Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not sure. If it goes to 0.0002, it will only be IMO for a while. If this happens, lots of people will jump in, and this will create a reversal momentum. The move two days ago made plenty of people aware of this short-term low-risk, high gain potential opportunity. Got in this AN, and planning to add more tomorrow.
"NEXH no bounce yet."
DD Machine:
http://www.ddmachine.com/default.asp?s=hexs.ob
If you folks haven't seen this site before, bookmark it. It's by far the best one side does it all DD site. Check out under Opinions. American Bulls say: "Our system posted a BUY-IF today. The previous SELL recommendation that was confirmed was made on 12.15.2004 (22) days ago, when the stock price was 0.0100. Since then HEXS has fallen -15.00%."
Could it be that the poisonous Cornell shares are almost gone? Let's hope so. Hope the Company has learned its lesson, and never ever do any business with those crooks. All other companies that I know (e.g., MOBL, CNCN, CIRC) went through the same hell after Cornell financing.
I see very few people and only few of the other boards are following HEXS. This would explain why the price and volume are so low right now:
http://www.boardcentral.com/aios/aios.cgi
This should change once we start moving, especially if it jumps much higher, which I for one expect it to happen any day now.
Mike
Rs, my small 8MM 0.0002 order was taken today (in 5 smaller instalments). If you have any trouble doing it, you might want to change the provider. Ameritrade is the best, IMO.
Mike
Andy, you are right. I don't blame SCHB, or any other MM. They only follow our orders. It will break alright, but only after the peanuts lovers (those that are only looking for a double) check out their pennies, and leave.
I remember the samer thing with QBID. It took it a while to break the 0.0002 wall, and then it moved fast to over 0.02. Got to admit I was among the one of those people that freaked out, and exited at 0.012 (120 MOMO), only to see it more than double shortly thereafter. Not with this one. I'll go for everything, or nothing (which is not much to lose at this entry level). The risk IMO is minimal, and the reward potential is very large.
Mike
----------------------------
"don't blame SCHB. Lately I noticed with OTC/pink stocks SCHB has been showing orders same as ECN!!!! I think since they are leaving the MM business and they don't trade the spread anymore and represent the order at the price its at. Say if I put a order .0511 for some stock SCHB will come up to .0511 on level II. Which basically means that the SCHB asks .0002 are just .0002 sells some big investors got out. All the other MMs with .0002 sells are asking .0003 because they want to get a buy at .0003 before they fill the sell @ .0002."
Quacker, thanks for posting it. Although old, the basics (for which I'm here) still apply:
* Company appears very undervalued with a market cap of just $9 million and looking for revenues to increase to over $50 million in two years
* Company’s infrastructure allows it to handle projects from start to finish, thus allowing for speed, excellent service, cost-effectiveness, and quality control
* Education market has huge demand for modular structures and bond acts to finance explosive growth
* GDVI has a good management team that is committed to major success
* Global will be making further synergistic acquisitions to handle demand and generate additional revenues
* Holding company concept provides diversification and generates multiple sources of revenue, thus mitigating risk
* Patient shareholders should enjoy substantial percentage gains from current depressed level of 7 cents (from $0.34 high last year, and with improved business environment since then, with only a marginal increase in the OS's).
Mike
Loading zone, IMO. Bought more @ 0.0007.
Good luck all,
Mike
***RB MB DD
I see RB has started today a new MB. You can access it using the Board Central:
http://www.boardcentral.com/aios/aios.cgi
Mike
PS: Below is one of the several DD contributions made by ednc_6 on the RB Message Board (MB)
_________________________________
By: ednc_6
05 Jan 2005, 04:32 PM EST
Msg. 15 of 15
Jump to msg. #
**** MMON DD ****
Please cut/paste this and add new info. Thanks.
Marmion Air Service specializes in Explosion-Proof Heating, Ventilation, Cooling Pressurization and chemical filtration solutions for mission-critical applications. Our reputation is based on superior equipment and service, from south Texas and Louisiana refineries to drilling rigs and chemical plants in Saudi Arabia and South America. Our products are designed for application in Petro-Chemical, Industrial, Agricultural, waste water, pulp and paper, elect. sust., medicine, and Aerospace.
