Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
rickyaces, how much are standard resolution charges for one scan?
I sure would love to get my hands on those value propositions.
Streets, I'm new on this board, but congrats on your marriage. Enjoy your honeymoon in Hawaii. I've always wanted to visit Hawaii, who knows with Neom success, I may get to yet.
clawmann, I saw in an earlier post the vol. on that .0132 buy was 840000 but I'm so slow I see you found it. I will upgrade my system if this stock does as well as we all hope. Thanks, I've used your posts and thoughts as somewhat of a barometer for me since I'm so inexperienced at all of this. Thanks again.P.S. I have much to learn.
Lucky, It was something to do with some software or something. I'm a little slow at this but give me a minute and I'll find what I was referring to. Thanks
luckyrabbit, How would Neom's sale off of the assets which they sold a while back fit into your theory of buying IP only and not the company? If Scanbuy or whoever is really buying Neom, maybe Neom was stripping down to what the buyer wanted or at least would take.
neomfriend, naturalborn gave the correct number earlier. 30 granted and 29 pending I think.
Now I'm wondering what they mean by strong and GROWING patent portfolio. Excuse me, intellectual property base.
success, maybe your email to neom's lawyers and neom had some effect on Scanbuy changing their press release. Who's trying to hide what and from whom. God this gets interestinger and interestinger. If Scanbuy bought Neom and our shares went up to about $15.00 each then Jonathon Bulkeley would be my new best friend.
Thanks Clawmann.
srowen, I understand high risk credit all to well from my own standpoint. But I didn't say it was yet determined to be illegal I said some of the debt after feb17 could be challenged especially by shareholders who held this stock prior to Feb17 and prior to this conversion dividend. I didn't say anything about letting the company go bankrupt. I said it would open a can of worms. You just let YA claim everything through debt and leave shareholders out and see if it doesn't get opened. Your post would imply that I couldn't hold someone accountable who shot me because I didn't get out of the way.
srowen, debtholders come first if it is a legal debt. Some of YA's could be challenged as to that, especially that incurred after Feb. 17 and some of this conversion dividend scheme. And what about this BOD who hasn't been duely elected from year to year as it should have been incurring such debt. Oh what a can of worms? My point is I don't think this BOD or management or YA want to handle this in a way that would cause shareholders to open that can of worms.
I have come to believe that YA sold those 77mil shares seeking some favorable 2009 tax consequences. They knew they could easily replace and after considering the tax consequences and the conversion dividend actually come out way ahead.
lesnshawn, I hope those geese represent the ecosystem and the leader is Neomedia and they're headed north.
Canuck, I don't know who Tobin Smith is or was, but I've read on here that he predicted a price of $ 5.00 a share.
Who knows, with a settlement and if it's a strong settlement for Neomedia, I may even get my shirt back. Thanks.
Rickyaces, I agree. When I first started reading about the patent suit, my first impulse was that I hoped Neom would destroy Scanbuy, but as I thought about it, I came to realize that the way for this to be most successful is "as a whole" as you've put it. As long as Neom's patent is not respected and adhered to, this technology could be so fragmented as to never realize its true potential. I think that recognition and acceptance of Neomedia's patent will be a part of the glue that holds this together "as a whole" and allows them to [as the former CEO of Neom put it] "get on with it". I agree with Nealpeart that others are watching this case and with Neom success, will realize they too need to pay the fiddler also.
Thanks for the good advice Rickyaces. I hope my optimism lately hasn't been unwarranted. If it has I apologize. I do the best I can to separate the wheat from the chaff.
Thanks Ricky, I appreciate everything that helps me learn. Keep in mind, I know nothing about the technical aspects of all this, nothing at all about how the market works, and very little about the business part of it, but am hungry to learn as much as my limited abilities will allow me to absorb. Thanks again.
Jadegreen, You asked your question of those who have experience in this. I don't. But I'm going to butt in a little bit. I'm old enough to remember the "Hulahoop" the guy who held the patent on it got rich. Others produced, marketed, and sold it. They colored it in many different colors added glow in the dark, added glitter etc but a hulahoop was still a hulahoop. I'm sure some giant toy maker came along and bought his patent and he got rich from that and future royalties. He may have never sold one hulahoop himself but still got rich. Neom's patented process is our "hulahoop". Or this is how I see it. A simplistic view, I know, but I think it may be that simple in the long run. Also let me add, this is a whole lot bigger than the "hulahoop".
