Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Can someone state with logic any reason why they think Kim can win this lawsuit especially after purguring himself multiple times to the court and providing zero evidence or discovery to back up his motion. Please remember the hearing is only about this suit and these notes and whether Kim was served properly and knew about the lawsuit before July 12th as he stayed. Remember also that a default against ngcg has already been entered
He can't legally claim that as the company is responsible. But good try
They did thAt months ago when kalisky was notified he was an affiliate and had over 10%. He sold I believe 30 million to Tom via a friend of Kim's
And if that's true ;). Maybe it's Kim dumping out of either fear of losing his lawsuit or because he know a reverse is coming.
Not sure but I don't think so. Plus he can't clear them I would think because it's a shell. He couldn't get a rule 144
The only one with shares to do that is kalisky
like I said all fiction and conspiracy theories but factless. You aked where the 30K payment to Klaisky was, well it was posted on the board last night along with proof of Kaliskys payment to NGCG and the assignment of the note. Maybe you should research better
ive only posted public information easily found in the court filings, this is an anonymous board, I can be anyone for real but it is irrelevant as the facts are the facts
that very well may be true because Kim may of figured out Kalisky is a liar and has put him in a bad situation.
Lets separate the known proven documented facts from the fiction and wild speculation and conspiracy theories involving the Ruppert Lawsuit.
Facts:
All of the notes have been documented with proof of payments
NGCG was served properly
Kim lied in an affidavit to the courts on multiple occasions
Ruppert has filed 65 pages of supporting docs and evidence
Kim has filed zero
Kims lawyer claims that they have no proof of payments of the notes and no evidence to present to the court
Kims lawyer claims that Documents which are already presented to the court don't exist
Mike Berrio resigned on April 29th, 2016 but effective as of May 31st 2016
Mike Berrio was an officer of the company on the day he was legally served.
Tom Kim clearly knew about the lawsuit prior to July 12th as documented in his sworn affidavit.
Tom Kims entire motion to quash service has been reduced to a burning pile of trash
Kim still has turned over zero discovery that is required to prove his allegations in his motion
Ruppert has made every document public for the courts and the shareholders to see
Kim has said nothing, produced nothing, and clearly lied and misrepresented the facts in sworn statement to the courts
Ruppert has been convicted of mail fraud 22 years ago and is irrelevant and it is his only conviction of any kind.
Shareholder are upset with Ruppert for selling his shares into the market and with good reason but it was done legally and properly and at least 1/3 of his shares that he has were transferred to Lorne Kalisky 80 million.
Ruppert corrected a scrivenors error by accidentally using the wrong note amount in his filing.
The correct note has been properly filed and with proof of payment as well.
Rupperts affidavit of damages filed months ago matched the correct amount of the notes 100%.
Fiction
Rupperts notes are fake as clearly fake notes don't have proof of payments attached
Ruppert did a fake 3 a 10 scam( ridiculous) as every note sued for had proof of payments from years earlier attached and dissected by the courts)
Rupperts suits were a fraud because NGCG settled them in 5 days( I guess maybe when the proof and the documents are clear and you know your wrong you settle quickly to mitigate damages further)
Ruppert commited bankruptcy fraud( the most absurd accusation of all as Pamela wasn't even Bankruptcy and Ruppert complied with every part of his bankruptcy including paying it off 16 months early to the court.
Ruppert has multiple felony convictions including a few years ago( not true as Ruppert did have an arrest but no conviction as adjudication was withheld)
Ruppert is trying to sue NGCG for a note that he already sued and won on( just not factual no matter how many times posters contend it is as the note was already replaced properly and was nothing more than a scrivenors error.
Kim says Kalisky has no shares or big blocks.
Victory Mining
Anal Lube
Truckloads of cups being sold
Hemp refreshers
no reverse split coming( trust me on this it is in the works)
TRANSPARENCY FROM KIM
urban mining
lithium mining
KIm hired accounting firm to redo all of the previous mgts accounting
2.8 million dollar big box deal( for what product and what happened)
Closing on big deal before going to China on Nov 1st
any substantive verifiable update or communications with shareholders
The other interesting point is that Kim has filed 3. Extensions for turning over all requested discovery so when he shows up in court he will have zero evidence to back up his claims and oddly enough may have a hard time explaining why has refused to turn over any discovery or proof documents as required plus file 3rd party objections to discovery from jag or Ross. WHAT IS HE TRYING TO HIDE.
And for what reason. Isn't everyone entitled to the facts and truth to make up their own minds
I guess someone didn't like the last post so the had it removed. Here is all the proof to prove that the DD referred to by certain poster is inaccurate about NGCG Here is the proof of payments of the notes to Kalisky, proof of the payment from Kalisky to NGCG and proof of the assignment . Cant wait to see what great NEW theory about fraud and fake notes is come up with next. Keep trying though it is helping your credibility out.
