Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you for the reply that clearly demonstrates my point in #19160.
The fact that no names were used.
Facts only, nothing derogatory and no curse words were used.
The fact that you replied.
The fact that you identified yourself as somehow offended.
Have a nice day.
Thanks all. The real facts just needed to be laid out as to what truly occurs in an R&D moving painfully to a pilot production setting.
There are some very intelligent people, that cannot for the life of themselves, realize what takes place in a Research and also a Development group that proceeds toward pilot plant operation. Furthermore, those same folks can not contemplate the machinations that must take place, timing, acceptance and proof of concept. Because of their particular lack of mechanical and dimensional experience, their mind ignores the reality of Research and Production modes. The result is high intellect and high ignorance.
No different from a person who is tone deaf and thus unable to carry a tune.
Unlike the tone deaf person (example, I am losing my hearing and it is effecting my tune) that is not funny. It is somewhat amusing though to see the contortions of those who are ignorant on purpose.
I feel that Coates is still about a month out from pulling the trigger on anything.
The reason being, $300,000 is about right for securing the commitment to manufacture from 3 to 6 part vendors that GC uses.
Vendors of shafts, seals, head castings, engine cover stampings or castings, pistons/rings, etc.
I would think he is far enough along on the design portion to be seeing the numbers clear enough to have stated his near term fiscal requirements.
If such is the case, the light at the end of the tunnel is not an oncoming freight train, just the bright glow of a natural or hydrogen CSRV gas engine exhaust.
My feeling? On or about June 8, 2017 Coates will have some very good news.
How do I know? I do not know for sure but from all I have seen and DD'd has led me to buy a boat load of shares at .006 or below in the last week.
I have done the best I can at anticipating a rise in share price while leaving a time buffer to sell at a reduced tax burden.
Long term, I see COTE as a huge success. A success that many in the actual ICE manufacturing industry would actually wish to go away (in order to avoid retooling and the massive cost of re-marketing the whole of Infernal Combustion Engines). In effect, the engine and vehicle manufacturers would have to admit that the technology has been around for thirty years and consumers have been duped with poppet valves!
The reason this company cannot get off the ground (to date) is because there is significant 'under coverage' of the invention and any company indulging in the COTE CSRV will be fighting the current world of engines alone (quite possibly to the point where large banking entities refuse to make loans for re-tooling). Is it a conspiracy, hell no!!! Simply the way the market symbiosis works its magic in retarding some and advancing others for the greater profit of a relatively small investor group.
Long story short.... that investor group is changing now (Trump or no Trump) with bashers getting hosed (unimaginable) and the little investor getting a windfall (also unimaginable).
Buy, IMO.
YEP! A whole lot of people are very quietly loading up at .0006 or below.
Having the idea that nothing occurs for the next 30 days (reduced tax on sale of stock).
In fact, let the bashers bash away, I say.
Loading up? Me too.
A GSA rfq/rfp for government takes months.
Not to be a party pooper but a US Army response from Coates is very involved and I do not see a huge pile of similar boiler plate responses from which to re-edit for the CSRV. A response would be nearly from scratch for the technology and George would need to hire a writer who speaks government. Having written a few GSA tombs for rfp (response for proposal or q quote) it is not like a PR!!!!
Saving grace is that George has a pile of decent tech info that is germane to an rfp/q but it needs to be sorted out to fulfill expectations. That is a real labor, takes time and lots of Q&A between Army and COTE.
There is more than I describe but you get the gist. Buy and hold IMO
I believe you are fairly accurate.
IF you were given $10k and could only invest it in CERS by Sept 11th or the money would disappear and you MUST make a gain of 25% or more (at some point) otherwise lose it all....
When and what would you do?
This question is open to you and anyone else that wants to comment.
HMmm.... back in triple zeroes again.
Just about time to buy big again too!
Sorry to hear that.
Stay tuned, there will be another opportunity.
Make sure you buy at the .0003 level, then hold.
It will settle downward in a week or two.
Best to you.
I agree to an extent but this article enclosed shows that $ & oil will flow from Trican's consolidation.