Not if but when Neom's patent holds, surely YA is smart enough to know that this pennyante conversion scheme is just that pennyante. They should realize the real money will be to let this stock show a few quarters of good PPS growth. That's what will attract the attention of investers and brokers alike. That's where the real money lies for them as well as us. Just My opinion of course. I may be showing my ignorance of how all this works, but that's the way I see it.
Abide, I don't think it's that complex. I believe it is a reflection of years of frustrations and disappointments with this stock and Neom. I think all that is about to change. Keep in mind this is only my opinion and I don't know much about all of this. I believe that many who have looked at Neom stock and passed will begin to take a second look as this begins to get out into the public.
Roadrunner, You are not much newer than I am, but I think your timing in buying Neom is just about perfect.
To all of you who have journeyed thru years with this stock in hopes of a succesful and prosperous outcome, from one who hasn't been through all those years, I honestly believe your journey is 95% behind you. By the way, I admire your guts and patience. God bless and lets keep our fingers crossed.
Thanks Bull, Grabbed my copy from the coffee table and looked as soon as I read your post. I've never been more excited about Neom' potential, and in my opinion this is only the beginning. I believe those in the print media who are savvy have already recognized that this may be the tool that will save the print business. I believe we'll soon see similar ads on most ad pages in most every publication in the world. Then we can talk about other uses of this technology such as uses in the medical field and prescriptions etc. I could go on all day but I know most all on this board who by the way are smarter and much more knowledgable about this than I, have already considered. I have been so disheartened at times with Neomedia and Neom's management that I've cussed them with every breath, but I feel that those days are very probably about over. With the Pacer documents and seeing this, God I'm excited about this. CLICK, CLICK, CLICK! to the multi billionth time each and every day. I hope I don't sound like a pumper, I'm just so excited about this I had to express it. Thanks.
Good eyes, webenick. Thanks, I'll be watching also.
Clawmann, When I underscore something thats written, I am attempting to emphasize it. Notice the new dates underscored and weren't in the other Pacer document? Do you think the judge may have done this and was making a point to the attornies? Just looking for some sign to hope a settlement is coming. Thanks
Thank you, Krays.
Thanks Success and also thanks Clawmann. I also like what Clawmann said about the judge possibly wanting to talk to the parties. He must have been satisfied that a further delay held some promise of a successful outcome or he wouldn't go along with these continued delays. I doubt he'll grant another. But remember, I don't know how courts and judges work. Clawmann what is your take on this?
Sleep. What the heck is Sleep? Since I got into Neom, I have almost forgotten what sleeo is. Hell, I can't even spell it anymore.
Zacked, You seem to know something that we don't or at least that I don't. Why don't you just go ahead and share it with us. This thing is driving me crazy! What does "grate" mean? Is that some clue?
Alwayswright, Thanks for the welcome.
Clawmann, Thanks.
Thanks to all who reply to my questions. I fully understand that I know less than most every member of this board about how all this works. The only way I can learn is by asking questions. Thanks again, it is greatly appreciated. Please keep in mind that any opinion I may express is only an opinion and that I don't much about all this. It has never been nor will it ever be my intention to offend any board member with anything I may post here. Thanks again.
[IF] there is a settlement here [US] in the patent case, what effects if any would that have on the patent challenge now underway in Europe?
Thanks Clawmann for keeping an eye on Pacer. And Thanks Krays for the English version of the number portability announcement.
Clawmann, Was there anything on Pacer today? The longer this goes without seeing anything on Pacer the better I like your theory. Until proven otherwise, I do believe there's a settlement on the table somewhere.
Ryan, I read your post then with great interest but was not a member here at that time. AS you know that transaction can be part of many scenarios some very good and some very bad.
Clawmann, I agree with your theory, The post I was mentioning is #186683.
Clawmann, I only joined the board on the 24th of Sept. and am looking back so please give me a minute to look it up. thanks.