Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Gattes, no filings = cutting costs. That combined with several contracts and partnerships generating revenue = a juggernaut to come. If there were no filings + no revenue generating deals, then that would be a problem. But I have confirmed EVERY deal that GGII has signed having to do with PRs announcing new revenue streams. ;) Try again.
Gattes, unlike AVEW and CLX, GGII is growing very fast with much revenue generating activity. ;) Try again.
EDD, too bad your view is but just two dimensional. Short + Technicals is all you seem to know, especially when GGII is clearly growing exponentially to command a firm foothold in the green tourism market. ;) Try again.
Gattes, you are really witnessing the rapid growth of GGII. This is a REALITY that you can not ignore or dispute. ;) Try again.
No....AVEW demonstrates NO evidence of growth; so that makes GGII reacting exactly the opposite of AVEW. ;) Try again.
Don't worry Gattes...I'm always prepared to take you on. If GGII were not rapidly expanding it's business, then I would concede defeat. But, there is plenty of evidence that GGII is growing exponentially; not just going by the PRs, but confirming the PRs as well. GLTU. ;) Try again.
Tons of Revenue coming in for GGII from this!
Yup...I made plenty of money this time last year here @ GGLB. That's reality right there bro! lol ;) Try again.
What's a laugh EDD is the laugh I'm going to have on you when the first Forward Split happens. ;) Try again.
Technically, wrong again EDD. There were plenty of 'lengths of times' that GGLB held at .0002. There have always been buyers here, and sit back and watch the buying continue causing Forward Splits to come. ;) Try again.
LOL EDD!! As if you care one bit. But fear not, for all of the F/S that will be coming will make up for this R/S. ;) Try again.
EDD: "...because Green Globe is a good concept". Well said! Thanks! ;) Try again.
There, there now EDD. You got your R/S that you always wanted. Can't win 'em all. So this point you can have and savor for a short while. A short while, because GGII is at a pps now that will get noticed; and in no time at all, all of the Forward Splits that will occur will more than make up for this R/S. So congrats for now.
Doctor AC: 35,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
Earnest DD: 1
Not sad at all crable. I am still left with plenty of shares that will eventually F/S, I predict, several times. Still pro GGII. You will see.
Cutting costs is good. ;) Try again.
STILL NO REVERSE SPLIT.
EDD, You have pointed this out already about 100 times, and I have already gone over this issue with you, so I won't do it again. Geesh! The only thing I will say (again) is that GGLB announced that it would be moving to the pink sheets to reduce costs. Nothing wrong with cutting costs. Today's news was legendary! STILL NO REVERSE SPLIT! ;) Try again.
Also a very meaty PR. No fluff here! LOL! ;)
GGLB is fast becoming a "universal sustainability label"!!! Just like I always said it will.
Well Steve_P, let the record show, by every single message that I have ever posted here on IHUB for more than a solid year now, that I have NEVER doubted the potential of GGLB. If that's not faith...I don't know what is! GGLB could grow EXPONENTIALLY in this new 'green market'. I look forward to more good news, and I thank you for the support. But worry not, I will remain here (in the trenches) spreading the good news of sustainability and supporting GGLB to the very best of my ability. GLTU
Yes Crable. Please review message # 18601. GGAP is "a wholly owned subsidiary of EC3." GGAP "pays GGLB a license fee for the use of the brand." GLTU
Crable... I am going by the PR that states in writing that EC3 PAYS GGLB A LICENSING FEE TO USE THE GREEN GLOBE BRAND. It's printed in ink as clear as day! ;) Try again.
Gattes, first of all...who is "they all" do?? Crable made a valiant attempt to clarify his own interpretation of the partnership between EC3 and GGLB. I think in the process, he confused himself even more. You just can't dance around facts, and the main fact made here today is THAT EC3 PAYS GGLB A LICENSING FEE FOR THE USE OF THE GREEN GLOBE BRAND. You all can deny it all you want for your own purposes, but this is one heck-of-a slap in the face fact! LOL ;) Keep on trying.
Gattes, unfortunately you thanked crable for nothing. I clarified the payment relationship between GGLB and EC3 for him. Indeed, GGLB IS PAID BY EC3 a LICENSING FEE. This was the original argument which now can be put to rest. ;) Keep trying.
