Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
holding well today
sure does, thanx....
let's go GRNO
yeah, that could be the key...guess it will be touch and go
if this can get and hold over 10.60...lots of room open on the way to 12.00, IMO
Thanks...yeah i was told that the float is basically locked and held, and there may be more than 100% held also, though it's not exactly known how many
so here's to getting to that magic number
yeah, looks like it just follows the dow
although yesterday it really dropped out of it's range:
was under the B.Bands, and the RSI was showing oversold
another crapfest DOW day could send it lower though
yeah, i think it was way oversold as everyone freaked out yesterday
I'm averaged under 10, although not as many as i would like (and i am in a "good faith" period til friday, so i hope it stays up, lol).
looks like a nice start to the day, and yeah, it's nice how it follows the DOW
thanx, will see what i can find out...kinda curious
how much of the float is locked down on this currently? any rough figures/estimates?
closer everyday to the promised land folks
lol, it was just a bit faster, although, you may have saved the other guy some time
nice
Analysts still like F:
Exert:
A.
Seymour said he wouldn't do anything and advised investors not to be lured into selling good stocks. Scaramucci said he would use the opportunity to buy and get set for the back half of the year.
B.
In the final trades...Scaramucci liked Ford(F).
Source:
http://www.thestreet.com/story/10795221/3/fast-money-recap-heading-much-lower.html
me too
ok, last AH at 9.87 so pretty close to the actual EOD
it makes me sick to think i was pondering picking this up at $2, but got cold feet
up to 9.92 then down to 9.83
ok close, not fond of the AH, but I personally think it was just was oversold
it's below the BB and the RSI is crazy low
it could go lower, but I think it will have a nice bounce on a green DOW day
but hey, I am far from an expert
yep
yeah, if it gets significantly lower (from here) i may splurge for some more
you're smarter than me...lol, i should have waited too, but got trigger happy
yeah, been in a bit of a downtrend, and then the entire market taking a hit today...good day to lock in some sub $10 IMO
couldn't resist getting in today
errr, yes...you're right...lol
my brain is fried from watching a 5 minute chart looking for alien contact
but at 45 mil...it would be like 168%
45 million locked short would be
66+45=109
109/66 = 165%
who says there is no one buying?
there has been daily buying
good point...and also...overview is important
hasn't fallen in weeks
has fallen over months
has risen over the year
anyone can pick apart any stock if they pick apart the chart during a pullback/correction/accum period...but it just isn't taking the whole in perspective, IMO
Anyone use zecco? Anyone fat finger a sell order?
I know if I put in a sell well over the ask I get a warning...has anyone seen a warning for putting in a sell (limit) well below bid?
oh man, i think i see what happened...looks like i changed the limit, and there was a fat finger...although, I am sure they will say it's me, and I know it was not
ex.
I had a sell in at a limit of .025
I lowered it to .019
BUT
it shows I lowered it to .0019
so they sold it at bid (.015)
quite crappy
anyone ever have their online broker sell a position well below the limit sell entered?
well i see a 20k+ trade....u?
curious to see if you get filled, they split it up, or make you wait an hour
nah man, someones just trying to twist your words, like the MMs are trying to twist the perception of CDIV's strength
"FWIW, I only see this one article on the Seattle Times website about CDIV."
Come on man, use those eyes. If you are going to link something, at least read it first. Before the article even starts is says the original posting date, and when it was last updated. That shows it was altered/corrected at least once.
I guess you missed the part where I said it was full of errors.
If a guy getting paid to do his job cannot even provide error free information, the entire credibility of his words should be questioned, IMO.
Again, believe what you want. I was here before the first article was published, and guess what, still here.
By the way, the CEO is quite easy to contact.
FWIW, the original release of that article was full of errors (shows lack of professionalism) and has since been regurgitated several times.
In fact, the original was such a POS, one would have to question the amount of effort that was actually placed in it's research.
But hey, believe what you want.