Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This stock is dead and down the tubes it goes. How are you feeling about hitting those 7's from here? Another "fib" might do, but I think most people have had their fill of ACLH.
like what?
"Sorry, we lied to you and don't have any previous or current associations with the companies listed on our page. In our defense though we gave you multiple opportunities to make money off the stock and we're sorry that some of you prefer to not make money but hold and stay greedy."
That kind of news?
The BP contract is not true either
LOL
There will never get a BP contract and slowly the company is going to forget all about their little "fib" and you guys are going to be more than happy sitting there with your watered down shares.
You tell me that when you get your contract, because I'm feeling pretty good that I'll be the one laughing when all is said and done. Take profits and play the stock. Don't sit and wish.
You are now comparing apples and oranges.
All PR's are honest and truthful is that what you are telling me?
Take profits and don't get left holding.
Show me. Except for their website saying that they have worked with these major companies...there's nothing to validate their claims.
Exactly what I'm saying. No money and no proven background of having worked in the previous oil spills.
What does ACLH have to provide? Chemicals? Sorry, they're out of luck.
Weeeee!!!
Well your "reliable source" is off for the day and who knows....maybe he's wrong about the split too
Well let's see... it's been like that ALL weekend and last I checked afterhours doesn't mean squat.
Delete this post if you must, but I'm dying over here.
Because Monday was a date that was pulled by a "trusted source." Now you have all these people waiting for Monday and maybe that rumor isn't true. Maybe the company decides to release info mid-week, but due to the fact that rumored Monday has been hyped by newsletters then whatever sell-off that normally would occur is magnified without news. I do believe that's why he said to not expect Monday.
Yes, and if you don't get news, you can blame the pumpers that use newsletters as reliable sources.
Look at the chart and you can see this is a pump and dump. No one is buying this and it'll be a matter of time before it fades away to subpenny. "IHSN" "THRR" "EWRC" all these three copied eachother's PRs> You guys are going to get a deal cancelled or no update.
When one reaches 5% ownership. Don't expect to find anything though; this buyout is never going to happen.
You can always take profits and wait for news, because you can always get back in no matter what anyone says. Hold and maybe the news that comes out is negative and let's see which person made the right choice.
Take a national media story and mold to encase your own stock. Yea, that's really nice there. The morale that I get out of that article is that the flippers are making off well playing the stock the way you should(not marrying it).
Except containing costs. You do realize there is a large scale chemical company involved already right?
You guys haven't even been focused except to say that ACLH is going to be used in the clean up effort in general. If the cleaning of ships are their only expected role then I'd be worrying about what NLC can provide. If you choose to believe that they are going to have a role in the clean up fine, but don't for a second think that they are vital.
No you guys are talking about the water and the sand and the now the ships. I can read.
Look at the new previous post. You don't throw money to the wind. You use companies that are able to do the work.
Yes, agreed. BUT, where you fall off the wagon is that you're not understanding that the larger companies already have contractors and those contractors have subcontractors and if they need more people they can do it in an instant. ACLH doesn't have the money to quickly expand and add on more help if needed. ACLH and its subsidarie(s) are not able to pull money out and mass produce their chemicals if they were to be used(I would like to note that NLC is already supplying chemicals). Big companies already are there and can continue to branch out. That's why BP is going to choose them. You're best hope is that ACLH gets contracted by one of the cleanup crews.
You keep screaming shorters, bashers, and MM's and you can't even bring up a logical explanation of how ACLH will secure a spot in this mess.
Edit: Keyword being "logic" in the business sense
And they are not going to put their money into a company that isn't suited to meet their demands or needs like ACLH. Sorry, but the "big boys/blue chips" that are well prepared and have ample amount of resources have this in the bag. How does it make sense to hire a bunch of small companies on different scales to take care of a job that a few large companies could?
Oh yeah, CLH alone has over 7000 Employees and ACLH would be lucky to round up 100. The difference with the companies that are involved is that they have MONEY!! And don't forget that MOPN(pink) had that wonderful PR with nothing to back it up just like ACLH does here too.
Hmmm ACLH...CLH...close symbols but totally different levels.
ACLH is not going to be used in the oil spill. Where do they fit in with guys like these?
http://stocks.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2010/Companies-Affected-By-The-Oil-Spill-HAL-RIG-PG-CLH-NLC0514.aspx
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100514/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill_investing_1
Cleaning the Animals
According to the Associated Press, Proctor and Gamble (NYSE:PG) delivered 2,000 Dawn dishwashing liquid bottles to the Gulf of Mexico in order to clean the affected wildlife in the region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services exclusively recognize Dawn as being the only safe bird-cleaning agent which is able to remove oil from feathers. In addition to seeing an increase in demand, Proctor and Gamble will undoubtedly benefit from additional positive brand association.
Cleaning the Gulf of Mexico
Clean Harbor (NYSE:CLH) is an environmental service provider focused in North America. CLH crew members are working along the gulf coastline to mitigate the environmental damage of the BP oil spill. Even after missing analyst's earnings estimates last week, the shares are up 12% since before the accident. When the oil approaches the Louisiana shoreline, Clean Harbor will have to send additional personnel.
Nalco Holdings (NYSE:NLC) rose nearly 6% in single trading day on May 12, 2010. Nalco is an water treatment corporation which has supplied over 325,000 gallons of COREXIT to the region. This chemical compound breaks oil into small globules which can be digested by bacteria.
