Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
20 - 48 - 88
Thanks!
Man Goes Into Women’s Bathroom And Commits Horrific Act To 10-Year-Old Girl…
As America sinks deeper into moral decay, the question that should be asked is how did we collectively allow this to happen? Obviously anyone with a once of common sense knows, that it would be just a matter of time before the sexual deviates would be larking within those bathrooms, that have now become “legal pervert zones!”
Of course the fault lies with so-called legislators that have once again put “political correctness BEFORE THE WELL-BEING OF THE PEOPLE, they’ve sworn to protect and defend.”
And it didn’t take long before what was anticipated happened in Pennsylvania, when Quarryville, PA, resident James Thomas Shoemaker, 19 was arrested for taking photos of a 10-year-old girl in a public restroom and charged with child porn.
The incident took place as Shoemaker hid in a stall of the woman’s bathroom in a Sheerz store on Manheim Park taking pictures of little girls going to the bathroom.
As stated, America is in decline thanks in part to a powerful yet manicure subculture of ill-informed social misfits, and a progressive political ruling class that prides itself on “inclusiveness”, while destroying the very fabric of human decency.
Make no mistake America is in a “cultural war”, that requires “all hands on deck”…silence is no longer an option if we are to protect our moral dignity, and more importantly our children!
Do you think men should never be allowed in the women's restroom for any reason?
http://usherald.com/begun-man-goes-womens-bathroom-commits-horrific-act-10-year-old-girl/
Not sure how anyone could live within 30 miles of Pine Bluff. I hated it anytime I had to drive anywhere near it...
That will smell good....
19 - 22 - 88
Thanks!
SCKT - $3.32
Socket Mobile Reports Profitable 2016 First Quarter On Y/Y Revenue Growth Of 26 Percent
Published: Apr 20, 2016 4:01 p.m. ET
NEWARK, Calif., April 20, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Socket Mobile, Inc. SCKT, -0.90% a leading innovator of data capture and delivery solutions for enhanced productivity, today reported profitable operating results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2016.
Revenue for the first quarter of 2016 was $5.0 million, an increase of 26 percent compared to revenue of $4.0 million for the same quarter a year ago. Net income for the first quarter of 2016 was $548,000, or $0.10 per share, compared to a net loss of $72,000, or a loss of $0.01 per share, in the first quarter of 2015. Gross profit on revenue for the first quarter of 2016 was 49.7 percent, an increase from 45.1 percent for the same quarter a year ago. Operating expenses for the first quarter of 2016 were $1.9 million, an increase of six percent compared to operating expenses of $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2015.
Kevin Mills, president and chief executive officer, commented, "We are pleased to achieve first quarter revenue growth of 26 percent year over year and our fourth consecutive quarter of profitability. Our data capture revenue, which comprised 79 percent of total quarterly revenue, grew 16 percent over the same quarter in the prior year, and our SoMo handheld computer product also contributed as we delivered some last time buy orders during the quarter. Our data capture business continues to be driven by third party mobile applications with the emerging mobile point of sale (mPOS) market leading the way. We expect these trends to continue during the second and third quarters, which are typically the strongest selling periods for these types of applications. In addition to mPOS applications, other key markets being addressed by registered third party developers include hospitality, asset management and various commercial services and enterprise mobility applications," Mills concluded.
SCKT - $3.32
Socket Mobile Reports Profitable 2016 First Quarter On Y/Y Revenue Growth Of 26 Percent
Published: Apr 20, 2016 4:01 p.m. ET
NEWARK, Calif., April 20, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Socket Mobile, Inc. SCKT, -0.90% a leading innovator of data capture and delivery solutions for enhanced productivity, today reported profitable operating results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2016.
Revenue for the first quarter of 2016 was $5.0 million, an increase of 26 percent compared to revenue of $4.0 million for the same quarter a year ago. Net income for the first quarter of 2016 was $548,000, or $0.10 per share, compared to a net loss of $72,000, or a loss of $0.01 per share, in the first quarter of 2015. Gross profit on revenue for the first quarter of 2016 was 49.7 percent, an increase from 45.1 percent for the same quarter a year ago. Operating expenses for the first quarter of 2016 were $1.9 million, an increase of six percent compared to operating expenses of $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2015.
