Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Just go to pumpanddumps.com and review the PR's released by the companies on that list. Look for any factual information and then check to see what the SEC has done about it.
The answer is that in general the SEC does nothing about lies in PR's. It is almost never a black and white situation about what was intended or what is within reasonable distance of the truth. Exaggerations are par for the course.
Get caught lying in an SEC filing and the reaction tends to be reasonably swift. It is black and white. Exaggerations are simply not factually accurate and therefore perjury.
The thought that info contained in a PR is under SEC scrutiny is a joke.
NO. The information I get from MDHI in my call to MDHI is reliable to me if I am satisfied with what MDHI tells me. Nothing more.
While I again will state that I have never spoken to Ronnie, why would I tell anyone over there to put out a PR when I have clearly and repeatedly said PR's are not a reliable source of information about a company without a corresponding SEC filing?
Anyone who believes a PR should be released should feel free to contact MDHI directly and ask for one. They should also ask any other questions they may have.
"If the company states things are good, why are the shares trading 7 shares for a penny????" because MDHI has not provided the proof yet
"why is the ask building daily????" Not sure if this is a fact but if it is it would be because some investors have decided not to wait any longer for MDHI to provide the proof of turning the corner yet
"Why are their no buyers?????" there are buyers. shares are changing hands every day. There will not be any real upward movement until financials are up to date
"Why are we 1 sale away from triple zeros???" Unlikely.
"Why isn't management buying shares at these crazy low prices, they have all the inside information, how come the families of management isn't buying up all these cheap shares ????" Insider trading rules
"Why are their no financials???"Financials are being released with additional detail as they are being broken down by quarter. It would be nice if they were coming faster. It would be nice if we were getting the audited numbers. Shareholders have the choice of waiting for the information to eventually be released or moving on to other investments. Those that are choosing to move on to other investments are the reason the buyers out there are able to get shares
What is difficult to understand? The only thing that can be considered reliable information is what is posted in an SEC filing.
PR's mean nothing. I have already addressed why in my previous post.
Info posted here or on other message boards as coming from phone calls mean nothing.
The only person that can consider information gathered from a phone call to be legit is the person who made the call. The only call that I can take as credible information is the one I made. Therefore I suggest that if anyone wants verification of the info I relayed from my conversation that they place a call to MDHI and ask similar questions. Some answers should be exactly the same as they are not time dependent--ie: "Are Costco sales drop shipped?" Some answers may be somewhat different because they are time dependent--ie: "Why are the audited 2012 numbers taking so much longer to file than the 2011 numbers did?"
Info posted that is supposedly from an e-mail means nothing.
There have been some claims that the info posted has been from e-mails. Those posts are no more credible than info from that is supposed to have come from a phone call. Only the person who actually received the e-mail knows for sure it is a true representation of what they received. It is too easy to adjust the info in an e-mail during the process of posting it so posting the supposed contents of a supposed e-mail is not is not documentation.
The only way all of us know for sure the information comes directly from MDHI is if it is in an SEC filing. Only certain people are allowed to file them. They are also the only sworn statements made about MDHI. Anything else is unreliable information except to the person who actually receives it from MDHI.
PR's are worthless. They mean nothing. Third parties that have a significant position in a company issue PR's all the time. Just think about that stupid blog post by Joe Noel. As someone who believes in MDHI, I happen to think MDHI pressured him to take it down as he is nothing more than a large investor and is not allowed to speak for the company. I have seen companies that are engaging in P&D's pay third parties to issue multiple false PR's and then blame an unauthorized third party.
Again, PR's not backed by SEC filings are useless.
I agree. It is a simple solution. Someone who is hung up on the delays should make the call to MDHI.
I have been satisfied with the information I was given. If/when the delays become a problem for my comfort level with my investment in MDHI, I will place that call and ask about it.
I will not call MDHI to ask other's questions again.
I don't know the answer to either question. I'm sure the potential repercussions are spelled out by the SEC. I would guess that the very least there would be perjury. I know the SEC has the right to permanently exclude people from participating in publicly traded companies but I doubt that would be the punishment.
I do know that I have no interest in the PR's many want to see about MDHI. I would be more concerned about my investment if there were tons of unnecessary PR's backed by nothing.
