Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
maybe its Conoco
conoco joins GEMI
http://www.gemi.org/GEMIHome.aspx
its been 2 weeks now. makes one wonder?
"wish i could say more"
why cant you?
why is it that some people can trade on inside info, and others cant?
daddy, im have been searching for a reason that the big oil company would gag MOPN, but designing new products for a client could be a reason.
lets just hope we dont have to wait to long to find out.
glta
Enbridge has dent in oil pipeline
better order some MOP products
http://www.freep.com/article/20100825/NEWS06/100825030/Miller-demands-oversight-for-Enbridge-pipe-dented-beneath-St-Clair-River
lol, Robots to clean oil spills?
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/will-robotss-clean-up-future-oil-spills/
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--A Royal Dutch Shell PLC (RDSA, RDSA.LN) executive told a commission investigating the BP PLC (BP, BP.LN) oil spill Wednesday that drilling off the coast of Alaska was safer than deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. He then faced challenges from a fellow panelist who said responding to a spill in Arctic waters would be much harder.
"It is adequate to proceed," Joe Leimkuhler, an offshore well delivery manager for Shell Exploration and Production, told the National Commission on the BP-Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. Shell repeatedly has said it plans to drill in 150 feet of water, not the mile-foot depths BP was exploring. "In the Arctic the operating environment is indeed fundamentally different," he said. He added that Shell plans to have "a flotilla of vessels" accompany drilling ships in the Arctic.
But Carter Roberts, the president of the World Wildlife Fund, said the Arctic region had few people, few ports, and little Coast Guard presence. "A response gap is much more present than in the Gulf," Roberts told the panel. Also missing: the oil-eating bacteria that have been credited with naturally degrading the oil. "It doesn't have the microbes, those wonderful microbes that began to consume oil in the Gulf."
Shell has much at stake as the presidential commission investigates the BP spill, the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. The company had wanted to drill exploratory wells in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas this summer when the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded April 20. Within five weeks, U.S. President Barack Obama put the drilling plans on hold until the commission could complete a review of the disaster.
-By Siobhan Hughes, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6654; siobhan.hughes@dowjones.com
Could it be SHELL?
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100825-710058.html
A "FLOTILLA OF SHIPS" with spill kits?
i have a buy order in for 7cents, altho, i think it could go lower. i have a problem with a major oil company putting in a gag order on mopn PR'ing what is perhaps the best news to ever happen to MOPN.
alex higgins has the best blog about the spill
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/
from the s.e.c. what is material information:
Other suggestions from commenters included providing more interpretive guidance about types of information or events that are more likely to be considered material. While it is not possible to create an exhaustive list, the following items are some types of information or events that should be reviewed carefully to determine whether they are material: (1) earnings information; (2) mergers, acquisitions, tender offers, joint ventures, or changes in assets; (3) new products or discoveries, or developments regarding customers or suppliers (e.g., the acquisition or loss of a contract); (4) changes in control or in management; (5) change in auditors or auditor notification that the issuer may no longer rely on an auditor's audit report; (6) events regarding the issuer's securities -- e.g., defaults on senior securities, calls of securities for redemption, repurchase plans, stock splits or changes in dividends, changes to the rights of security holders, public or private sales of additional securities; and (7) bankruptcies or receiverships.47
By including this list, we do not mean to imply that each of these items is per se material. The information and events on this list still require determinations as to their materiality (although some determinations will be reached more easily than others). For example, some new products or contracts may clearly be material to an issuer; yet that does not mean that all product developments or contracts will be material. This demonstrates, in our view, why no "bright-line" standard or list of items can adequately address the range of situations that may arise. Furthermore, we do not and cannot create an exclusive list of events and information that have a higher probability of being considered material.
Information is material if "there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable shareholder would consider it important" in making an investment decision.
right from the s.e.c.
It is about time to learn who the "big oil" company is.
haliburton is not an oil company.
oil plume in GOM 600 ft thick
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/science/earth/20plume.html?src=mv
33,000 miles of pipe line in the gulf of mexico
http://motherjones.com/environment/2010/09/bp-ocean-gulf-other-time-bombs
another must read for cleaning the gulf. enough work for mopn to last for yrs.
http://www.nature.org/pressroom/files/gulf_20_20.pdf
must read why MOPN and similar products should be used on all future oil spills.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jerry-cope/the-crime-of-the-century_b_662971.html
BP's branding problems.
hey BP, use MOPN in ur advertising...........lol
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/18/AR2010081803063_2.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2010081803652
BP oil hit new york beaches?
scroll down a bit to see the article
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/
250,000 @0.108 at 16.04pm
imagine if this guy could get MOPN into walmart!!
news out. but who is the BIG OIL COMPANY?
if MOPN's oil company is Shell or Chevron, it is possible that MOPn could be involved in cleaning that region from spilled oil.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_in_the_Niger_Delta
all we can hope for is for MOPN to contract with the oil company who made the mess for help in cleaning it up.
i beleive it is chevron and or royal dutch shell but not sure.
good luck daddy and keep up the good DD.
pops, niger is on the western coast of africa. BUT THANKS. my post was 'tongue in cheek".
does MOPN have a sales rep in the Niger Delta?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amb-john-campbell/oil-pollution-in-the-nige_b_684608.html
read before this gets deleted.
just speculation. please stay on topic.
scientist say 80% of oil still in gulf.
http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/08/georgia_scientists_say_80_perc.html
the question is, does MOPN need vendor status to get paid from BP.
i would hope that MOPN would not PR that just to get a PR out of it.
shell cleaning up Niger?
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9HK2AG00.htm
this la times story is why im holding for much larger gains
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-oil-future-20100814,0,7293922.story
lets say that there are 10,000 feeder ships. $6,000 per kit $60,000,000 dollars.
lets say MOPN gets 10%, thats $6,000,000. thats a conservative figure, in my opinion.
i like this line in the recent PR
"There are currently 3,858 U.S. coastal oil drilling platforms serviced by a far larger number of feeder oil cargo ships and oil tankers subject to this mandated U.S. Government requirement."
i wonder how many feeder ships are out there?
it would be nice if MOPN could clean up ecuador.
but the clue is in the PR about the spill kits.
MOPn has been leaving many clues in the PR's since july.
held most of the gains from yesterday........
good luck next week.
I THINK ITS BP!!
Bp will spend billions rebuilding its brand as a green company using green products for future spills.
it is a small bone for BP but a big bone for MOPN and its shareholders.
just my opinion
this is a quote from the white papers. i believe the white papers came out july 1. i believe yesterdays pr stems directly from the white papers.
jmho........
"The white papers below have been submitted to the US Coast Guard to describe the various products and processes that MOP Environmental Solutions can bring to the efforts in the Gulf of Mexico.
This does not represent all of the alliances we are working on or all possible methods from engaging MOP to clean up the surface oil. At least one process is still to be posted but involves some complex alliance building and due diligence before we can make it public".
alliance building.........already PR'ed
due diligence........getting financials updated, accts receivable financing....
im just connecting the dots.........i could be wrong
I suspect that when the name comes out so will the orders/purchase agreements.
im of the opinion that this "major oil company" came to MOPN and not the other way around. this major oil company asked that the financials be updated and that accounts receivable financing be in place.
one only has to look to the timing of the PR releases.
glta