Breathin' clean fresh air and lovin' life.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Boots: Have you done the math? Look down the road at all?
OK, then.
On that, you based your opinions. We all got 'em.
Hey, you could be right...interest will wither here to nothing, they won't sign on any software contracts and most likely they're subsidizing their own work for Viking and losing money on every job.
Just another stinky pinky, right?
Tom sucks, right?
Ian's software is crap.
Chuck Brooks is a poser. I get it now.
Gee, what was I thinking? Appreciate your cogent insight.
Thanx.
lns
kilquote: Hint from DISA direct? Priceless. lns eom
FORU: "to completed Financials..." Done. Done done. lns_eom
TenKay: Q1 not due till 8/30. lns eom
MUST READ ARTICLE!!! It drips Bravatek...
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bjxjxv/the-pentagon-says-it-will-start-encrypting-soldiers-emails-next-year
A letter from vice director of DISA Sarah Zabel to Wyden, which Wyden's office shared with Motherboard, said that "the use of STARTTLS will be implemented as part of the migration to the new email gateway infrastructure." The migration will be done "in July 2018," the letter reads.
HOW TO GET TO BE THE QUICKEST COMPANY TO GO FROM .0001 TO A BILLION?!
IT JUST TAKES ONE BIG, FAT CHECK.
I forgot to add the link where the 4.5 and 10 million mail.mil usrers came from. Them...
http://www.disa.mil/enterprise-services/Applications/DoD-Enterprise-Email
And, the tweet* where the $250/head contract valuation came from...
DHS Market Potential for Ecrypt One: Employees (about 277.543) with Software Annual Rev-$41.63 M; Services-$15.82 M and Support- $12.49 M
— Bravatek Solutions (@bravatek) May 14, 2017
Mjolnir: I'll never understand it sometimes, the things that get discussed and the things that don't.
Your post sharing this article should have gotten a LOT of discussion today when you posted it.
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bjxjxv/the-pentagon-says-it-will-start-encrypting-soldiers-emails-next-year
IT DRIPS BRAVATEK...
A letter from vice director of DISA Sarah Zabel to Wyden, which Wyden's office shared with Motherboard, said that "the use of STARTTLS will be implemented as part of the migration to the new email gateway infrastructure." The migration will be done "in July 2018," the letter reads.
WHAT'S GOING ON HERE ? My assesment is this...
1) NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (NTI) was originally formed in the 90's as a publicly traded company under the symbol: NEOM
2) As time went on and the business grew, to secure debt planned for aquisitions to further grow the company, around 2006 NTI entered into a patent security agreement (PSA) w/ YA (formerly, Cornell) for all the patents. This PSA was restated in the 10/28/13 10Q report.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=9570628.
3) Fast-forwarding to January, 2016...Long after much demise to NTI had taken place and very little growth, a "NOTICE of Security Agreement" was filed w/ the USPTO in January, 2016. This was essentially just an 'FYI' filing as NO ACTION was taken at that time as a result of THIS filing other than letting it publicly be known again, for the record, that the PSA CONTINUES to remain in force.
http://legacy-assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/assignment-pat-37640-208.pdf
4) NTI eventually defaulted on that PSA a few months later on 6/1/16.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11433099
5) Around this same time, YA had created a private corporate entity who they own and control, NM,LLC (evidence of this is that YA and NM,LLC both list the same exact address as their respective corporate headquarters'). Then, as part of the actions taken by YA against NTI for defaulting on the PSA, in lieu of monetary payment which NTI could not satisfy, YA forced NTI to assign all rights to their entire patent portfio over to NM,LLC a couple months later, on 8/24/16 (again, NM,LLC = YA).
