Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
See my last post, and you'll know who is.
Yes, I know. That's for July 30th, 2010. The latest on that site. If you go here http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100817.txt You will see the results for August 17, 2010.
That link has the short interest from July 30th, which was 0, the latest available on that site. The link I posted was from FINRA's and was from August 17, 2010. The actual latest short intersest available anywhere. The next one will be at the end of the month. I'm not too sure how it works on the greys, but I just happened to come across the link while researching something else. So I went and looked at ACLH, and that's what it said, 85,000. By comparison it was pretty low to some others that were in the billions.
Tex, check out the short volume from yesterday. 85,000 shares short volume. http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100817.txt
That saying is attributed to P.T. Barnum, as well as "A fool and his money are soon parted", but I recall hearing somewhere that he never actually said either one. Anyway, at $.0002 Subway is on me.
My question was rhetorical. What do you think I've been living on these oh so pitiful days? Anyway, I'm already down two bucks TFBN, so where can you get lunch for a buck? LOL. Actually I was hoping this would move just a little at least when season starts. Any projections? Seems like it did something last year.
Thanks for the post MD08. I have that site in my favs, but never knew that was on there. The few I looked at that recently moved from grey to pink didn't look too promising, but you are correct, they do go from grey to pink quite often. I think the last time I was on that site was to check ACLH, and they (I think) said it was caveat emptor. Didn't know what it meant, but it sounded like a rotting carcass to me. With the skull and crossbones and all. Of course that was right at the begining of the suspension. If you look at ACLH on that site today, not much has changed.
Too funny. Sorry 'bout your loss brainstem. Yeah, I've been burned too. Cost money to learn in this game. Hey, where can you buy lunch for $3.00?
So it is possible to come back then? Why were they suspended? Filings look up to date, and insiders are buying. Actually that's not a bad looking stock. Just off it's low. I wish ACLH looked like that.
That's what I've come to understand. When I first looked at TFBN there was nothing in the way of info anywhere. Apparently you guys had this board going, but IH website would never show it. They even suggested I start one. Anyway I picked up 10,000 for $3.00 just to see if would do anything, but now that I know what's happening, it doesn't look promising. I look at it as a lottery ticket. Who knows, maybe when football season starts, it will move some. Thanks for the response.
TEX, how are those four doing now? This is the kind of info we need on here. Anon777's article about the former FEMA director, and things like that. Anything but a post from the boy with kaleidascope eyes. Yeah, nice name change there buddy. Well, it's past noon now and no volume on ACLH. I'm long on this, but it's not looking too good near term with this kind of volume.
Let's talk about Newsweek articles, and then ask ME if I don't pay attention. At today's volume of 173,000 I don't suppose your order went through. Was that you at 12:00 PM who bought 50,000 shares at $.0006? Or tried to? Seeing as the day low was $.003, that order may have been cancelled. Trade however you want, but if your going to spout off about what you're doing, or "trying" to do, don't expect others to not say anything about it. So far you've made false statements about news articles, and "IMO" you may be manipulating stock prices. Are YOU paying attention now? All I ask is that you stick to the facts if you're going to post on here. Opinions and conjecture do nothing but confuse and annoy. 500,000 yeah right, there wasn't even half that volume today. Explain how you plan to get rid of that many shares once you get them. The ten day average volume is barely above that, and the trend is that it's only going to get lower. Those are facts. Do you still wish to question my attention span?
Jay, you just have to be realistic. Never fall in love with any stock. Their sole purpose is to raise money for the company, not you. Buy low and sell high. There are many thousands of stocks out there you can invest in. Look for ones nearing their lows, research the company, and never invest more than you're willing to lose. If a company is legit, at their low, and there's no negative news or scandals, it will usually go up when investors learn about it. Everyone looks for the bargain. Of course there are those who are betting it will go down too. basically it's a gamble. You just have to look for the best odds. ACLH is a penny stock, and it's trading exactly where it's supposed to be regarding it's history. A lot of people on here, like myself, got sucked up in the hype, and bought when it was high. Luckily I had flipped it once and made a few bucks. Then I jumped back in again hoping to make more. While what I have in ACLH now is basically nothing, and if I lost it all, I still have made money from this stock. I am a shareholder, and would like nothing more than to see it go up. However, I'm not planning to retire because of ACLH. Good luck, and trade smart.
O.K. I've said this before, but I think it wise to know that the charts available to me go back to 2006 for ACLH. Even when I try to go back ten years, it only goes to '06. So, in it's four year history, it has only been above $.05 per share three times. It spent half of '07 and all of '08 sub-penny, and a lot of that was in triple 0's. Keep in mind that we are exactly where we were before the Deepwater explosion. Right around half a cent. April 19th it opened at $.0025. This stock is trading pretty much for what it's worth on average. IMO dreaming that ACLH is going to a dollar is a fools folly. Could it happen? Sure why not, but does it's history show that it can? Absolutely not. It's only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. It may be some time before it's reputation gets it over $.05 again. It's done it three times in four years. So realistically thinking, it may take twelve to fifteen months to do it again, that is if you believe in the law of averages. If not, get out your rabbits foot, and throw your cash into this. People may lie about whatever, whenever they want, but the numbers always tell the truth. Keep this in mind when playing the ACLH game. It's good wholesome fun for the entire family!