Marmion Air Service commenced operation in Texas in 1998 in residential and commercial HVAC service. The company is recognized by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation - TACLB019367E - as a contractor in the field of Heat Ventilation and Air Conditioning. The company is in the process of working towards third party certifications on selected manufactured equipment.
History______http://4lfs.com/news.asp
News_______http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MMON.OB
Filings______http://knobias.10kwizard.com/files.php
(current as of 12-31-04 MRMN)
Chart_______http://quotes.nasdaq.com/quote.dll?page=charting&mode=basics&selected=mmon
Website_____http://www.marmionair.com/
**Share Structure:
11-22-04 (per 10QSB):
Series A preferred stock: 500,000,000 shares authorized,
2,870,000 shares issued and outstanding.
Common stock: 3,000,000,000 shares authorized,
298,430 shares issued and outstanding
http://knobias.10kwizard.com/filing.php?repo=tenk&ipage=3108468&doc=1&num=3&total=35...
Quacker,
Glad to see someone else is looking into GDVI. I'm also a GDVI veteran, and I strongly believe that in some near future we stand a very good chance to leave the penny land.
I used to post on RB, but since last week for some reason I only can read, but I can't post over there. You can use either the DD Machine, or the Central Board sites to access it. Except for some bad apples (same as on any other RB boards), you'll find some good posters, especially "Climber" (I wish he would also join us here). He took his time (from his East Coast location) to visit the Company twice (if I'm not mistaken), and calls Phil almost weekly.
All that GDVI needs is some help from us. If you go to Board Central, or the Yahoo group, you'll see that (except for the RB, and the CBS Market Watch, where I also post now and then - you'll recognize me) not many other boards (and just a few people) know about our sleeping beauty. We have to do something about it. Although I'm quite bussy with my two R&D high tech companies, I was doing my part, and I think some other people should start doing it. No pain, no gain! We should ask as many people as we can to jump in and contribute to a GDVI advertising campaign. No pumping, just facts! And the facts speak for themselves.
This company deserves a lot more than what it gets, simply because so very few people have ever heard about it. Once they (potential new investors, and I mean investors not traders) have the chance doing their DD, I believe they will find GDVI's story worth looking into.
Best 2 you,
Mike
FYI: Regulation SHO: This Could Get Interesting
Source: The OTC Journal, today's edition
The OTC Journal archives reveal I have written three editions on the subject of illegal naked short selling over the past two years. It is a fascinating subject, and one that is back in the news as a new SEC regulation goes into effect this week.
If you have an interest in this subject and want to review the past editions, here they are: 4/19/03,5/18/03, and 2/4/04.
Illegal naked short selling has been problematic for microcap stocks for many years, but the pendulum began to swing the other way in early 2004. Normal short selling requires the seller to borrow the shares ahead of executing a sell trade in shares not owned. The seller hopes to buy them back later at a lower price and lock in a profit.
For many years short sellers have been able to simply sell unlimited supplies of small stocks through overseas brokerage firms, even though no shares have been borrowed. Thanks to loopholes in the clearing system, these sellers are never forced to deliver the shares. In essence, short sellers have been able to "counterfeit" supplies of stock by avoiding the regulations from offshore.
Small and microcap companies have been particularly vulnerable to this practice as there is often little institutional support for the stocks. When a stock starts trading poorly, small investors tend to panic and sell, forcing prices even lower. Once an enormous short position is established, a smear campaign often follows, characterized by negative articles from questionable sources and malicious posting on message boards with no disclosure. The stock ends up trading so poorly the company cannot raise equity capital, and many die a premature death.
A high profile example of this kind of practice occurred in the middle of December. Sirius Satellite Radio (NASDAQ: SIRI) had been on a tear over the past several months. Clearly the stock was richly valued and extended, and it was rumored short sellers were getting killed. Miraculously a complete hatchet job article appeared in Barron's, which sent the stock temporarily plummeting. While indeed, there was a strong argument the stock was overvalued, the article was completely one sided and gave no credence to the growth argument. A similar article in the Wall Street Journal was much more balanced. If you think the Barron's article was an accident, and short sellers didn't know about it in advance, you are living in LaLa land.
