Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
At this point nothing official/factual has happened any further then the latest PR.
All of what is posted as being done or filed or registered is NOTHING but gossip!
If the company wanted to show investors what has been accomplished another PR explaining to its investors would be appropriate. Another PR would only help to move ANWM forward.
Until then ANWM is just another color, gray.
Buying just came in. I think it's angry take that buying.
I did sell and made $...looking to get back in to make more. Now who is LOL?
I've said all along all one has to do is pick at it. Like I said earlier...
If your caught holding I say look back at the past. In it you will find your out. It's happened many times over the past decade & 1/2
10 mil shares @ $0.0001 = $1,000 Sell those same shares @ $0.0002 = $2,000. $1,000 profit gotta love it.
Nope I got on the right bus. ;)
What happened to the buying? I'm trying to.
What happened to the buying? I'll buy some who has some for sale @ $0.0001?
Back to $0.0001 I knew it was to good to last at the $0.0002 level.
Where's the buying? Well back down to $0.0001.
Kinda late to say the CEO failed. You have been around for over 10 years and nothing has ever come about in all those years. Now all of a sudden he failed?
Would you like to comment on this?
No more so than the putative non-dilution agreement and its alleged breach which saw placid Ken do absolutely nothing despite promising to do so. Then of course came his dismissal and the whimpering reaction from gentle Ken when it happened despite him apparently giving Jeff an ultimatum and a deadline date on the board for action, action which he neither named nor implemented.
SEE, I told you, get ready...
If your caught holding I say look back at the past. In it you will find your out. It's happened many times over the past decade & 1/2. Just look at the investors/actors who have been around all that time.
They made $ that's a FACT!
Pete my boy you are so right in what you say!
It's all staged. They are just acting.
For years I've watched the same type of post...
Its his fault no her fault, don't blame me blame him, not me it was him, legal this SEC that, he knew no he didn't. Year after year the same thing.
IDCN is a big stage of PLAYERS/ACTORS. Nobody can blame anybody but THEMSELVES if they lost money or got caught holding or felt they were lied too!
As I've said before (10 years) all one had to do is look at IDCN's past. What you would've found was the following...
The same CEO.
The same IRO.
The same group of investors.
The same dilution.
The same zillion bogus Pr's.
The same zillion bogus updates.
The same zillion bogus great things are gonna happen post.
The same zillion bogus the charts this and that.
The same zillion bogus EVERYTHING!
To the new investors, I say shame on you for not doing a very important part of DD, read old post. To those who made $, I say good for you. To JB, I'm sorry to say you got over you worked the system. To the IRO kudos and your another one who worked the system.
What is the system? The PINKS!
To the posters who say don't blame the IRO, I say you can't blame him for working the system. To those who defend the IRO with all their twisted logics, I don't buy it. One isn't the IRO for years knowing IDCN has NEVER had any viable business venture and state he never knew anything or he was lied too. Remember he has made a ton of money off of IDCN and many other stocks so who's the fool? In a way not him.
Yes he can boast how he recommended it and it went up 1000% and 3000% and say, "I told you so". But bottom line is nobody can sit here and tell me he was/is some innocent bystander who NEVER knew anything.
People time to move on. If your caught holding I say look back at the past. In it you will find your out. It's happened many times over the past decade & 1/2. Just look at the investors/actors who have been around all that time.
They made $ that's a FACT!
IMHO
Every day on this IDCN board the same story and the same ole song and dance! How bad this company is, how bad the CEO is, how bad the S/S is and how bad every supposed business was!
Yet investors made money all along in IDCN.
Almost 1000 post! Yet he made money several times.
Don't get me wrong for years I've said IDCN is nothing but a PLAY stock. For years I had other posters try to beat me up telling me how great IDCN is.
IDCN is a play stock and those who have been around for years know this. Why some feel the need to write hundreds of post saying the same thing is beyond me. They are no better then other posters on other boards who bash. Get which stock I mean?
Another funny thing is they are the first ones who ask others if they own and when someone says no they slam that person. Yet they are on this board IDCN and they don't own. Is that, "Do as I say, not as I do"?
People say they have been in IDCN a decade 1/2 and they are just now complaining about dilution?
