Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Which confirms that there should be no confusion among shareholders--their accounts will be updated accordingly by their brokerages.
If not a shareholder, searching the company name to locate the new ticker will suffice.
Thank you!
PVEC
Are you not the former acting CFO of the company? One could beg the same question of you.
My work and subsequent obtaining of information was done AFTER the fact. End of that story.
And, let it be noted, I no longer trade this company stock. I wonder what you might make of that?
PVEC
Interesting short numbers according to FINRA (not otcmarkets):
20131119|XNRG|9426400|0|74335490|O
20131118|XNRG|3825000|0|3825000|O
XNRG
FINRA short numbers for VDSC, 19 November 2013:
20131119|VDSC|31,291,915|0|122,214,172|O
PVEC
Please note the update to the company website at:
Continue to monitor the site throughout the day as we should receive further updates.
PVEC
What is your question or issue with the "E"? The "E" represents enterprise.
The ticker was not changed on 8/19/13 with the CUSIP change because he elected not to change it. That was his decision and he was well within his rights to make that decision. However, he has decided to contact FINRA for a change and a change he was granted. Again, the "E" represents ENTERPRISE, a word that us undeniably part of his company name.
It is not baffling. And, he is not required to act any differently than he has with respect to this change or the additions and modifications to the website. And how would a shareholder end up confused since, if a shareholder, their brokerage will update the symbol in the system and it will be business as usual?
PVEC
I am sorry, but that Rehco Rd. address is not new--Koos claimed that address for his cyro business and it was listed as the address for Tasco Holdings since a while back.
See below a C&P of a contract for confirmation.
Have you been calling and faxing, requesting updates by way of the site, in the form of a PR, etc.? You are entitled to updates and he has provided next to nothing since the S1 filing. That is not even posted on his website which I find odd. Updating the website will suffice in my opinion.
The answer is no.
VDSC
Indeedy!
VDSC
It's a pretty comprehensive site. Feel free to peruse:
I am LOVING those updates on the website!
ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Aboard!
VDSC (for now)!
I haven't followed-up because I have a true concern for some people still in this stock. Believe you me, if I were to post regularly on this board, there would be a lot more crying than there is now. YOU CAN BET YOUR SHARES ON THAT AND TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH.
I posted the truth and nothing but the truth. I need not point out anything at this juncture--all will be revealed in time, good or bad.
The PPS and lack of action on the part of the CEO speaks for itself. An S1 and no follow-through to date by the company or the CEO speaks volumes. Tell me something, has there been an update worth a hoot on the website lately? Has the CEO released anything at all of late in an attempt to allay the concerns of his shareholders? No, he hasn't.
I HAVE PROVIDED THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT.
The problem is not the science or the doctors--the problem is the corrupt CEO and his corrupt partnerships. The SEC, FINRA & other venues provide you with enough cautionary tales. If the CEO does the right thing it will be because he is FORCED to and not out of any concern for the shareholders of BMSN.
Looking like PV has a Zeus-like strategy, eh?
VDSC
Just remember, and I believe this was pointed out yesterday:
"Transactions on the site are protected" & Validation began two days ago and is in effect for a period of twelve months.
Looks to me like we are going to be able to make some bookings (AS PROMISED) on the site real soon. Appears the system is updating.
It don't take a GED in rocket science to figure out what is going on here!
Go VDSC!
Again, can you substantiate those incredible accusations? I consider myself pretty thorough (have proven such) and have recently completed quite a bit of research on the company. There is nothing, absolutely NOTHING that points to an SEC investigation of PV or PVE. Despite the number of attempts to have such done, the requests are without merit and therefore ignored. The SEC has real fish to fry.
So, again, I ask, will you SUBSTANTIATE YOUR INCREDIBLE ACCUSATIONS?
VDSC
Since PV is pretty well established in Florida, don't see him going to GreeCe, unless to vacation, anytime soon.
Waaaaay too much noise here not to load up.
VDSC
Though there has been none of late, dilution (i.e., acquiring money to PAY BILLS) is a necessary in business.
The "dilution" money has been hard at work and shareholders will soon see the benefits.