CLH
Stocks to watch: Gulf cleanup may be opportunity
By JOEL SCHECTMAN (AP) – 19 hours ago
NEW YORK — With the exploded well in the Gulf of Mexico continuing to spew 200,000 gallons of oil a day, the cleanup has already cost BP $450 million and it's rising by $10 million a day.
Companies that specialize in environmental cleanup are being called upon to stem the damage, and investors may want to look at firms that could see a surge in business.
The well blew open on April 20 when the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform exploded. Several companies are working with the Coast Guard to block the spread of the oil and prepare for a labor intensive mop-up as the slick reaches the coast.
One company that is likely to take a lead in the cleanup is Clean Harbors Inc. (CLH), the largest environmental decontamination company in North America, with almost 7,000 employees and a $1.6 billion market cap.
Clean Harbors has worked on high-profile disasters before, decontaminating television studios hit by the 2001 Anthrax attacks and helping to clean toxic mold out of homes following Hurricane Katrina. The company's stock surged in both cases.
For the Gulf oil spill, workers are driving vacuum trucks, with 2000-foot long hoses, to the edge of inlets where they will suck up thousands of gallons of oil, as the spill reaches the shore.
"Once it hits you will have laborers literally scraping oil off the shores with high-pressure hot water streams," said Clean Harbors CEO Alan McKim.
The company has long-term contracts with the Coast Guard that automatically took effect after the disaster, and it already has 700 employees in the region. The Massachusetts-based company expects that number to rise as the oil hits beaches, according to McKim.
"There is a pretty clear line from this disaster to revenues for Clear Harbors," said David Manthey, an analyst at Baird & Co. "When there is an oil spill, Clean Harbors is going to be there."
In the wake of the disaster, investors jumped on the stock, shooting prices 27 percent from $55 to $70 in just a few days. The stock later retreated back to around $61.
Manthey cautions that the stock may have risen too fast in the short-term, and that Clean Harbor's revenues from the cleanup are more likely to be in the "tens-of-millions," rather than "hundreds-of-millions."
Analysts say the spill could cost BP as much as $15 billion in cleanup expenses, settlements of class action lawsuits, and other costs. The Exxon Valdez disaster in 1989 cost Exxon $4.3 billion.
But even if investors are overestimating the money that Clean Harbors stands to make on this disaster, the company stock may still offer longer-term value.
As U.S. manufacturing picks up in 2010, factories will need to dispose of hazardous chemicals, a task that they may have delayed during slow quarters. Dealing with this buildup of industrial waste may give Clean Harbors strong revenues in the second half of 2010, according to Michael E. Hoffman, an analyst at Wunderlich Securities. Revenues for the company were $1.1 billion in 2009.
Investors looking to put money in the cleanup should also take a look at Nalco Holding Co. (NLC), a $3.35 billion market cap firm, which makes chemicals that are being used to break up the oil in the spill. Another player is Lakeland Industries Inc. (LAKE), a small company that makes disposable uniforms worn by the disaster workers.
With the damage total not yet known for this disaster, long-term investors may want to consider steering clear of companies that may be on the hook for the costs. Those include BP, which owns the well, Transocean, Inc. that was operating the rig, and Halliburton Inc., the company that was responsible for sealing the well.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h5dLajJN-9EPDsrShwBgpCshC2gAD9FMRN083
Put ALL of your money in IHSN :o) You will reap all your rewards and benefits in due time baggies !!
Yes, really funny indeed. I found that out already
Because HONESTY and integrity presides in pinksheets and PR'S right?
ACLH
May 6th
ACT Clean Technologies, Inc. (Pink Sheets: ACLH) (www.actcleantech.com) released the specifications of the Company's environmentally safe, EPA approved solution for their patented fluids designed to not only effectively remove oil sludge from water and ship's hulls, but also to increase oil production from existing wells that have experienced production declines over time.
It sounds to me as though they sent in their own bid.
Now let's look at the OTHER candidate...
MOPN
MOP Environmental Solutions, Inc. (MOPN.PK) has been designated as a "Resource" by both British Petroleum (BP) and the United States Coast Guard to assist when needed for the clean up efforts in the Gulf.
Now how does MOPN look? I'll call Bullsh*t until it actually comes out of the horses mouth.
I haven't heard it from BP. Sounds like it's the other way around going from the previous PR.
No YOU'RE living a dream!! BP will incur fines and the cost of the cleanup. That's IT!! They're going to pick the companys they choose to work with and i'm sure that Halliburton/Transocean will be lending a hand. I'm sorry but we don't live in a dictatorship quite yet.
Too funny
– Transocean, which owns the BP-leased offshore rig gushing oil into the Gulf of Mexico, filed a petition in a US court Thursday to limit its liability in the spill to 27 million dollars.
While British energy giant BP is responsible for the cost of the cleanup, BP executives told a congressional hearing Tuesday that Transocean was responsible for the failure of a key giant valve system.
Common sense and actually relaying the FACTS. The government can't FORCE any company to hire anyone. You guys are so focused on BP and don't realize that Halliburton/Transocean are going to have their plans in deciding how to clean up the spill. And for the record the real company at fault isn't BP.
FALSE!! Especially seeing that the U.S. government has no leverage over BP except fines and you forget that Transocean and Halliburton have a major role in this oil spill.
ACLH Go DOWN wit yo bad self!!