6) As a RESULT OF THAT ACTION, NTI was later RELEASED from the PSA by YA (and YA's previous corp names as well) on 1/23/17 because of NTI's having then satisfied the terms of PSA through assigning 100% of all of their rights to the patents to NM,LLC (again, due to their defaulting on repayment of past debt obligations to YA).
http://legacy-assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/assignment-pat-41469-160.pdf
IMO, the release of NTI from the PSA on 1/23/17 by YA was only that...a release of any further debt obligations to be owed by NTI to YA since all debt owed had been satisfied. At that point, w/ all the debt obligations of NTI owed to YA having been satsfied and NTI being left w/ nothing to survive on, YA essentially set NTI free to, well, "die"....just naturally go out-of-business.
NTI is now "dead" (no longer a legal operating corporate entity) due to failed business ventures entered into by previous CEO's (CF and MC, not LM), and their signing of debt agreements owed to YA to pay for those failed business ventures, way back 10+ years ago.
BUT, "NeoMedia", the BRAND NAME, lives on...
http://www.neom.com
As it currently stands, NM,LLC is now 'dba', "NeoMedia", to simply keep the "NeoMedia" brand going due to its established name recognition is the 2D barcode market.
Was anything of the former NTI left "alive"?
Yes...its NEOM shell*...which, through NTI's PSA default being triggered and acted on, YA now has CUSTODIAL control over.
With the new found CUSTODIAL (only) control YA aquired over NTI's publicly traded shell* stock, NEOM, YA subsequently spent all of the resources necessary to satisfy all of the DTCC's questions and concerns they had concerning NTI's past stock transactions which were still tied to the NEOM shell* stock. As a result, the DTC CHILL was subsequently LIFTED (see stickied** post above for that proof) on the NEOM shell* stock and there are currently NO LONGER any broker trading restrictions on the NEOM shell stock being publicly traded.
* - "shell", since NTI is now out of business due to defaulting on the PSA
** - direct link to proof of NEOM DTC CHILL list removal if post if replaced
WHAT DOES ALL THIS REALLY MEAN FOR THE AVERAGE PENNY STOCK INVESTOR AND/OR TRADER?
It means that NEOM...the MM sponsored, empty, restriction-free and publicly traded stock SHELL is NOW able to be used in a REVERSE MERGER of any sort by YA.
Most likely outcome, IMO, will be YA using its CUSTODIAL controlled NEOM shell to take its own private entity, NM,LLC public via a reverse triangular merger (RTM) and NTI's subsidiary, Qode Services Corp.
It is IMVSHHO, that most of the trading activity we've seen in NEOM over the past six months (and will continue to see) has been YA buying up as much of its own (CUSTODIAL controlled) NEOM shell stock as they can for .0001/share for them to profit from however they best see fit before, during and after they take their privately held NM,LLC (dba, "NeoMedia") public via an upcoming RTM they are planning.
Time will tell how accurate my assessment is.
I hope the above shared analysis provides some insight and understanding to those who have any concern or interest here and are confused or just plain lost as to what the heck is going on w/ everything in this situation.
Best,
lns
next20bag: I think the same thing. Once this hits NASDAQ and word that Bravatek is the new 'standard' to protect 'The Homeland', yes, a lot of folks will most definitely want to invest just for that reason.
It'll be the most 'patriotic' stock to have in one's portfolio, bar none.
lns
kilquote: Appreciate you sharing! lns eom
Guju: Excellent article. Appreciate it! lns eom
wg: Where do we see what the fiscal year is? I see it here and it gives w/ the last NT-10K...
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BVTK/profile
FY'17Q1 just ended.
FY'17Q2 ends 9/30/17.
No?
lns
GOINGUP: One thing I do notice, or maybe just didn't before, it looks like the splash of intro paragraphs on the home page are different. A lot of emphasis on their MAP.
I sent a measly suggestion into them via the website 'contact us' link to change that acronym to stand for, "Market Alliance Partnership program", instead.
The MAP program.
Flows better, IMO.
lns
Fashers: Really? lns eom
cj/GOINGUP: None of that looks new to me. lns eom
Rufus: I see nothing new at this moment. All those 'new' links have been there for a while.
