Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well, I must be one of those original rare buyers then. I bought in July '09, long before that very low share price and long before I found out about this board and have been accumulating ever since. Still haven't sold 1 single share. If you think I'm leaving anytime soon, you've got another guess coming.
Not quite sure what to make of this, but if true, gold will most certainly take off to unheard of levels. It's just a matter of time, IMO.
Thomas Jefferson, declared, "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Did Jefferson have a crystal ball when he spoke these words? Has a private bank taken control over our nation's money supply?
The following is a conversation with Mr. Ron Supinski of the Public Information Department of the San Francisco, Federal Reserve Bank. This is an account of that conversation reconstructed to the best of my ability from notes taken during the conversation on October 8, 1992.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CALLER - Mr. Supinski, does my country own the Federal Reserve System?
MR. SUPINSKI - We are an agency of the government.
CALLER - That's not my question. Is it owned by my country?
MR. SUPINSKI - It is an agency of the government created by congress.
CALLER - Is the Federal Reserve a Corporation?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Does my government own any of the stock in the Federal Reserve?
MR. SUPINSKI - No, it is owned by the member banks.
CALLER - Are the member banks private corporations?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Are Federal Reserve Notes backed by anything?
MR. SUPINSKI -Yes, by the assets of the Federal Reserve but, primarily by the power of congress to lay tax on the people.
CALLER - Did you say, by the power to collect taxes is what backs Federal Reserve Notes?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - What are the total assets of the Federal Reserve?
MR. SUPINSKI - The San Francisco Bank has $36 Billion in assets.
CALLER - What are these assets comprised of?
MR. SUPINSKI - Gold, the Federal Reserve Bank itself and government securities.
CALLER - What value does the Federal Reserve Bank carry gold per oz. on their books?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't have that information but the San Francisco Bank has $1.6 billion in gold.
CALLER - Are you saying the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has $1.6 billion in gold, the bank itself and the balance of the assets is government securities?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes.
CALLER - Where does the Federal Reserve get Federal Reserve Notes from?
MR. SUPINSKI - They are authorized by the Treasury.
CALLER - How much does the Federal Reserve pay for a $10 Federal Reserve Note?
MR. SUPINSKI - Fifty to seventy cents.
CALLER - How much do they pay for a $100.00 Federal Reserve Note?
MR. SUPINSKI - The same fifty to seventy cents.
CALLER - To pay only fifty cents for a $100.00 is a tremendous gain, isn't it?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - According to the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve pays $20.60 per 1,000 denomination or a little over two cents for a $100.00 bill, is that correct?
MR. SUPINSKI - That is probably close.
CALLER - Doesn't the Federal Reserve use the Federal Reserve Notes that cost about two cents each to purchase U.S. Bonds from the government?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, but there is more to it than that.
CALLER - Basically, that is what happens?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, basically you are correct.
CALLER - How many Federal Reserve Notes are in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - $263 billion and we can only account for a small percentage.
CALLER - Where did they go?
MR. SUPINSKI - Peoples mattress, buried in their back yards and illegal drug money.
CALLER - Since the debt is payable in Federal Reserve Notes, how can the $4 trillion national debt be paid-off with the total Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.
CALLER - If the Federal Government would collect every Federal Reserve Note in circulation would it be mathematically possible to pay the $4 trillion national debt?
MR. SUPINSKI - No
CALLER - Am I correct when I say, $1 deposited in a member bank $8 can be lent out through Fractional Reserve Policy?
MR. SUPINSKI - About $7.
CALLER - Correct me if I am wrong but, $7 of additional Federal Reserve Notes were never put in circulation. But, for lack of better words were "created out of thin air " in the form of credits and the two cents per denomination were not paid either. In other words, the Federal Reserve Notes were not physically printed but, in reality were created by a journal entry and lent at interest. Is that correct?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Is that the reason there are only $263 billion Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - That is part of the reason.
CALLER - Am I mistaking that when the Federal Reserve Act was passed (on Christmas Eve) in 1913, it transferred the power to coin and issue our nations money and to regulate the value thereof from Congress to a Private corporation. And my country now borrows what should be our own money from the Federal Reserve (a private corporation) plus interest. Is that correct and the debt can never be paid off under the current money system of country?
MR. SUPINSKI - Basically, yes.