There is no direct link indicated but I feel the folks at Trican are a much better solution for funds than a vapor ware equivalent SS. New capital field equipment is needed and can no longer be allowed to 'fail & replace'. A longer equipment life must be bought into and I believe that a few folks at Trican are willing to use the CSRV to get field costs down, be it a 12 cyl nat gas or COTE current diesel. If COTE SP goes lower I simply buy more.
http://insights.globalspec.com/article/4500/canadian-oilfield-service-groups-combine?frmtrk=cr4digest&cid=nl&et_rid=420181381&et_mid=83448920
Energy and Natural Resources
Canadian Oilfield Service Groups Combine
David Wagman
22 March 2017
Trican Well Service Ltd. says it will buy Canyon Services Group Inc. for around C$637 million ($475.9 million) plus C$40 million in debt.
The combination is expected to a western Canadian-based energy services firm that has the asset base, cost structure, and financial capacity to create value for its stakeholders, said Dale Dusterhoft, Trican's president and CEO, in a statement.
The deal represents a 32% premium over the closing price of Canyon shares March 21, 2017.
The combined company will have 675,000 HHP of available fracturing capacity, a footprint of service bases across western Canada, and products and services across cementing, coiled tubing, nitrogen, industrial services, and fluid management.
The companies say that as "supportive economic conditions emerge, the combined company will look to bring a significant volume of currently parked equipment back to work at a low cost."
Both boards of directors have approved the deal, which is expected to close in the second half of 2017.
Based in Calgary, Alberta, Trican provides specialized products, equipment, and services that are used during the exploration and development of oil and gas reserves.
Canyon is an oilfield services company that focuses operations in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin with two core business lines: pressure pumping services and fluid management services. Canyon provides pressure pumping services while Canyon's subsidiary, Fraction Energy Services Ltd., provides fluid management services.
The COTE stock price can move even closer to being worth a bit less.
But George Coates will always be able to maintain the price above 'worthless'.
I doubt the company will slide into obscurity, in fact,
the CSRV will become a standard valve system world wide.
The stock price is getting to where I will buy even more. Very close at hand.
The dimensionally challenged, flat screen, 2D thinkers that post the opposite sentiment
to mine should educate themselves a bit further into the mechanical understanding (to
which they have previously admitted a lack) and join the real, fully dimensional world.
For now, the lack of news upon which the 2D's dwell is surpassed by their lack of mechanical
insight.
Buy and stay long.
Noted.
Well put and a quite good summation of a large segment of world thinking IMO.
The problem is the executives at the top of companies at whom the CSRV is aimed, that would rather enjoy safety in their position and retire with a golden parachute.
They are not entrepreneurs or challengers but instead, keepers of the status quo.
They are of high intellect and colossal ignorance. Not unlike most of the press/media.
WRONG again!!!
The oil industry most certainly CAN afford to use more efficient engines, especially CSRV.
What you and a few other folks ignore is the fact that top level executives are more desirous of their golden parachute than the economic and social potential of a positive paradigm.
Same with banks and the same with transportation of all kinds. You and a few others may mistakenly THINK that the error is with Coates or that big bad industry does not desire the change to CSRV or other types. I would be quite surprised to find that the NREL is not aware of the CSRV.
You and a few others may continue to think in a flat business plane at the expense of looking as if fools, not recognizing that there is significant depth of application (similar to 3D).
The human problem is not George Coates or 'the lack of industry's need', it IS a 'human' fear problem at an industry executive level... and a few people who blast the CSRV personify the dense block headed retreat from embracing new technology (around for years in the case of Coates).
I am in this stock because the design is superb. The whole idea is incredibly gratifying to see people who actually believe that they are in possession of great intellect, fail so publicly by demonstrating anything other than colossal ignorance of good design. IMO those who blast the CSRV are totally out of intellectual clue when it comes to the realm of physical or corporate dimensionality. They are hopelessly self imprisoned in a 2D world.
I pray you are not in such company.
Having fun and buying more COTE!!!
Excerpts from
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/trf.13993/full
See full text for abbreviations and context.
Given their rapid emergence and lack of predictability,
emerging pathogens challenge the current testing paradigm...
An alternate way to manage the continuous threat of
emerging infectious agents is the use of PI technologies
to proactively protect the blood supply and mitigate the
risk of TTIDs. PI = Pathogen Inactivation
The findings of this study are of particular importance
after the US FDA recommended in August 2016 to
1) test all donations collected with a licensed or investigational
individual donor NAT for ZIKV under an investigational
new drug application, 2) to implement pathogen reduction
technology for PLTs and plasma using FDA-approved
devices, or 3) to implement pathogen reduction technology
for whole blood or RBCs if an FDA-approved or
investigational device becomes available.
