Ok - then I'll ask you the exact same question I asked Starlost, why do you suppose that GS is spending so much money on attorney's and accountant's fees filing petitions for share cancellations, motions for service by alternative means, bringing the stock off of the expert market to pink current, tweeting about name and symbol changes, and negotiating the withdrawal of the appeal on GVSI?? Is he doing this just to F with everyone and fool them into thinking he's going to ultimately execute a RM when in reality he has no intention of doing so? Yes, there were the FINRA rulings from the past versions of GVSI - however, do you REALLY think GS has not factored that into his decisions prior to spending this kind of money on a shell? What would he benefit from continuing to pursue GVSI if he didn't believe he can ultimately change the name/symbol and execute a RM. If you tell me how HE benefits from fooling us all then I might give you/Hi/Lo, Chrion, Starlost, etc. etc. some degree of attention. Starlost replied that he thinks GS won't find a worthwhile merger partner - ok, maybe that's right, but that's a far cry from you implying he's lying to us to enrich himself on GVSI. Without you providing a motive and means to enrich himself on GVSI, commons sense says you're here for an agenda - not because you really believe what you post.

How is my post biased?? The negative ones on this board seem to imply (regularly) that GS is "up to no good" and knows this ship (GVSI) will ultimately sink and is stringing us all along. I'm asking what's his motive to lie to everyone and presumably spend hundreds of thousands of his own money on GVSI if he knows he can't get a name/ticker change and RM approved? WHY WOULD HE DO IT??!! Is it possible that he'll fail or that the company he merges with will be another HMBL in the long run - of course, anything's possible. But this guy is spending a fortune - why would he do that if he didn't think he's going to ultimately score on it? It's not a biased question - give me a reason and I'll consider it. Without a reason, I can't take you guys seriously for even a second.

Jayman - I'm going to take a leap of faith that you actually want to have a real conversation on this issue. Why do you suppose that GS is spending so much money on attorney's and accountant's fees filing petitions for share cancellations, motions for service by alternative means, bringing the stock off of the expert market to pink current, tweeting about name and symbol changes, and negotiating the withdrawal of the appeal on GVSI?? Is he doing this just to F with everyone and fool them into thinking he's going to ultimately execute a RM when in reality he has no intention of doing so? Yes, there were the FINRA rulings from the past versions of GVSI - however, do you REALLY think GS has not factored that into his decisions prior to spending this kind of money on a shell? What would he benefit from continuing to pursue GVSI if he didn't believe he can ultimately change the name/symbol and execute a RM. If you tell me how HE benefits from fooling us all then I might give you/Hi/Lo, Chrion, Starlost, etc. etc. some degree of attention. Without you providing a motive, commons sense says you're here for an agenda - not because you really believe what you post.

Exactly!! The only reason these idiots keep incessantly posting is to rile people here. The relentlessness of their negative posts show that they have an agenda against GS. I understand that you are trying to be a check and balance on their misinformation war, but the constant back and forth with them on this board has made the board almost impossible to follow anymore. There used to be SOME value checking this board to see if anything new is communicated - but really there's nothing of value here anymore.

That goes for BOTH sides (not just Norm) of this back and forth nonsense show here every single day. I think Norm posts to keep the score card even so the constant negativity has a counter balance.

Another genius. Whatever - then go and keep
Arguing with the nameless bashers who’s sole goal is to mess with people like you.

Who said I want you to sell your shares!? I couldn’t care less what you do with your shares. Just contribute something of value instead of arguing with the bashers who are clearly baiting you with every post and you bite at the bait each time. You read me all wrong - but that’s not surprising

Hmmm. Yeah because you’ve owned GVSI for 2 years you definitely know what’s going on - lol. We all know we’re waiting for the name/ticker change (just don’t know when it’ll happen or if it’ll be approved. Probably will but no guaranty). We all know we’re waiting for share cancellations - just don’t know when it’ll happen. We all know we’re hoping for a RM with a real asset with actual revenues-just don’t know when/if it might happen. Now tell me what it is that YOU know that every other freaking person on this board doesn’t know. I may be a “newbie” to this board, but I’ve owned this stock just as long as you have and see no unique knowledge being presented here.

The back and forth sniping between you 2 groups is comical and sad all at the same time. Neither of you know what’s going to happen - ur just guessing. Stop acting like either side actually knows. Such a useless board.

Any time you disagree with a post of mine, I view that as a badge of honor. Ur a total joke. Of course if he does the RM on any one of the 3 shells it's proof of concept that George is able to work through each shells individual issues and get to the finish line. Will he get there on all 3 - who knows?! But getting there on any one of them is a good sign for the other 2.

