Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm not sure why you're still reading things that were never written. Here's my point:
FACT: in order for 2010 shareholders (bagholders) to break even on their TCEL investment, TCEL's market cap would have to reach approximately $37 billion.
That's it.
That's all I said, so please stop accusing me of saying all of this nonsense. I wonder if the same principle applies to when TCEL shareholders read the PRs and filings.. Imagining things that aren't in the writing...
So what happened to .018 in Q1? LMFAO
FACT: A position worth $15000 in 2010 is worth less than half a penny today. #bagholdersgotscrewed
TCEL INC has no connections or licenses to ANY patents.
Per the filing: TCEL was worth a net $0 in 2010. TCEL is worth a net $0 today.
Sticky this: TCEL FACTS
No I am not. Why is this so hard to understand? I don't know how to explain this any simpler.. After the R/Ss and drastic A/S increases, TCEL was selling shares at fractions (hundred thousandths and millionths) of what the 2010 and 2011 shareholders paid. Not only that, but they were also selling millions of times more shares to new investors. Therefore, the 2010 and 2011 shareholders got royally screwed. If you look at ALL of their positions today, they currently account for less than one (1) share of TCEL at .0001.
Is that clear?
FACT: TCEL has never been worth more than $0, nor anywhere near $37 billion. TCEL is currently worth $0, or approximately -$2 million with their imaginary license and settled liabilities.
FACT: In order for those shareholders to break even (a position worth $15000 back then is worth far less than one-quarter of a penny today), TCEL would need to reach a market cap of approximately $37 billion based on the current post-massive dilution S/S.
FACT: I never said anyone lost $37 billion.
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think either of those two facts imply that anyone lost $37 billion. I'm not sure why this is such a hard concept to understand.
FACT: Nobody has ever made money going long in TCEL.
More like everyone has accepted that TCEL is a scam and have moved on..
No revenue, increase in losses as expected.
Operating loss increased 350% in Q4, yet revenue remained the same at $0 for yet another year
You've severely misinterpreted the simple, non-interpretive fact I stated. TCEL needs to reach $73 billion in order for 2010 shareholders to break even. How does that sentence imply that those shareholders LOST $73 billion?
Per filing THE FUNDING IS "NOT FINALISED"
Did I say that? No. That's how math works. That's how devastating their 1000 and 1500 to 1 splits and ridiculous 1000 fold arbitrary A/S increases have been.
Billions weren't sacrificed because that figure assumes that the stock would have maintained the same S/S and price as 2010. Over 99% of the shares on the market today were sold at thousandths or millionths of the 2010 price, therefore further distancing from the original value.
If you took all of the shares from all of the shareholders in 2010, all of their positions together wouldn't even make $0.0001 or even one share today.
All of those shareholders are now represented by ONE share.
Nobody has ever made money going long in TCEL.
So what you're saying is that this is basically the first time TCEL has ever hit bottom? LMFAO
MUST READ: Do you understand that in order for TCEL to restore the value to the positions of shareholders from 2010-11, TCEL's market cap would have to surpass.. You might want to sit down before you read the next line...
$73 BILLION
LMFAO!
And then once it hits $73 billion, those shareholders that used to own 1, 5, maybe 10% of TCEL will then own less than .00000001%
Does that paint a picture of just how badly TCEL has screwed over its shareholders?
Not even the buyers can explain that one to us.. Incomprehensible
So your average is still over .0005 based on what you said earlier about your position, right?
Almost half of today's volume was selling at an all-time low, approximately 1/10000000 the price it was several years ago. Not sure how you could paint that as a positive.
So 3 years later, any explanation of what happened to the millions that mysteriously disappeared before Marc Lovito resigned and fled the country? I'm assuming that they believe that is not a criminal act and can just be dusted under the rug and forgotten.. GDSM. Marc Lovito will be found and will pay DEARLY for his crimes.
TCEL AS DEAD AS IT GETS
As a matter of fact, I believe I believe I stated that he was selling down to .00028 and above. Oh wait.. Yeah, that's exactly what I said. Thanks for the libelous accusations and misinformation though. Credibility much?
And in all honesty, I just say the exact opposite of what I read here on this board. Seems to be working for me, wouldn't you agree?
Out of the thousands of posts O___, B__ D__, Ad___, mail__ etc. made, can you show me even one prediction that was even remotely close to being correct? Cause I see thousands of predictions that didn't quite materialze.. And now just about all of them have taken off for the hills.
I called trips if .0055 fell, .0055, .004, .001, .0007, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1.
10-1 vs 0-288
Ridiculously funny, TCEL!
LOL well it was .0005-7 when I made that call. I'm pretty sure I was closer than some of the other clowns that said .001, 002, 005, 01, 018, 02, 05, 10, 30, and .50! HILARIOUS! I was the only one who called the DIRECTION right and somehow your tunnel vision doesn't see the issue here. GLTA, sorry for your losses. I've made $40k here in stocks and compensation. I'm definitely not the one who's mad about something
Sorry for your losses. Better luck next time.
TCEL = poorly run scam
.0002s going bye bye, thin to .0001!
Blackbridge got shares at .0001, sold for .0003/4/5. The end.
What a great story, huh!?
That's 800k at .0002, not .00028. You're welcome.
TCEL literally couldn't be any more dead
99.99993% losses doesn't look very positive imo..
So, DO THEY HAVE THE MONEY OR DO THEY NOT HAVE THE MONEY? WHICH IS IT?? NO PROGRESS YET AGAIN. They just re-worded their previous explanation for why they've spent over 99.999993% of shareholder investments in 5 years yet have seen and INCREASE in liabilities and debt and NO PROGRESS. SERIOUSLY?
The filing said they haven't finalised the funding. In other words, still no progress.
The weak hands are out, and all that's left are bag holders who are stubborn enough to hold on for 5 years and watch their $15,000 position turn into half a penny! LMFAO!!!
How big is the convertible note going to be for the $2 million loan they haven't even "finalised" yet?
I'm thinking 2 trillion shares at .000001 for $2 million cash
TCEL can't even find financiers that are willing to pay more than .000077/0001 for $500-1000 worth of shares today. How the hell are they going to muster up $2 MILLION using convertible notes!??!?
0% gains! That's a record for TCEL shareholders!
FACT: TCEL was issuing convertible notes for .000028 LAST MONTH. What does that tell us about where investors think this is going?
FACT: TCEL was issuing convertible notes for .000077 when the market price was .003 and above
You can't sell at .0003, you're going to lose between 33 and 99.9999999999999% of your investment. Sorry.
FACT: If someone invested $15,000 (FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS!!!) in TCEL back in 2010 when it was beginning the therapy cells and patent acquisition process, that person's $15,000 would be worth less than HALF A PENNY TODAY
HALF A PENNY!
You know what's even more shocking than that? After 5 years, TCEL still doesn't have ANYTHING to show for those losses. NO PATENTS, NO LICENSES, NO MONEY, NO ASSETS!!!!
TCEL is still on the same downward trajectory as 2010 today. Good luck!