The amotosalen/UVA systems for plasma and PLTs were
approved by FDA in 2014 and were commercially available
when ZIKV emerged in the Americas and the INTERCEPT
Blood System for PLTs was implemented at the time of the
ZIKV crisis in Puerto Rico in February 2016 to safeguard
and maintain the availability of the blood supply on the island.[60]
The results of this study complement previous results[65]
and show that ZIKV can be inactivated in all blood components
(Table 3) using amotosalen/UVA for PLTs and plasma[41]
and S-303 and GSH for RBCs. The availability of broad spectrum
PI technologies for all blood components enables a new paradigm
for blood safety that can be used to maintain the ongoing
availability and safety of blood products in time of epidemics
with newly emerged and potentially susceptible pathogens.
A great reason to buy while the price is at the $4 mark.... but not for long!!
Yep, the update actually seems to recognize the class 'shareholder'. Most interesting. Buy and stay long IMO.
Sorry JulesM and all other onlookers... The V16 generator (1 megawatt) being discussed is NOT the 6 cylinder natural gas CSRV unit that George Coates built. That size conversion would be a massive undertaking and be 20 hours a day, 6 days a week for nearly a year to get the patterns, machining and electrical sorted out just for a test run!!!
Wall Township, NJ – (Marketwired – August 17, 2016) Coates International, Ltd. (OTC PINK: COTE) (the “Company”) business plan calls for manufacturing operations in both the Eastern and Western Hemispheres. Some of the larger CSRV industrial natural gas generator units to be produced will be rated for 1,000 KW = 1 M.W. and 2,000 KW = 2 M.W. and are expected to weigh 16 to 20 tons each."
The V16 is between 5 to 10 times more powerful than the 6 cylinder CSRV and probably weighs 5 times the 6 cylinder natural gas CSRV unit. Also, I doubt that the V16 has a valve train any more significant than any other poppet valve diesel.
If the CSRV 6 cylinder were for sale with a 150 kw generator attached it would be about $50k to $70k if mounted to a Cummins type bottom end.
There is nothing preventing GC from putting a CSRV head on one of his Cummins bottom ends and selling just the engine off Ebay. I am sure it would get snapped up very quickly. Damn, I might just buy one.
All of the YEARS of Coates detractors and Coates supporters grappling back and forth have brought no resolution to any closing point. For whatever it is worth, Coates still exists, the blasters have not seen the company's demise to .0000 and Coates has not turned a major set of sales. STALEMATE.
As for Secure Supply bringing anything to the table, I have seen no sales and or profits derived from their services. That lack of evidence is commensurate with detractor's prognostications that Coates will surely go down the drain next quarter (an enduring lie ongoing for years, unfulfilled).
There is no PR coming out because either something bad or good is about to happen and nobody inside (they have control that I do not) is talking. On a personal note, as much as the mechanics are positively most viable, the embracement by the world is not.
That said, there is great fun in cogitation of mirage facts rising on far horizons, only to dematerialize upon arrival. When one assumes highly stacked risk, then proceeds to demand forthright disclosure, an amount of disillusion is to be expected.
The fix is therefore quite simple, GC and SS must sell something they create that proves valuable and detractors must show knowledge of a certainty of failure 'date'. I see neither from either.
All boils down to what will win the argument. That places me in a far better position than the few diehard Coates detractors toward whom I turn my deaf ear, for they have no mechanical, electrical or practical experience with creativity other than lingo berating that which is beyond their two dimensional grasp, in a no less than three dimensional world.
Stay long and buy more COTE.
Actually Coates does not need Secure Supplies and its hydrogen. Coates also does not need the US Government subsidies and US green movement.
There are dozens of EU and Asian foreign governments that are sycophants of global warming caused by mankind, for whom the CSRV is the perfect answer until huge changes in battery capacity are equivalent to fossil energy levels and can be produced as cheaply.
His invention simply fell into the tree hugger's lexicon and made good PR copy for both.
1. The real $$ come from ICE users and manufacturers that MUST reduce their costs of goods and improve engine viability, efficiency and lifetime.
2. In the oil and gas fields the current setups of generators are continuing to be a massive cost from frequent engine burnout fueled by dirty gas and lack of maintenance.
3. Valve systems are eating over 30% of engine production costs and result in QC problems and failures in the field (at your local garage too).