With just a few minutes looking back in mid 2005 the O/S 475,000,000. Now as per the Ibox as of Oct 25, 2010 the O/S 6,427,945,445.
Why are people complaining about dilution like it was something new.
Space1230 in that post by Iblong2 he said...
Georgos Androutsopoulos was given control of the company by being voted president by majority vote.
That's one of my 64,000 questions. Who, claimed to be a majority holder to have the right to vote any person as an officer?
It's been said on this board there are 3 major holders...Iblong2, Chuck and I guess Ken or the SCG. Chuck says not him! Now, I'm not saying you know the answer but one of the two would be the person or group. No? Did someone from MLKNA elect him?
Is he really the President or is it just an unoffical post on this board? At this point that's about all we have...an unofficial post stating so!
Take that one step further, if one is to be a majority holder and they had the right to vote in an officer of a company then they would have to be registered somehow with the SEC in order to do so.
Here is another question to anybody...
Many people are friends with Ken and I know Ken has been banned for a short time but I can't understand nobody is calling him to get some possible answers. I don't think the excuse of "no matter what he says nobody is going to believe him yada, yada, yada".
Some simple questions can be answered. Hey Iblong 2 did you vote in GA, Ken how about you or your group? I can't beleive someone hasn't asked Ken if he knows. I also would think one of them would be in contact with MLKNA every day. They must be on a first name basis! I find it hard to believe being they are large shareholders they would be able to explain some simple questions.
Ken being the first in line, being the IR person. Is it offical, has MLKNA been doing the financials? Is there an attorney, I don't need to know his name. Is it true GA is the offical Pres. or is that just Ihub gossip? Did they send in the Form 211 yet? These are simple basic questions which somebody should know the answers too which would surly apease some investors.
Just tring to understand a little more Chuck. You said...
Therefore, it is my belief that this loosely knit group of investors that own Long positions referred to as SCG probably does own a majority of the Float in the Shell ANWM. Therefore, a majority of voting shares could easily be amassed to elect Directors, CEO's, Presidents, etc.
You say it is your belief and I respect that, that the SCG is a loosely knit group. Thats fine!
How could a loosely knit group have the authority to pick any officers of a company unless they are an offically registered group somewhere?
If you go on SCG home page, it says Ken Ash-Owner Stock Sharter Group. Ken uses the word "we" many times in his definition of his group.
Do you know if the SCG is a registered company or something INC, LLC? Again I would surely think they would have to be in order to have a majority vote as to electing anybody.
Example, Chuck says my group, I say my group what says we are anything and have any right? Do you follow me?
At some point the SCG has to be something listed somewhere for it to have rights. And if they are registered somewhere somehow then wouldn't they have to file something with the SEC in order to claim their right to pick an officer of a company?
You also say...
I know that I do not own 10% and it is my understanding that Ken Ash does not either.
Do you know it that is a fact the Ken point of 10%?
Comments?
Next when it comes to the said filings...
In the last PR put out by the company they said...
At the time ANWM was preparing to become "Current" and drop the "Stop sign" on OTCMARKETS.COM by filing the necessary documents to do so.
Being your a top holder and KEN is a holder and backer of ANWM and his group is supposed to be majority holder I don't understand how nobody could/can get any solid info on said filings.
One would surely think Ken would've know something to help investors with any updates all along.
Comments?
Hello Space 1230 I must say I cannot complain, piss and moan, question or belittle you for making money in IDCN. That's whats it's all about. I'm glad for everybody who made money. I hope you made tons.
As I've been saying all along the CEO has run this company the same over the past decade & 1/2. It has always been a farse.
You know it, Ken knows it and many others know it. The one way to prove it is...One doesn't hang around a farse of a penny stock unless they're making $. Right?
I keep hearing this dilution garbage. Come on he has diluted this stock for years.
You know it, Ken knows it and many others know it. So why this sudden suprised reaction? So was everyone here? Because you made $.
When it comes to the CEO making ANY of his wimsical farse venture come true, he has never.
You know it, Ken knows it and many others know it. So why this sudden suprised reaction? So was everyone here? Because you made $.
How TRUE are your words!!!!!!!
To da Moon
Again I can't keep saying for years IDCN has been a nothing company and yet investors blame the CEO!
