Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
,,,,,,,Thanks i'm a human too you know. And someone has to say what needs to be said. Otherwise...i would have no credibility.
LOL
IDWS CEO,,,nice pic don't ya think?
http://www.seminolesheriff.org/drawRegistration.php?registration[rfn]=2613
you never know with these...."take profits relentlessly"-Tokyo Joe
So profound..."sometimes the most obvious answer is the one overlooked" --Megas
I'm just going to sit here in my purple pajammas and absorb all of that knowledge Megas dropped!!!!!
"--sometimes the most obvious answer is the one overlooked"
MEGAS the great.
SILENCE to the collective...THE GREAT MEGAS SPEAKS:
Megas email today...
sometimes the most obvious answer is the one overlooked huh, LOL, I too am encouraged:
now with the auditors, essentially non controversial but everybody
hyper
careful because of intense
public scrutiny as a consequence of fake share issue.
thomas megas bcit
Good evening to the collective,,has the Great Megas given our daily edict??????
,,,Hey Patrick Downs.Your Boy Scott back in Rehab i hear. Tell Laura she could send the arrest warrant for Scott Wilding there.
He may still be there not sure. Hope this helps
SOLID RESEARCH....why can't your answer#3797?????????
Go on record oh wise one...IS THIS THE TIME DUMP'EM???
We're ALL EARS Jimmy.
-- Now .46
Yup...appears Megas is looking to get paid. Drag this thing out as long as possible,,,weaken our resolve and cut a side deal.
I guess crime pays.....There is just no way in Hades 5Months later we are no better off than we were when this whole saga began. I shudder to think how many FBI agents would be all over this had this been a NYSE STOCK.
all IMO
Curious,,,,if this were a NYSE or Nasdaq stock how would the SEC respond.
Please answer post #3820
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=8138572 As i said once before...
,,,,,,,Convicted felons can't work for McDonalds but can run small cap companies. Hahaaaaaaaaaaa!
From CEO Patrick Downs: Scott Wilding and IDWS...Scotty On the run?
Email "He bought some shares from Laura Brickley a third party consultant to the previous company. Owed her $50,000 paid $25,000 and when rest was due on September 18th he disappeared. Last I heard she was so mad she was putting out warrant for his arrest."
From: Patrick Downs
================================================================
Scott Wilding SEC violations
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=8178880
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=8159822
Way to go Patrick you sure know who to surround IDWS with...
position-I'm neutral IDWD
You mean this Scott Wilding??
From: inyourdreams 10/19/2005 8:03:18 PM
Read Replies (1) of 146837
"Scott Wilding" more violations; Guy should work for SEC fulltime that way they can keep an eye on him. He's obviously back in business from all of the RB postings on IDWS:
This is G o o g l e's text-only cache of http://216.63.13.30/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=474524 as retrieved on Feb 11, 2005 13:37:00 GMT.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
Click here for the full cached page with images included.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:3xspQTKjouIJ:216.63.13.30/boards/read_msg.asp%3Fmessage_id%3D47....
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=474524
[this one goes way back to GOLF.Then there's the more recent one i posted. I see he's still at it no doubt.] This time making ago at it with IDWS/IDWD
Posted by: scu8452
In reply to: None Date:8/23/2002 6:58:56 PM
Post #of 122
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
August 23, 2002
Date of Report (Date of earliest reported)
GOLF ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its chapter)
DELAWARE 0-18303 11-2990598
-------- -------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer
of incorporation) File Number) Identification No.)
1008 S Clayton St.
Springdale, Arkansas 72762
---------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
479-751-2300
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
NOT APPLICABLE
Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
ITEM 1. CHANGES IN CONTROL OF REGISTRANT. Not applicable.
ITEM 2. ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF ASSETS. Not applicable.
ITEM 3. BANKRUPTCY OR RECEIVERSHIP. Not applicable.
ITEM 4. CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT.
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS AND REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE.
In this Report on Form 8-K, we will refer to Golf Entertainment, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, as "Golf," "the Company," "we," "us," and "our." These
terms include by reference, all of the current and former subsidiary
corporations we have owned either all, or a significant interest in, since
becoming a reporting company.
A. RISK FACTORS EMERGING SINCE FILING OF ANNUAL REPORT
1. Since the filing of its annual report on Form 10K. the Company has
identified emerging risk factors related to market conditions which are being
disclosed through this filing. The nature of the risk being identified is
alleged market manipulation at the hands of an organized crime element as we
have described in a lawsuit filed by the Company, styled Golf Entertainment,
Inc., v. Carla Sue Hohenhouse, at al., case number 02-5133, filed in the
Western District of Arkansas at Fayetteville.
2. The suit has been filed under the civil provisions of the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 USC Sect. 1964(c). The original
suit was filed on June 18, 2002, and amended on August 15, 2002. In the
amendment Ms. Hohenhouse and others are described as a persons who have
attempted two predicate felony violations of the Hobbs Act (extortion) in a
manner designed to interfere with interstate commerce, namely, the trading
of the Company's securities. A number of persons are identified in the amended
complaint as associates, aiders, abettors and co-conspirators of
Ms. Hohenhouse. These are:
a.) Leonard Vaughn Mauck, the self-described "editor" of an internet
website, a former NASD licensee; Mr. Mauck resides in Dallas, Texas;
(b) Mahmood Jamshidi "Mac J." Shahsavar, a Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
resident who purportedly owns the website edited by Mr. Mauck.
c.) Robert Kirk, a/k/a "Robert Church," a/k/a "Robin Kirk," a/k/a/
"Robin Kirk, Ph.D," a self-described "writer" for Mauck and
Shahsavar. Mr. Kirk resides in Tampa, Florida.
d.) Scott H. Wilding, a stock promoter residing in Pembroke Pines,
Florida.
e.) Various "John Doe" defendants, including:
i) "John Doe#1" alleged to be a former FBI agent who previously
assisted the various other defendants;
ii) "John Doe #2" (a/k/a: YaMoron) alleged to be a person involved
in corrupting a state of Arkansas public official.
iii) "John Doe#3" an unknown named official or employee of the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission who has
allegedly provided John Doe#2 and the other defendants with
confidential SEC materials regarding the Company.
f.) John Doe#4, alleged to be an employee of Lycos, Inc., working in a
job/position where that person can control access to and the content
of various www.ragingbull.com message boards, and who has corruptly
assisted the other defendants in the operation of the various schemes
complained of in our RICO Complaint in chief.