What a strange stock. When I first came across this one I tried to get a quote here. I got the quote, but IH said there was no message board. Why don't I start one? So I tried, and nothing happened. WTF? This was last Thursday. When I checked again today I see boards going back to the 21st. WTF? The only info I could find was the 52 wk high and the current pps. $231,000.00 down to $.0001, WTF? Is there any real info on this or what? Even the charts are inconsitent: Jun 1st, Open $107,374.00, High $107,374.00, Low $.30, Close $.30, Volume 2,000. Then on June 2nd, Open $107,374.00, High $107,375.00, Low $.30, Close $.60, Volume 2,100. WTF? Can this be true? Someone paid $107,374.00 on June 2nd for a stock that closed on June 1st for $.30, WTF? I know this is wrong because that same high goes on until today on the 52 wk chart, and we damn sure know that wasn't the high today. WTF? If someone has some real info on this I'd love to here it.
Yeah, I'm holding as well. Haven't heard anything new either, but it was good to see it move a little. With no bid or ask though, there's really no way of knowing what it's going to do. Need to get off the grey.
Back to $.003. Now I feel like the drummer for The Kings Of Leon sitting under a pigeon.
$.006, oooh! $.0051, awe! Hey, at least it's moving. I feel like Peter Griffin eating fruit striped gum. Disapionted.
Huge jump to $.006, 71% gain.
Very well put Greedy Malone. There are plenty of other places to lose money that at least have a bid and ask. Chasing ACLH seems like a fools folly. What I've done is placed a standing sell order for a price that is ridiculously higher than the current PPS. If we all did the same we might see an increase. The only reason it drops is because some are selling at that price. Hold your ground people.
I've read all the posts, and still don't really understand what's going on, but it's very interesting. Can anyone buy shares, or are you only allowed to sell? If so, who's buying the sold shares? Was there a cutoff point some time ago to purchase? IMO it would be worth a few bucks just to see what happens.
I didn't see what you mean. Can you clarify?
Just looking at the charts for ACLH (should've done this before) as far back as I can, which is Jan, 30 '06. Open $.15, close $.14. Took all of '06 to drop to $.01. Pretty slow and steady drop with some minor upswings along the way. Half of '07 to get exactly where we are today $.005. The rest of '07 and all of '08 in triple 0's. Then in Jan '09 it jumps to about $.05, and averages about $.03 until Nov '09 when it hits $.14 very briefly. In reality it stays between 1 and 3.5 cents until Dec, '09 when you start to see double 0's again. From Jan, '10 it goes from about $.01 to exactly where we are now at $.005 in March. Until the whole BP thing started, this is exactly where this stock was. Right where we are today at $.005. So if you think about it, ACLH is trading at about it's average. In reality, it's only been over $.05 about four or five times in it's existence. It may take a year or longer for ACLH to get back to $.05 or more. Just throwing this out there, but IMO it's never been over $.17 in it's history, and it's avereage is half a penny or less. So don't wait for this thing to rain gold down on you, but if you're patient, it may get back to $.05 eventually.
You just jarred my memory a bit. When I called he also said that the reverse split was not going to happen, but they still had that option. So I imagine at that point he knew about the split, but not the suspension. I guess it's par for the course for ACLH to keep the head of investor relations in the dark about anything going on with the company. After all, why would he need to know anything?
It's not so much what he said, but how he said it. Had that "snake oil salesman" tone to it. Made me want to check my backside for carcinogens.
I understood. Like I said, I want to know what's going on too. One thing that's bothered me, and I didn't know what to think of it when Ares told me, but on the day of the suspension I called him during the now famous "radio show". I said the SEC has suspended ACLH, and wanted to know what happened. He said he didn't know anything about it, and would look in to it. He told me to call him back later. Then he went on to say that at least the stock had been over $.01, and I should be glad. That has struck me as odd since that day. As if to say that $.01 was all they were hoping for, or at least that's how I think I took it. Just seems strange for the head of IR to say something like that.
How can I make this any clearer to you? You signed up. It is NOT spam. Now you can opt out. They have your email, IP address, and time you signed up. You will lose this battle every time. I guarantee it. Just unsubscribe, and you'll be free to pursue a life of religious fulfillment. 'nuff said?
Did you check the box that says "Tecnology, Product & Services"? If so, that's why you're getting the email. Most likely it's an automatically generated email, and goes to anyone who opted in. Do you have a problem with someone trying to make money? If you were on my mailing list, I would send you anything I'm invoved in. Wouldn't you? Just opt out, but accusing someone of spam after you've signed up is just as illegal as receiving it unsolicited. Proceed with caution.