Kevin Mills, president and chief executive officer, commented, "We are pleased to achieve first quarter revenue growth of 26 percent year over year and our fourth consecutive quarter of profitability. Our data capture revenue, which comprised 79 percent of total quarterly revenue, grew 16 percent over the same quarter in the prior year, and our SoMo handheld computer product also contributed as we delivered some last time buy orders during the quarter. Our data capture business continues to be driven by third party mobile applications with the emerging mobile point of sale (mPOS) market leading the way. We expect these trends to continue during the second and third quarters, which are typically the strongest selling periods for these types of applications. In addition to mPOS applications, other key markets being addressed by registered third party developers include hospitality, asset management and various commercial services and enterprise mobility applications," Mills concluded.
Trump Towers Over New York
The Republican frontrunner scores a sweeping win, as does Hillary Clinton, in the state they both call home.
David A. Graham
| Apr 19, 2016
New York delivered big wins to a favorite son and a favorite daughter on Tuesday, as Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump dominated returns.
Clinton—who isn’t a native, but in the grand tradition of New York transplants, represented the state in the U.S. Senate—bested Senator Bernie Sanders, who spent his early years in Brooklyn and retained the accent despite his long residence in Vermont. Clinton’s win was no surprise, but she ended up beating Sanders by around 15 points, exceeding most predictions. On the Republican side, Queens native Trump cruised to a huge victory and celebrated his win at Trump Tower, where he announced his campaign with a brash and splashy press conference 10 months ago.
The Republican side was the one to watch Tuesday. Trump has dropped the last couple of nominating contests, and he’s been shellacked at state conventions across the country where delegates are selected to go to the Republican National Convention. That puts Trump in danger at a contested convention, where delegates are freed up to vote for the candidate of their choice on the second, third, or subsequent ballots (depending on state rules), and makes it even more important for him to secure the 1,237 delegates required to win the nomination outright.
That figure has become more challenging in recent weeks, but it is not out of reach for Trump, and Tuesday’s dominant showing brought it a lot closer. By winning the state, Trump picked up 14 of its 95 delegates. But most of the GOP delegates are allocated by congressional district—any candidate who tops 50 percent clinches all three in each district, while they’re otherwise split. For John Kasich and Ted Cruz, the goal on Tuesday was simply to keep Trump under 50 percent in as many places as possible and peel off a few delegates.
It wasn’t a great night for those plans. With the votes mostly counted, Trump was on pace to take roughly 90 delegates. By Tuesday night, Cruz’s campaign had decided the Texan was unlikely to win a single delegate. He spoke before the polls had even closed at a rally in Philadelphia, where he was campaigning ahead of next Tuesday’s Pennsylvania primary, and barely mentioned Trump. (It turns out that turning an entire state’s “values” into a pejorative is not an effective tool for winning that state.) Kasich, meanwhile, had placed many hopes on New York. Lagging well behind both Trump and Cruz, the Ohioan had hoped that the Empire State’s demographics might echo his home state and give a boost to his campaign—and his argument that only he can win a general election.
Trump was jubilant but uncharacteristically brief at his victory party in Manhattan, where he was backed by his family and joined by New Yorkers from businessman Carl Icahn to former gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino. He sought to declare the race effectively over.
“We don’t have much of a race anymore based on what I’m seeing on television. Senator Cruz is just about mathematically eliminated,” Trump said, using the Texan’s formal title rather than Trump’s usual favored epithet, “Lyin’ Ted.” But Trump also issued a threat to Republican insiders, warning that voters would not stand for him being denied the nomination if he reaches the convention with only a plurality of delegates, rather than the 1,237-delegate majority. “It’s a crooked system, it’s a system that’s rigged, and we’re going to go back to the old system,” he said. “Nobody can take an election away with the way they’re doing it in the Republican Party.”
Perhaps Trump’s brevity was intended to avoid the provocative comments he has sometimes made on election nights and elsewhere. Certainly, he seemed to be avoiding controversy. Alluding to a recent campaign shakeup, however, he said, “It’s a team of unity. People don’t understand that. The press does understand that, but they don’t want to talk about it.”
Kasich finished second to Trump, with around a quarter of the vote, and he seemed likely to peel off five delegates. Cruz finished a distant third and earned no delegates.
Bernie Sanders’s finish proved a disappointment. (Early exit polls suggesting a closer-than-expected race proved misleading.) Clinton’s home-field example helped her to an easy win. While that edge was always expected, Sanders made a play for New York, campaigning hard across the state, save a short jaunt to the Vatican over the weekend, where he spoke at an event and briefly met Pope Francis.