3. Previously, Lycos, Inc., was served with a Rule 45 Federal Subpoena to
produce for inspection and copying, various documents that would reveal the
identities of various John Does named in our litigation. On the deadline
date for compliance, despite the requirements of Rule 45, Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, Lycos, Inc. neither complied nor filed a timely objection as
required under Rule 45.
4. On August 23, 2002, the Company filed in the United States District Court,
Western District of Arkansas, an Application for Citation and Order directing
Lycos, Inc., to appear and show cause why Lycos, Inc. should not be held in
direct contempt of the United States District Court, and punished pursuant to
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 45(e). The Company intends to
vigorously pursue sanctions against Lycos not only for the cost of enforcement
of the subpoena, but, for all economic damage accruing to the Company as the
result of Lycos shielding various defendants from service of process in the
RICO Complaint, and the additional time afforded these defendants to perpetrate
further violations of Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5. The
Company is researching whether or not it is practical to join Lycos as a
defendant in the RICO or other litigation designed to interdict the Section
240.10b-5 violations through Court ordered supervision of the "ragingbull.com"
electronic venue on the basis that it is a public nuisance not unlike a real
premises maintained or tolerated by a conventional landlord, upon or in which
habitual criminal activity is occurring.
5. Following determination that the Company and several of it staff were
being victimized by professional stock manipulators, the Company undertook to
file various complaints with law enforcement and regulatory agencies. The
agencies that the Company has contacted and is actively supplying information
and assistance include the Office of Inspector General, United States
Securities and Exchange Commission; the Enforcement Division, United States
Securities and Exchange Commission; the Southeast Regional Office, United
States Securities and Exchange Commission; the Office of the United States
Attorney, Eastern District of New York; the Office of the United States
Attorney, Western District of Oklahoma; the Little Rock Field Office, Federal
Bureau of Investigation; the Oklahoma City Field Office, Federal Bureau of
Investigation; the Tampa Field Office, Federal Bureau of Investigation; the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Savanna Georgia Resident Agency; the Florida
Division of Securities; the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, Tampa,
Florida; and the Florida Comptroller's Office. The Company believes that it
has exercised and is exercising due diligence in pursuing criminal prosecution
of the persons it believes has committed federal and state violations in
connection with manipulations and attempted manipulations of its stock.
6. Among the many risk factors associated with investment in any stock,
especially a stock traded on the NASD "over the counter" bulletin board system
is regulation of brokers holding a "short position." Recently developed news
stories anecdotally suggest that Canadian brokers are especially able to sell
stock which they do not own in an issuer such as Golf, for example, and thereby
adversely affect the trading or market for the securities of any one given
issuer. "Naked shorting" is especially dangerous to a company such as Golf
which is subject to market volatility and rapid changes in the bid/ask price.
7. One defendant in the Company's RICO lawsuit, posting in an internet
message board, claimed twice in early July, 2002, that he was "short" 27
million shares of the stock of the Company. This defendant, Leonard Vaughn
Mauck, is a former NASD license holder and represents himself as an expert in
trading matters. If Mr. Mauck was truthful in his claims, and, the Company has
no reason to believe he is not, then the actual public float of the securities
of the Company would be greatly inflated, and not tied to any stock ever
actually issued by the Company. In turn, such naked shorting would reasonably
be expected to cause an unlawful dilution of legitimate shareholder interests
and adversely, markedly affect the bid/ask price for our common shares on the
open market. As the result of the statements made by Mr. Mauck, the Company
has initiated complaints with the NASD and Canadian authorities in an effort
to determine the truthfulness of Mr. Mauck's claims. If found to be true,
Mr. Mauck's self-described shorting activities will result in further
litigation by the Company to protect the interests of legitimate shareholders.
8. As noted in the amended RICO Complaint of the Company, the defendants have
unlawfully obtained, utilized and then disseminated information allegedly
corruptly obtained from an Arkansas state public official, Robert C. Balfe.
In order to determine what risk management techniques would be of benefit to
the Company, we compared our present situation to that of other public
companies which were recently victimized by another well-organized group of
stock manipulators led by Amr I. Elgindy. In our analysis, and as we stated
in the Company's Amended Complaint, we believe that persons alleged to be
operating to manipulate the common stock of the Company are using nearly the
exact same methods and means as the Elgindy crime enterprise. In one instance,
we believe we have one overlapping Elgindy co-defendant, named as defendant
John Doe#1. The similarities involve planting false, misleading or materially
untrue stories in legitimate media outlets, using governmental units or
agencies to harass the victim company; corruptly obtaining confidential law
enforcement information; extortionate demands; extensive use of internet
stock message boards to deliver false, misleading or incomplete information;
use of mass e-mail deliveries to accomplish the same purposes as the misuse
of internet message boards; harassment of the Company's employees, vendors,
supplies, contractors, or customers.
9. In the Elgindy risk analysis, based on the experiences of other crime-
victim companies, we observed that the ability of the perpetrators to operate
against a company is greatly enabled when they are able to corrupt public
officials; compromise legitimate media and engender suspicion, hostility
toward, and defame a victim company. We have identified other victim
companies these same defendants are now apparently operating against. The
alleged manipulators we are dealing with, as was the case of Elgindy,
actively cultivate a public image of being "exposers" of frauds and
"protectors" of the public interest. As was the case of Elgindy, some of
these defendants use the assault on a victim company to actually sell
subscriptions to their paid-access website for the purpose of furthering
their fraudulent conduct.