4. Training and continual parts revisions for variable cams and timing mechanisms are complicating efficient repair times, especially considering their deep relation to electronic computer modules, programming and in service testing. Modules are simple to replace but the diagnostic systems are far too expensive, thus raising service costs to the consumer.
The CSRV provides a fresh and more mechanically simple departure. No doubt, in the future the ICE makers will create a SNAFU or technological FUBAR around the CSRV.
The ships, trains and off road vehicle rules will not be rolled back because they are international products shipping to Green Crap countries. GC has the international solution.
If anything, if Trump's folks were to get hold of the CSRV,,, good heavens.....
the US Gov would then be forcing CSRV down the EU's and others throats with glee. What a coup that would be. USA holds the patents and the EU/Asia pays USA through the nose. And all the while the tree huggers would have to agree with Trump!!!
F yea! Beam me up Scotty.
Somehow I feel the recision bodes well not only for Coates
but also for those that hold COTE shares. Seems to be a
strange move to make but I do not believe it is entirely
selfless either. To me it is either a legally required act of
fiducial responsibility or a demonstration of good faith
(or concession) to an investor. Either way it seems as
though there is redemptive value.
Surely, you jest.
Any of the online or storefronts such as Edward Jones etc. will be glad to bring you on board.
$85 inclusive should reap 100,000 shares, some more or some less.
Read my other posts here and elsewhere and you will find that I understand the mechanical and electrical worlds of power. Invested in both, with the probability of both merged as hybrid systems to include ammonia (alkaline) fuel cells (AFC as well as PEM), there is no question that Coates will have a large market share. When this happens is a moot point.
Buy a cheap trash can. Put an unreasonable amount of money in the trash can. When you get to the point that it is painful to further fill the trash can, take it out to buy COTE stock..... today.
If not today, then walk away, never to revisit such a notion.
There are detractors of COTE who have failed that test. It is a right of passage IMO.
Buy COTE and stay long.
Is it possible for you to write your own letter and then post the result?
The comment was a bit more wide than the idea that Trump will put some fiscal hurt on China.
The idea is that China was running by the thought process that Hillary Clinton would provide predictable influences and that various business scenarios would be chosen from their contingency planning.
Trump's election literally kicked contemplated contingencies to the curb for many Chinese business models.
Just as though Wall Street is scrambling, so is China. Problem is that they are at a significant disadvantage because US business (unlike the Wall Street investors) thrive on confusion (creates inventive solutions). They will need to take a close look at the advantage (I feel) Coates has in this new turn and how things may become a greater advantage for Coates as TPP is replaced by perhaps bilateral trade agreements.
It is my thinking that the Chinese may very well have to kick in some coin to build Coates expanded facility. That is where I see the vice being applied. If they want production and profit, they may have to build on our shores, that is definitely a change.
There is, IMHO a good additional reason for your excellent answer.....
I have listened for a while, keeping quiet.
Sorry, not a baseball fan but after 108 years the Cubs won the Series.
Hillary was to sweep out Trump and if he won the market would crash. Nope!
The Chinese are now up to their collective eyeballs in increasing debt. Today in no way able to stare Coates down. He has the patents and they have cheap underutilized labor and far too many idle manufacturing facilities.
The 2016 election literally put a ten inch vice on the Chinese balls. They will have to find some (or someone's) money to build a US factory on GC's property (he owns). All this in order to satisfy their obligation under an errant forgone conclusion a few months ago.
2 out of 3 ...... so far.
I am far from out of this, staying long and waiting to buy more at .0003.
Go George and Gregory!!!
SL.... please wake me up when it hits .0003 or lower again.
I bought in, some time ago, at .0003 and a boat load at .00016.
Coates is probably to be the darling (good) investment of the century.
All the rest of the nay sayers can continue to have to work for someone else for a living.
Great investors work for themselves, are very few and generally contrarians, something
you and I both know. Naysayers wonder why they can only complain.
They push the market down..... for which I thank them profusely.
Buy more and stay long. IMO
I can only imagine that the same derisive comments would be from the small segment of those who refer to GC as purposely printing shares for dilution, if it was early in the career of Ford, Bessemer, Drake, Hughes, Wright, Sikorsky, Piasecki and others whose inventions were eschewed until proven by persistence.
The fact be, that if such dissenters were so brave as to anonymously post derisive regurgitation of pseudo facts, why could they not display enough intelligence to define a correct and business savvy approach toward the success of the patented ideas? Or at least mention their success in the world of business?