CALLER - I smell a rat, do you?
MR. SUPINSKI - I am sorry, I can't answer that, I work here.
CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been independently audited?
MR. SUPINSKI - We are audited.
CALLER - Why is there a current House Resolution 1486 calling for a complete audit of the Federal Reserve by the G.A.O. and why is the Federal Reserve resisting?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.
CALLER - Does the Federal Reserve regulate the value of Federal Reserve Notes and interest rates?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Explain how the Federal Reserve System can be Constitutional if, only the Congress of the U.S., which comprises of the Senate and the House of Representatives has the power to coin and issue our money supply and regulate the value thereof? [Article 1 Section 1 and Section 8] Nowhere, in the Constitution does it give Congress the power or authority to transfer any powers granted under the Constitution to a private corporation or, does it?
MR. SUPINSKI - I am not an expert on constitutional law. I can refer you to our legal department.
CALLER - I can tell you I have read the Constitution. It does NOT provide that any power granted can be transferred to a private corporation. Doesn't it specifically state, all other powers not granted are reserved to the States and to the citizens? Does that mean to a private corporation?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't think so, but we were created by Congress.
CALLER - Would you agree it is our country and it should be our money as provided by our Constitution?
MR. SUPINSKI - I understand what you are saying.
CALLER - Why should we borrow our own money from a private consortium of bankers? Isn't this why we had a revolution, created a separate sovereign nation and a Bill of Rights?
MR. SUPINSKI - (Declined to answer).
CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court?
MR. SUPINSKI - I believe there has been court cases on the matter.
CALLER - Have they been Supreme Court Cases?
MR. SUPINSKI - I think so, but I am not sure.
CALLER - Didn't the Supreme Court declare unanimously in A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. vs. U.S. and Carter vs. Carter Coal Co. the corporative-state arrangement an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power? ["The power conferred is the power to regulate. This is legislative delegation in its most obnoxious form; for it is not even delegation to an official or an official body, presumptively disinterested, but to private persons."
Carter vs. Carter Coal Co.]
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know, I can refer you to our legal department.
CALLER - Isn't the current money system a house of cards that must fall because, the debt can mathematically never be paid-off?
MR. SUPINSKI - It appears that way. I can tell you have been looking into this matter and are very knowledgeable. However, we do have a solution.
CALLER - What is the solution?
MR. SUPINSKI - The Debit Card.
CALLER - Do you mean under the E.F.T. Act (Electronic Funds Transfer)? Isn't that very frightening, when one considers the capabilities of computers? It would provide the government and all it's agencies, including the Federal Reserve such information as: You went to the gas station @ 2:30 and bought $10.00 of unleaded gas @ $1.41 per gallon and then you went to the grocery store @ 2:58 and bought bread, lunch meat and milk for $12.32 and then went to the drug store @ 3:30 and bought cold medicine for $5.62. In other words, they would know where we go, when we went, how much we paid, how much the merchant paid and how much profit he made. Under the E.F.T. they will literally know everything about us. Isn't that kind of scary?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, it makes you wonder.
CALLER - I smell a GIANT RAT that has overthrown my constitution. Aren't we paying tribute in the form of income taxes to a consortium of private bankers?
MR. SUPINSKI - I can't call it tribute, it is interest.
CALLER - Haven't all elected officials taken an oath of office to preserve and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic? Isn't the Federal Reserve a domestic enemy?
MR. SUPINSKI - I can't say that.
CALLER - Our elected officials and members of the Federal Reserve are guilty of aiding and abetting the overthrowing of my Constitution and that is treason. Isn't the punishment of treason death?
MR. SUPINSKI - I believe so.
CALLER - Thank you for your time and information and if I may say so, I think you should take the necessary steps to protect you and your family and withdraw your money from the banks before the collapse, I am.
MR. SUPINSKI - It doesn't look good.
CALLER - May God have mercy on the souls who are behind this unconstitutional and criminal act called the Federal Reserve. When the ALMIGHTY MASS awakens to this giant hoax, they will not take it with a grain of salt. It has been a pleasure talking to you and I thank you for your time. I hope you will take my advice before it does collapse.
MR. SUPINSKI - Unfortunately, it does not look good.
CALLER - Have a good day and thanks for your time.