Small companies have been hounding regulators for years to take steps to eliminate these oppressive practices. In February of last year the NASD one upped the SEC by implementing the Affirmative Determination Rule, which required US brokerage firms to affirmatively determine if an overseas brokerage firm selling shares through them can actually deliver the shares. This made for some exciting moves in heavily shorted stocks.
The SEC has finally implemented the long awaited Regulation SHO. Regulation SHO went into effect on January 3rd. Beginning January 10th, each day a list of securities with excessive open naked short positions will be publicly published.
This required list is referred to as the Threshold Securities List. Under Regulation SHO, threshold securities are defined by two criteria: 1) there are at least 10,000 shares in aggregate failed deliveries for the security for five consecutive settlement days and, 2) these fails to deliver constitute 0.5% or more of outstanding shares.
If the failed deliveries for the stocks on the Threshold List are not rectified within 13 trading days, the market maker to whom the shares was sold will effect a "buy in" in the open market.
Each exchange is required to maintain a daily Threshold List. I am guessing the list will be found at the web site of the exchange; i.e. www.nasdaq.com and www.otcbb.com.
It will be interesting to start monitoring the Threshold Lists for unusual movements to the upside.
I am not opposed to the practice of short selling. I believe all investors should be able to bet on any stock in either direction. I am opposed to sophisticated fund managers with offshore accounts using loopholes to initiate trades you that you and I cannot execute through our regular brokerage accounts. If they can do, we should all be able to do it.
The Threshold List could become a favorite resource for locating trading ideas on the long side. It might become the sport of hedge fund managers. These new regulations are emerging out of down side excesses from the the 2000 to 2003 time frame. The pendulum is finally swinging back to a level playing field. These actions by the regulators will help the OTC Bulletin Board become the incubator it is intended to be.
FYI: Regulation SHO: This Could Get Interesting
Source: The OTC Journal, today's edition
The OTC Journal archives reveal I have written three editions on the subject of illegal naked short selling over the past two years. It is a fascinating subject, and one that is back in the news as a new SEC regulation goes into effect this week.
If you have an interest in this subject and want to review the past editions, here they are: 4/19/03,5/18/03, and 2/4/04.
Illegal naked short selling has been problematic for microcap stocks for many years, but the pendulum began to swing the other way in early 2004. Normal short selling requires the seller to borrow the shares ahead of executing a sell trade in shares not owned. The seller hopes to buy them back later at a lower price and lock in a profit.
For many years short sellers have been able to simply sell unlimited supplies of small stocks through overseas brokerage firms, even though no shares have been borrowed. Thanks to loopholes in the clearing system, these sellers are never forced to deliver the shares. In essence, short sellers have been able to "counterfeit" supplies of stock by avoiding the regulations from offshore.
Small and microcap companies have been particularly vulnerable to this practice as there is often little institutional support for the stocks. When a stock starts trading poorly, small investors tend to panic and sell, forcing prices even lower. Once an enormous short position is established, a smear campaign often follows, characterized by negative articles from questionable sources and malicious posting on message boards with no disclosure. The stock ends up trading so poorly the company cannot raise equity capital, and many die a premature death.
A high profile example of this kind of practice occurred in the middle of December. Sirius Satellite Radio (NASDAQ: SIRI) had been on a tear over the past several months. Clearly the stock was richly valued and extended, and it was rumored short sellers were getting killed. Miraculously a complete hatchet job article appeared in Barron's, which sent the stock temporarily plummeting. While indeed, there was a strong argument the stock was overvalued, the article was completely one sided and gave no credence to the growth argument. A similar article in the Wall Street Journal was much more balanced. If you think the Barron's article was an accident, and short sellers didn't know about it in advance, you are living in LaLa land.