Crable...you have totally missed the point! EC3 cannot be granted license to manage the Green Globe brand (WHICH IS OWNED BY GREEN GLOBE INTERNATIONAL) without paying GGLB a license fee! This is exactly what the original argument was to begin with! GGLB pays EC3 to deliver the benchmarking and certification program and EC3 pays GGLB a license fee to use the brand. Very simple partnership to understand. ;) Try again.
Crable...you don't seem to understand your own argument! EC3 cannot be granted license to manage the Green Globe brand (WHICH IS OWNED BY GREEN GLOBE INTERNATIONAL) without paying GGLB a license fee! This is exactly what the original argument was to begin with! GGLB pays EC3 to deliver the benchmarking and certification program and EC3 pays GGLB a license fee to use the brand. Very simple partnership to understand. ;) Try again.
Gattes, I have not only investigated this one fact, but investigated and verified several others as well. So if you are insinuating that I have only investigated this single issue for almost a year, you are purposely misleading the GGLB public. GGLB's stock price will do what it does, but the truth of the matter to begin with is that EC3 pays GGLB a license fee to use the Green Globe brand, period. End of discussion. Yet another source of revenue. ;) Keep trying.
Gattes, it's not a matter of believing the PRs or not. It's about investigating the PRs, which I do on a regular basis. Rest assured, this PR is absolutely true. In addition, give it time. I mean, it's only been since May 11th when this agreement was announced! LOL! ;) Try again.
Wrong again FFF. GGAP (Green Globe Asia Pacific) is a wholly owned subsidiary of EC3 Global. In fact, GGAP "a wholly owned subsidiary of EC3 Global" has "AGREED TO PAY GREEN GLOBE LIMITED A LICENSE FEE FOR THE USE OF THE GREEN GLOBE BRAND". Yet....again, ANOTHER SOURCE OF REVENUE for GGLB. So, to sum up, EC3, in essence, pays GGLB for use of the brand. Please review the PR of May 11th. ;) Try again.
Yet ANOTHER source of revenue!
FFF, next time I'll investigate before I make a spontaneous assumption. I have to remember that every little thing I say is extremely scrutinized. However, GGLB did announce that they would be going to the pink sheets a couple of weeks ago in order to cut costs. So there's nothing surprising there. STILL NO REVERSE SPLIT.
GGLB must have filed today because the (E) has been dropped from GGLBE. It's back to GGLB now both on Scotturd and IHUB. It's going to get very interesting here.
FFF, It's not fair to speculate one way or the other. So you go on speculating that it will, and I will go on speculating that it won't.
FFF, going on 4 months now, AND STILL NO REVERSE SPLIT! ;) Try again.
FFF, that would be like saying that GE doesn't generate any revenue from NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC. LOL Doesn't matter how, or where GGLB earns it's revenue...bottom line is that it earned over $15K of revenue in it's last, FAR OUT-DATED 10Q FILING. Lots more revenue earned since November of 2008. ;) Try again.
EDD, you are continuing the redundancy, but I will be happy to repeat myself for the 801st time. MICRO COMPANIES (LIKE GGLB) WILL ALMOST ALWAYS SHOW MORE EXPENSES THAN REVENUE ON IT'S BALANCE SHEETS. However, GGLB has more than amply demonstrated rapid growth and will show far more revenue in the next filing. ;) Try again.
Thus, once again, disproving your earlier claim that GGLB has "never shown $1 in revenue". Typical function of micro-companies to have more expenses than revenue in financial filings. You know that as well as I do. ;) Try again.
There is ample proof that GGLB has revenue. Once again, for the 800th time, GGLB earned over $15K in it's last 10Q filing. Far more than the "not even $1" you falsely claimed before. LOTS OF REVENUE EARNED SINCE THE LAST 10Q!! ;) Try again.
GGLB has a ton of revenue to sort out and report on it's next filing. ;) Try again.
Not a good observation at all actually. Everybody knows about the status of GGLB's late filings. Nothing new there. But FFF's speculative claim that GGLB will be filing a 15-12G is, once again, is only pure speculation on his part. ;) Try again.