Hahahahahaha. Proud of payment of the 30k already submitted with scriveners error docs. But thanks for trying. You make me chuckle as your theories are so cute. Jason is suing because he has a legal assignment on the note and he paid 30k because that was the amount owed with intersst and it wasn't in default like the other one but thanks for asking
Don't get excited as there is no concurrent bankruptcy's or bankruptcy fraud. Ruppert was in a chapter 13 bankruptcy for 5 years on a repayment plan and successfully completed the plan and the bankruptcy was discharged early in 2015 because all creditors were paid off in full early.
just so you have the facts and not other poor DD again
put in cace 16-08940 that wiorks sorry
it works when I click it, of course you can always just go to the broward county florida court online search, search the case number 16-08940 and it will come up
Here is the link to prove that your DD is wrong and backwards. It is clear to see that it is not Kims 65 page motion as you have said but it Rupperts 65 page motion which is very clear and with all proofs attached.
https://www.browardclerk.org/Web2/WebForms/Document.aspx?CaseID=ODUzOTEwNw%3d%3d-OydYdHM4HSo%3d&CaseNumber=CACE16008940&Style=Jason+Ruppert%0a++++++++Plaintiff%0a+vs.+%0a%0aNew+Generation+Consumer+Group+Inc%0a++++++++Defendant&FragmentID=MjI4NTEzMzU%3d-9rU6%2fA8wPyU%3d&DtFile=05/25/2016&DocName=Response+to+Motion&PgCnt=65&UserName=&UserType=Anonymous
last time I will explain this and you don't need to apologize but if I were you I would wait for all of the filings to upload and the court documents to be completed before you conclude facts and clearly that you don't know about the 125,000 note you don't know the facts, there were several notes that I gave them that they actually paid back in full.
there are 4 notes owed that total $105,493.58 that they are being sued for which matches exactly the amended affidavit filed with the court. 60k, 8k, 12,493k and the note you keep referring to from Kalisky was for 25k not 60. It was nothing more than a scrivenors error and a scrivenors error and clarification has been filed however the affidavit all along was correct. The 25k note is filed in yesterdays filing if you read the filing.
Why not comment on how TK lied to the court in an affidavit and to shareholders about when he knew about the lawsuit etc.... No mention of the facts posted in the filings I noticed.
And yes Kalisky did almost 80 mill shares from me for a variey of reasons including debt settlement and monies paid. These shares and the agreements associated with them have been posted for months but you already know that. Every penny being sued for now or ever was actually given to NGCG and not fake notes as you say or contend. Proof of payments have been submitted to the courts as well
Of those 237?million. Kalisky got 80m of them plus his own 3a10. He did dump a lot but was holding on after put together the deal for Kim to but out Ruppert's Lein and note for 125k and take control. It has just backfired that all. It is such a cluster fffff that it has kalisky fingerprints all of this disaster
Are you joking around or do you just think people here are ignorant. Your dd was and is backwards and wrong I don't need to post any links to prove it. It is clear in the court registry and the docket if anyone looks. What a joke !!
Or if his shares were deposited and cleared and in the street name
Kim didn't file anything, It was Rupperts lawyer that filed a 65 page response to Kims motion to quash service with irrefutable proof that he knew and was served properly. Iglows post was false and inaccurate. Please read the filings and you will see.
I am not the clerk, TK also a 3rd extension for his discovery request yesterday and that isn't on there as well. Don't worry it is all in perfect order, sometimes the clerks are backed up on inputing things.
I'd rather sell nothing than sumo them here for no money. It's not wiry it period to me to dump
I have only 8 mill left and no they aren't anymore. I have sold a share in 6 months at least.
Yes. I would think
Only one with 15 mill shares is kalisky. That should tell everyone everything. If he is dumping than he knows the ship is sinking fast
boy I really hope you do, it will fun as your facts at so bloviated.
Freeze, you r smarter than that, of course not, it was a scrivenors error and the note correction has already been filed as well the original affidavit of damages filed months ago has the proper amount on it. I know this is tough to swallow but the notes are good, real and legit and will be collected upon. Others can speculate, argue, try and dissect but the reality is that I am a debt holder, like it or not.
no they were all legally sold into the market or transferred to Lorne Kalisky
was all submitted to court for the hearing next week, just a matter of when today the clerk enters into the online system, they are sometimes backed up an slow, it can appear at anytime or even as late as tomorrow
Don't worry the rest will post on the docket tomorrow
just check the dockets I owe you nothing
maybe you should check all of the filings and then apologize to everyone on the board for misleading them the whole time.
may want to check the court registry tomorrow, Hopefully Tk is successful so he'll be able to pay off the judgement coming in a few days.
Not only was it Toms corner but was praised and touted as being the most transparent thing any pink sheet co had done and ngcg was setting a new standard of transparency
In Toms corner. Go back and read it
Why ? Everyone of them and everything said has all been bs. Not one thing in his updates has been accurate down to the simplest things like hiring a new lawyer and accountant or doing a name change. His announcements are all bs for hype and to try and get the stock to move. The sooner everyone realizes it the easier reality will become. Where the shareholder appointed to the board he promised?? A lot of talk but not a lot of filings or facts
Just to show the inaccuracies of these posts. Whenever ruppert sold shares because they were not retail they alwYs showed as t trades and had an avg next to the trades at the end of the day. Was not ruppert who sold