MR. SUPINSKI - Thanks for calling.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the reader has any doubts to the validity of this conversation, call your nearest Federal Reserve Bank, YOU KNOW THE QUESTIONS TO ASK! You won't find them listed under the Federal Government. They are in the white pages, along with Federal Express, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), and any other business. Find out for yourself if all this is true. And then, go to your local law library and look up the case of Lewis vs. U.S., case #80-5905, 9th Circuit, June 24, 1982. It reads in part: "Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the federal reserve are NOT federal instrumentalities . . . but are independent and privately owned and controlled corporations . . . federal reserve banks are listed neither as `wholly owned' government corporations [under 31 U.S.C. Section 846] nor as 'mixed ownership' corporations [under 31 U.S.C. Section 856] . . .
28 U.S.C. Sections 1346(b), 2671. `Federal agency' is defined as: the executive departments, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States, and corporations acting primarily as instrumentalities of the United States, but does not include any contractors with the United States . . .
There are no sharp criteria for determining whether an entity is a federal agency within the meaning of the Act, but the critical factor is the existence of the federal government control over the `detailed physical performance' and `day to day operations' of that entity. Other factors courts have considered include whether the entity is an independent corporation . . . whether the government is involved in the entity's finances, . . . and whether the mission of the entity furthers the policy of the United States . . . Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks, and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities . . .
It is evident from the legislative history of the Federal Reserve Act that Congress did not intend to give the federal government direction over the daily operation of the Reserve Banks . . .
The fact that the Federal Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks does not make them federal agencies under the Act . . . Unlike typical federal agencies, each bank is empowered to hire and fire employees at will. Bank employees do not participate in the Civil Service Retirement System. They are covered by worker's compensation insurance, purchased by the Bank, rather than the Federal Employees Compensation Act. Employees traveling on Bank business are not subject to federal travel regulations and do not receive government employee discounts on lodging and services . . .
Finally, the Banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own name. 12 U.S.C. Section 341. They carry their own liability insurance and typically process and handle their own claims . . ."
According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, "When the Federal Reserve was created, its stock was sold to the member banks." ("The Hats The Federal Reserve Wears", published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia)
The original Stock-holders of the Federal Reserve Banks in 1913 were the Rockefeller's, J.P. Morgan, Rothschild's, Lazard Freres, Schoellkopf, Kuhn-Loeb, Warburgs, Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs.
The MONEY-CHANGERS wanted to be insured they had a monopoly over our money supply, so Congress passed into law Title 12, Section 284 of the United States Code. Section 284 specifically states, "NO STOCK ALLOWED TO THE U.S."
* Monopoly - "A privilege or peculiar advantage vested in one or more persons or companies, consisting in the exclusive right (or power) to carry on a particular business or trade, manufacture a particular article, or control the sale of the whole supply of a particular commodity, A form of market structure in which only a few firms dominate the total sales of a product or service.
`Monopoly', as prohibited by Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, has two elements: possession of a monopoly power in relevant market and willful acquisition or maintenance of that power, as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior power, business acumen, or historical product. A monopoly condemned by the Sherman Act is the power to fix prices, or exclude competition, coupled with policies designed to use and preserve that power." (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition)
The Federal Reserve Act goes one step farther, "No Senator or Representative in Congress shall be a member of the Federal Reserve Board or an officer or director of a Federal Reserve Bank." They didn't want We The People to have any say in the operation of their monopoly through our elected officials.
What can you do about it? Contact your congressman and senators to protest and demand hearings to investigate the unconstitutionality of the Federal Reserve Act. You can find their name, address, email address, phone number or fax number at http://thomas.loc.gov/ . But most of all, remove your support for the Federal Reserve System by using the statutes to remove your collateral from the system. Remove your assets from their control, remove your Strawman Corporation from their control.
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/Federal-Reserve.html
Carbon credits are synonomous with the issue of global warming and the burning of fossil fuels has been questionably attributed to global warming.
SIP data provide more interpretable information than the simple IP measure discussed above; however, this is still being researched and is rarely used as a production method. SIP data may be able to distinguish between the different minerals (metallic minerals, graphite, and clay) that produce IP anomalies. ;)
Well, oil is also a commodity and does seem to frequently track with gold. Many don't like gold's volatility and oil has provided a more stable platform in the past. BUT, with all the turmoil going on in world economies right now and the big push for green energy, that trend may be shifting somewhat, at least for now.
