Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
so much for a legitimate comparison
That would be good, except I've tried that before, and all the discussion is about shorts and their effects as opposed to local vs worldwide customers, valuation, Nasdaq vs OTCC, liquidity, revenue, etc. SO for starters compare to Brightcove. Then we can move on to others.
And how's that working out??
So not to confuse anyone, dividends would be devastating to the company to get rid of available cash instead of building the company. As there are no shorts, no reason to pay a dividend while trying to establish a balance sheet that looks attractive to potential buyers of the company. Time will tell. Though before you take anyones word, compare the competition. Good Luck
Taking over at Fenway?? they are sponsoring an event that is advertised on the jumbotron. At least they are putting their money (profits) to good use, instead of dividends. Are they also increasing their R&D Budget, should be in the financials when released. But more visibility for TEVE for pending purchasers of the company just might work if there is more than one person in the stands who actually know what the event is that's being advertised.
The link you provide has nothing to do with telvue and in addition the product/service reviews are poor.
Oh? 44 years they've made money but looks as per their financials, they are paying any profits to the preferred shareholders. Good luck on your purchase. I'm sure not too many are convinced to buy this stock, especially if comparing to the other stock that lost 90% in the previous year
The points are still valid, no shorts, no proof of shorts, profit from getting rid of personnel, still dark, not much has changed, neon alley, minimum, charter hardware and service?? All that in January yet because of reduced overhead only they had a profit of 34,000 dollars?? Makes my argument much more valid of the minimum revenue from Neon and the others, a much better accurate description to the events subsequent to the post, than posts that stated:
Soon the spit will hit the fan,
Shorts are in trouble
Shorts must cover ASAP
Shorts will be in trouble "in a bit"
Shorts will go to jail
Shorts are evil
Nite is in trouble
And what's really funny, is the recent post that stated only the shorts care about the shorts and noone is talking about manipulation.
Prepare for the upcoming sale, I'm sure it will happen in a bit, asap or when the spit hits the fan.
I Have! If you recall I posted the change in date of the shareholders meeting informing others of this after my "conversation" with Mr Hume. I don't ask to get the answer, but to see if there is anyone who will honestly reply. As the longs continue to ask for proof of what isn't there, I ask for items easily obtained, that is if attainable. For the benefit of all who read you'd think people would be more forthcoming with accurate information. If in fact that information was truly available.
How many personnel were let go??
Are the financials available to shareholders??
Are they audited?? as most quarterly reports are not, the auditing comes on the annual report......
Were the profits because of reduced overhead only?
What's the percentage of revenue per division year over year?
Was a NDA required to be signed to see the quarterly reports??
Is there a CEO statement going forward in the report??
Answers I'm sure will not be forthcoming, but to hide behind the do your own DD?? Begs the conclusion that many don't know. PR's do not a good company make.
Are the third quarter audited financials available yet or just the PR to this date?
A great Idea Joe, how many employees did TEVE let go in the past 2 years?? So much for creating jobs.
Another rough day, and after 44 years, and decreasing revenues holding on is counterintuitive.
I thought you just said, only ones who care about the shorts are the shorts? yet it's mentioned in the next post?? And I thought no one today was mentioning manipulation yet you just stated people who have been here for years shorting the hell out of this company?? Please!!!!!
can you please quantify "in just a bit"??
Then let me ask you why some continue to say that a person on the "dark side" is trying to ruin TELVUE just by virtue of posting on a message board?
THERE IS NOTHING ANYONE CAN DO OR SAY THAT WILL CHANGE THE OUTCOME OF WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE.
TELVUE WON THIS WAR A VERY LONG TIME AGO. THE FACT THAT MANY CAN NOT SEE THAT IS NOT MY PPROBLEM.
FTD's are not always caused by an illegal act. IF million dollar "award" settlements are the norm, a 10 percent "fine" is worthless to them and won't mean anything. Jail time for bonafide felonies would be appropriate, though then that falls on the tax payer, Its not pretty however you look at it. But you cannot punish all FTD's as if they were criminal.