If you filled in the info on this page, http://actcleantech.com/investor.html then you are on their mailing list, and have legally given them permission to send you anything they want. Even stuff you may not want. If you no longer wish to receive emails from them, unsubscribe. It's really that simple. Don't worry, we won't tell anyone we saw you crying.
How is it spam if you signed up to their mailing list? Once you sign up they can send you anything they want until you opt out. What did you think you were going to get, a birthday card? Also, you may legally receive emails from any of their partners. Don't give out your email address, and then complain when you get an email. I mean c'mon man, really?
From the YESD message board, "In addition, we have acquired the rights to distribute all of BioElectronics Corporation’s (Pink Sheets:BIEL) product line throughout Japan, including the Allay Menstrual Pain Therapy and ActiPatch Therapy products." Wish I had some cash to throw at this. Looks good.
You can call him yourself. Here's the number, 877-299-5596. Give 'em hell, arrrgh!
Chris21, that's my point. Why is it okay for one company to have no ethics, but not another. I don't want to get into a discussion of who did what to who, but if it's trading, just give us a bid and ask. We've all taken a hit on this one, so is a B/A too much to ask for? For every sell there's a buy, so what has the SEC accomplished? People are buying and selling, albeit at a lower price, but it is trading. So what was the point of suspending it? Just so brokers can charge more for the trade? Because that's all that's happened.
@Chris21, They're pinks, which means they are, for the most part, all frauds. I read everything when I signed my name, and knew about BAT fee. My point is that, now that the suspension is lifted, and there is no B/A, the brokers are the ones profiting , and not the shareholders. When you call, and some tard answers the phone with the tone of "we don't know what's happening", and then they hit you with the sales pitch of "would you like to do a broker assisted trade?". BS, they know exactly what they're doing, and it's profiting from the suffering of others. It may be lagal, but where are the ethics?
I'll just say it starts with an S, ends with an E and has two T's in the middle. They said if I want to buy or sell I have to use a broker assisted trade, and that's $27.00. I'm not selling any though. I don't care what happens, I'll ride this thing down to a billionth of a tenth of a penny. Just so they won't get my business, and I'll never trade with them again.
Not just me, everyone else who wants to trade ACLH with them. They're taking advantage of a bad situation, and profiting. Like I asked before, where's the SEC now? Nowhere, because it's legal for them to do it. It's like building ambulances. You make money because you make something to carry vicims of trauma to medical attention. Ambulances aren't free, and the company that makes them has to show a profit to stay in business. So the only way for them to make money is for people to suffer. There are others too, doctors, lawyers, medical supplies, etc. All profiting from others suffering. So the SEC has to stick their fat ugly head in to this business, why? Because it's politically motivated. ACLH IMO did nothing that any other compny tries to do. MAKE MONEY! Are we capitalist or not?
Yeah, I've been seriously considering dropping these "brokers", but their office is two blocks away, and very conveniant.
I was on a job yesterday so I had limited access to a computer. I didn't see ACLH until 10:00 AM, and as we all know it was way down. Just like I thought it would be. I tried to place a sell order, and "no way Jose" was what I got for a respnse from my account. It said call the office, so I did. They must have put the least intelligent person in charge of receiving calls about ACLH. Of course, that's what they wanted us to think. Let me explain. You know when tou're talking to a legitimately stupid person, and when someone is just playing stupid? I got "We don't know what's happening", "We've received a lot of calls and emails on this one", "Would you like to regard this as a worthless stock", and the best one was "You'll have to do a broker assisted trade if you want to buy or sell". I'll focus on the last one because this is about the only place anyone is going to make any money on ACLH, and it won't be us. The charge for a broker assisted trade is $27.00. I don't know how many trades were made yesterday, but at over 16,000,000 shares, it had to be quite a few. If everyone who traded yesterday had to pay $27.00, well, do the math. Anyway, it's just another case of profiting from a disaster. So where is the SEC now, "protecting the investor", because brokers stand to make major profits from this one, and isn't that what ACLH was accused of doing? I know, its all legal for them to charge what they will to make the trade, but the SEC hasn't protected anyone. They've only lined the pockets of those who's coffers are already overflowing. I'll close with a quote from the late Ronnie James Dio, "Silver linings can disappear, but they always shine"! It's just that someone else gets to see the glimmer.
@ximon Yeah, a 250% jump would be great. I live in Florida, so at least I can get a job cleaning a British company's mess. From what I saw on the news though I think you have to be an illegal alien to get hired, LOL. I bought ACLH because they already took over my trade, and can't find work anywhere. You know things are going haywire when you have to speak Spanish to work for a company that's English. Hey, I call it like I see it.
@TEX Yeah, facts. Imagine if the trading world dealt only in the facts. 99% of these "stocks" wouldn't be worth a red cent. Most already aren't. It's all speculative, and a gamble at best. These "stocks" mostly trade on news anyway, and we're all ready to jump on the next big thing. So in the spirit of Washington Irving, never let the facts get in the way of a good story, LOL. One for the grandkids at best. A year from now we may not even care who ACLH was, but who knows?