Many, I guess, just haven't checked it in a very, very long while?
I don't know.
Still waiting...
I'm patient.
lns
Rufus: Read my posts. YW. lns eom
Alpert: Yes. Exactly. Those. Love 'em. lns eom
Popt: That is not true and WE ALL KNOW IT!! Haha!
Wasn't the case when I bought my .0001's!!! I will show you next time, for sure, just to prove truth here, AGAIN.
Then, what story will we hear?
Oh, yeah...Photoshop again, right? loL!!
Just too funny.
lns
VAgal: Sounds PATENTley like awarded confidence! lns eom
TA: True, that is norm. Glad BVTK is different. lns eom
devil: Still waiting for the crash... Haha lns eom
devil: "It's risky." NSS...Life's a gamble. lns eom
devil: Neat DD, dude. How U so good? Ha lns eom
devil: Just how, pray tell, do you know? lns eom
TA: One BIG FAT CHECK changes everything. lns eom
Frontline: BRING ON THE U3! GO BVTK!! lns eom
Boots: US Govt trusts Dr.C=FACT, not-opinion. lns eom
Boots: FACT=YKTG paid shares-for-service=NOT OPINION. lns eom
Boots: Buyback pps effect is not opinion. lns eom
TenK: I believe otherwise. Time will tell. lns eom
Steely: If buying back shares is what they are thinking about, for various reasons, then I'd think at sometime they'd publicly hint that.
If, on the other hand, a buyback of shares, for various reasons, were not on the BOD's minds then we'd not read of it being hinted publicly.
They just hinted at it yesterday.
What do you think that tells ya/us?
What do they gain in doing a R/S? A reduction in O/S and a subsequent identical reflection of it in the share price. That's it. For the right reasons, good for the shareholder, but limited in its benefit. They lose out on the benefit of having any control of the reduced shares. They just go back into the A/S. At the same time, they also gain a lot of further distrust in its shareholders because many will never see an R/S as a good thing. Never. Very, very bad for the shareholder as a collective. It creates a sinking ship.
Bravatek's BOD is well aware of this.
What do they gain in conducting a share buyback program?
Quite the opposite.
Added benefit of having control of the bought-back shares...retire from A/S forever or put in their Treasury for future use and benefit. A benefit such as the 'funding' of an Employee Stock Option program. With 100 employees for just the sales side of the house planned in the next 18 months, they will want such a program in place, ASAP.
Another benefit in addition to the natural supply/demand rise in share price that will occur is the HUGE vote of confidence exhibited by the BOD in anticipation of the company's future growth with implementing such a move. And, implementing a share repurchase program ALWAYS reflects in a HUGE SURGE in retail CONFIDENCE corresponded by a SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE in buying pressure and subsequent HEALTHY RISE in magnitude of its stock price, per share.
Bravatek's BOD is well aware of this of this, too.
I have lots of trust and faith in, and confidence that, Bravatek's BOD will deliver what's of best benefit for not only the company's future but that of its common shareholders as well...of which, YTKG (consultants for Viking business arm) is one to the tune of a modest 10 million shares. They are one of us. That is how they got paid. Common shares...the ONLY way they directly got paid for their highly beneficial services. Therefore, I'd have to think 'Tommy Boy' wants to do good on the deal.
I look at it like this...If he's obviously so trusted by YTKG to accept that kind of deal and obviously so trusted by the U.S. Federal Gov't to employ him to oversee half a billion in its own investments in NWO capital of the world, Khazakstan, why in the world should a shareholder also not hold similar convictions of the man?
It would behoove a shareholder to not trust the words that the Hon., Dr. Thomas A. Cellucci, CEO of Bravatek, communicates to us. His words or those of the company he leads.
I trust him and I am patient.
lns
Boots: May not "need" it but damn sure best to "have" it in each.