VDSC
SUBSTANTIATE PLEASE. SINCE BASED ON CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE THROUGHOUT THE WEBSITE (CHANGES THAT WERE ONGOING SINCE SUNDAY NIGHT)IT APPEARS THE SITE IS SOON TO UNVEIL SOMETHING HUGE AND BENEFICIAL TO SHAREHOLDERS AND SOON-TO-BE CUSTOMERS.
AGAIN, SUBSTANTIATE.
VDSC
Really now? Can you substantiate that? Are you privy to the finances the company has presently secured or is in the process of securing? Are you privy to the full nature of the deals the company is presently securing?
Are you aware of the full extent of disclosure rules for certain public companies?
Can you really say with 100%, with something to substantiate of course, what has not been disclosed by the company with respect to finances, deals, partnerships, etc., etc., etc.,?
I think not.
XNRG
Buckle up folks, will be getting exciting around here very soon.
XNRG
VDSC Short Numbers for 18 November 2013 as per FINRA:
20131118|VDSC|21,805,531|0|109,269,768|O
REGSHO
VDSC
What was said was:
You are 100% spot on!
VDSC
Our Webmaster has been busier than most realize--have you noticed the URL change?
The site now has an SSL certificate installed which means that the entire site is encrypted.
You go Webmaster!
VDSC
Substantiate. This could have been routed by anyone. Verifiable proof that the company is dumping?
There is no dumping by PV.
VDSC
SUBSTANTIATE the dilution assertion, please.
VDSC
It is a lot more sinister than that & neither PV or PVE have any culpability in it whatsoever.
VDSC
Are you not a former CFO of the company, released of his duties by Peter Violliotis?
VDSC
Why oh why on earth would a company that has already been subject to the nefarious attempts by some to sabotage their endeavors divulge enough information about current transactions that such would assist in further attempts to destroy?
TSK, TSK.
Jerry knows what he is doing now that he is fully aware of the lengths some will go to to thwart his efforts.
XNRG is about to make some very happy (i.e., we faithful investors).
XNRG
On 11/17/2013, my research confirmed that not only did PV not authorize the release of the financial statement or any information contained within, neither PV or any member of the company had any knowledge of its creation and/subsequent release.
The company is in no way associated with or responsible for the "false" statement/report.
I provided the link to FINRA's short number report and last weeks numbers are as follows:
VDSC SHORT VOL
Monday VDSC|2,637,338|0|19,295,556|O
Tuesday VDSC|97,741,982|0|308,223,852|O
Wednesday VDSC|58,192,155|0|156,296,244|O
Thursday VDSC|40,559,731|0|136,080,226|O
FRIDAY: VDSC|17,618,617|0|146,623,685|O
I have outlined and provided proof that there was a major muck-up with the 12 & 14 November PR's.
Last weeks debacle was not the first time PV has been a victim of similar inaction nor is Saturday's release a first-time example of so-called company issued information being not at all authorized by the company.
Look outside the box.
VDSC
Would that be like the clear reason for the lack of PR distribution on 12 & 14 November was PV's attempt at withholding it from the authorities and the masses? (Please refer to the top sticky).
THERE IS NO DILUTION!
VDSC
Actually, if you incorporate the illegal position within these numbers, you will find that these numbers are fairly close in explaining activity (though there is a margin of error albeit a slight one). That will require some research since the practice is illegal. But, that does not mean it is not a reality or that finding the info to explain how this happens works.
Those numbers reflect the shorting of the VDSC stock.
VDSC
Absolutely is. Since we no longer live in the dark ages we are afforded technology that allows us to figures these things out. Might not always happen at the pace we like since the crooks are generally one step ahead. But, perseverance pays off.
The fact that recent changes in the laws and joint tasks forces with the SEC/FINRA and the DOJ are making a world of difference.
VDSC.
They are coming. If you would refer to my recent sticky and the short number list that has been provided, you will see there have been a few unforeseen issues that presented themselves. Many things going on. But it is coming.
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!
So, let's try this again, shall we?