It’s the first bad night for Sanders in a long time. He had won seven of previous eight Democratic contests, and despite the Clinton campaign’s hopes and expectations, the Democratic race seems to be tightening as it goes forward, rather than allowing Clinton to pull away. In some polls, including the first PRRI / The Atlantic poll this month, Sanders has tied or pulled ahead. But Sanders still lags Clinton by more than 200 pledged delegates (to say nothing of superdelegates), and so he needs big wins to overtake her. The result in New York doesn’t do that for him.
“Today we have proved again there’s no place like home,” Clinton told a crowd in Manhattan. “New Yorkers, you’ve always had my back, and I’ve always tried to have yours.”
Like Trump, and not for the first time, Clinton tried to pivot to the general election and put the primary behind her. But she put that in her strongest terms yet.
"The race for the Democratic nomination is in the home stretch and victory is in sight," she said, telling Sanders supporters, “There is much more that unites us than divides us.”
As usual, Sanders far outpaced Clinton among young voters; the two candidates roughly split voters ages 30 to 44, according to exit polls. Those polls also showed the pair roughly splitting white voters, but Clinton winning African Americans 3-1 and Hispanics 2-1. She also won among the poorest voters.
Sanders barely spoke Tuesday, giving his traveling press corps the slip and jetting back to Vermont, where he held a brief press conference—most of it via conference call, with reporters still on the trail.
The results were somewhat marred by irregularities in the voting process. Reports spread of eligible voters being purged from the roles, in some cases at large scale. Some polling places reportedly opened late or voting machines were not functional. New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer promised an audit. “There is nothing more sacred in our nation than the right to vote, yet election after election, reports come in of people who were inexplicably purged from the polls, told to vote at the wrong location or unable to get into their polling site,” he said. Mayor Bill de Blasio backed Stringer.
That followed several days of complaints about the system. New York’s primary is closed, which means only registered Democrats and Republicans could vote, and the deadline to switch registration was months ago. That system put Sanders at a disadvantage, as he has drawn support from independents, and some of his backers complained that the process was unfair. Also shut out were two of Donald Trump’s children, who couldn’t vote for their father after missing the deadline to register as Republicans.
The small number of votes might have helped Trump in Manhattan, which he was on pace to lose narrowly to Kasich, and where his most prominent developments stand. Home-state status can be a boon, but too much familiarity really does breed contempt. But Manhattan was one small, 13-mile blemish for Trump on an otherwise excellent night.
—David A. Graham
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/04/new-york-primary-clinton-trump/478872/
Trump Towers Over New York
The Republican frontrunner scores a sweeping win, as does Hillary Clinton, in the state they both call home.
David A. Graham
| Apr 19, 2016
New York delivered big wins to a favorite son and a favorite daughter on Tuesday, as Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump dominated returns.
Clinton—who isn’t a native, but in the grand tradition of New York transplants, represented the state in the U.S. Senate—bested Senator Bernie Sanders, who spent his early years in Brooklyn and retained the accent despite his long residence in Vermont. Clinton’s win was no surprise, but she ended up beating Sanders by around 15 points, exceeding most predictions. On the Republican side, Queens native Trump cruised to a huge victory and celebrated his win at Trump Tower, where he announced his campaign with a brash and splashy press conference 10 months ago.
The Republican side was the one to watch Tuesday. Trump has dropped the last couple of nominating contests, and he’s been shellacked at state conventions across the country where delegates are selected to go to the Republican National Convention. That puts Trump in danger at a contested convention, where delegates are freed up to vote for the candidate of their choice on the second, third, or subsequent ballots (depending on state rules), and makes it even more important for him to secure the 1,237 delegates required to win the nomination outright.
That figure has become more challenging in recent weeks, but it is not out of reach for Trump, and Tuesday’s dominant showing brought it a lot closer. By winning the state, Trump picked up 14 of its 95 delegates. But most of the GOP delegates are allocated by congressional district—any candidate who tops 50 percent clinches all three in each district, while they’re otherwise split. For John Kasich and Ted Cruz, the goal on Tuesday was simply to keep Trump under 50 percent in as many places as possible and peel off a few delegates.