I do not believe, for a moment, that those engaged in GC's near defamation, have any other credentials than those of typing on a keyboard.
Many who do follow this forum do have success in business, education, engineering, investment, invention, volunteering expertise, time & money to those of lesser or potential fortune.
I see GC as the quintessential determined inventor, maligned by some who may have the background to appreciate his task or pose constructive ideas for the furtherance of bonafide USA government approved & accepted patents but fail to assert themselves in a proactive manner.
Tis a shameful waste of one's intellect but that is what this forum will legally accept.
Therefore, I believe the forum is most helpful in allowing the identification (although protected by avatar anonymity) posters with a far more dim view of the patent holder than is warranted. IMO
Great reply to whomever the writer was of accusing any of the forum members of being ignorant.
I am reassured that someone is keeping track of the tone of members.
That said, I am also of the belief that Mr. Coates has no way of printing shares in any way that could produce even the most rudimentary income.
If there are those that propose such a fiscal feat I would appreciate their presentation backed by a competent named CPA and not some irrelevant past headline of allegation of wrongdoing overturned by a court judge.
Just as you will not get a comparison of some erring poster's financials, you will not get a forum member to present a CPA that can point to GC being a crook.
Coates has a great idea, patent and business opportunity. I will continue to support his direction of the company and the interests of its investors. IMO
To quote you, you are spot on....
"I don't think anyone with Google doesn't know the history of this company. So the need to constantly bring up old news is kind of weird."
"Other than that.....Move on if you lost money...your not saving anyone.....its not 1994 we all have google and can see for ourselves the history of GC and the company."
I might just add that although GC has made a number of financial extensions, it is the MMs that have been able to leverage the error of his way into a market control of the stock price in a manner outlined below (ripped from Upper Division)....
Dilutors
If you have been trading penny stocks for some time, you’ve probably heard the term “dilution” thrown around quite a bit. Dilution hinders a stock from running and can push the price down as well. Dilution is most noticeable when a market maker shows a certain amount of shares at a specific price, but sells much more than the amount shown (soaking up size). For example, VFIN may be showing 10,000 shares for sale but actually selling hundreds of thousands. When I see a market maker who is infamous for dilution on a level 2 screen, it is a red flag. Frequent dilutors include but are not limited to VFIN, VNDM, PERT, and VERT. I view dilution on a level 2 screen the same way I view a resistance level on a chart; price levels that will be hard to break.
Your grandfather was ahead of his time, provided you with a stock advice that has cost you very little and has a great potential compared to what you have personally invested. No matter how a few may disparage your investment, keep the faith. Buy COTE IMO
Substantive and actionable news on Coates' part?
No, I have come not to expect any type of verifiable, actionable, investment worthy or PR shaking news.
Now, is that bad.... No, it is not bad.
It is a perfect type of scenario that a few people can take a positive side and 'invest' their discretionary capital whilst another few people rail at the pomposity of an entrepreneur, then encourage the buyers to 'divest' their shares.
I learned a long time ago not to expect anything from just words and only partially rely on what I can see.. "Believe nothing of what you hear and half of what you see"
I do not need some folks encouragement nor the other's discouragement. I have a great capacity for finding and investing in winners, such that I retired quite early. This, what I do, is not work, it is a deep rooted following of courses with the potential for financial reward and quite fun.
Those who scoff make it possible for others to leverage the jeering into good earnings and the longer it takes, the greater the reward. I am actually encouraged by the scoffers, they are better than any chart or method of forecasting. IMO
So, no, I expect no news.
Three weeks to complete the deals with China???
HHmmmm..... Three weeks makes it about September 19th, 2016.
That will be a very interesting time line. I will bet that the price per share will be more near .0004 than .0008.
Still not low enough to entice me to jump back in and buy more shares. That would be somewhere around .0002. Difficult though, for me to see a price that low. Could happen but I have doubts.
This is so much fun to watch, because when it does go up, it will be so unexpected, fast and totally unreasonable.
If you have it to lose, this is a good place to buy a high risk & high reward stock. IMO
I'll drink to that!!!
Good invitation there vegasandre. That would make a most wonderful open house, to see those who believe that GC is somehow stuffing his personal piggy bank on the backs of any type of investor - illegally.