Small companies have been hounding regulators for years to take steps to eliminate these oppressive practices. In February of last year the NASD one upped the SEC by implementing the Affirmative Determination Rule, which required US brokerage firms to affirmatively determine if an overseas brokerage firm selling shares through them can actually deliver the shares. This made for some exciting moves in heavily shorted stocks.
The SEC has finally implemented the long awaited Regulation SHO. Regulation SHO went into effect on January 3rd. Beginning January 10th, each day a list of securities with excessive open naked short positions will be publicly published.
This required list is referred to as the Threshold Securities List. Under Regulation SHO, threshold securities are defined by two criteria: 1) there are at least 10,000 shares in aggregate failed deliveries for the security for five consecutive settlement days and, 2) these fails to deliver constitute 0.5% or more of outstanding shares.
If the failed deliveries for the stocks on the Threshold List are not rectified within 13 trading days, the market maker to whom the shares was sold will effect a "buy in" in the open market.
Each exchange is required to maintain a daily Threshold List. I am guessing the list will be found at the web site of the exchange; i.e. www.nasdaq.com and www.otcbb.com.
It will be interesting to start monitoring the Threshold Lists for unusual movements to the upside.
I am not opposed to the practice of short selling. I believe all investors should be able to bet on any stock in either direction. I am opposed to sophisticated fund managers with offshore accounts using loopholes to initiate trades you that you and I cannot execute through our regular brokerage accounts. If they can do, we should all be able to do it.
The Threshold List could become a favorite resource for locating trading ideas on the long side. It might become the sport of hedge fund managers. These new regulations are emerging out of down side excesses from the the 2000 to 2003 time frame. The pendulum is finally swinging back to a level playing field. These actions by the regulators will help the OTC Bulletin Board become the incubator it is intended to be.
My shares are NOT FOR SALE, until this goes into pennies!
Mike
Prekupec, where have you seen the 500MM OS? Do you have a source for that info?
Mike
Since the R/S, only less than 120MM shares have been bought by the Directors, as part of the compensation plan. Check out the S-8 fillings:
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/filings.jsp?symbol=mmon
Mile
Message Boards & the "DD Machine."
Bear & Fung, if you care to know what most other MOBL (or any other) boards are talking about, go to Board Central (I'm posting from there):
http://www.boardcentral.com/aios/aios.cgi
Choose the stock, # of posts (5 or 25), or see what's hot, and what's not, by clicking on the "Most Popular" boards.
The yahoo board, and for a good DD on any stock, log into the "DD Machine:"
http://www.ddmachine.com/default.asp?s=mobl.ob
Mike
MobilePro led the way as Maryland firms beat S&P
On Sunday I was very pleased to find this news in the AOL "Business Headlines" section. This is very good.
-----------------------------------
Business Headlines
• Another good year, providing the dollar doesn't sink too fast, rates stay reasonable
balimoresun.com - Jan 2 2005 08:58:32 GMT
• MobilePro led the way as Maryland firms beat S&P
balimoresun.com - Jan 2 2005 08:58:32 GMT
• Financial TV guru assailed over ads
balimoresun.com - Jan 2 2005 08:58:32 GMT
• As 2005 arrives, Enron is reaching for closure
Sun-Sentinel.com - Jan 2 2005 08:47:12 GMT
• Eye in the sky keeps tabs on productivity
Sun-Sentinel.com - Jan 2 2005 08:47:12 GMT
If you don’t have AOL, or haven’t seen it as yet, here it is (if you've already seen it, sorry for the dust):
MobilePro led the way as Maryland firms beat S&P
By Jamie Smith Hopkins
Sun Staff
Originally published January 2, 2005
Maryland's publicly traded companies as a group had reason to celebrate on New Year's Eve - they ended 2004 with stock gains of 18 percent, double the Standard & Poor's 500 index.
The Sun-Bloomberg index, which tracks the stocks of 90 businesses based in the state, bumped downward until August and then rose quickly. Six companies posted increases for every four that didn't.
Half of the top 10 were high-tech or biotech companies. And more than half of the worst performers - like Ciena Corp. - ply their trade in those sectors, too. That's life in Maryland, which has worked to make a name for itself as a research-and-development state.