It wasn’t a great night for those plans. With the votes mostly counted, Trump was on pace to take roughly 90 delegates. By Tuesday night, Cruz’s campaign had decided the Texan was unlikely to win a single delegate. He spoke before the polls had even closed at a rally in Philadelphia, where he was campaigning ahead of next Tuesday’s Pennsylvania primary, and barely mentioned Trump. (It turns out that turning an entire state’s “values” into a pejorative is not an effective tool for winning that state.) Kasich, meanwhile, had placed many hopes on New York. Lagging well behind both Trump and Cruz, the Ohioan had hoped that the Empire State’s demographics might echo his home state and give a boost to his campaign—and his argument that only he can win a general election.
Trump was jubilant but uncharacteristically brief at his victory party in Manhattan, where he was backed by his family and joined by New Yorkers from businessman Carl Icahn to former gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino. He sought to declare the race effectively over.
“We don’t have much of a race anymore based on what I’m seeing on television. Senator Cruz is just about mathematically eliminated,” Trump said, using the Texan’s formal title rather than Trump’s usual favored epithet, “Lyin’ Ted.” But Trump also issued a threat to Republican insiders, warning that voters would not stand for him being denied the nomination if he reaches the convention with only a plurality of delegates, rather than the 1,237-delegate majority. “It’s a crooked system, it’s a system that’s rigged, and we’re going to go back to the old system,” he said. “Nobody can take an election away with the way they’re doing it in the Republican Party.”
Perhaps Trump’s brevity was intended to avoid the provocative comments he has sometimes made on election nights and elsewhere. Certainly, he seemed to be avoiding controversy. Alluding to a recent campaign shakeup, however, he said, “It’s a team of unity. People don’t understand that. The press does understand that, but they don’t want to talk about it.”
Kasich finished second to Trump, with around a quarter of the vote, and he seemed likely to peel off five delegates. Cruz finished a distant third and earned no delegates.
Bernie Sanders’s finish proved a disappointment. (Early exit polls suggesting a closer-than-expected race proved misleading.) Clinton’s home-field example helped her to an easy win. While that edge was always expected, Sanders made a play for New York, campaigning hard across the state, save a short jaunt to the Vatican over the weekend, where he spoke at an event and briefly met Pope Francis.
It’s the first bad night for Sanders in a long time. He had won seven of previous eight Democratic contests, and despite the Clinton campaign’s hopes and expectations, the Democratic race seems to be tightening as it goes forward, rather than allowing Clinton to pull away. In some polls, including the first PRRI / The Atlantic poll this month, Sanders has tied or pulled ahead. But Sanders still lags Clinton by more than 200 pledged delegates (to say nothing of superdelegates), and so he needs big wins to overtake her. The result in New York doesn’t do that for him.
“Today we have proved again there’s no place like home,” Clinton told a crowd in Manhattan. “New Yorkers, you’ve always had my back, and I’ve always tried to have yours.”
Like Trump, and not for the first time, Clinton tried to pivot to the general election and put the primary behind her. But she put that in her strongest terms yet.
"The race for the Democratic nomination is in the home stretch and victory is in sight," she said, telling Sanders supporters, “There is much more that unites us than divides us.”
As usual, Sanders far outpaced Clinton among young voters; the two candidates roughly split voters ages 30 to 44, according to exit polls. Those polls also showed the pair roughly splitting white voters, but Clinton winning African Americans 3-1 and Hispanics 2-1. She also won among the poorest voters.
Sanders barely spoke Tuesday, giving his traveling press corps the slip and jetting back to Vermont, where he held a brief press conference—most of it via conference call, with reporters still on the trail.
The results were somewhat marred by irregularities in the voting process. Reports spread of eligible voters being purged from the roles, in some cases at large scale. Some polling places reportedly opened late or voting machines were not functional. New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer promised an audit. “There is nothing more sacred in our nation than the right to vote, yet election after election, reports come in of people who were inexplicably purged from the polls, told to vote at the wrong location or unable to get into their polling site,” he said. Mayor Bill de Blasio backed Stringer.
That followed several days of complaints about the system. New York’s primary is closed, which means only registered Democrats and Republicans could vote, and the deadline to switch registration was months ago. That system put Sanders at a disadvantage, as he has drawn support from independents, and some of his backers complained that the process was unfair. Also shut out were two of Donald Trump’s children, who couldn’t vote for their father after missing the deadline to register as Republicans.
The small number of votes might have helped Trump in Manhattan, which he was on pace to lose narrowly to Kasich, and where his most prominent developments stand. Home-state status can be a boon, but too much familiarity really does breed contempt. But Manhattan was one small, 13-mile blemish for Trump on an otherwise excellent night.