If investors did one ounce of DD they would've known everything was a farse. Lets review the last decade & 1/2...
Issac Harbor-Farse
Garnet-Farse
Ilasoft-Farse
EMiricle Cream-Farse
Gold-Farse X's 10
Grizzly-Farse
Water-Farse
LOI-Farse X's 10
MOA-Farse X's 10
Spinoffs-Farse X's 3
Spirit River-Farse
Nickle-Farse
Diamonds-Farse
Genoray-Farse
Hockey Stick-Farse
Bele Mines-Farse
The only thing that was NOT a farse was the-DILUTION, over and over and over and over again. Which was so obvious a child would've noticed it. Yet that's being treated like if it was something new? Dilution just started?
So NOW we're to hear how the CEO is a scam artist? JUST NOW? Investors are just realizing this NOW? Are you kidding me?
Some say certain longtime friends got taken/scammed/were lied too/fooled. What? Again are you kidding me? They invested in IDCN and made $ for years. No one was taken or lied to. The ONLY thing that happened to them is they made a ton of $ laughing the whole time.
When is all this "I can't beleive this happened" trash going to stop? Hey I'm not saying the CEO is a saint but don't blame anybody if you invested and lost $ in IDCN because you thought something new was going to materialize.
If I had a nickle for EVERY time I heard the word legal, IDCN and CEO in the same sentence I'd be rich. Let alone other words like SEC, prison, bogus, scam, cheated etc, etc.
And just NOW this is something new to investors? People give it up. You don't like the CEO, yes we see that. Is he going to change? Doubt it. Has he over the past decade & 1/2? Nope.
You guys are a fun group to watch day in and day out posting the same stuff over and over.
Last bit of wisdom. Spend a couple hunderd bucks and buy a couple million shares and I bet you you can double your $. Some say "what $200 that's nothing". Well now sit back and think what those who have invested in this stock have made over the last decade & 1/2. Just look back through the many post on this board and others and you'll see they made good $. And what did they invest in? One thing....A FARSE!!![/b]
NOW, just NOW your complaining? LMAO
For some reason some investors in IDCN feel the need to post hundreds of post over and over again stating how the CEO this the comapny that and everything was a lie.
Yet the same people didn't care when they made $ over and over in IDCN throughout the last decade & 1/2. Bragging at times!
Splitting hairs?
I posted facts as to what I saw written in black & white about ANWM. If one looks at said facts it shows an increase.
It wasn't me or anybody else who felt the need to do a calculation to prove some point and then make their own assumption of as to why.
Splitting hairs,
Yes you did. For whatever reason I can only say it was to be confrontational because I posted.
Forget about rounding?
Again it wasn't me who brought that issue up. It was used in your calculation to prove your argument.
You know I thought I saw a poster that slammed another poster telling him/her something about...one can't pick and choose what they wanted to use to prove their argument. Hmmm, "Do as I say not as I do?"
Forget about rounding or when a credible poster said "270 mil" 18 months ago. Forget about IR stating 274 mil 6 months ago.
Again it wasn't me who started the rounding game. It wasn't me who started the 6 month post issue.
O/S that went from 270,000,000 (1/2011) to 270,870,000 (6/2011) doesn't warrant discussion.
Doesn't warrant discussion?
A share increase is always an important concern for all investors.
It sounds like if a poster wants to post something they must get it approved by you first so you can decide whether it's warranted or credible or if it's to old or to new or silly or a post is to long or drawn out or to thin. Is that what you saying to the board?
Is it a fact, technically yes
Yes? Did you say yes? Stop the presses! Raise the flag! This is a National Holiday! So the long and the short of it is what I said was correct. O wait a minute never mind doesn't count, it was thin, ridiculous issue to even initiate in any fashion.
And to end we get more calculations. Here let me see if you can calculate one more thing for me?
How much dirt is in a six foot hole?
Answer...NONE it's a hole.
Have a nice 4th...GL
Bear Market take the time and you'll see some positive post of mine. Fact
I know Ken has made $ Playing stocks over the years. Fact
While your checking you should also see many times I've stated Ken and others are PLAYERS. Fact
I'm here playing his play. Fact
If memory serves me right I've also stated I will keep him honest. Fact
How is showing facts and keep things honest (not one sided) being one sided?