Of course - so then the posts should be viewed as an attempt to prop up GVSI at the expense of SRNW. Again, what I'm saying is if you're a shareholder of GVSI, you should wish good things for SRNW and vice versa. Success at SRNW (even if it comes before GVSI) is proof of concept for George. I think we all believe that GVSI will be the bigger runner in the long term since it's more likely to attract a larger target company. It's also likely that SRNW will take awhile to get there since according to George, there's gonna be another forward split before the RM. But trying to prop up GVSI by downing SRNW will have the opposite effect - it will perpetuate the belief that George can never seem to get there anymore. It's counter productive.

The reason some people reacted to your posts on Twitter and iHub was because they came across as a cheap and unnecessary attempt to prop up GVSI at the expense of SRNW. Does it matter which is first to a RM?! Wouldn’t one of the trifecta finally getting there be proof of concept for GS to the others? Again, I own plenty of all 3 and I assume many/most here are in a similar position.

So is the latest tactic on this board to subtly criticize SRNW in the hopes that it might shift money to GVSI?! What else is the point of posting on GVSI’s board and on Twitter the fact that SRNW may need a small extension to serve a few remaining defendants in the cancellation case?? Unless something has changed, it’s clear that GVSI is ahead in the process since GS claimed another split is coming for SRNW after the cancellations are done. Seems to me these hit job posts against SRNW only feed into the bashers on this board claiming that GVSI is all smoke and mirrors when the primary point of emphasis is that GVSI may be ahead of SRNW in the cancellation/merger process and nothing substantive about GVSI’s potential merger prospects or the likelihood of the GVSI cancellation hearing getting on the court docket soon. I’d imagine that many here own both shells and don’t care which one is first.

Actual substantive question for the board. With regard to the share cancellations that have been filed for GVSI (and SRNW), does anyone know what the REAL timetables for the remainder of the proceeding? Meaning, the Defendants have all now been "served" either the conventional way or by publication. How long does each Defendant have to file a response to the company's pleadings (is there extra time to respond for out of state Defendants - which is typical in most civil cases)? If the Defendants fail to respond, how long until the company can request a default judgment against them? What's the timeline for the Defendant's to file an appeal from any default judgment? I'm Hoping perhaps there might be a lawyer on this board who knows the actual answers. I'm thinking the out of state Defendants have 40 - 60 days to respond. The once the company files a default against them for failing to respond, the default judgment process will take another 60 days to become final. Then maybe another 30 days to appeal before the judgments are actually final taking us to December/January when the company might actually be able to do a RM. Again - I'm asking any lawyers on the board to comment.

I've blocked many on this board due to the out of control crazy, ranting posts, but I have not blocked you since I think you do try to have a discussion at times. So, here's my question for you - why do you care whether the company GS brings in "for the first time in his OTC WIZ career, is a company WITH REVENUE?" Is your goal with this investment to stay for 5 years and invest in the next big thing??? Or is your goal here to make money, and sell on what will often be an irrational but large pop on news?! I'm here to make money and could care less whether GS brings in a company with sustainability - what does that matter to me. I bought in at or near the bottom and am looking for a nice, quick, profitable exit on the RM news. Again, some here seem to have personal animus towards GS that I don't get. If you were in for TSNP/HMBL and sold early on news, you would be in love with GS and couldn't give a hoot whether HMBL ended up being a bust. Same should go with GVSI/SRNW/WNFT.

This board has now become a total joke. It's just not worth the time weeding through the nonsense to get to one or two worthwhile posts out of every 50. It's a shame, but the constant battle between the over the top haters and the over the top koolaid drinkers make it time to move on. Best of luck to all - I think we'll see a slow rise over the next month or so and then it will come down to GS putting up or shutting up (my guess is that he ultimately puts up, but that there will be delays along the way like we've seen over the past 2+ years).

So, to be clear, are you again now going on the record saying that GVSI cannot get the name and ticker changes through due to the past regimes FINRA/SEC litigation and the subsequent dismissal of the appeal by GS? I just want you to be crystal clear so that Hokie can add this to his list of fallacies in about 60 days once the name change and ticker change are approved.