—David A. Graham
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/04/new-york-primary-clinton-trump/478872/
Revenue by school:
http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/
Click on each school to get a pop up box on data like year to year, tickets, donation, etc.
4 - 18 - 48
Thanks!
????? Overreacting... He wins 1 more major in the next 2 years, he will be the youngest in history to get to 3 majors...
22 - 48 - 78
Thanks!
wow, lucky you....Not an easy ticket!
Could you change my total to 281?
Sorry...
Thanks!
Live coverage of the par 3 contest begins at 3pm
http://www.masters.com/en_US/watch/index.html
Day, Stenson, Scott, D. Johnson, Mickelson - 276
Thanks!
4 - 22 - 48
Thanks!
uniform violations
Oosthuizen
Thanks!
Soaring Gun Sales Cause Crime Rate to Plummet
(Bob Adelmann) Following the record-setting year of gun purchases and ownership, Smith & Wesson projected increasing sales for 2016, coming in at between $150 million and $155 million for the first quarter of the new year. Once all the data was in, however, the nation’s oldest gun maker was forced to revise those numbers upward by 16 percent, to between $175 and $180 million for the next quarter.
This squares with the increasing number of background checks, which jumped last year to 23 million, the largest number ever recorded since the federal background check system started in 1998.
The notoriously anti-gun New York Times tried to learn what was behind the increasing interest in buying and owning firearms, and was forced to admit that political pressure on law-abiding gun owners was the primary reason, declaring, “Fear of gun-buying restrictions has been the main driver of spikes in gun sales, far surpassing the effects of mass shootings and terrorist attacks.”
The Times, which pointed out the conundrum facing anti-gunners. “Th[is] dynamic shows a Catch-22 for gun control proponents: pushing for new restrictions can lead to an influx of new guns,” the article noted. This, of course, is exactly the opposite of the intended result, made clear years ago when Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) declared: “If I could have banned them all — ‘Mr. and Mrs. America, turn in your guns’ — I would have!”
Also no doubt annoying to the Times is the simple fact that as gun ownership has increased, violent crime has declined. John Lott made waves with the publication of More Guns, Less Crime in 1998, based on a county-by-county study of the impact that 13 different types of gun controls had on crime. He revised it in 2000 and then again in 2010, each time making the increasingly persuasive case that as gun ownership expanded among American citizens, violent crime dropped. According to the FBI, the violent crime rate in 1994 was 713 per 100,000 population. Ten years later it had dropped to 463 per 100,000. In 2012 it dropped still further, to 387 per 100,000.
Likely even further annoying to the anti-gun crowd was a study by two scholars, Don Kates and Gary Mauser, published in 2007 by Harvard University, entitled “Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?”
Their answer? No: “Whether gun availability is viewed as a cause or as a mere coincidence, the long term macrocosmic evidence is that gun ownership, spread widely throughout societies, consistently correlates with stable or declining murder rates…. The data consistently show that … more guns equal less crime.” (Emphasis in original.)
That’s what Phyllis Engler, a recently retired physical education teacher, said following her first gun training class last week at the American Range shooting facility outside of Austintown, Ohio. She suffers from arthritis but told James Haggerty of the Wall Street Journal that “it was hard holding [the pistol] … but I think with practice, I’ll be fine.” She added: “They better not mess with the women of Austintown.”
The number of seniors taking gun training classes from NRA instructors across the country has quadrupled in just the last five years. Gun shop owners are reporting similar experiences, with Glenn Duncan, the owner of Duncan’s Outdoor Shop in Bay City, Michigan, estimating that at least a third of his customers now are women.
Felons may be criminals, but they aren’t stupid. A survey of convicted felons conducted by two University of Massachusetts professors discovered that 81 percent of those looking for a criminal opportunity determined in advance if their target was armed, 74 percent avoided homes that were occupied for fear of being shot by someone, and 57 percent said they feared armed citizens more than they did the police.
It’s one thing to own a firearm. It’s another thing to know how and when to use it. Engler is right: Criminals had better not mess with armed citizens possessing skill at arms. As more and more citizens take advantage of their Second Amendment-protected rights, one may reasonably expect those violent crime statistics to continue to decline.
http://govtslaves.info/soaring-gun-sales-cause-crime-rate-to-plummet/
The National Inquirer???