Even though MDHI is not a fully reporting company it still chooses to give us information through sworn, legally binding statements.
Knowing who was spoken to will not help "fact checking" in any way. As previously stated, fact checking can be accomplished by calling the company and speaking to someone. Another reason I won't share the name is I see no reason to open anyone up the repeated abuse that would surely follow.
I said I would call MDHI and report back on the questions I asked. I have shared all the information I received on the phone calls I said I would make. Of course, that was almost 2 months ago and things change over 2 months.
I would suggest that anyone with questions pick up a phone and call MDHI. They are extremely willing to answer questions as long as you remain respectful.
Something caused a delay in the release of the audited 2012 numbers. I don't know what it is. I have never said the auditor was still on vacation or that I have any other information regarding the further delays.
I have speculated that since everyone knows the numbers through the end of Calendar 2012--Fiscal 2013 qtr 1 and qtr 2--do not show MDHI turning the corner, MDHI wants to release audited 2012 and audited 2013 at the same time. Again, for a change this is nothing more than speculation on my part.
It is not a difficult concept. The information you ask for is unknown because we don't have up to date SEC filings. That is the whole point.
Any claims of increased negative cash flow since the end of Calendar 2012 are not verifiable and directly contradict statements made under oath that MDHI has achieved positive cash flow. Not only positive cash flow but a growing positive cash flow.
Beyond that information given in a sworn statement, none of us know the specifics.
Getting into Costco does not help the PPS long term because that info does not tell us how much Costco will help. Receiving the first orders through Costco does not help the PPS long term because that info does not tell us how much Costco will help.
The long term PPS will be affected by SEC filings that show numbers verifying the information already presented under oath in previous SEC filings. The extent of the affect on the PPS will be tied directly to what extent the positive cash flow is expanding.
"clearly we have no idea of sales" directly contradicts "reality is that since MDHI has had the costco situation there has only been more loss"
"Positive cash flow is not the same monster as profit." is irrelevant. Turning the corner to positive cash flow is the first step towards profitability and a huge improvement.
This is especially true with a product that generates monthly recurring revenue without adding additional costs. When every unit delivered adds to a growing recurring positive cash flow operating profits are on their way followed by net profits eventually.
Again, back to the original premise, Costco's involvement with MDHI cannot possibly have had a long term effect on the PPS as Costco's effect on MDHI's financials is not known yet. It is faulty logic to expect a long term PPS benefit just from getting into Costco.
Other than a few days after the initial announcement that MDHI was getting into Costco in December of 2011 and the initial announcement that MDHI had begun to receive orders from Costco at the end of June in 2012, MDHI’s affiliation with Costco has no bearing on the PPS. This is because we don’t yet know specifics of the effect Costco has had on MDHI’s bottom line. All we have been told so far is that MDHI has reached a growing positive cash flow over 2013 fiscal qtr3 and 2013 fiscal qtr4.
It is very likely that the sales that have been made through Costco have been a significant factor in achieving a growing positive cash flow, but once the financials verify the statements made under oath in multiple SEC filings most investors won’t care if Costco caused the positive cash flow or all the other distribution channels did.
Clearly investor confidence has eroded as filings have taken longer than initially projected, yet many (including me) felt getting some filings would show MDHI was making progress and be the start of a higher share price. That has not happened yet.
Contract with SAFC is coming due soon. Guaranteed value of $5.2 mil. The only chance of living up to the guarantee is SAFC giving MFTH tons and tons.....and tons of restricted shares.
MFTH will then report the cash value of those shares as its 4th qtr revenue just like they did with the initial $1.8 mil payment they received in restricted shares last year.
MFTH shoots up. MFTH may promise another dividend out of that supposed revenue, who knows. MFTH insiders dump a bunch of shares.
If any of us are lucky, we get out while the getting is good and maybe break even on the investment we made looking for the free cheddar of the last dividend promise.
Good news from the latest filing is we can now approximate MDHI's float.
From the latest 10-Q the current OS is 1,364,719,304 shares
Here are the recently issued restricted share we are aware of shares that we are aware of:
3-6-13 550,674,510 (I will ignore the other nearly 40 mil they said might be sold)
Since 3-11-13 when the OS was 777,625,563 as verified by the TA. 1,364,719,304-777,625,563=587,093,741 restricted shares issued.
