I would say lookout for individuals who have been saying this for the last 15 years and it has done nothing of the sort. How is it that one would say you came out smelling like a rose even though since the split the value is down 90 percent?? You sure that's not fertilizer you smell??

Been saying that for years, the finra numbers do not show short positions, for those you have to go to www.otcmarkets.com Have a great weekend all, guess there is no reason for "shorty" to take it down this week afterall even with Monday being a holiday.

No a waste of time, even joe has said so, questions are asked not answers given, 5 minutes in and out. All I need is the financials, if they don't have those, then so be it. proxy should be out to list topics being discussed, if..............

when you can prove there is a valid current short position, then I'll be interested, the fact you think and continue to state only 55,000 in the float instead of the truth of over 600,000 in the float is another thing that is just too funny. Dividends will mean nothing, and I truly doubt dividends will ever be paid. So when you address your concerns to the CEO and CFO, what was their response?.........cricket, cricket, cricket

Why would I leave, my three shares are up for sale at 100 per, do I expect them to ever sell, no. But like you and others its fun thinking about it. Compare to other companies that have a stock price above 300. Look at market cap, PE ratio, forward earnings, revenue, profitability, market awareness. TEVE does not come close so what makes you think the current situation rates such a high pps?? There are no shorts:

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TEVE/short-sales

300 per share puts market cap over 186 million dollars, now that's ludicrous. Also for Alan, splits mean nothing in an illiquid stock, percentages remain the same. Dividends? not a wise decision financially if you need money for constantly improving the technology to stay ahead or keep up at a minimum. Therefore cash should not be wasted giving back to shareholders, like you said Mr Lenfest does not need the money, and exclusion of shares will not happen as each class of stock must be treated the same, if he has preferred shares, such as in ETCC where only he gets the dividends and not the common shareholder, that is another story. With a new CIO, will be interesting to see how many shares he now has or what his pay/stock options will be.

If my value went from 750,000 dollars to 75,000 I'd be pumping it too, even if the arguments don't make sense.

Did I say anything about insider trading?? No, I said he may have access to inside information as he seems to know an awful lot of information not readily available to most, or more than likely rose colored glasses bs. Would be nice to stick with the facts, unfortunately unless you are in the company or close to it, there are no facts, no updates, no client information, who comes who goes, on going contracts, changeover of clients etc, we do know how many people have left the company and the few that were hired, that's about it. PR's mean nothing especially when it comes to financials. I look forward to seeing what they publish this year, and no NDA required, wonder how he knows that, or maybe since I have a share to call bs, just trying to lay the platform for bs explanations, as I will be asking for last years financials as well.

Do we have insider information, Emmett is busy as hell?? and next quarter will not require an NDA, so if that's the case all should write Mr Hume, let them know QTIP said no NDA and all can request the financials to this company, He states the last quarter will be audited, that's another not entirely true, the next report should be the annual report, and no one knows if it will be completed or not, whether it will be available or not, could just be another PR. If you are a shareholder of record, you should not have to request anything, if the company has anything straight they should already have your name and address and send any proxy material and financials to you. It also appears Joe is saying they will no longer be dark and start filing with the SEC?? Maybe insider information??

Yes, sell the company and get some backing from one of the major companies, so their equipment is proprietary to the cable company, they will have serious pricing power over their customer base and advertising. But no, this company will remain until Mr Lenfest doesn't or sells, thus the route of ETCC

So first you state Comcast is only using TEVE software, but you have no proof and no longer are making that statement? Second you infer that 5000 peg stations all are upgrading at a cost of 15-25 grand yet you now say you have no idea who has a contract, third, you say you know they have two large charter jobs, but there has never been any monetary amount listed, how long the contracts were for and exactly what any consolidation or upgrades were going to happen. Year end financials you insist are on the way, yet your DD is on their website?? New customers every day? so who was added yesterday, who added the day before, who's signing up today?, to say hardware and software is also a mistake as the hardware doesn't work without the software, so it's one package based on the hardware purchased, and 15 percent of what is their maintenance fee? When is that 15 percent paid, up front? for the length of the contract? Too many unsubstantiated claims. But of course you don't know how much, how many, or when anything will happen. That's nice.

that was supposedly last year, I've seen no indication that another NDA is required or even requested, if things were so great they'd want everyone to know about it. ETCC still reports and they are losing money every month, TEVE not reporting does not make any business sense, but if they have the financials be rest assured I will get them and standby to call bs as to the unsubstantiated claims made on this board.

so you retract your statement that only telvue software is used by Comcast? And PEG stations have never been profitable, please show where you get the 15-25k price tag for an upgrade?? What's included in the 15K and what's included in the 25K price?? How many of those 5000 already have the latest equipment, how many don't but are happy with what they have, how many have already signed a contract to upgrade. Without that information you only have unverified conjecture.

