline. May 9, 2024.
People underplay what a time jump to fall (or even later fall depending on punctuation) Les laid upon a small audience in a semi-public beer soaked venue.
How the f could he not know a day ahead of time the 10q would not include that? Les is a mess. He knew time mattered, yet he confounded his audience. Why?
Where are fibs more likely, 10qs or fake bars?
So you are saying a T worm was controlling his mind?🪱
By the way, there was nothing a day later in the 10q about “Later, in the fall.” Even though Les thought the 10q would have something about later in the fall on the May 10th. It did not.
Makes you wonder if they didn’t need to file for an extension after all.
May 9 was exactly 80 + 60 days from December 21. Les interviewed on May 9.
May 10 was 10q after hours.
You are reading it wrong.
Here is what he said. I separated the two thoughts for clarity.
He said, “sometime later, in the fall”
I’m guessing 90% here did not know that inspections are not typically conducted in Phase I (80 days) of 150 day accelerated review. When conducted, they are conducted the last 70 days of the total 150 days.
Just speaking my mind. In over a decade, I don’t recall a time when Les ever overestimated the time something would take. Therefore, I don’t think he thinks he is overestimating now. One could hold out the hope Les isn’t told everything.
You must have missed Les’s interview. God knows I missed it until days after reading the 10q.
That doesn’t take you to fall.
Correct.
Wrong. Go back and listen 100 times to what he said.
Instead:
Les Goldman
“As part of our dialogue with them, if we heard there was something wrong, we’d have to say so, and that would be material, so no news is good news.”
Again, no audible available for posts on this board.
“Maybe a rare case of LG underpromising in order to set expections.”
⛔️
You heard what Les said. I listened to what Les said. The board does not have an audible feature for me to listen to your posts. Thank goodness.
That would instead mean the accelerated 150 day was “off track” which is not what Les said. Les said “on track.” The, up to,120 off clock time for NWBO’s response is not counted in the on or off track.
This board does not have an audible feature.
To my knowledge, your first sentence is flat out wrong.
Read my answer again. You seem to lack reading comprehension.