At this point ANWM has moved on one PR., hype/post on this board and comments from Ken. That is about the only side to ANWM. Fact
Yes what you say is a Fact...Nobody knows for a fact what is going to happen
Everybody have a nice 4th.
So why is post 9856 your post, which is 6 months old better then the one I referenced? Ridiculous
So you get to pick for your own argument the time frame of when a post is valid and not valid for discussion. Ridiculous
O okay, your way or not at all. Ridiculous
With that reference I used Chucks numbers. You know the same person which you slammed me over saying I was not being respectful because I supposededly didn't believe you! Ridiculous
You use the word round. So you get to pick for your own argument how that you know for a fact it was rounded? Ridiculous
So if if you take what you posted 270,000,000 and the new number is 273,870,000 and to suit your post you say it was round number then why was it rounded DOWN?
My God does EVERYTHING have to be confrontational?
I posted what was facts it became confrontational when someone felt the need to quibble over as he put it 0.32%.
In post 15105 it was said...Outstanding shares as of 1/26/11 were recorded on OTC as a nice round 273,000,000.
Who said it was rounded up or down? That was the number shown. Fact In that same post it was not denied the number recorded on OTC was 273,000,000 was it?
So who is being confrontaional here?
Frankie were you talking about me over their?
CC if you go to the OTC site and click on that area and go through the first 5 pages you'd be surprised at what you see. ;)
So to date this is what we have...
ANWM is a stock symbol. Fact
Ken Ash touted the stock as the next big thing! Fact
The shares are supposed to be locked-up, tight float, in good hands! Rumor
As per the OTC market site Ken Ash is listed as the Investor Relations Firm through the Stockcharter Group. Fact
A PR was released which brought Premiere into light. Fact
As per the OTC market site Georgos Androutsopoulos, President is the only offical officer at this time! Fact
As per NJ records he lives in NJ and Premiere is run out of his home/apartment. Fact
The PPS went up on no other news, to I believe $0.053! Fact
We were told the financials were being worked on! Rumor
No offical PR to state if true! Fact
There is supposed to be a mining connection! Rumor
No offical PR to state if true! Fact
Mining issue was semi backed through the OTC market site showing Metal mining and short blurb in latest PR! Fact
As per the OTC site Incorporated in NV! Fact
As per the OTC site transfer agent is First America Stock Transfer! Fact
As per the OTC market site the Shares Outstanding 273,870,000 a/o Jun 16, 2011. Fact
Shares Outstanding went up! Fact
As per the OTC market site the Float 210,901,333 a/o Jun 16, 2011. Fact
The float went up. Fact
The stock was suspended for a short time and is now on the Greys. Fact
The company put out a PR. stating they are working on the issue. Fact
The stock has not traded since the SEC issue. Fact
This is about the jist of ANWM. If anybody would like to add any facts to the list please feel free to do so.
That's my point in this entire issue with what Space 1230 posted.
Just because he said those thing in his post (Space 1230) "what we were told". Does not mean it to be a fact.
You then say...I could say i just got off the phone with someone but i didn't. At that point an investor (you) could call the same person and ask question. If 2 & 2 don't add up to 4 then do you trust said person?
then you say...So i take ppl at thier word until i have a reason not too
Chuck said financials are done, are they?
We were told the shares structure didn't go up but the new sites shows different. Who do you trust now?
Posted by Charles who runs the other forum.
KWP hello. On another forum it was posted the financial were done. Are they?
Asking a person to elaborate further on his post is NOT asking for HIS life history. Many would say it helps an investor to better understand ones investment.
Gee I guess that's not good investing smarts?
A few things I find interesting...
It's interesting why Ken is still touting IDCN after JB diluted IDCN and supposedly cost Ken a ton of $.
I find it very interesting why the CEO (Gator-Baiter/JB) is going after the other board Ken is involved in.
But what I find even MORE interesting is why Ken has done nothing being JB has diluted the stock allegedly without Ken knowing it. Costing him a ton of $ and above and beyond that trying to take down the other stock.
To da moon!
More questions about what you post...