It's all about end-to-end trust of communications.
https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/2015/0415_cyber-strategy/docs/DOD-DHS-Cyber_Article-2016-09-23-CLEAN.pdf
We will find out soon enough.
Tommy says, "be patient".
http://www.arcyber.army.mil/Pages/ArcyberHome.aspx
https://www.defense.gov/News/Special-Reports/0415_Cyber-Strategy/
C. Build Partnerships
The foundation of effective response begins with establishing robust and enduring partnerships
both across the Federal Government and with the private sector. We must collectively understand
our capacity and capabilities, as well as the thresholds for requests for assistance.
PROPHET: Exactly, and that is precisely why they mentioned it, IMVSHHO. It's NOT to hammer out a DEAL w/ the entire Federal Gov't. for the purchase of Encrypt One software as it's sole email system software for 100% secured, identical inerteroperability between all 220 of its internal agencies.
NO. IMO, that MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR DEAL has ALREADY been SIGNED w/ the U.S. Federal Gov't. (for all we know, could've happened yesterday at the Pentagon, where TC was scheduled to be at).
IMVSHHO, the 7/19 meeting is to COORDINATE exactly HOW the blanketing of the entire U.S. Federal Gov't. and all 220 of its agencies w/ Ecrypt One's PROVEN AND PASSED, 3RD PARTY TESTED (by Amazon?) 'white list' email system protection is to be accomplished.
An undertaking such as this is going to be a monumental task and one that will require military like strategy, planning and coordination to be successfully accomplished in the shortest time frame possible. In other, as quickly as possible!
Everyone agrees...this needs to be done, like, 'yesterday'.
Yes, I do believe we will see Bravatek be the FASTEST company EVER IN HISTORY to date to go from a valuation of a few million to multi- BILLIONS.
How?
One BIG FAT CHECK from the U.S. Federal Gov't. THAT'S how!
Be patient, my friends...a shitload of news is on the way.
GO BRAVATEK!
lns
Popt: We see it happens all the time...one buys shares at the advertised bid price and it is reported as a sell, RED, on the daily Trades list. This fact is indisputable. We've all witnessed it...at least those who have taken a look at how their buy-at-the-bid purchases were recorded on the daily trade transaction lists.
Do you concur w/ the above statement, Yes or No?
lns
Diego: I sense sincerity in that first post when he talks about making others financially successful. That's us he's talking about. I really think he's gonna get a kick out of engineering his latest comeback as his best...straight to The Naz w/ NO R/S!
What am I talking about!? He IS getting a kick out of it! Haha!! Go, Tommy Boy!!!
Fastest company from .0001 to $2BB in earnings ever!
It's coming.
lns
wg: Talk about giving back to humanity...
The Federal Gov't is going to promote the 'White list' (Ecrypt One) approach to email system security to all of the govt's it deals with as well as the entire private sector in the same manner it pushes vaccines on everyone...by guilt! Haha!!!
We all gotta be protected!!
NCOIC's Cross-Domain Interoperability push in action!
What's that referred to again? Herd mentality?? No, that's not it. But, in any case, once the FederaI gov't is behind this, it'll be, "Katy! Bar the door!!" time.
MMMOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!
lns
cj: "cascading sales" lns eom
cj: Out of that $20BB, looks like BVTK could have a solid 10-15% of it...
Two - two and a half babababillion dollars.
Enough to blanket all 220 federal agencies? Federal grant to Bravatek to assemble an army of contractors to do the work ASAP??? Oversaw by the head of Army's Cyber Security division? Reason for tomorrow's and 7/19 meetings???
FED GOV POC AOR??? HELLO?? VIPI?
Some good analysis by an absent as of late, poster...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131459309
I trust his guesstimation. Seems like a pretty well connected guy.
FYI - He just might know what he's talking about...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131509894
I believe Dr.C's prognosis that we could see NASDAQ 'sooner than we think'.
GO BRAVA
lns