10. Management believes that our civil litigation will be successful
ultimately. Our challenge is in finding a more timely means and method of
interdicting the 10b-5 violations we have complained of. We believe that these
manipulators we have sued in federal court are well skilled in the activities
we have accused them of in our pleadings and we are monitoring their
activities on an ongoing basis, making additional complaints to the above named
agencies when and where appropriate.
B. OUR CORPORATE CHARTER & STATUS
11. In May, 2002, we were notified by the State of Delaware that we owed, by
their calculation, approximately $400,000 in unpaid annual franchise fees or
taxes. We investigated their claim and undertook to make a series of curative
filings required to restore the charter of the Company to active status. The
Delaware Secretary of State file-stamped our final filing, the reinstatement
proceeding, on June 21, 2002. The resulting cost associated with the Delaware
curative filings was less than $400.
12. As the result of data entry errors, however, the computer system of the
Delaware Secretary of State failed to reflect these events. On August 21, 2002,
defendant Carla Hohenhouse, using what we allege to be an artifice of fraud,
undertook to interfere with our right to registration in Delaware by filing
or causing to be filed a "reservation of name" purportedly affecting our
rights to conduct business in Delaware. Thereafter, the various RICO defendants
disseminated false and misleading information regarding the Company, stating as
a materially true fact, that the Company's charter was revoked and that our
business operations were somehow in violation of unspecified laws. In
particular, the RICO defendants made extensive use of internet stock boards
to disseminate this false information. On August 21, 2002, the Company learned
from a confidential source that defendant Hohenhouse intended somehow to
"assume control" of the Company through her Delaware filings. The Company
contacted the Delaware Secretary of State on August 22, 2002, obtained the
appropriate corrections in their database and voided the actions of
Hohenhouse. Subsequently, we filed additional complaints regarding the Delaware
events with the Southeast Regional Office of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Federal Bureau of Investigation on the basis that
the Delaware events occasioned by Ms. Hohenhouse constitute further 10b-5
violations.
13. Ms. Hohenhouse is not an officer, director, employee, affiliate nor
control person of Golf Entertainment, Inc., a registrant under the Securities
Act of 1934, as amended. In this regard she has no lawful authority to engage
in any business activity in the name of, or, on behalf of the registrant
Company.
14. On August 21, 2002, we filed articles of domestication for Golf
Entertainment, Inc. with the Arkansas Secretary of State.
C. OUR STATUS WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
15. The Company is now, and has been at all times material, in full and
complete compliance with all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. We have reviewed Item 401
of Regulation S-B as it regards disclosure of background information for any
person or persons the Securities and Exchange Commission defines as an
individual subject to the regulation. The Company has adequately complied
with all aspects of that Item with careful attention to the requirements to
disclose information relating to the integrity, ability and experience of
our managers, directors, officers and key employees. On August 22, 2002, we
concluded complete background checks on all persons covered under the stated
Item 401. The Company has made all required SEC public disclosures regarding
our staff and will continue to do so.
16. Despite media stories which we directly attribute to the 10b-5 violation
activities of the above named RICO defendants, all for the purpose of
disseminating false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information about
the Company, neither the Company nor any employee, director or officer has
been notified by the Securities and Exchange Commission that it is the subject
of any order of investigation, inquiry or proceeding. The various RICO
defendants, however, are believed to be falsely circulating such information,
in violation of 10b-5, as part of their overall scheme of manipulation of the
securities of the Company. The Company was contacted in early June, 2002, by
a staff examiner at the Securities and Exchange Commission, Southeast Regional
Office who requested that we fax him a copy of our pleadings filed in the RICO
action. We have since been in ongoing contact with that same office,
periodically transmitting complaints for 10b-5 violations for persons living
in the SEC's Southeast Region, and furnishing that office with information we
believe documents those violations. On August 22, 2002, we formally asked the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Southeast Regional Office to
commence litigation on the behalf of the Company and its shareholders to
interdict the 10b-5 violations we have complained of.
D. OTHER LITIGATION
17. On August 22, 2002, the Company received notice that RICO defendant Carla
Sue Hohenhouse and Daniel Johanning commenced a suit in the U.S. District
Court, Southern District of Georgia, case CV402-189, wherein Golf Entertainment,
Inc., was named as a defendant as well as The Genesis Trust, James W. Bolt, John
C. Dodge, Timothy Brooker and various "John Doe" defendants. The Company has
reviewed the filing, which was filed by the plaintiffs "pro se" (without
benefit of an attorney). Counsel for the Company does not believe that
Ms. Hohenhouse and Mr. Johanning have stated a cause of action upon which
relief can be granted. Their suit claims, inter alia, slander (reporting
Hohenhouse's criminal activities to law enforcement authorities), libel
(purported but unspecified statements made somewhere on the internet); Libel
per se (unknown persons suggesting somewhere on the internet that Hohenhouse
and Johanning are likely to go to jail); "False Light Invasion" (suing
Hohenhouse and Johanning for the activities described in the federal RICO
complaint they are named in); "Civil Conspiracy," (a term still being
researched but with no actual "real world" applicability to the subject matter
of the litigation); Injunction, (presumably to try to stop the RICO litigation
against them in the United States District Court; preclude the Company or its
employees from making criminal complaints about Hohenhouse or Johanning, or
both of them). The Company has observed a number of materially false, deliberate
untruths set forth in the preamble to the plaintiff's Complaint. The Company
will seek to remove this lawsuit to Arkansas and join it with its lawsuit
against these same actors. The Company will seek immediate dismissal of the
pleading as scandalous; a fraud upon the Court and a violation of the
aforementioned 10b-5 regulation. The Company believes the suit of Hohenhouse
and Johanning is frivolous, that it is intrinsically an artifice of securities
fraud, and is totally without merit. The Company will vigorously defend it and
seek appropriate sanctions against the plaintiffs for fraud upon the Court.