"Biotechs and technology companies are very volatile - they'll always have their ups and downs," said Aris Melissaratos, the state's secretary of business and economic development. "I think tech and biotech drove performance in 2004, and it's going to drive it in 2005."
The Sun-Bloomberg index closed Friday at 313.62, its high point for the year.
Its 18 percent increase since the closing bell on Dec. 31, 2003, beats the S&P 500, up 9 percent; the Nasdaq composite index, up 8.6 percent; and the Dow Jones industrial average, up 3.2 percent.
Dan McHugh, president of Lombard Securities in Fells Point, credits luck of the draw rather than geography: It was a good year for financial and small-cap companies, and Maryland has a generous helping of both.
Most of the state's marquee companies did particularly well.
The stocks of investment firms Legg Mason Inc. and T. Rowe Price Group Inc. jumped 42 percent and 31 percent, respectively. Spice maker McCormick & Co. Inc. rose 28 percent. Power-tool maker Black & Decker Corp. rose 79 percent.
Investors pushed up stock values 53 percent for men's retailer Jos. A. Bank Clothiers Inc.; 7 percent for MedImmune Inc., maker of nasal flu vaccine FluMist; 8 percent for military contractor Lockheed Martin Corp.; and 12 percent for Constellation Energy Group Inc., one of the state's few Fortune 500 companies and the owner of Baltimore Gas and Electric Co.
The Sun-Bloomberg index, formed at the end of 1994, finished at its highest New Year's Eve closing. But it has yet to fully recover after the temporary euphoria of the dot-com craze. The index is 10 percent below its peak in March 2000.
Its best yearly gain was 2003, when it rose more than 40 percent after losses the previous three years.
In 2004, the index's top performer was Bethesda-based MobilePro Corp., a wireless technology and broadband telecommunications company once floundering so badly that three years ago it had to engineer a reverse stock split of 200 to 1.
Last year, its stock jumped from just under 3 cents a share to 21.6 cents, up 645 percent.
During that time, MobilePro acquired 14 companies and began producing revenue after none at all in 2003. It's not profitable yet - losses quadrupled in the third quarter because of acquisitions - but investors won't have to wait long, promised Jay O. Wright, MobilePro's chairman and chief executive.
"We're going to be profitable in 2005," he said.
Silver Spring biotech company United Therapeutics Corp. made the top 10 - with stock appreciation of 97 percent - because it turned profitable for the first time last year. It also won Food and Drug Administration approval for an intravenous version of its pulmonary arterial hypertension drug, Remodulin.
"If you look at the biotechnology universe, there aren't that many companies that are actually profitable," said Jay Markowitz, a biotech analyst at T. Rowe Price who follows the company. "Now I think investors are anticipating increased growth."
Other top performers included beleaguered chemical-maker W.R. Grace & Co., whose stock rose 430 percent on hopes that the Republican-controlled Congress will pass a national settlement of asbestos claims; designer-jean maker I.C. Isaacs & Co. Inc., whose stock increased 400 percent after the company become profitable after years of losses; and health care company Dialysis Corp. of America, which gave shareholders a two-for-one split at the beginning of last year and then watched its stock run up about 630 percent.
But last year was unpleasant for Medifast Inc. of Owings Mills, a weight-loss company that saw its stock slide 75 percent to $3.52, making it the Sun-Bloomberg worst performer of 2004. Net income was down 25 percent in the third quarter, which Medifast blamed in part on quadrupling insurance and legal expenses. It is fighting three lawsuits it calls "frivolous."
Other poor performers included formerly high-flying high-techs such as Manugistics Group Inc., a software company that saw its stock slide 54 percent last year, and Ciena, the computer networking provider whose stock slumped 49 percent.
Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc., a television broadcasting company that faced controversy by planning to air a program critical of Sen. John Kerry shortly before the presidential election, also secured a place in the bottom 10 with a stock slide of nearly 40 percent.
And Spherix Inc., a Beltsville company with a call-center business and a sugar substitute called tagatose, has been fielding call after call from investors wanting to know why the stock plummeted 50 percent last year.