Minimum total current restricted shares is 587,093,741+550,674,510=1,137,768,251.
So the maximum float is current OS less the minimum number of shares not being freely traded in the open market. That number is 1,364,719,304-1,137,768,251=226,951,053
Please present any facts that would verify the information in the post you are responding is a "shell game.
Even if MDHI's management has the voting right for other investor's shares, they cannot "take away" proxy rights.
Individual investors can give them away.
It is not the same thing.
I stand corrected. they are 2 different infusions of operating capitol. The initial one must be what pushed MDHI's OS up against its AS that made the share expansion necessary. As per the information at the top of this page
"MDHI - Share Structure
As of March 11th, 2013 ~ Verified by TA
AS: 800,000,000
OS: 777,625,563"
This information from http://www.formds.com/issuers/medical-alarm-concepts-holdings-inc:
"2013-03-06 New Form D Offered: $350,000 Sold: Yet to Sell Type: Equity Only"
Is verified in the 10-k filed on 8-15-13:
From http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=9462736-932-206374&type=sect&TabIndex=2&companyid=786864&ppu=%252fdefault.aspx%253fcik%253d1443089
"On March 6, 2013 – The Company announced it has received an investment led by a strategic partner. Under the terms of the agreement the three investor groups purchased 550,674,510 restricted common shares for a price $307,500. The company received gross proceeds of $307,500 upon closing as there were no sales commissions or brokerage fees paid to any party. The Company plans to offer up to an additional 39,059,490 common stock at similar terms and may from time to time complete additional investor common stock purchase agreements. Securities purchased in this Offering may not be transferred or resold except as permitted under The Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and applicable state securities laws, pursuant to registration or exemption therefrom. Securities purchased in this Offering will be legended to reflect the foregoing rights and obligations. The Company reserves the right to accept or reject any subscription in its sole discretion for any reason whatsoever and to withdraw this Offering at any time prior to the acceptance of the subscriptions received. Subscription funds paid by a Subscriber whose subscription is rejected will be returned promptly without interest or deduction. The Securities Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and covenants of the Company and the Buyers. Pursuant to the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to provide customary indemnification to the Buyers, their affiliates and agents against certain liabilities."
"On May 17, 2013, as also disclosed in the Medical Alarm Concepts Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) definitive Schedule 14C Information Statement dated May 17, 2013, a majority in interest of the Common Stock holders approved an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation. The amendment is effective upon the filing of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State. On June 7, 2013, the Company filed an Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation (the "Amendment") with the Nevada Secretary of State, affecting the increase of its authorized number of shares of Common Stock (the “Authorized Share Increase). This amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation increased the number of the Company’s authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, from 800,000,000 to 1,400,000,000."
"The Company recently received an investment led by strategic partner, JTT-EMS LTD of Shijiazhuang, China. Under the terms of the investment, JTT-EMS LTD purchased Common Stock in a private placement transaction and has indicated to the Company that it plans to hold these shares as a long-term investment. The financing, including additional investments by current shareholders, will total up to approximately $330,000. There are no warrants or options associated with this investment. As more fully noted below, funds received will primarily be used to rebuild inventory levels to meet the growing demand and to pay professional fees associated with returning the Company to fully reporting status."
2013-03-06 New Form D Offered: $350,000 Sold: Yet to Sell Type: Equity Only
This was the initial offer regarding the shares to be sold to the Chinese and others. Why raise the AS and OS if a deal has not already been put in place?
PR means nothing. We need the filings. Until then there will be no significant upward movement.
Right now almost all shareholders are in a circling pattern with their investment in MDHI. A few looking to add, a few fed up enough to take any losses they might have and a few flippers not getting the movement they want.
That is why there is only small movement in the PPS and generally only small exchanges of shares.
Filings. Filings. Filings.
There is not now nor has there ever been over a billion shares of MDHI in the market. Until earlier this year the AS was only 800 million and there was still a gap between the OS and the AS.
Any of the new 600 mil share expansion to the AS that have been issued are still restricted shares and therefore not available in the open market.