Yes, very interesting, in 2009 the post reveals that for the previous 10 years nite has never covered, stocks been manipulated since at least then,therefore dating back to 1999, and yet some continue to push this stock for others to buy even though for years they feel the stock is manipulated. Another recent post says there are different rules for shorts and "rules are meant to be broken". Again, so why would one take advice from those that continue to complain about the manipulation, and purported violations of MM's?? Anyway, five plus years from the post and still "coming for you". Doesn't seem to be working out very well.
Those times that NITE posted a sale were to take this stock down. He does not wish this stock to rise and the reason is simple. He is short. He is really short. I don't think he even knows how short he is. Here is how I know. I wait and I watch and NITE sells 600 shares at a ridiculus price and I move in and buy 10,000 or maybe 20,000. I wait and he says someone else sold 2000 shares at a price even less. So I buy 20,000 or 40,000. He never covers. In ten years he has never covered. It' time NITE. I am coming for you.
I refer you to this once again, directly from the SEC website.
Please note that fails-to-deliver can occur for a number of reasons on both long and short sales. Therefore, fails-to-deliver are not necessarily the result of short selling, and are not evidence of abusive short selling or “naked” short selling. For more information on short selling and fails-to-deliver, see http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/keyregshoissues.htm, http://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mrfaqregsho1204.htm, and http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/34-50103.htm.
And I'm sure you can prove the two MM's have no shares. That there is no possibility that an actual individual is tired of waiting and has submitted a limit order to sell. As you have said some bought at 2 cents presplit if they sell at 10 cents presplit, that's good enough. Since they went dark no form 4 will be submitted so maybe the directors are selling. Happens all the time. And everyone knows just because the REGSHO shows shares, does not necessarily mean they are shorted shares. Not having financials to review, is the revenue stream continuous for "maintenance and support" or only for sale of hardware? If for maintenance and support good for them if for the sale of hardware, unless they continue to gain customers, your revenue will be considerably less in the future. Question is what is the percentage of the different types of revenue?
So you obviously believe 10 thousand shares are available, so there goes the short conspiracy.
Going back 5 years and accounting for the 1 for 200 stock split, how many total shares were sold short?? If all the shares this year were sold short, how many is that? Now looking at those numbers, even if all were sold short, that still isn't very many now is it?
Its much harder to PROVE what isn't there, than for you to prove what is?? So if it's there, the onus is on you.
If you thinks that's funny, on the other board it's stated that the shorts are the cause for the loss of jobs at telvue. That's priceless.
These people do not give a tinkers damn about you or the jobs they are trying to ruin at TelVue.
My conjecture is that it is bull, no attack but why not say it is. That way some people who take the website verbatim never question, It would be so much worse to say our system continues to crash and is not as stable as we like. Creative don't you think? And the regular maintenance?? more like we have problems and we need to shut down the system to fix. Think what you will, but there is no transparency here.
http://engineering.telvue.com/
Cloudcast having difficulty, better start that R&D program again.
All that sounds good, except the company is dark, so no renewed interest from future investors, no audited financials only PR's which will keep real investors away, non liquid stock with spread too wide for investors to become interested in. But at least you aren't quoting those that say the 10,000 dollar quote for the stock is soon to be upon us, with dividends being paid. Company, market cap does matter as you point out, but stock is still too expensive, as what is the year over year expense on R&D?? What is the year over year overhead costs?? All matter to potential investors. Time will tell if they can continue, but until they show continued growth with a realistic PE. Not to compare company to company, but Mr Lenfest's other company of which he is majority owner has been in business 44 years and going nowhere for the common holder but paying off to the preferred owner, ie himself. I do not see anything here investor friendly for those that are looking at this stock from a purely unbiased neutral viewpoint. Good Luck as eventually expenses are going to have to increase to keep up with the competition. I still expect a sale and that is what the CFO is positioning this company for, easier to sell a profitable company, even if only slightly, then one that continues to burn through cash. Reduce personnel, reduce overhead costs, reduce R&D, increase revenue, sell company, classic business move, as it's not the company some may want but the technology, then again, competition remains fierce.
And how long has that been said, while other stocks are making many millions, without all the drama.
That I agree, nothing here will change, only the company and it's transparent operations will change anything, the share structure must change, the company must stand on it's own as only 255 shareholders of record mean nothing, when the majority shares are owned by one person. Only the company matters, and so far they are hiding behind a darkening cloud.
and how's that working for you?? If anyone wants the truth, go to every LTNC operation, talk to employees, management, see how many come and go. Then you'll know. PR's and SEC filings mean nothing in the penny world.
and Im sure telvue will be most open in posting the quarterly report to the public for certainly they have nothing to hide, or will it be another, non audited PR.