18. Although not material, the Company previously requested, and, the plaintiff
Genesis Trust, plaintiff in Genesis v. Golf, agreed with the Company in
requesting the United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas to
set a formal "fairness hearing" in case 02-5088 in order to put on testimony
for the public record regarding the settlement previously entered into by and
between the Company and others in an omnibus settlement agreement. Previously,
the Plaintiff Genesis Trust waived a formal Section 3(a)(10) "fairness
hearing." The sole purpose of a Section 3(a)(10) is to allow judicial
determination that a proposed settlement is fair to the person accepting such
settlement shares under Section 3(a)(10). The parties will also ask the
District Court to make a judicial determination as to the exact meaning of
"free trading shares."
E. MEDIA RELATED EVENTS TIED TO THE RICO DEFENDANTS 10b-5 ALLEGED VIOLATIONS
19. The RICO defendants, in furtherance of the alleged 10b-5 violations we
have described in our litigation and related law enforcement and regulatory
complaints, have utilized various media resources in their alleged attempts to
violate 10b-5 and injure the Company. The most egregious example thus far
determined is an article appearing a tabloid biweekly periodical called "the
Northwest Arkansas Business Journal." The Company has previously filed court
documents that illustrate that the article was either written or co-written
by RICO defendants Leonard Mauck and/or Robert Kirk. Their activities with
this publication commenced on June 20, 2002. Defendant Kirk announced the tone
and focus of the article about a week prior to its publication. The Company
provided the purported writer, Jeffery Wood, with documentation refuting the
majority of the claims contained in the story. The Company will likely bring
separate civil suit against Mr. Wood, the publication and its publisher for
damages associated with their alleged 10b-5 violations and the economic injury
to the Company. The Company is presently investigating the feasibility of
making the suit a class action case on behalf of the Company and its
shareholders.
F. MATTERS RELATED TO SHAREHOLDER: THE GENESIS TRUST
20. Following certain events related to publication of adverse statements
regarding the Company and its shareholder, The Genesis Trust, the Company
undertook to request and obtain copies of the Trust's establishing documents.
What the Company then determined is that Genesis Trust is organized as an IRS
501(c)(3) entity. It was formally organized as an entity under 501 (c)(3) in
August 2001. During the interim period, it has operated in all regards as a
charitable organization with its stated purposes being, inter alia:
"b) Designation. The Trust shall be used for the purposes of
facilitating cultural adjustments in the State of Arkansas
resulting from Hispanic immigration. Should, in the sole judgment
of the Trustees, the necessity for the Fund cease to exist, the
Trust is instructed to use these funds for the support of
scholarship, endowments, grants, charitable contributions,
research, research grants, investments (or a similar purposes or
interests)."
21. The Company contacted the Internal Revenue Service regarding the adequacy
of and requirements of the Trust to make certain filings with the IRS. The IRS
in turn provided the Company with a copy of their Form 1023 Instructions. Under
Instruction 1023, The Genesis Trust is not required or even due to file their
initial Form 1023 until on or after November 1, 2002. The Company has received
assurances from the Genesis Trust that it intends to file its Form 1023 on or
before the lawful deadline established by the Internal Revenue Service and that
its operations, in all manners, fully comply with the guidelines set forth in
IRS Instruction 1023.
22. Under IRS published guidelines, the Form 1023 which the Company has been
assured by The Genesis Trust it will file, will, by operation of the underlying
policy and regulations of 501(c)(3) make the effective date of the 501(c)(3)
status August, 2001. The Company has made an independent review of IRS policy
and procedure and concurs that the statement by the Trust is materially
accurate.
23. The review of the enabling Genesis Trust establishing documents revealed
that the form and content are, with the exception of specific language in the
First Article where language regarding the mission statement of acculturation
issues related to Hispanic immigration, exactly that which is promulgated by
the Internal Revenue Service as part of its published 501(c)(3) structure
suggestions. In short, the IRS created or drafted the enabling document that
the Genesis Trust is founded upon, thereby giving a strong presumption on
the part of the Company as to the regularity of the affairs of the Trust
and its lawful authority to function as a non-profit entity.
24. No person affiliated with the Company is materially related to any control
person of the Genesis Trust; the affairs of and operation of The Genesis Trust
are divorced, separate, apart from and unrelated to any operation of the
Company. No person affiliated with The Genesis Trust is affiliated with the
Company as such is defined under applicable SEC regulations, terms and
definitions.
G. THE COMPANY'S 506 PRIVATE PLACEMENT
25. On August 22, 2002, upon discussing the nature of emerging risk factors
with participants and prospective participants in the current Regulation D,
Rule 506 private placement of the Company, the Company elected to withdraw the
current Private Placement Memorandum in favor of redrafting the section
entitled "RISK FACTORS" with special emphasis on risk analysis associated with
"offshore shorting" and "naked shorting" as they relate to dilution of the
equity investment proposed by the current 506. It is the opinion of the
Company that it can re-draft and reissue the required offering documents
within two weeks or less of the date of this report. The Company anticipates
that it will resume private financing activities on or before that stated date.
H. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACTIONS
26. On August 22, 2002, the Board of Directors was called to special session
to discuss proposed management changes. Dr. Tim Brooker stated his desire to
resign due to contractual conflict of interest with his relationship with Oral
Roberts University. Dr. Brooker then resigned as Board Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. Dr. Brooker, as a director, then nominated Michael F.
Daniels as Board Chairman. The Board then elected Mr. Daniels to the Chairman's
position. The board then appointed Mr. Daniels as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company. Dr. Brooker then tendered, and the Board reluctantly accepted
Dr. Brooker's resignation from the Board. Dr. Brooker expressed no disagreement
with the Company nor any action taken during his tenure in relationship to his
resignation from the Board.