Please, PLEASE don't brag on what you made the last 12 years and Bitch, Wine and Complain daily about shit not going your way... Thanks in advance!
Scott Brown - PRO
Thanks!
Danny Willett - WGC
Thanks!
4 - 18 - 19
Thanks!
I just want to pass this along, it is amazing...
My step daughter gave me this recipe for laundry detergent. She has an 18 month old, a 3 year old and a step son that's 16 years old. She keeps a Very clean house would not give that up to save money, so I was very interested in her formula. She has been using it for over a year and we have been using it for a few months. It is amazing...
All the ingredients are available at walmart and you can wash for less than $.05/load...
Your first purchase will be around $18 then the next 4 will be around $10 ea. You get around 225 washes per purchase. So for each cycle of 5 purchases you get a total of 1125 wash cycles for $48 bucks! That equals $.0427 cents per wash!!!
The Recipe:
2 cups of Borax
2 cups of washing soda
2 bars of naptha bar soap (grinded, use a cheese grater or food processor.)
1 canister Downy unstoppables
You only use 2 teaspoons per load of laundry
Link to each item:
Borax http://www.walmart.com/ip/20-Mule-Team-Borax-All-Natural-Laundry-Booster-76-oz/20850525
washing soda http://www.walmart.com/ip/Arm-Hammer-Super-Washing-Soda-Detergent-Booster-Household-Cleaner-55-oz/19407690
naptha bar soap - No link
Downy unstoppables (you can get any scent you want, the recipe is for the smaller bottle.) http://www.walmart.com/ip/Downy-Unstopables-In-Wash-Fresh-Scent-Booster-13.2-Oz/17729334
Jason Day
Thanks!
Good info, I will check it out...Thanks!
4 - 18 - 41
Thanks!
Jason Dufner
Thanks!
Thanks to all that replied to my other post on lawn mowers. I purchased a 2016 Cub Cadet XT2-LT42 today. The XT2's are only available from authorized dealers so I had to pay the sales tax.
I went in intending on purchasing a Husqvarna but Cub Cadet won out in the end. Not based on price but quality and features, plus it has a better warranty. Only time will tell but I am currently very happy with my purchase.
If you are interested, following is a link to the list of Cub Cadet XT1/XT2 mowers....
http://todaysmower.com/2015-cub-cadet-xt1-xt2-lawn-garden-tractor-review/
11 - 20 - 22
Thanks!
Looking for any input I can find. I am going to purchase a new riding mower this year (within a couple of weeks). My yard is 1.75 acres with some steep inclines (most is pretty level but very steep about .2 acre). I will spend under 2k. I have narrowed it down to the following 3:
1. Husqvarna YTH22V46 - $1699.00 + tax = $1851.99
http://www.lowes.com/pd_521687-63311-960450045_1z0wgcv__?productId=50119839&pl=1
2. John Deere D110 - $1699.00 + tax = $1851.99
http://www.lowes.com/pd_521666-573-BG20869_1z0wgcv__?productId=999981842&pl=1
3. Cub Cadet XT1 Enduro Series - $1699.00 - no tax, my wife has a tax free account.
http://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/product/cub-cadet-xt1-enduro-series-46-in-22-hp-v-twin-hydrostatic-riding-mower
I have read the reviews from each and they are about the same. Most are great, best mower ever bought, with a couple of bad "lemons" mixed in.
I like the Husqvarna (Briggs & Stratton engine) the best but is it $150 better than the Cub Cadet (Kohler engine)? I have always heard great things about John Deer (John Deere Branded engine not sure manufacture) but the reviews are about the same and its a smaller motor & deck. I don't mind the 42" deck but I like Horsepower!!!!
The mower I'm retiring is a Husky from tractor supply. It has a 25hp briggs & Stratton engine with a 46" cut. It has been a work horse for the last 11 years. The engine and deck are still in great shape, the rest needs to be retired...
I would love to hear any and all opinions. tia
I agree but I seldom visit it because of the trouble I have with it.
I have the same issues...
I like the turnout...Republicans are around 2 to 1 in most states...
Wow, I have been reading this shit for too long. Congress has the purse strings, the president can only do so much.... For the last
7 years, the congress has failed, "el presidente" has prevailed.
Cruz may win Texas by 10%...
In TN, I was expecting Cruz or Rubio to take Memphis, Nashville and Knoxville. Nashville went to Trump, that was a shock....