Geophysics Video
INDUCED POLARIZATION (IP), A Short Tutorial
Basic Concept: Induced Polarization (IP) is commonly used in the mining industry to locate metallic sulfides such as pyrite, chalcopyrite, and other metallic minerals. Like the magnetic method, it provides data on the distribution of metallic minerals and could be regarded as mapping changes in lithology. Induced Polarization anomalies are found over metallic sulfides, graphite zones, and some clays.
Induced Polarization is an electrical method that measures the change in the measured resistivity of the ground with frequency. Numerous electrode arrays can be used to measure IP data, several of which are illustrated in figure 1.
Figure 1: Electrode arrays used to measure resistivity.
The Dipole-dipole array is used to illustrate the waveforms. This is probably the most commonly used array for measuring Induced Polarization. Two methods are used to obtain IP data: time domain and frequency domain. In time domain, a constant current is passed into the ground using two of the four electrodes. This current is then rapidly switched off. During this off time, the remaining two electrodes measure the resulting voltage. If an IP effect is present, the voltage across these electrodes will not suddenly return to zero as the current is turned off, but will decay to zero over a period of time, usually within a few seconds, as illustrated in figure 2. Simple IP measurements usually integrate the IP voltage over a specified time period, say T1 and T2 providing a single number that is a measure of the IP response. However, if a more detailed analysis is needed, the full voltage and current waveforms are recorded. The units used to measure the IP effect, called chargeability, are mV/V. Using the Fourier transform to convert the data to frequency domain, these data can then be converted to the variation of IP response with frequency, called Spectral IP (SIP). In frequency domain, the IP effect is measured at different current waveform frequencies. If more than two frequencies are used, SIP data are recorded.
Figure 2: Induced Polarization waveform.
Induced Polarization surveys require electrodes, a data recorder, current transmitter, and a power source for the transmitter. An example of an IP data recorder is shown in figure 3.
Figure 3: Induced Polarization instrument. (IRIS Instruments)
This particular instrument can record up to 10 channels of data simultaneously. It can also be configured with the automated data recording instrument systems, making data recording efficient.
Data Acquisition: Induced Polarization surveys are conducted much like resistivity surveys. Readings are taken at discrete stations to form lines of data crossing the area of interest. In frequency domain, the variation of IP response with frequency is obtained. In the time domain, if the current and voltage waveforms have been digitally recorded and a Fourier analysis performed, the variation of resistivity with frequency is measured producing SIP data. SIP data provide more interpretable information than the simple IP measure discussed above; however, this is still being researched and is rarely used as a production method. SIP data may be able to distinguish between the different minerals (metallic minerals, graphite, and clay) that produce IP anomalies. However, if the goal is to simply map the occurrence of metallic minerals, spectral IP methods are probably not required.
Data Processing: When recording IP data, resistivity data are also recorded. Both the resistivity and IP data are usually plotted in section form called a pseudosection. With this presentation, data from the smaller electrode separations are plotted near the top of the pseudosection (ground surface), and data from the largest electrode separations are plotted at the bottom of the pseudosection, thus simulating a plot showing resistivity and IP against depth for all values along the traverse. A typical chargeability pseudosection is shown in figure 4. The horizontal dimension is distance, and the vertical dimension is related to the electrode spacings used to take the measurements. Although these data are from a fairly shallow survey using small electrode spacings, it does illustrate the method, presentation techniques, and the interpretation. Surveys to much greater depths can be performed using larger electrode spacings.
Figure 4: Measured (apparent) resistivity pseudosection.
Data Interpretation: The pseudosection data are usually interpreted by using inversion techniques, where initial model estimates are input to the program, which then calculates the pseudosection resulting from this model. It then determines the degree of fit of the calculated pseudosection with the field data, modifies the model accordingly, and a new pseudosection is then calculated. This process is repeated until the model provides a pseudosection that gives a good fit to the field data.
The interpation of the data presented in figure 5. In this profile the elevation the ground surface has also been incroporated. The field IP data shown in figure has been interpreted showing the chargeability along the profile against depth and is shown in figure . In this profile, the elevation of the ground surface has also been incorporated into the interpretation.