27. Mr. Daniels tenure with the Company spans over 20-years. He has served
as an executive officer, Board Chairman and CEO during his tenure with the
Company.
ITEM 6. RESIGNATIONS OF REGISTRANT'S DIRECTORS.
As stated above, Dr. Tim Brooker resigned from the Board of Directors on August
22, 2002, expressing no disagreement and requesting no notification by way of a
Form 8-K filing regarding any aspect of his resignation. The resignation is
announced only as a matter of interest to shareholders.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
Amended Results of Operations
For the three months ended June 30, 2002, the Company had total revenues of
$112,767. The Company reported no operations revenues during 2001.
In fiscal 2001, the Company underwent a period of continuous operational
losses and experienced a period of business inactivity. The resumption of
business, a new focus within the field of entertainment has tended to validate
the new business model of the Company and yielded revenues. For the three
months ended June 30, 2002, the selling, general and administrative costs of
the Company was $41,161 while during the same period in 2001, the same costs
were booked at $91,372.
There was no interest expense during the reported period ending June 30, 2002.
During the comparable period of 2001, interest expense was $4,126. Management
continues to employ a cost control plan and reviews overhead expenses weekly
in an effort to avoid incurring an operational deficit. Net income for the
period ending June 30, 2002 was $35,375.00 During the same period in fiscal
2001, the Company reported a net income of $ 2,870.00
ITEM 8. CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR. Not applicable.
ITEM 9. REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE. Not applicable.
IGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
GOLF ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Registrant)
/s/ Michael F. Daniels
------------------------
(Signature)
Michael F. Daniels, Director and CEO Date: August 23, 2002
Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last Read Next 50 | Previous | Next
Add Board Mark GECC Add Person Mark scu8452 Report TOS Violation
Search: SubjectsTicker Members Public Msgs My Private Msgs Quote/Chart/Subject
© 2005 Investors Hub, Inc.
About Us User Agreement Contact Us iHub FAQ Advertising You are logged in as Guest
Solid research answer the question.
No are you?
DO YOU work for JP TURNER: YES OR NO???
ARE YOU AFFILIATED OR PARTY TO JP TURNER in anyway?
HAVE YOU been promised compensation by JP TURNER in any form??
PREMISE: THROUGH JP TURNER is where huge IDWD short position is believed TO EXIST. More on JP TURNER....doing dd
Position: IDWD i am neutral.
Megas to SACM CEO..."Cocktail weenie Joe?"
SACM CEO: "no thanks...your die hard suckers er shareholders are giving me gas. See you on Monday Tom....don't cut me any slack"
Megas to SACM CEO: Are we still on for the DTCC/SEC cruise this year...see you there.
Whaaaaaaaaaaat!!!!! LMAO the whole market is one big freakin rigged wrestling match!
,,,,,,,Lance sounds like Megas is looking out for himself only. How opportunistic...."he went in demanding $2M dollars"
,,,,,,,I say we organize MARIO-SHAREHOLDERS-BOUNTY GROUP!
We fly to Papua New Guinea and drag their SORRY crooked arses back here to the U.S.
I HAVE THE SPIKES and NIGHT STICKS (This is still a family show)
DO YOU work for JP TURNER: YES OR NO???
ARE YOU AFFILIATED OR PARTY TO JP TURNER in anyway?
HAVE YOU been promised compensation by JP TURNER in any form??
PREMISE: THROUGH JP TURNER is where huge IDWD short position is believed TO EXIST. More on JP TURNER....doing dd
Position: IDWD i am neutral.
Speaking of trendmarketing...Now i remember: Scott Wilding sent me first copy of their alert.
From: investor relations (Scott
To: TowerInvestments@netscape.net
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Fw: Emailing:IDWS trendingmarkets.zoomshare.com
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:53:04 -0400
Files:
This message contained attachments, but some of them could not be displayed.
So the question becomes did Scott Wilding who has been admonished by the SEC on numerous occasions hire TRENDINGMARKETS report also. Who incidently did a 180 degree reversal today?????
-I am neutral IDWD
So Scott Wilding who SEC ordered to Cease-Desist:
fesses up to you???? Can i forward a copy of your post to the SEC. I just received this information on Scotty below...and i don't know what Cease-Desist means to you but i have an idea. Gesssssh Patrick were you aware of this......
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
File No. 8353 / January 9, 2004
Admin. Proc. File No. 3-11307
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Matter of
Research Investment Group, Inc., Scott H. Wilding, SmallCap Solutions, Inc., Complete Financial and Operations, LLC and Tyler T. Fleming
Respondents.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AS TO SMALLCAP SOLUTIONS, INC., COMPLETE FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONS, LLC ANDTYLER T. FLEMING
I.
On October 23, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") instituted public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") against SmallCap Solutions, Inc. ("SmallCap Solutions"), Complete Financial and Operations, LLC ("Complete Financial") and Tyler T. Fleming ("Fleming") (collectively "Respondents") to determine whether they violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act and, if so, what sanctions, if any, were appropriate.
In response to the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer"), which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission or in which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the jurisdiction of the Commission over them and the subject matter of the proceeding, which are admitted, Respondents consent to the entry of the findings and sanctions set forth below.
II.
On the basis of this Order and Respondents' Offer, the Commission finds1 that:
FACTUAL SUMMARY
1. This matter involves a common abuse found among certain small publicly held companies. In recent years, many such companies have hired stock promoters to tout their shares on stock-picking websites and through mass-mailed e-mail messages (commonly known as "spam"). The promoter is often compensated in the form of purportedly unrestricted shares of the company's common stock, which the promoter sells after its touting has attracted investor interest in the company.