"We don't really know why," said Richard C. Levin, Spherix's acting president and chief executive. The company lost a federal contract for national parks reservation services but recently won its protest.
The biggest problem for Spherix appears to be inaction: the Danish firm to which it licensed tagatose has yet to build a large plant to produce the sweetener.
Maryland businesses ought to do well on the whole this year, said Daraius Irani, director of applied economics at RESI, Towson University's consulting arm. A growing number are tapping into defense and homeland security, markets with a funding supply conveniently located next door in Washington.
"They are well-positioned to reap the rewards," Irani said.
***Telecom & Wireless Free Daily Newsletters:
http://www.dailylead.com/latestIssue.jsp?i=18500&l=1916719
http://email.wirelessdesignmag.com/cgi-bin7/DM/y/edCj0IQcnz0DNV0UXu0Ep
Good info for serious MOBL investors,
Mike
Positives and Negatives from the last SEC filling.
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/filings.jsp?symbol=GDVI
(I previously posted it on the RB MB)
Positives:
*Total assets increased from $4.5 MM last Q, to $5.6 MM now
* Financials:
- Total revenues increased to $ 4,326,779 in the six months ended October 31, 2004 from $2,633,337 in the six months ended October 31, 2003. Sales are beginning to increase due to the addition of two experienced salesmen last quarter. Global Modular is becoming accepted by the school districts as a reliable manufacturer of modular school classroom buildings.
- Cost of revenues was $2,957,616 and $$1,669,083, respectively for the six months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003. Gross profit was $1,369,163 and $964,254, respectively for the six months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003. This is due to Global Modular increasing the sales staff and becoming known in the modular school classroom market during the six months ended October 31, 2004.
- Total operating expenses increased to $ 1,108,869 in the six months ended October 31, 2004 from $819,538in the six months ended October 31, 2003. The is mainly attributable to increases in selling, general, and administrative costs in connection with the increased sales and operations of Global Modular and MBS Constructions
- Overall positive: “As of October 31, 2004, the Company had a working capital surplus of $1,911,550 and a gain from operations of $110,496 for the six months ended October 31, 2004. The Company generated a deficit in cash flow from operations of $1,027,112 for the six-month period ended October 31, 2004. The deficit in cash flow from operating activities for the period is primarily attributable to the Company's net adjusted for depreciation and amortization of $115,830, common stock issued to consultants and employees in exchange for compensation of $130,176, an increase in accounts receivable of $490,517, an increase in inventory of $1,057,073, an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $158,055, an increase in employee advances of $43,286, a decrease in deferred revenue of $34,877 and an increase in accounts payable of $400,194.”
* “As of October 31, 2004 the Company had seventy-five employees. The Company anticipates that the number of employees will satisfy its production backlog during the next six months.”
* Very positive: “The Company’s current backlog has increased to approximately $4,000,000 as compared to approximately $250,000 the same period one year ago.”
* Very positive: “At some point during the current or successive fiscal year, Global Modular intends to expand its product line to serve the commercial/business sector. This sector consists of retail, industrial and institutional (including educational institutions that reside on private property). This sector adheres to building designs and specifications administered by the Department of Housing (DOH)”
Negatives:
* Weighted average shares (basic and diluted) outstanding have increases since last year from 243 MM to 277 MM. While dilution is not good, the increase is not by much, and the OS is still lower compared to other OTCBB at the same price, most of which hardly can show any income.
* The Langley Deal: “Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company issued 25,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock (“Consideration Stock”) to be held in escrow, in exchange for Langley Shares (“Langley Consideration Shares”) equal to the same value of the Consideration Stock. The Consideration Stock was released, however the Company did not receive the Langley Consideration Shares. Subsequent to the date of financial statements, the Company filed an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Fresno Division, against Langley for, among other cause of action, securities fraud, breach of contract and rescission in relation to the Agreement. The Company has demanded the 2,500,000 shares of Consideration Stock wrongfully transferred to Langley being return to the Company and the Consideration Stock has been coded so as not be considered issued. “
(a) since this was not a cash transfer, the deal was not good, IMO, for GDVI
(b) GDVI, has now to tighten it’s belt, or if capital work is needed I think they should be able to obtain a bank loan, under much better conditions. So, this might actually turn to e a positive, IMO.