There has been 1 verifiable Pump and Dump by MDHI as a company. It happened over about 10 days 3 and a half years ago (approximate dates were 3-8-2010 3-17-2010) and was orchestrated by Howard as part of his scheme to line his pockets to the detriment of MDHI and the shareholders. About 65 million shares (approximately 25% of the existing OS at the time) were dumped with daily volume on the days of the pumps peaking at 20 million and driving the PPS from almost .25 all the way down to .025 (prior to the pump, the daily volume rarely even broke 15,000 shares).
To put that in perspective, a pump and dump of the same magnitude today including the restricted shares would require dumping approximately 337,500,000 shares. Even using the pre-expansion numbers, a pump and dump of the same magnitude would require dumping almost 195,000,000 shares.
The median PPS during this share price plummet was .1263. It is therefore reasonable to assume that the average PPS during this dump was at least .10. Since Howard was given large quantities of shares in lieu of payment, he would have profited about $6.5 mil during this dump. Again, compare that with the supposed dumping that is going on today--1 mil shares a pop at an average PPS of .0015 and an original purchase price with a 25% discount over fair market value and it is clear that any claim of continued dumping is ridiculous.
Ronnie has been fighting to repair the damage done to MDHI and its reputation by Howard Teicher ever since he resigned in June of 2011.
It is an annual 6% interest rate which I believe is paid monthly. It is not only smart for the business, it is smart for the patent holder. They receive a guaranteed 6% return each and every year without risking the original amount.
Anyone have any losses on any of their investments since July of 2008? THe patent holder doesn't. At least no on the patent.
As for the technology racing forward, there was nothing new in the market for 30+years til MDHI put the speaker in the pendant.
What is the new tech racing forward now? Cellular coverage? Most medical alarm systems already offer that. GPS tracking? Not needed for the vast majority of people that need the protection that medical alarms provide. A "fall sensor" in the pendant? Vastly inferior to the speaker in the pendant.
The one thing that medi-pendant needs based on the reviews I have seen is for the pendant itself to be smaller. I'm sure crossing the border between water resistant and water proof would be nice too but that may be a trade off for having both the microphone and speaker in the pendant that is limiting in how much water protection can be achieved..
Do your investments have a guaranteed perpetual 6% return?
Every up and down in the market, including the extended crash, the patent holder has been getting paid 6% annual return in monthly checks.
No risk. $12,500.00 every month since July of 2008. Without ever a chance for a reduction in the initial $2.5 mil owed.
If a guaranteed 6% came with every investment made, nobody would be complaining about MDHI>
The patent is for the system with the microphone on the pendant. That will not become useless until the patent expires. What happens between the receiver and the phone line is not patented anymore. If it was there would only be one brand of medical alarm system.
The only recent upgrades in the industry have been the use of cellular service instead of a land line which is not exclusive to anyone--just have to work with a carrier or carriers. Cellular carriers are all whores and will take money from anyone willing to pay them while trying to pick the customer's pocket when they are not looking.
The other recent tech is that at least one company now has a pendant that is supposed to be able to tell if the customer fell. there are so many things that can go wrong leading to tons of false alarms if something other than a fall occurs and the customer cannot be heard at the base unit. This company is using this tech only because they cannot use the better tech of having the microphone on the pendant itself.
My whole point was that the patent holder is doing great getting paid 6% on his money. He has already been paid more that 30% of the $2.5 mil without reducing the original amount owed. It would make no sense for the patent holder to leave MDHI as they would be starting from scratch any pace else.
In today's world, perpetual 6% earnings on several million dollars without lifting a finger is a nice life. The patent holder isn't going anywhere after Jan 1st. If anything, I'd be willing to bet the patent holder hopes they don't ever pay off the original balance.
The way these extensions keep happening like clockwork about a week before the old agreement expires, the patent holder hasn't even asked for a bump in the interest. Probably because there is absolutely nowhere to go to replace a guaranteed 6% return year after year after year.
I don't want PR's. The only thing I care about are the financials presented in SEC filings which are slowly being given to us.
I would prefer audited numbers but un-audited ones showing progress would satisfy me as well.
Those dates don't really mean anything. The payments are all interest only and at 6%. There is no place the patent holder can get a guaranteed 6% on their money and get pain monthly like clockwork.
Since entering the agreement more that $750K has been paid for the use of the patent and the patent holder is still owed the original $2.5 mil.