2. Under the federal securities laws, a public company cannot distribute unrestricted stock to public investors without first registering the offering with the Commission or having a valid exemption from registration for the transaction. Registration requires a company to provide important information about its finances and business to potential investors, and allows the Commission to review the company's disclosures. In an attempt to circumvent those registration requirements, certain issuers have sought alternate sources of purportedly "free trading" company stock in order to compensate the stock promoters. In such arrangements, the issuers and promoters are nonetheless participating in an unregistered offering of securities to the public in violation of the federal securities laws, as described below.
RESPONDENTS
3. Fleming, 33, of Las Vegas, Nevada, promoted small cap companies from 2000 through 2002 on his website, WallStreetWest.com, and through an electronic newsletter, Wall Street West Newswire. Fleming conducted his stock promotion business through two corporate entities he controls, SmallCap Solutions and Complete Financial.
4. SmallCap Solutions is a Nevada corporation used by Fleming to conduct his stock promotion business. Fleming is SmallCap Solution's sole officer and director.
5. Complete Financial is a Colorado company also used by Fleming in his stock promotion business. Complete Financial registered the trade name WallStreetWest.com, LLC with the state of Colorado. Fleming is the sole member of Complete Financial.
OTHER RELEVANT PERSONS
6. Research Capital, LLC ("Research Capital") is a Florida venture capital company that seeks to invest in genomics-based biotechnology companies.
7. Research Investment Group, Inc. ("RIG"), a Florida corporation, promotes small cap companies by hiring others to mass distribute e mail messages and faxes touting its corporate clients.
8. Scott H. Wilding ("Wilding"), 42, of Pembroke Pines, Florida, is the sole officer and director of RIG.
THE FIRST UNREGISTERED DISTRIBUTION
9. In or around November 2001, Research Capital hired RIG to promote an issuer, whose common stock was traded on the OTC Bulletin Board (the "Issuer").
10. Research Capital was affiliated with the Issuer. Research Capital's principals owned approximately 18% of the Issuer's outstanding shares, and Research Capital agreed to provide the Issuer with $1 million in working capital and to establish a public relations campaign for the Issuer. The Issuer had no significant revenue-generating activity and was nearly completely funded by, and dependent on, Research Capital.
11. Research Capital and RIG entered into an agreement under which RIG would establish a promotional campaign for the Issuer in exchange for an option to purchase up to 4,000,000 purportedly unrestricted shares of the Issuer from Research Capital and its principals at $0.025 per share. At the time, the Issuer's stock was trading at approximately $0.075 per share.
12. Shortly thereafter, RIG's sole officer and director, Wilding, exercised a portion of this option and purchased 3,300,000 shares of the Issuer. The shares, which came from Research Capital's principals, were deposited into Wilding's personal brokerage account.
13. RIG's Wilding subcontracted with Fleming and his company, SmallCap Solutions, to perform a portion of the promotional work in exchange for 150,000 purportedly unrestricted shares of the Issuer. One of Research Capital's principals transferred 150,000 of his shares of the Issuer to SmallCap Solutions on December 27, 2001. The shares were deposited into SmallCap Solutions' brokerage account. Fleming, as the sole officer and director of SmallCap Solutions, was the sole signatory on the company's brokerage account.
14. SmallCap Solutions posted a profile of the Issuer on the SmallCap Solutions website on or about January 5, 2002. That website was operated by SmallCap Solution's President, Fleming, under the business name Complete Financial. Within several days, daily trading volume of the Issuer's shares rose over 600% above the volume in the preceding month.
15. Between January and April 2002, Fleming sold the shares of the Issuer that SmallCap Solutions had received from the Research Capital principal on the open market for $6,005.
16. No registration statement was filed with the Commission or was in effect as to the Issuer's shares sold by SmallCap Solutions. Because SmallCap Solutions had obtained the shares from persons directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by the Issuer, or under direct or indirect common control with the Issuer, with a view to distributing the stock to the public, the stock was not exempt from registration. As a result, the securities were restricted and could not be sold to the public within a year after they were acquired by the promoters. The transactions constituted an illegal distribution of securities, and the Respondents violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.
THE SECOND UNREGISTERED DISTRIBUTION
17. In April 2001, another issuer, whose common stock was traded on the OTC Bulletin Board (the "Second Issuer"), hired Fleming and his company, SmallCap Solutions, to promote it in exchange for 30,000 of its unrestricted shares.
18. Fleming knew that an issuer cannot issue unrestricted shares directly without registering the transaction. The Second Issuer's president directed a shareholder to transfer 30,000 shares to SmallCap Solutions to pay for the promotional campaign. The Second Issuer reimbursed the shareholder with 60,000 restricted shares of the company.
19. Upon receiving the Second Issuer's stock certificates from the shareholder, SmallCap Solutions' Fleming deposited them into SmallCap Solutions' brokerage account. As the sole officer and director of SmallCap Solutions, Fleming was the only signatory on this account.
20. SmallCap Solutions posted its first tout of the Second Issuer on its WallStreetWest.com website on April 3, 2001. Three days later, the Second Issuer's stock price rose 18 percent, from $1.0625 to $1.25, on volume that was 255 percent higher than the average daily trading volume over the preceding six months.
21. From July through September 2001, SmallCap Solutions sold the shares it had received for the promotional campaign on the open market for $15,955.
22. No registration statement was filed with the Commission or was in effect as to the Second Issuer's shares sold by SmallCap Solutions. Because SmallCap Solutions obtained the stock from a person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by the Second Issuer, or under direct or indirect common control with the Second Issuer, with a view to distributing the stock to the public, the stock was not exempt from registration. As a result, the securities were restricted and could not be sold to the public within a year after they were acquired by SmallCap Solutions. The transactions constituted an illegal distribution of securities, and the Respondents SmallCap Solutions and Fleming violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.
VIOLATIONS
23. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondents violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act, which prohibit the offer or sale of securities through the mails or in interstate commerce, unless a registration statement has been filed or is in effect as to such securities.