All who attend can get a chance to make a personal delivery of a question encompassing their longstanding grievance(s).
Those who have the opportunity as stockholders should take the trip. Those who are not stockholders (of market/retail purchase or 'original' investor) would not gain entry, unless credentialed press.
So it may be of value for those who had bought stock, then sold at profit or loss, to buy some again and join those of us who have maintained our shares.
Just reading PRs, echoing past data or driving past the place by plan or happenstance, is no basis or replacement for actual contact with the entity about whom one, if they desire to be believed, is to make comment.
At $10 one can pay the price of admission of 10,000 shares, drive up and walk through the doors of Coates International instead of driving past those doors.
I will await what might suffice as some weighty excuse, for one who claims knowledge of COTE, to decline such an economical offer, especially if it is in their own back yard. IMO
Bullrunner7 You are definitely onto something
with your comment .... 'It is always nice to see what the negative comments are even in the midst of overwhelming signs of positive things happening and just know they are wrong with absolute confidence sorry not sorry Go Coates!!' as this quote by GC clearly shows....
"After further negotiations, the Company declined the request from the Chinese government for a worldwide exclusive license. Instead, it has been agreed that the Chinese manufacturing company will be structured to establish Coates International, Ltd. as the majority owner."
Read carefully mogman post# 16303 and 16309
Quite simple... GC has real business guts that 99% of those who jump into the market are ill prepared to recognize. This will take months... time for the shorts to have a nice time disparaging GC's efforts.
Fact is, this time period coming into view will allow you and others to get in on the action before the price per share rockets up. Just remember that I said so, if those on the sideline fail to purchase.
#16303
The 'exclusive' license will, in my opinion, never ever be permitted by GC.
This position put forward by the Chinese delegation is the start point of a Panmunjom (Korea) style set of negotiations. On the 38th parallel, months were burnt during negotiations just for the color of the tablecloth and the size of the table before any substantive talks were pursued.
Running out patience and the clock are part of the Chinese scheme while GC will try to make the license 'non-exclusive' world wide but with huge areas of exclusive license for certain Chinese interests. He will need a negotiator to play one Chinese interest against another to weave an acceptable web of mutual support in China for his idea of licensing.
This is a craft to be practiced and he has some very talented folks to do the bidding.
It will take months but is very doable.
I would never sell at this point, instead buy more shares as the stocks backslides for a while. A GREAT BUY OPPORTUNITY>>>> IMO
#16309
Exclusive the way the Chinese (or any bright group) mean to use the word, is total control and application. That means diesels, petrol, lawnmowers, the actual pump in an air compressor, outboards, aircraft engines and heaven knows what else.
That is not worth just millions or even billions.... that is literally trillions of dollars and whole national economies.
Few seem to grasp the absolute enormity of the CSRV valve system.
GC realizes this and in no way would he capitulate by pulling a Harlan Sanders move (sold his name and KFC for about $3 million.... ugh!!).
NFW. I am also sure that he has significant succession planning that will keep the potential suitors outside the gates for a long time and keep updating his patents toward currency.
This is not just business but more like a war, at least untill battery and electric motive power replace the internal combustion engine.
This will take time and huge amounts of guts and GC is not too old either. IMO
More positive news out from "The Street.com"
Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Bryan Brokmeier believes the spotlight on Brazil will benefit a company working on treatments for the Zika virus, like Cerus (CERS) . "Although there have been new announcements of the low risks of contracting Zika during the Olympics, Zika continues to make headlines and we believe that growing awareness and fear may drive shares of companies that are involved in combating Zika higher," he wrote. "CERS offers the only FDA approved pathogen inactivation technology and was recently included in the FDA guidance document for reducing the risk of transfusion-transmission of Zika...At least 12 babies in the U.S. have been born with microcephaly and other serious brain defects caused by Zika. That compares to more than 4,000 babies born in Brazil. More importantly, peak mosquito season just passed in Brazil so most infected babies haven't yet been born - according to multiple recent articles, 40,000 infected babies are expected to be born in Brazil. In our view, a few special reports during the Olympics on Zika and the babies born with microcephaly may be sufficient to create a national outcry over the need to combat Zika in the U.S, which would further support shares of CERS."
Page 3 of 6
https://www.thestreet.com/story/13674386/3/which-stocks-are-impacted-by-the-rio-olympics.html
Excellent analysis, well done bullrunner7!!!
Stay long and buy COTE.