From the 10-q filed with the SEC on 10-15-13
"4. PATENT
On July 10, 2008, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement and Patent Assignment Agreement (the “Agreement”) to be effective July 31, 2008. The Company is obligated to pay the seller $2,500,000 on June 30, 2012. The Agreement specifies interest of 6% to be payable monthly, commencing on July 31, 2008. The seller will reacquire all patents and applications if payment is not made on June 30, 2012. On September 24, 2013, this due date was extended to December 31, 2013."
I'm glad to see the patent agreement was extended.
I recently read that the patent agreement had expired and patent holder and MDHI were fighting because the patent holder had not been paid the monthly interest payments in a long time.
That would have been really bad for MDHI. I'm extremely pleased there was no truth to that report.
MDHI has never once stated that they are profitable as of today in any SEC filing.
It is just something that was posted here.
That is correct. My call was intended to try to clear up some things that were vague about MDHI including the new Cellular capability. We know for a fact the cellular capability exists as it is advertised on the COSTCO website.
That post is clearly marked as answers I received while talking to a company representative and nothing more. That is whaat the company representative told me. I do believe another poster provided a link to an ad that clearly stated ATT was the provider before I spoke to MDHI but I don't remember which poster so I can't go back and find it.
Next week. Last week. The week before. Last month. TOMORROW!!!!
Everything in that particular post is the answers to questions I asked during a phone call to the company. The only way to verify is to call and ask the same question. That is actually the question based on the info rokkdatstock said he was interested in as I posted a message here listing what I wanted to know and asking for others to supply legitimate questions for me to add to my list.
Again, for the record, the person I spoke to was not Ronnie.
It is not a difficult concept. I called MDHI. I spoke to the receptionist who offered to try to answer my questions. When they were not the usual questions she gets from shareholders she transferred me to another individual to have my questions answered. The person I was transferred to answered all of my questions.
The person who answered my questions was not Ronnie.
Please point out anywhere I said I didn't call MDHI or I didn't speak to someone at MDHI.
Here is my original post about the call and my follow up to a question about the affect the calls had on my opinion about MDHI>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=91744244
"Sorry for the delay in responding. I guess the 2 calls I placed made me feel better but I think the best way to put it is that my conversations with people at MDHI re-inforced my previous feelings about the company.
The first call to MDHI I was able to talk to an actual person who I didn't think gave me a run around which was reinforced when I spoke to the same person the next day. The second time I called she asked me what my questions were to see if she could answer them and immediately transferred me when she couldn't.
Again, I was impressed that a member of MDHI's management team came to the phone quickly and didn't seem bothered to be talking to an investor. Not only were the initial questions answered without fumbling, the follow ups which came to mind based on the initial answers were easily handled and more in depth as required. The part that I liked the most was the answer to the question based on rokkdatstock's post. What I asked gave a lot of room to skirt the question or not give a lot of info as it was worded along the lines of "can you tell me more about the new wireless feature". The answer was in depth and detailed. It was probably as forthcoming as legally possible. "
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=91699800
"OK. Here are the results of my phone call to MDHI this afternoon.
1) Any residual income on international sales? No
I followed up with if this would be true for China as well. The answer was essentially: the China agreement is not complete yet so there are no guarantees but as of now MDHI will be in charge of and paid for the monitoring.
2) Is Costco arrangement drop shipping? Yes
3) Why are 2012's taking so much longer from receipt to postings than 2011 did? Auditor has been on vacation
I followed up with if this is the inhouse auditor reviewing the numbers and was told essentially: the independent auditor has been on vacation. The numbers have been completed but the 10-k itself has not
4) If 2013 audited financials are taking a long time, will MDHI post un-audited ones to update shareholders until the audits are complete? No but this was followed with essentially: paying accountants to do both unaudited and audited numbers is an unnecessary redundency and that no one will be satisfied with unaudited numbers after MDHI has been getting caught up with the audited ones. At this point the company feels it is better served producing the audited numbers late than unaudited numbers at all. I would have a hard time arguing with that logic as long as audited 2012 appears soon.
Finally based on rokkdatstock's request I asked if MDHI can provide any additional information about the new wireless feature. The answer was very complete, telling me essentially: Currently the wireless connection is a small add on upgrade device that can be plugged into any existing medipendant. The next generation medipendant that will have the wireless built is not available yet. The wireless capability is what MDHI feels is important to advertise at this time more so than who the carrier is because MDHI expects to have multiple carriers. ATT is the first provider to sign on with MDHI to provide wireless service."