Wait a minute though; I read very well - about a week or two ago, you said that these "restrictions" weren't only on reverse mergers, but also on name changes (which is why you argued that GVSI had only been changed to American Blockchain with the Nevada secretary of state, but not with the SEC or FINRA). However, suddenly now that GVSI has applied for name and ticker changes, the prior restrictions only apply to reverse mergers? Or is that just all you got left? I'll ask again - what is the deal with you and GS? There's clearly something personal there - no other explanation for your obsession with this ticker and drive in life to attack him

You've lost any small modicum of credibility you might have still had with that post. Clearly, GVSI views the current name and ticker symbol changes as "winnable." So are you saying you were right because the proposed corporate actions of GVSI management prior to GS becoming involved was permanently denied? Do you think anyone here gave a (bleep) as to whether prior management's proposed corporate actions were lost? Or, are you trying to say that GS's new application for name and ticker symbol changes will be denied due to the denial of prior management's requests? Make it clear so we can all chuckle when this plays out.

This is what differentiates Hi-Lo from the other skeptics on this board (like Kaptynn, Starlost, etc). There's nothing wrong with being a skeptic or being critical. There have been mind numbing missteps by GS along the way with his 3 shells (e.g., checking off the wrong box on SEC filings, not meeting self-imposed timelines, the "promise land" tweet on WNFT) that would one skeptical. But there's an obvious difference between the SEC/FINRA level of scrutiny applied to the prior regime of GVSI versus the last 2 years of the custodianship/shell. Plus, it is highly likely that GS can get 2 years of audited financials for this shell - as it has done literally nothing during that time span. Is it a slam dunk - NO! If it were a slam dunk, it wouldn't be trading at .009ish. But it's a nice calculated gamble given the risk/reward. Hi-Lo has a history with GS that he's not sharing IMO

Jayman - let's have a real discussion now (I'm not interested in all of the name calling). Do you think the SEC/FINRA is really going to treat GVSI the same now (2 years after custodianship) as they did 5 years ago when GVSI's prior management was running a scam company and trying to push through corporate actions that were not beneficial to the shareholders? Don't you agree that when GS requests the next round of corporate actions, the SEC is more likely going to conduct a brand new review and barring anything unusual, will likely use a standard 2-year look back at audited financials, which will be easy for GS to obtain since the company has literally done nothing from a business standpoint and has just been a shell for the past 2 years? Yes, I agree with you that by withdrawing the appeal, it does not change the fact that the request for corporate actions of the dubious prior management are permanently denied, and withdrawing the appeal does nothing to change that fact. However, can we also agree that new management is likely NOT going to be held to the same standard of review given the custodianship and actions for the past 2 years? Doesn't logic point us all in that direction?? This is where I see ulterior motives of many of the negative posts here - not necessarily yours, but many others. They're trying to push the theory that because GVSI was held to a high level of scrutiny 5 years ago, new management is automatically under the same level of scrutiny as a shell - I think that reasoning is simplistic and wrong

I asked you this a few days ago and you refused to respond. You have to explain why GS is the target of your unrelenting rage. Unless you can provide a real reason, those of us who are casual users of iHub can’t take you seriously. As Hokie has pointed out repeatedly, you’ve been wrong over and over again on this ticker. Explain your history with GS and maybe we can give you some credibility.

You do realize that shareholders here know that this is a high risk investment. If they don’t, that’s on them. Clearly you have personal animus towards GS. Be upfront and tell us what’s the origin of your personal animus. Maybe we can take you a bit more serious if you can explain a real reason why it appears to be your mission in life right now to personally attack GS. Without this context you’re dismissed by most/all as a typical bashed to be ridiculed and ignored.

Real question - does anyone know from reading the actual court documents in the case, itself, where GS was required to post notice to the shareholders he was unable to serve. I've read many posts here running the gamut from GS needing to post in both Nevada and each/every state the particular shareholder he seeks to cancel resides, to only needing to post in Nevada and mailing the court papers to the last known address of the shareholder (which seems incorrect since GS has posted in Florida - and I doubt he'd do that if he wasn't required to do so). From my brief reading, it seems that the court decides where the posting is required in each particular instance. Anyone actually read the court's order on the posting requirements in this case to satisfy the notice requirements? I'm just trying to figure out whether we're likely to see another motion to postpone the deadlines.

Been watching these posts for over a year now. Unreal how many of you are so obsessed with bashing this ticker. This is a SPECULATIVE investment. You're not investing here in the likes of a blue chip stock. You're here because if it hits, you'll make serious coin (assuming you have a decent sized stake). If it fails, we lose it all. It's called risk/reward - simple as that. Do the bashers here actually think that anyone is going to sell their position because an anonymous poster on iHub says GS is going to fail??!!