Since induced polarization phenomena also occur when clays are present in the subsurface, the method can possibly be used to estimate clay content. The survey techniques, processing, and interpretation are similar to those described above for metallic mineral detection.
Figure 5: Interpreted Induced Polarization data.
Advantages: IP measures the variation of resistivity with frequency and provides a unique interpretation showing polarizable material such as clays, graphite and metallic minerals.
Limitations: The induced polarization method, like the resistivity method, requires electrodes to be inserted into the ground. However, with the IP method, the polarization signals can be quite small, and it is important to put as much current into the ground as possible to increase the measured signals. If the ground surface is hard or dry, it may be difficult, not only to get the electrodes in the ground, but also to put electrical current in the ground. This can usually be solved by pouring water on the electrodes, thereby improving the electrical contact between the electrode and the surrounding soil.
Better call your doctor!
Forget the "tinker toy" drill rigs and bring in the BIG CATS. LETS ROLL!!!
From Biochem's sticky post above "NEWS! UPDATED KATX DD AS OF June 29, 2010":
NOW, HOW ABOUT FINANCING?
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KAT Exploration has secured funding for up to $5 million. The funding contract GUARANTEES $1 million over the next 6 months and the remaining $4 million to be delivered upon agreements within the contract being achieved over the course of the following 6 months of no specific date. The funding is to provide operational support for Kat for at least the next 5 years. The funding was secured with 50,000,000 restricted shares.
Kat Exploration has retired its previously executed REG-D 504. There are no REG-D 504 offerings, warrants or options in place to date.
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Kat-Exploration-Secures-up-5-Million-Funding-With-50-Million-Restricted-Shares-Retires-1102443.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and from Ken Stead’s email:
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ken Stead <kstead@katexploration.com>
Subject: XXX
To: XXX
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 2010, 2:39 PM
XXX,
...All the 504 stock has been sold in to the market already and it was not to a single investor in the state of Wisconsin but to 12 over a period of 2-3 months. Our DTC sheets confirms there is no one holding any significant Kat stock at all.
Ken
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its future endeavors the company would hope to ensure non-dilutive options where the merits of the projects will fund the operations. As one of the co-founders of Cornerstone Resources Inc., who had done joint ventures with major mining companies such as Noranda, Phelps Dodge, and other major companies, Mr. Stead is quite familiar with world class mining companies and is confident in bringing their interest to Kat’s projects as they move forward. Future press releases will provide more updates to confirm more guidance on the direction of the company.
http://ca.news.finance.yahoo.com/s/23112009/34/biz-f-business-wire-kat-exploration-report-recent-discoveries-its-lucky-property.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As you can see, financing is not an issue right now.
You forget. KATX is a small time operation (only 1 geo until just a few days ago). These properties are huge, lots of territory to cover not to mention the reams of data they have to plow through. If Ken says we need more time, then I believe him and fully trust him to do whats in the best interest of the shareholders. He hasn't let us down yet. On the contrary, he's done more than what most of us here ever expected in terms of setting us up for the big KABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM. Mineral exploration is NOT an exact science. The more data/evidence you can gather to support your hypothesis, the better your odds will be at success. THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE DOING RIGHT NOW.
Go ahead, jump ship if you want to. You'll probably get burned. The DOW lost almost 300 points today. The board was ALL RED! But in spite of all that, this little KAT eeked out a gain. And Friday when the government jobs report is released, -300 will be a mere pittance. There's no safer place to be right now.
Delay that by 2 weeks, until after the divvy deal ends and I'll agree with you. The ones who get rewarded will be the ones who trust Ken and his team BEFORE the divvy deal ends and BEFORE the pps takes off. The rest will be left behind in the dust.
Today's news was HUGE IMO. For them to delay the start of drilling at the last possible moment AND HIRE ANOTHER GEOLOGIST MUST mean they've come across something spectacular. TAKE ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL THE TIME YOU NEED KEN AND THE REST OF YOUR TEAM!!!
"Due to the latest discoveries of several new very strong IP targets the company has decided to engage the services of another geologist and geophysicist to work along with Mr. R. James Weick on laying out a very constructive drill program. These discoveries have created a much bigger work load and latest trenching has uncovered extensive amounts of sulphides over a strike length of 700 meters.