Remember PEG stations for the cloud and local origination storage, maybe you can be specific as to what each listing uses the cloud for so it is actually worthwhile and accurate information for the reader.

And yet the IHUB page only shows these cloudcast customers: All PEG stations.

TelVue® CloudCast™ customers

AHECTA
Akron, OH
Atlanta TV
Bloomfield, NJ
Brookdale Community College Television, NJ
Concord, MA
Egg Harbor Township High School, NJ
Jackson Township High School, NJ
Jersey Access Group (JAG)
Marple Township, PA
Mass Access
NATOA
Penfield, NY
Philadelphia, PA
Queen Anne's County, MD
Springfield Township School District (Delaware County), PA
Summit, NJ

Then why don't all the past five years worth of financials show any income from comcast or time warner for cloud storgage?? Was it given for free, and what is the storage these two companies use? How much storage does telvue have. But again, show me the money to back up your claims.

as teve cloud is relatively new, someone please show me where Comcast and time warner moved all their on demand / streaming videos over to the telvue cloud, where was it all stored before telvue cloud?? exactly where it is today, not on telvues cloud, don't you think if telvue was the sole source of comcasts video service that they would have sent out a massive PR?? And shouldn't the finances show the massive charges to the cable company for storage, control and distribution of such a massive amount of storage information? Does what has been posed here as the truth really make sense or have any truth to it at all. NO just wishful thinking, with zero proof of such. Volume zero, liquidity next to zero, loss of 90 percent since the split, no insider buys, no employees buying, no stock options executed, no what has been posed here is blatantly wrong, anyone with common sense can tell you that, look at telvues website and look at their PR's and what they actually do. Sorry, but let's keep it in the realm of reality and not rose colored glass BS.

again you are wrong, teve cloud does not hold 100 percent of all on demand programming for the cable companies, therefore telvue does not provide 100 percent of software, they provide PEG cable stations but do not anywhere close control the entire cable networks streaming video, please just call your local cable company to know the truth, geez are you serious??

first a lot of phone calls, that's funny, second plenty to buy at 14 dollars and never raise the price, but not a one share, not from insiders not from employees, not from anyone, why not?? because they realize consolidation of equipment, personnel will reduce the TEVE footprint throughout the two cable companies. Redundancy costs money. Need another example, US Airways and American airlines, soon to be one airline, consolidate maintenance and equipment, parts supply contractors etc. A million reasons why no one bought, I haven't heard one yet.

I really enjoy your spin, first you say TELVUE is the only ones providing software, then you state you want a link that shows others streaming from telvues cloud, that's pretty good, your first post insinuated that telvue was the only software these cable companies use, period. I'd like a link to show that no one else or no proprietary software from the cable companies is used at all, that only Telvue software is used. Again, great to have a sense of humor, but why no shares traded today??

that would be incorrect, telvue is not the only software being used, and if it was such great news, how come no one picked up a single share today?????

can you say consolidation, think about it, mergers do not increase a third parties responsibilities, they merge to ultimately save money and increase shareholder value, shareholders of the two companies, not TEVE. When in doubt do the research of third party suppliers in any airline merger, any parts supply company merger etc. No this does not benefit TEVE in one single way. Or maybe you can enlighten all on how consolidating systems (reduction) is good for TEVE??

Not necessarily, this will cause consolidation to prevent redundant systems, expect less not more. Merger is step one, consolidation and integration of two systems step 2, removal of redundant systems step 3, personnel cuts step 4, Continuously looking for ways to reduce costs, increase revenue step 5.