I took the time to see if there was a matching book-end for this "mine chat." Took about a year & boy did I find it. Could it be sheer coincidence that it was a perfect fit, yeah perhaps but very very unlikely.
Elaborating on this issue can only help everybody's investment in ANWM.
1st thing I did on suspension day was get on the phone & call the SEC.
So what did you ask them and what answers did they give you? Who did you talk too?
I also emailed the SEC.
What did you ask? Was it the same answers as what you were told on the phone? did you tlakl to the same person?
Yet if anyone stopped speculating for a minute & called Medlink, they'd tell you that they have 'attorneys working on the anywhere md financials along with the former president.'
Who did you talk too? What did this person have to say?
Space 1230 you put out alot of supposed info. The other day you posted info and I asked you to elaborate further. So again I'll ask...
New mgmnt had an attorney review them & some changes were requested.
Who is the attorney? And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
Changes were made,
What changes were made? And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
there is apparently a new cfo involved
I might've missed this info so please tell/show/explain who this person is? Background on this person?
He wanted some more info from Medlink, so now the financials are back at Medlink for signatures.
And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
There is an MM in place to file the 211 w/finra
Who is the MM? And who told you this? Who is this MM? Please show/tell us factual info.
The mm, of course, wants the financials - so back to Medlink.
And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
What I can tell you is that Georgos spent 3 days this week, thus far, at MedLink
And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
& the meetings are with Vouno (ceo), not Rose!
And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
not one person here took the time to call Medlink
Is that what you did? Who did you talk too? If this is how you got all the above info then why wouldn't Ken be privy to said info and explain this to the investors? What you have put in your post is good info. If true factually!
If true factually, Ken should as IR person be stating this info to the investors days ago. Did you dicuss this with Ken?
Because Ken didn't post this info on this board, Space 1230 did! And you know what else I find odd? His post was removed as being Off Topic. Hmmm. O it's obvious you know that for a fact.
I don't have to talk to Ken. And if he did talk to Ken then why wasn't ALL this info post offically on this board or in a PR? And alot of blanks need to be filled in on those statements.
Space 1230 you posted some info in a post which I find interesting and important if true and factual! Being you seem to say you know more then others clearing up the following can only help ANWM. So please take the time and fill in the blanks?
New mgmnt had an attorney review them & some changes were requested.
Who is the attorney? And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
Changes were made,
What changes were made? And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
there is apparently a new cfo involved
I might've missed this info so please tell/show/explain who this person is? Background on this person?
He wanted some more info from Medlink, so now the financials are back at Medlink for signatures.
And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
There is an MM in place to file the 211 w/finra
Who is the MM? And who told you this? Who is this MM? Please show/tell us factual info.
The mm, of course, wants the financials - so back to Medlink.
And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
What I can tell you is that Georgos spent 3 days this week, thus far, at MedLink
And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
& the meetings are with Vouno (ceo), not Rose!
And who told you this? Please show/tell us factual info.
not one person here took the time to call Medlink
Is that what you did? Who did you talk too? If this is how you got all the above info then why wouldn't Ken be privy to said info and explain this to the investors? What you have put in your post is good info. If true factually! If true factually, Ken should as IR person be stating this info to the investors days ago.
Tefman, the day the Premiere PR came out I asked many of those type questions and got slammed for asking.
Teffy...not missing anything from your post. As I said I find it interesting how you say Ken has made JB (owner of IDCN) lots of $. Would you care to elaborate how he MADE him $?
IMHO...Being the stock has NEVER had anything except bogus this and BS that over the last 10+ years. So one has to say it was all done by PLAYING the stock. That says alot, something that is frowned upon by some.
Want to discuss my beliefs about the Teffy issue? Or do yoy want to drop it? :)
Hello...Tefman, I sure find the following comment by you very interesting.
am still amazed to see this type of talk about KA when he is the one that has helped many make money, EXSPECIALLY the GATOR
In one breath you say Gator is (JB) and in the next you say how Ken has made JB (Gator) money! Hmmm gotta love that comment.
I've said all along PLAYERS, a whole pile of them from owners to IR's to the group, to Tefman.
Yea I don't know what that deal is. Did the same thing with the other stock site when news came out about that company.