III.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions specified in Respondents' Offer.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
A. Respondents cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.
B. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that Respondents shall, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest in the total amount of $24,721.05 to the United States Treasury. Such payment shall be: (A) made by United States postal money order, certified check, bank cashier's check or bank money order; (B) made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission; (C) hand-delivered or mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center, 6432 General Green Way, Mail Stop 0 3, Alexandria, Virginia 22312; and (D) submitted under cover of a letter that identifies SmallCap Solutions, Inc., Complete Financial and Operations, LLC and Tyler T. Fleming as Respondents in these proceedings, the file number of these proceedings, a copy of which cover letter and money order or check shall be sent to Helane L. Morrison, District Administrator, Securities and Exchange Commission, San Francisco District Office, 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, California 94104 4691.
For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary
Endnotes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondents' Offer and are not binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/33-8353.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 01/12/2004
,,,,,Distancing themselves from SCOTT WILDING and IDWS:
"We are sending our SELL alert out on this one.
Per our due-diligence we are feeling a little uneasy with all the news the company is producing and it appears to be a little overdone with all the hype.
We prefer to stay away from this type of play."
http://trendingmarkets.zoomshare.com/0.html
-HURRICANE DECENDING ON PEMBROKE PINES,FL.
CAT5 LOOKS TO BE A MONSTER.....
I am neutral..IDWD
I thought this division didn't exist? Isn't this what you've been claiming for weeks now?????
Also i recieved a personal threat. FBI has been notified to which they are VERY interested...so more investigations are coming down the pike. SCOTT WILDING WHAT A MESS YOUR IN BOY along with any associated parties.
I recall recieving that alert...Perhaps the third party sent it to me???????I'll have to go back to see if it reveals who....if i still have it.
Oops my bad,,,Wrong board.
Where is Carter and Sytner BTW?????
He will not talk to me because he's waiting to give you his daily report Lakers. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
,,,,,,,LOSING PATIENCE MEGAS just tell us whizz-off or get this done!!!! 5 Months now since forged shares were discovered.
That's a different story,,,i think you know what i'm saying.
IDWD new symbol tomorrow
OT: Janice's,,, must be da bomb! THAT BOY HAS DONE A 180 DEGREE TURN!!! Anyone have pics of Janice????JIMBO PROMOTED TO LEAD BASHER NOW...heheeeeeeee RIP JIM'S GZFX oh i know that was a joke Jimmy...HAHAA laugh laugh funny funny ALLL THE WAY TO THE BANK!!
Prove it Scotty!!! UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Release No. 8387 / February 17, 2004
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
FILE NO. 3-11307
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Matter of
RESEARCH INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.,SCOTT H. WILDING, SMALLCAP SOLUTIONS, INC., COMPLETE FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONS, LLC,and TYLER T. FLEMING
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: ORDER MAKING FINDINGS
AND IMPOSING SANCTIONS
BY DEFAULT ON RESEARCH
INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.,
AND SCOTT H. WILDING
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") instituted this proceeding on October 23, 2003, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"). The Order Instituting Proceeding ("OIP") alleges that Respondents violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. A hearing is scheduled to begin on Monday, February 23, 2004.
On January 9, 2004, the Commission issued an Order Making Findings and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 as to SmallCap Solutions, Inc., Complete Financial and Operations, LLC, and Tyler T. Fleming. See Research Investment Group, Inc., Securities Act Rel. No. 8353 (Jan. 9, 2004). The proceeding remains open as to Respondents Research Investment Group, Inc. ("RIG") and Scott H. Wilding.
Respondents RIG and Wilding received the OIP on November 3, 2003. The Division of Enforcement filed a Motion for Default Judgment ("Motion") as to Respondents RIG and Wilding and a Declaration of Robert L. Mitchell in Support of the Motion on February 2, 2004.
The Commission's Rules of Practice provide that any respondent who fails to file an answer, appear at a prehearing conference, or answer a dispositive motion may be deemed to be in default and the allegations in the OIP may be deemed true. 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155, .220. Respondents RIG and Wilding have not answered the allegations in the OIP, and have not responded to the Motion. Accordingly, I GRANT the Motion and find Respondents RIG and Wilding in default and that the following allegations in the OIP are true as to these Respondents.
FINDINGS
This matter involves a common abuse found among certain small publicly held companies. In recent years, many such companies have hired stock promoters to tout their shares on stock-picking websites and through mass-mailed e-mail messages (commonly known as "spam"). The promoter is often compensated in the form of purportedly unrestricted shares of the company's common stock, which the promoter sells after its touting has attracted investor interest in the company.
Under the federal securities laws, a public company cannot distribute unrestricted stock to public investors without first registering the offering with the Commission or having a valid exemption from registration for the transaction. Registration requires a company to provide important information about its finances and business to potential investors, and allows the Commission to review the company's disclosures. In an attempt to circumvent those registration requirements, certain issuers have sought alternate sources of purportedly "free trading" company stock in order to compensate the stock promoters. In such arrangements, the issuers and promoters are nonetheless participating in an unregistered offering of securities to the public in violation of the federal securities laws, as described below.
Respondent Fleming, 33, of Las Vegas, Nevada, promoted small cap companies from 2000 through 2002 on his website, WallStreetWest.com, and through an electronic newsletter, Wall Street West Newswire. Respondent Fleming conducted his stock promotion business through two corporate entities he controls, SmallCap Solutions, Inc. ("SmallCap Solutions") and Complete Financial and Operations, LLC ("Complete Financial").
SmallCap Solutions is a Nevada corporation and Respondent Fleming is SmallCap Solutions's sole officer and director.
Complete Financial is a Colorado company, which registered the trade name WallStreetWest.com, LLC, with the State of Colorado. Respondent Fleming is the sole member of Complete Financial.
RIG, a Florida corporation, promotes small cap companies by hiring others to mass distribute e mail messages and faxes touting its corporate clients.
Respondent Wilding, 42, of Pembroke Pines, Florida, is the sole officer and director of RIG.