That sure is a change to the windfall of revenue, dividends, splits, rinse repeat. Thanks for the assessment that there are much better stocks out there currently paying dividends than wishing for this one to come through. I like the few small purchases, whereas all your previous posts seemed like you had almost as much as qtip, before he started selling.......good to have a sense of humor, enjoy

so you are saying that your apple stock will be much more valuable to you in the future than any teve stock. That I agree with, and three shares because that's the change that was in my pocket, I will see the financials, if they have any, or will it be just a PR again?? Either way, TEVE will go the same route as ETCC, years of no value but to one person.

For the board, if this stock is such a steel at this price, .07 cents presplit, lol, why do we have days where there is no volume?? you mean no insider buys?? no shorts "shorting" the stock?? Wonder what's wrong, how long can one beg you to buy more shares to stick it to the shorts? Maybe some just aren't listening?? LOL

then buy up all the shares at 14 if they are so cheap, why wouldn't you??

Audited, maybe, but usually if they were a reporting company they would have 90 days from the end of year being the end of March. So no reason to even look for them until that time.

You'd also think employees of LTNC would buy up all these "cheap" shares, but that's not happening either, wonder if they know something???

You can buy 4000 shares at 14 without affecting the price, why wait, and I look forward to your explanation as to how 200 shares were reported short yet with the knowledge from 4kids that 100 shares went to a long how the other two orders were split to show the 200 short??? or maybe the finra only shows the execution not a valid short position? Please explain.

No are no shorts, have a good evening, back to .0001 and delisting soon.

so 370 total shares sold, 100 sold to a long, there was one other position of 100 and one position of 170 so by your "short" numbers, one order of 100 and 100 of the 170 were short? and the 70 remaining in the same order were not, or was it 170 short and 30 of the 100 order short. You see the numbers do not add up, the finra short sales is only the way the shares were executed and do not mean a short position taken. Again, if 100 were bought by a "long". You cannot divide up either of the other two orders, shorting a portion of one of them, just doesn't happen. There are no short positions in TEVE.

And by now we all know those finra numbers are being misread, and do not mean short position established. www.otcmarkets.com

That I agree with, PR's mean nothing

a lower price will not create liquidity, the only thing that will do that is a secondary offering, both Lenfests companies, etcc and teve Terminated a registration of securities. Mr Lenfest wants total control of these companies, with ETCC he gets all the dividends, the common shareholder nothing, His companies are not about the individual investor. There will be no liquidity as long as mr lenfest keeps 93 percent of the 630 thousand float. Splits or lower prices do not change the ratio available, and therefore do not change liquidity. This stock will remain in its current range for years to come.

I can't wait, but even if its true, I can still call BS on any poster here.

Since you've posted on the ETCC board before, I'm sure you know plenty, especially the fact of who is getting the dividend payments, and the massive reduction in revenue over the past couple of years, so yes going by way of TEVE, Let's get the financials and then we can truthfully analyse them.

means nothing, prior to the opening, numbers are either not accurate, such as the bid and ask listed for most stocks change, and the amount all that's needed is 100 listed, read about the level 2 numbers and what is required and you will see there is nothing wrong with the two level2's: and thank you for allowing others to read: Oh and there are no shorts!!!

02/10/2014 15:23:15 Bought 3 TEVE @ 14 -51.99 11.75

Transaction ID: 11166740218
Order Number: 10353404381
Session: Regular Market Hours
Date Entered: 02/10/2014
Time Entered: 15:21:55
Commission: 9.99

so you know the amount of shares each officer and director own? That's interesting, and who do you think bought those three shares yesterday. That was I, had some spare change to throw away which did two things. Allowed you all to feed into your conspiracy theory and me to be able to see whatever finances are released and call BS to all the posts here. So it wasn't painting, I had 13.02 offer all day, but what's 98 cents times three, so I bought within seconds at 14. Oh the manipulation, that made my day. Thanks to all who entered their opinion of what those three shares meant. Too Funny

why would they "get together",that's nuts, no but how was the CIO paid?? in shares?? Salary?? Will be nice to see the financials. As for the squeeze, same as the shorts it's the mantra of AlanC. Did you ever figure out who said insider trading first?? Now that was funny.

I'm sure the CEO, CIO, and possible directors have that amount, the point is more than likely it is an insider, therefore 14.00 is what they value each share. So with no shorts, no impossible squeeze, which hasn't happened in the OTC, 14 would be it. When the financials come out, if they do one, outside of a PR, then we'll all know.