Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's way too cheap! $10,000,000,000 maybe.
Nope! It heard you and turned around.
I suggest that Dr. Seymour can't understand the hand wringing over this because he's on the inside looking out. It's another occasion of his not empathizing with the unaffiliated shareholders. He should put himself in our shoes before making such statements.
Don't you man 300,000,000 shares, which at $50/sh is worth $15 billion.
Why didn't Seymour just say that instead of letting everyone stew over it for a day? Why must he always respond to IHUB messages? NNVC's lack of communications skills never seems to improve.
It's not a lab. It's an empty building that is scheduled to become a lab. So someone said.
I believe Lvus was referring to 2013 following human trials in Australia.
Can NNVC run its toxicology tests in Australia, and if so can/would they be accepted by the FDA? Or, will the FDA require them to be run here as well?
Can human trials in Australia begin before toxicity tests are completed in the US? What are the FDA protocols for approving tox tests? What is the usual time frame for such approval after data are submitted?
That's probably as good a strategy for NNVC as any I can offer.
Not if he's investing my money.
It was earlier this year when he was talking to a Wall Street type after one of the NNVC presentations. Based on what he had heard, the Wall Street guy opined that we should be at $4 by the end of 2012.
I think we can safely assume the $4.00 share price prediction by Christmas that Dr. Seymour reported ain't gonna happen.
What gives? Half-hour into trading day and only 500 shares traded.
Perversity, thy name is NNVC.
My concern is that if the oral solution (no pun intended) superceded all the 10K information, there seems no reason to not have stated that immediately in a PR. There is no information in such a statement that gives aid or comfort to the enemy. I would like to see an immediate Quarterly report (FY 2013 Q1 - which ended Sept 30), detailing that and putting the new time frames in proper context. If we're going to have human testing in Australia in 2013, just say so, and stop beating around the proverbial bush.
Are you telling me that any information available after June 30 (3 months ago) couldn't be included in a (late) 10k? For God's sake, put out a PR plainly stating that. Don't leave everyone assuming. The dissemination of information by NNVC leaves a lot to be desired. Another place where professional help would be advantageous.
Sad but true! I think the docs are in danger of running off their long- term faithful supporters. I was a business executive for forty years. If I had run my companies like this, it would have been four years. I wish they would get some professional development people involved. Most doctors are terrible managers; financial and otherwise.
The 10K now projects completion of phase one and phase two trials earliest 2015. Can someone explain to me what the **** they have been doing for six months and why it will take more than two years to get to Phase 3 clinical trials. I'm at a loss to understand the dilatory pace of this company. There seems to be no urgency on anything.
I believe shingles is a variant of the herpes family of viruses. Tests already done by NNVC in that area indicate Herpicide may be a cure for all these variants.
What's a chuck?
if tox takes six months, we just passed that mark from the FDA meeting.
Do you keep a separate set of funeral clothes to bring out when the NNVC funeral procession passes, or is that your normal dress?
All of the Cides operate with the same mechanism - a ligand attached to a polymeric micelle. They envelop and deconstruct the various viruses in the same way. This has been demonstrated over and over. That's why I conclude that all the testing should be viewed as a single body of work.
I believe that everything tested and reported by Kard is a replication of tests done by other independent scientific research facilities: LSU, UC Berkely, UCSF, Einstein, Southern Research, Etc. on various CIDES. My question is, why isn't all that testing sufficient to satisfy the FDA for efficacy, safety, and toxicology?
That $20 will get us to Hawaii. Cox says Flucide has a market potential of $25 billion. If you assume a large pharmaceutical company licenses the product and agrees to a 15% licensing fee, that is $3.75 billion to NNVC. Also assume 200,000,000 shares outstanding at signature. That'a $18.75 per share. At a modest multiple of 25 times earnings the stock would be worth nearly $500 per share. Diwan and Seymour will vault into the ranks of the nations wealthiest individuals, and we peons won't do too badly either. And that says nothing about HIVCide or the other blockbuster drugs to come.
Apology accepted. Good luck to you and all NNVC fans.
For your information I have been a shareholder in NNVC since 2005 and one of their biggest booster. I find your comparison of me with Ovidius extremely offensive.
Apparently the Cox pill has lost its potency. It might be just as well. What we need are the toxicology results and a phase one testing schedule. ASAP
Is this all about being correct? I personally think management has been judicious in their financial planning and resource management, including Diwan financing the new lab. Their approach may not be as expeditious as some of us would like, but the slow,steady progress compares well with some billion dollar pharmaceutical start-up timelines. And there is only so much inside information that can be shared without running afoul of the FDA or the SEC. Why take the chance.
I've owned stock in NNVC since 2005, and no negative test results have been reported in all that time. I'm still bullish. If you are disenchanted, why do you hang around and castigate the management? Move on.
When was the last time you had a positive comment about NNVC? Does your car not have a reverse gear?
Ask Dr. Seymour.
"ditto"
I predict that NNVC and it's viricides will constitute a positive disruptive Black Swan event that will take the world by surprise - within two years.
An attack on Iran's nuclear facilities is a potentially negative disruptive Black Swan event that could make everything else moot.
So,your primary motivation is hate and revenge? Let it go. You'll be much happier.
No, and yes.
Does anyone have a logical explanation for the 10% haircut in NNVC share price in the last two days?
Good to see you're still around to pour water on other people's parade. You're nothing if not consistent.
One would think that with all your experience you would be heavily into meditations.