Some of the bigger targets extend west of the grid and south of where the geophysics ended."
I'll bet they're just giddy with excitement right now and are probably working 'round the clock to try and finish the new drill target locations before the drill crew arrives. THESE GUYS KNOW THEIR STUFF. WE GOOD!!!
You ain't seen nothing yet. Going much much higher.
Well said...........couldn't agree more! Although a year ago when I first bought in @ $0.38, I wasn't so sure, LOL.
I'm counting on it. I just don't see the courts allowing this to get to the point of bringing down JPM though. JPM is one of Bernankes "to big to fail" institutions and he's probably right. A JPM failure would likely lead to a collapse of the entire banking system IMO.
That is my understanding of it as well, although I wasn't aware of the tax deferrals to 2011 & 2012, an added bonus. My chief concern about this is having to wait the 5 year minimum for access to the profits tax free. I'm about out of faith in this economy. Too much corruption and a government that seems unwilling to take the necessary steps to correct it. Make sure your portfolio includes the physical stuff as well IMO.
.........and yet MORE evidence shareholders #1, company #2. What is there NOT to like about this company??? This is an investors dream. FREE shares is a gold mine........at today's prices.....with a bright prospect of shooting much higher??? That is just unheard of. Naysayers shot down again!
How can anybody read those PR's and emails and think these guys don't know what they're doing. This has got to be the most thorough, well planned, leave no stone unturned (pun intended!) finance, uplist, property acquisition, deal making, drill program ever in the history of junior exploration companies. It's just a matter of time folks. I for one am extremely excited over what is about to unfold here.
At this point, it's not a question of IF gold is down there, but HOW MUCH. VISIBLE gold in the drill core and this thing is going to fly. Just watch.
As was mentioned earlier, you could possibly call in and have the broker 'fix it' presuming it was done promptly.
Don't be fooled. That's an old trick used to mess up chart resolution when the stock is about to make a move. Happens all the time.
You are in the right place!
Just in case anybody is wondering about the size of the Olympic Dam deposit:
http://www.gogeometry.com/mining/olympic_dam_mine_uranium_billiton_australia_video_map_news.html
I would much rather have the cash then restricted shares.
Thanks for that excellent summary. I agree except for the criticism and the last part:
"You should know by now that this will NEVER GO TO TRIAL. Why?, because our opposition will ALL GO TO JAIL, that's why. It's that simple.
That is EXACTLY why this SHOULD go to trial. Justice MUST prevail!
If that were to happen, the issued JPM shares would undoubtedly be restricted to prevent a massive selloff, IMO.
I have not been following this real close and depend heavily on the fantastic DD here on this board. I'm in this on the chance that TRUTH will prevail. Certainly hope you are right for the sake of those who have lost much.
RIGHTOUSNESS says we should win hands down, CORRUPTION says we shouldn't. Whether we win or not will depend on how much truth is left in our justice system and the motivation to dig it up. My guess is it will get covered up with a settlement and the corruption will continue. Very sad.
That will be a game changer for sure!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=50219651
Cheapies about to disappear.
"KAT Exploration shareholders will be unaffected while having restricted shares of BVIG.OB distributed as an additional equity."
All in keeping shareholders #1. Yet ANOTHER promise kept!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=49884947
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=50219651
GOLD in a breakout this AM! $1257.40/oz, +$9.80
This post defines the character of this board to a "T". Long after we are all millionaires, this is the one that will remind us of how we got there! I for one will have it framed and posted on my wall.
FROM FB, BirdmanBob4, aka: Bob Nordberg As Mayor of Handcamp ...It is my proud honor to officially announce tomorrow is "Do not sell a dang share day"....and I am officially announcing that next week is "Watch a Market Maker Squirm week" .......
I LOVE IT!!! Who's on board?
Perhaps it doesn't do anything in regards to short or naked short selling, but it does send a message as to what investors think this stock is worth.
I'm with you but I think $1 is way too low.
A true classic that deserves a sticky!
Want to calm your fears about this stock??? INCREASE YOUR DD!!! It's all here on this board. All you have to do READ IT!
You are exactly right. These have been my thoughts all along as well. Nothing more than going back and filling the gaps.
I believe in happy endings! ;)