Research Capital, LLC ("Research Capital") is a Florida venture capital company that seeks to invest in genomics-based biotechnology companies.
IR Specialists, Inc. ("IR Specialists"), a Rhode Island corporation, promotes small cap companies on its website, TipReporter.com.
In or around November 2001, Research Capital hired RIG to promote an issuer, whose common stock was traded on the OTC Bulletin Board ("the Issuer").
Research Capital was affiliated with the Issuer. Research Capital's principals owned approximately eighteen percent of the Issuer's outstanding shares, and Research Capital agreed to provide the Issuer with $1 million in working capital and to establish a public relations campaign for the Issuer. The Issuer had no significant revenue-generating activity and was nearly completely funded by, and dependent on, Research Capital.
Research Capital and RIG entered into an agreement under which RIG would establish a promotional campaign for the Issuer in exchange for an option to purchase up to 4,000,000 purportedly unrestricted shares of the Issuer from Research Capital and its principals at $0.025 per share. At the time, the Issuer's stock was trading at approximately $0.075 per share.
Shortly thereafter, RIG's sole officer and director, Respondent Wilding, exercised a portion of this option and purchased 3,300,000 shares of the Issuer. The shares, which came from Research Capital's principals, were deposited into Respondent Wilding's personal brokerage account.
RIG's Respondent Wilding subcontracted with Respondent Fleming and his company, SmallCap Solutions, to perform a portion of the promotional work in exchange for 150,000 purportedly unrestricted shares of the Issuer. One of Research Capital's principals transferred 150,000 of his shares of the Issuer to SmallCap Solutions on December 27, 2001. The shares were deposited into SmallCap Solutions's brokerage account. Respondent Fleming, as the sole officer and director of SmallCap Solutions, was the sole signatory on the company's brokerage account.
RIG also subcontracted with IR Specialists to perform a portion of the promotional work in exchange for 400,000 purportedly unrestricted shares of the Issuer. Under the agreement, IR Specialists would "e-mail blast" messages touting the Issuer to 8,000,000 potential investors, and arrange for profiles about the Issuer to be posted on its website and on other stock-promotion websites. As compensation, IR Specialists received 400,000 shares of the Issuer from one of Research Capital's principals on January 2, 2002. The shares were deposited into IR Specialists's brokerage account.
SmallCap Solutions posted a profile of the Issuer on the SmallCap Solutions website on or about January 5, 2002. That website was operated by SmallCap Solutions's President, Respondent Fleming, under the business name Complete Financial. IR Specialists's promotion began at around the same time. Within several days, daily trading volume of the Issuer's shares rose over 600 percent above the volume in the preceding month.
Between January and April 2002, Respondent Fleming sold the shares of the Issuer that SmallCap Solutions had received from the Research Capital principal on the open market for $6,005. Between March and July 2002, IR Specialists sold most of the stock it had received from the Research Capital principal on the open market for $5,980. In addition, in the weeks following the promotional activities, Respondent Wilding sold the shares that RIG had received from the Research Capital principal for $121,715.
No registration statement was filed with the Commission or was in effect as to the Issuer's shares sold by RIG, SmallCap Solutions, or IR Specialists. Because these stock promoters had obtained the shares from persons directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by the Issuer, or under direct or indirect common control with the Issuer, with a view to distributing the stock to the public, the stock was not exempt from registration. As a result, the securities were restricted and could not be sold to the public within a year after they were acquired by the promoters. The transactions constituted an illegal distribution of securities, and Respondents RIG and Wilding violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.
As a result of the conduct described above, Respondents RIG and Wilding violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act, which prohibit the offer or sale of securities through the mails or in interstate commerce, unless a registration statement has been filed or is in effect as to such securities. I find, therefore, that it is in the public interest to impose the following sanctions.
ORDER
Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, I ORDER, that Research Investment Group, Inc. and Scott H. Wilding cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.
Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, I FURTHER ORDER that Research Investment Group, Inc. and Scott H. Wilding shall, within ten days of the entry of this Order, pay disgorgement of $121,715, and prejudgment interest from August 1, 2002, through the last day of the month preceding the month in which payment of disgorgement is made to the United States Treasury. Prejudgment interest shall be calculated as provided for in Rule 600 of the Commission's Rules of Practice. See 17 C.F.R. § 201.600. Such payment shall be (A) made by United States postal money order, certified check, bank cashier's check or bank money order; (B) made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission; (C) hand-delivered or mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center, 6432 General Green Way, Mail Stop 0-3, Alexandria, Virginia 22312; and (D) submitted under cover of a letter that identifies Research Investment Group, Inc. and Scott H. Wilding as Respondents in this proceeding, and the file number of the proceeding. A copy of the cover letter and check shall be sent to Helane L. Morrison, District Administrator, Securities and Exchange Commission, San Francisco District Office, 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, California 94104-4691.
I FURTHER ORDER that the Motion to Withdraw as counsel for Respondent Wilding filed on February 4, 2004, by Nancy Brodzki, Esq., is GRANTED. See 17 C.F.R. § 201.102(d)(4).
I FURTHER ORDER that the hearing scheduled to begin on Monday, February 23, 2004, is canceled.
Brenda P. Murray
Chief Administrative Law Judge
How does Patrick get close to these crims:http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/33-8387.htm
This is getting posted all over...about Scott Wilding? is this you.
"Scott Wilding and IDWS...On the run. Email "He bought some shares from Laura Brickley a third party consultant to the previous company. Owed her $50,000 paid $25,000 and when rest was due on September 18th he disappeared. Last I heard she was so mad she was putting out warrant for his arrest."
From: Patrick Downs
Did Scott Wilding the CokeHead Hire you?? Too
,,,That was a good one posting CEO's arrest record. THAT TOOK me completely by surprise. Bashers are good.
How long has it been 3 months since MEGAS SAID "Sec filings are almost complete"