I have never talked to Ron and I never claimed to have talked to Ron. If you re-read the original post you will see that I never gave the name of the person I spoke to. The receptionist couldn't answer my questions and so she transferred me to someone who could. It was not Ron.
Beyond that, I have indicated in past posts that-
1. MDHI has no control over how long the independant auditor takes to complete their job.
2. I'm disappointing they released un-audited numbers after telling me during that same conversation they didn't intend to release anymore figures until the audits and full filings were complete (we were specifically discussing 2013 at that time) but I understand that in business circumstances change and I don't know the reason the for this particular change. I may have something to do with a change in reporting laws tht would give MDHI the slight up-tick of being a limited reporting company rather than a non-reporting company.
2. No-one should be making investment decisions based on my opinions. I just invest some in penny stocks hoping to find my "vitamin water". I happen to like MDHI. Anyone who doesn't shouldn't invest in it. I do not post here to entice potential investors. I post here to respond to misinformation about MDHI.
1. There are significantly less than 1 billion shares in the open market. Not even the full 777,625,563 oustanding shares from before the lastest 600 mil AS share increase are in the open market and any of the new shares that were actually issued are restricted.
2. There are thousands of non-reporting companies and limited reporting companies that do not partake in the practice of pump and dumps. While being behind in filings is not a good thing, it has nor bearing on whether or not a company is a poump and dump.
3. A pump and dump is a specific practice of artificially inflating the interest in a stock and then massively dumping 10's of millions to hundreds of millions of shares. It takes that kind of volume to make money at the margins available in sub penny stock.
4 When MDHI sold the most recent shares from the 600 mil share expansion. those shares were sold at fair market value as an investment in the company. When MDHI allows a discount purchase price on the conversion of a note that discount is 25%. MDHI's PPS has been hovering around .002 for the better part of a year. The discount off that price would be .005. How much volume is needed to make real money at a .005 margin? So far this month about 20 mil shares have changed hands. There is almost a 0.0% chance that every one of them was an insider dumped share as there are people tired of waiting for the financial to be produced but just assuming that they all were, the total profit this month's supposed insider dumping at the .005 margin would only be $10,000. Split 4 ways? Only 3 ways? NOBODY is risking jail for that king of money.
5. Constant lies? Yahoo has 15 updates about MDHI during this calendar year. 9 of those were notifications from EDGAR about SEC filings, 4 of them were PR's that contain the exact information that was included in the SEC filings, 1 was a notification of a conference call with investors and 1--just one--was the ill-conceived PR that indicated they had the 2012 audits complete before the filing was ready to be posted to EDGAR. Market watch.com, shows 2 additional notifications for the January 31'st conference call. That simply does not constitute misleading statements in company PR's.
I try not to base my investment decisions based on what someone decides to post on a message board. I only trust what I read in an SEC filing. I also try to make sure I understand what those filings actually say, not what I would like them to say.
"Fact everybody is in the dark until real factual numbers are filed for all to see"
That is true. I have never argued that. Before the company will take off we need to see the company's financials through the end of fiscal 2013.
Everything else is mostly just conjecture and innuendo at best with a lot of provably false information as well.
Funny to call MDHI a pump and dump and then copy information from a website that clearly does not mention MDHI along with the THOUSANDS of stocks they list as being pump and dumps.
http://www.pumpsanddumps.com/p/hall-of-fame-m-z.html
Putting 2 disassociated statements together in one post does not connect them. It takes an actual connection to connect them.
Spot on again. That is why I ask for proof to verify the statements made as fact. I often see "facts" represented as fact and no proof is ever offered.
At least tonight there was an effort to produce some evidence of promises but still nothing from an SEC filing.
An investment made in MotorBooster that MDHI walked away from when the positive test results for motorbooster turned out to be fabricated that was PR'd before the deception was known is called a false promise.
Howard Teicher's PR about an add campaign after he had already resigned form the company is presented as a promise from MDHI and the current management.
The entirety of post # 32988 from john12341 ignored as if it wasn't the start of the discussion about facts.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=93085933
Facts? Not relevant to the majority of the MDHI discussion.