They didn't put the money back in as there was no money to put in, they took over 25 million dollars of mr lenfest's money and blew it all, now to save a little face they let go of alot of personnel just to show a minimal profit, now with no R&D budget, each month that goes by has them falling further and further behind the competition. Good Luck
Shorting is legal!! The question is a great naked short conspiracy of which there is no proof, period. Something Illegal?? Maybe some should let this be known to the CFO, some have?? and nothings been done by TEVE?? MMMMMMMMMMMMM
Been watching for a couple of years, and so far nothing, no evidence of shorts, no evidence of anything, this company should be able to stand on its own, but obviously not, if people are relying on a short conspiracy for their shares to rise, sorely mistaken. If such a travesty exists, why invest? Again, for the sake of argument you are correct, lawsuits are minimal and the only thing the investor is entitled to is to receive their original monies back. Not much of an investment here. but we'll keep watching, can't wait for those dividends to be paid, if ever, and watch nothing happen.
Those 44 shares came off FTD list on 4 September. No more FTD's, through the latest report which covers first half of September. No more shorts, no more FTD's. No dividends, no conspiracy. TEVE must stand on their own. No windfall.
Very smart a reverse split is the beginning of the end.
It's not over yet, they did the extraordinary step of letting go senior staff, engineers, and management, this is just the beginning, just wait and see.
My pleasure to provide a link unlike many:
http://btreport.net/2013/04/early-bird-applications-now-being-accepted-for-2013-diamond-technology-reviews/
How It Works
Every year, BTR invites vendors to submit written information about products/solutions that have been released or upgraded since the previous year’s SCTE Cable-Tec Expo (October 2012) with photos and spec sheets criteria used in the Diamonds rankings include, first and foremost, unique technology or application thereof, innovation, ease of use, efficiency, reliability and contribution to profitability.
Rules & Tips for Your 2013 Diamonds Application FormIn putting together your package for the judges, please make sure to include the following:
A spec sheet – detailing the parameters the product or service is designed to meet.
A brief technological description of how the product works.
A photo or photos
Please Note: No more than 5 extra pages of documentation, including spec sheets, are allowed. Pictures, diagrams and/or charts do not count toward your 5 pages.
Optional Items to Consider:
Testimonials by users
A simple brief that summarizes the ability of this product, and how it differentiates itself from the competition
Photos and diagrams, particularly block diagrams or flow charts that help describe how the product or service works.
2012 4-Diamond & Above RecipientsWill You Make the List in 2013?
Arris Group, Inc.
Aurora Networks
Azuki Systems
Ciena Corporation
Cisco Systems
Comcast
ComSonics
EXFO, Inc.
Gigamon
Harmonic, Inc.
IneoQuest Technologies, Inc.
InnoTrans Communications, Inc.
JDSU
Motorola Mobility
RGB Networks
Sandvine
Spirent Communications
Sunrise Telecom Incorporated
TelVue Corporation
Zanaware
Hopefully the management does not feel that way, they'll be falling like Blackberry and Dell, if you can't keep up with the latest, resting on what you've done will soon be outdated and a disaster.
The concept of this discussion is one who claims there are companies who pay monthly dividends and maybe TEVE will be included in them, there is none and has been shown that there is none. Any single entity company has not been shown to pay monthly dividends. Did you by chance look at all the diamond awards? First they are all self nominated, send in your info and be judged, second the competition remains fierce with many being multi-national companies with exposure all over the world, TEVE lucky to show their little profit and only because they let go so many high value employees.
Also TEVE isn't in the "penny market" anymore, yes still a pink sheet, but no longer a penny, so they should be looked at in comparison to others, of which they don't look very good either in business plan, financial transparency, nor product development.
4 of the five were in April, of which major management and technical experts were just let go. One "improvement" over a previous product on the fifth, or customers were just given the option to do the editing. So after all the experts were let go there has only been one improvement, that's not saying much for their current R&D program, and proves my point. And to the ones who think a dividend will be paid, TEVE would do much better by reinvesting in itself before paying the few bagholders of this stock.