The below (see way below) exhibits show that on 12 November PV paid OTC Markets (here out referred to as OTCM) for Web Release Plus for the 12 November PR to be distributed by PR NEWSWIRE. On 12 November OTCM released the PR but did not distribute the PR accordingly. On 13 November, I contacted PR Newswire and engaged in a fifteen minute or so dialogue with a representative that confirmed that despite the fact that the PR was to have been distributed by PR Newswire, it was not. I then contacted OTCM at which time I spoke with Gareth Colglazier, who, at my behest, searched the information I provided with respect to the PR, ultimately confirming that there was some sort of glitch that he could not explain, that the PR should have been distributed by PR Newswire on 12 November and that he would work to resolve the matter asap. Because of said glitch, Gareth was unable to locate the original file, subsequently requesting via email for such to be provided (see below). Since I had already contacted PV, AND HAD IN MY POSSESSION THE RECEIPT FOR THE 12 NOVEMBER PR RELEASE after explaining my findings and conversation with the parties involved, I requested he forward me the original file so that I could make it available to OTCM for an immediate rectification of the issue. Such was done, the file was provided to Gareth and the PR was finally distributed after hours on 13 November.
The fact that the PR was not released as it should have been on 12 November was not due to a lack of contact information on record for PV or any action on PV's part. Rather, it was due to an error in the OTC Market's system. The same error that would require me to contact OTCM AGAIN on 14 November after they failed to distribute the 14 November PR as it was intended. Once again, it was confirmed that there was some sort of glitch with the OTCM system. Once again, at Gareth's request, I provided the original file, since it could not be located in their system. Once again, the PR was reissued and at last distributed via PR Newswire as it should have been from the start.
As I stated yesterday, information shows that these last two occurrences are not the first time PVE's PR's were not properly distributed by OTCM.
This FAILURE ON THE PART OF OTC MARKETS coupled with the erroneous claims made against PV resulting from this failure--claims that remain completely unsubstantiated--have had a significantly negative affect on the reputation of the company, the CEO AND the pps.
***Previous legal information stated has been retracted to remain on topic****
Similarly, U.S. corporations are chartered by the state and/or federal government, and have both legal and ethical obligations to the public and to their shareholders; given the profound effect social media and website content have on investor interest, a company can and will be held accountable for information it disseminates by way of their website or any social media outlet it utilizes in its efforts to sell itself. Although PV counted a few chickens before they hatched with respect to what he can issue with the present trading status of the company (i.e., issuing 8K's before being fully registered with the SEC) every single bit of information that PVE disseminates in an attempt to acquire shareholder interest (money) can and WILL be considered as an attempt to meet or thwart PV's legal and ethical obligations to his shareholders and customers. Conversely, there is significant flexibility in the disclosure of financial information with respect to revenue and how and when it is disseminated. PV is well within his rights at this juncture to announce revenues via his website, public media or carrier pigeon if he so chooses. He is NOT required to provide the bone fide documentation associated with the said revenue, whether it be through financing, contracts, etc. The fact that he discloses such publicly--BY ANY PUBLIC MEANS--is sufficient under the law.
There is a significant difference between faux pas and fraud. Especially when said faux pas is committed during the course of attempting to further legitimize your already legitimate endeavors. Mistakes happen when you are human. The SEC understands this. Courts of law understand this. And any investor with enough sense to actually consider where he/she invests his/her money should understand this.
As it has been repeatedly pointed out a myriad of times, PV & his enterprise have been hard at work solidifying Zeus-like deals that will in very short order that will ultimately compel his shareholders to go dancing in the streets. The present state of the pps is not due to illicit or wrongful dealings by PV or PVE.
NAAAAAH!
VDSC
Further to that, when considering the PR debacle that was absolutely no fault of PV's, on the same days of this incredible shorting, you can't help but to wonder WTH is going on. Something is seriously corrupt and it is NOT PV!
There is a squeeze coming. I have no doubt.
VDSC
Is there a point? Dilution is necessary for developing companies. Sorry, but if a company is founded with a billion in the bank, it is hardly developing and doesn't require going public for further assistance to expand and see their endeavors materialize. That is business.
The present state of the pps has more to do with corruption that PV has no part in whatsoever. And he is doing all that is required to prove this and thwart it.
VDSC
Scroll down to ORF: Note Monday's short volume compared to that of Tues-Thurs which is ridiculous!
FINRA
And you are correct, the company is not diluting.
Indeed!