Mike
***GDVI DD
1. Start with the older, but nicelly done DD.
http://pennystocktalk.com/gdvi.htm
2. Although old, if you like what you see, go to the next step, and see what people on the other boards say (using the Board Central):
http://www.boardcentral.com/aios/aios.cgi
As you'll notice not many people know about this great (IMO), high growth potential stock.
3. To learn more (including opinions, SEC fillings, graphs, etc.) go to the "DD Machine:"
http://www.ddmachine.com/default.asp?s=gdvi.ob
If you've gone through all the pain (no pain no gain!), I trust you'll like what you see, and join the longs (am I the only one here?)
Mike
Kris, I believe this is going to go into pennies soon. Why? If the absolutelly worse crap think (GAWD) did a ride (prior to their third R/S last year from 0.0003 to 0.015 (which almost made up for my previous loses there), MMON can do a lot better.
Think about it: The only business GAWD has (and they are good at it) is printing shares and dumping them. No other Company can "proud" itself with the kind of dilution they brought to the shareholders as they have:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=GAWD.OB&a=10&b=12&c=2001&d=00&e=4&f=2005&...
I JUST STAY AWAY from that CRAP, although now and then, whenever they came out with other crap "news," I still post on some GWAD boards so as to make the newbies aware of those two con artists (Rick and Flo).
MMON has a good chance, IMO. However, one should not bet everything on this alone. Diversify. There they are many other stocks out there. Check out also: TSBI, BTOO, CYBT, and also try to get into PRRM (at 0.0001 if you can - you might have to wait a week or more to get it at this price, but you might get lucky). Or if you like better ones, check out: MOBL, COVD, VFIN, and (especially) GDVI.
Mike
JUST STAY AWAY from this CRAP! Or, you'll join the ones before you that will come to regret it. This is (by far) the champion diluting scam. See below:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=GAWD.OB&a=10&b=12&c=2001&d=00&e=4&f=2005&...
Mike
1. The move down was to be expected w/o news. After profit taking, now we are in the accumulating mode.
2. If the rumor (a large contract) comes true, this should move into pennies fast.
3. We might still end up in the green today, and move again up tomorrow (w/ or w/o news), IMO.
Mike
Time to MOVE, IMO. Do your DD:
For a good DD on this, and any other stock, I recommend you the "DD Machine:"
http://www.ddmachine.com/default.asp?s=tsbi.ob
You have in one place everything you need: yahoo news, SEC fillings, graphs and opinions, and so on. While there check out the Yahoo message board. Some people over there are quite bulish on this.
Mike
You are very welcomed Kris. I'm using it (the DD machine) for all my initial DD needs.
Any idea what caused it to move today? I expected it to start moving, but not as furious as it did this AN. I simply can't explain it, unless the big drop lately was caused (as I expected) by the year's end tax selling season. I hope this is the explanation, and if so the move will continue for a while.
Since I couldn't find any reasonable explanation for the drop, I loaded my boat over the last two weeks. The financials start looking good (in fact they just started making money the last 2 Q's), so I truly expect it to leave the subpenny domain soon.
Best 2 you,
Mike
***MMON DD
1. DD Machine:
http://www.ddmachine.com/default.asp?s=mmon.ob
2. Message Boards:
Board Central:
http://www.boardcentral.com/aios/aios.cgi
Niz's Billionaire Boyz Club Member Forum:
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB00412
3. Indicators:
First Support level: 0.0007
Pivot Point: 0.0011
First Resistance (R1) level: 0.0021
R2=0.0023, R3=0.0035
If you care to learn about the Support, Pivot Point, and Resistance level (indicators that the MM's use), and how to calculate them yourself:
http://www.e-minidaytrader.com/snr.html
4. Opinion:
Since the PPS ended up at HOD (High of the day), expect a nice gap to develop tomorrow morning. This can go into pennies, short-term, IMO.
mike306oh