Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Brilliant. Good IR. Wide open market applications. Winning technology. It keeps getting better.
You bought yourself a powderkeg gang. Be careful when you're playing with matches tonight. Super day. Feels very early in the story. What a great time to have entered.
After buying my first position yesterday, I saw the buying in force by other buyers had full continuation this morning. I kept buying in quantity and was matched side by side by some very heavy artillery. It is very good fortune that I did all this pretty much right up to the PR. That is called good luck. Schlumberger is a fantastic. It means this company is getting work from the biggest and the best blue chip companies.
Some observations & comments from my own 2 day accumulation spree:
NITE is trying to cap off the stock. I am grateful because it allowed me to buy in size and have a cost basis just over 0.76 now. Whether they had plenty of inventory at one point or not they could not be expected to have much now. If they were playing it in the other direction they bet wrong and they'll get taken out by the other strong buyers and have to cover. If they did short then we'll see this pop another 10-20 cents on that covering response alone. But I'm not a big fan of explaining all scenarios as if shorting is actively being done.
I figure NITE has their reasons. They may have had a client to unload for. One thing I know about NITE is when there are big clients who want to accumulate NITE will cap a stock as long as they can so they can build a position for their client. They can be very stubborn about it, but realize they are cost averaging for their client then and if the client wants a million shares and it costs them 85 cents a share to compensate for NITE's capping the stock while they poach retail traders taking profits then that is how it works out.
But NITE doesn't really care sometimes so it can just be spinning the wheels even thinking about it. They will short on the Ask just because they are a badass MM and if they bet wrong well they are trading a zillion other stocks that day and they make their money most of the time.
There has been real size out there buying on the Ask. I was getting 10k fills steadily and so were others. I never went over 15k on a single buy, but others did. Whatever is going on I know I had serious company gobbling this stock up.
Now as to all you guys camping out on the bid let me say this: when you see the money flow like you did here + they are filling on the Ask for what was probably a limited time period it only makes sense to quibble over spending an extra few cents per share if you are a scalper or a trader who does not take any chances whatsoever.
It may boil down to time frames for some holding DPDW now, but if you believe this company is going to do very well and you are going long, then it is best to buy it and get in generally speaking when you have a year long chart that shows this busting through a dollar soon enough.
Anyway, I have a feeling the management of this company is wired into very big things and this could be a true monster stock. I bought big so I can make millions if we are correct, but I also feel quite comfortable that the technical support is there to buy and hold with a floor building well above my cost basis.
This is looking excellent. Best of luck to everyone
Schlumberger is huge. The scaling up of DPDW could be a massive revenue wave with clients like this. I'm very satisfied with my purchase.
Less shares have been available in the Forties so far than there were in the Thirties. That ought to tell you something.
gobble gobble belch
I'll tell you what the real bullying going on is:
Attacking the person and pushing their point to the background
Making lame attempts at character assassination based on totally spurious comments like "you're a basher hunting for cheap shares"
Deleting posts ON TOPIC
Demanding people not violate board rules, but not applying the rules uniformly
Crushing Dissent
That is the real bullying going on.
You can't handle a comment that supporting that is stupid? Too bad.
I don't comment on peoples' sexuality, their lifestyles, their personal lives. I don't tell people they are impotent. You told me to wash out my mouth with soap when you were the one who flipped out and make silly comments about somebody's sexual capacities. Get a grip.
Lovely. Yeah, that's terrific. Except the bully is Overhead. And anybody who consistently strokes them has got some serious gap in their comprehension of who is willing to discuss the truth and who isn't. I prefaced my statement with an apology to you because I think you are probably good hearted, but I knew you'd take offense at my statement and it was not targeted at you. The point is even good people can be really stupid sometimes and for you to stroke Overhead as much as you have is really absurd. It doesn't mean I categorically call you stupid, but that is a stupid thing to do. You can't handle that much then you are being really thin skinned. Those mods have been blocking all real discussion until recently and if you can't stand up to the real bullies that is up to you. I didn't bully you. I told you how I felt.
Bizzy tried to wear me down today. They are behaving like petulant children. Kind of like watching a policeman in diapers on an episode of Cops.
Sorry Seabiscuit, but I have to say this. Anybody who keeps saying Overhead has done a good job as a mod is either really stupid or totally full of it. They keep saying it is not on topic if iFinix did not pay their bills with a company which I know to be the case. Can you believe the gall of that fascist twit? Shareholders should tell him to go to hell.
Says you. You continue to trivialize the situation with comments about my supposed trading motivations.
Why do you think Xeller defended me today? Because I was frank to them via PM when they asked how I felt months ago when I was maintaining my silence so you'd get your pop.
They chose to take their chances with the stock, but they know I was not trading or flipping then and and I'm not now. I gave them my private opinion and I wished them well with their choice to stay though I questioned its validity.
You want me to take off the week here just stop baiting me with statements that I am hunting for cheap shares. It is amateurish to keep saying so.
Have a good week
Tell you what Russell. I'll take the rest of the week off here to see if they report anything by the end of the month like some still hope. If there is still that hope I'll leave it alone while that time still exists. I can take you up on that. Good luck
That sounds like some kind of trader logic though I can't see how it will work out. But if they want to try let them.
I asked. I did not declare.
How can they flip now Todd? There may be some people who want to flip, but trading offers no flips. If you can take in 2s on the bid and sell at 3 I would be amazed.
I asked and it was an open ended comment. The use of the word
IF
was purposely put in there. And the question of
WHEN
it was changed.
When told it was earlier I immediately accepted the explanation.
I held off for half a year and all it resulted in was shareholders getting bombed into oblivion by dilution.
Matching up your statement "If ya ain't got nothing nice to say then don't talk"
with your rally cry to pump the stock to attract new buyers to sell the stock to
is an interesting moral equivalency unto itself.
Also, sometimes it can even be investors close to the company who agree to share some of their large positions with new buyers to encourage more big boys to come on board and start buying. They get their first taste of stock from a negotiated sale and then keep buying on the open market. This can be encouraged by the company if they are smart about markets and know that the quality of their shareholder base is very important to the company's future. That can sometimes motivate a redistribution of shares even from parties that know full well how successful the company can become. It is like giving one for the team.
Brikk, I think it means some buyers have approached shareholders privately and negotiated their large purchases. Many times those will not show on the wire if shares are transferred between accounts for an agreed upon sum, but sometimes they are simply traded AON between two accounts at the agreed upon price. They may have figured out who had a cost basis much lower, asked if they'd sell some hoping they wanted some profit peeling and liquidity and the answer would be yes. That the trades are not going through below the prevailing bid is a good indication that the going price is setting up a higher new base. Good stuff
That is one key point you successfully made here. Now why exactly should new buyers be lured in by what you admit would be pumping up a bad situation? So you advocate people take in new blood so they can exit their positions? I get it.
That is very fair. That is what I've tried to say in my own words already. I think people can learn something from your resummarizing my situation. I am grateful for your effort.
Posted by: TradeSwapper
In reply to: overhead who wrote msg# 79328 Date:9/26/2007 3:31:29 PM
Post #of 79330
Excuse me. My first post about Elite Trader was restored by the admins after one of the mods here deleted because it is very much ON TOPIC.
Due Diligence that shows whether a company:
- Meets its contractual obligations
- Pays its bills
- Is dropping the ad campaign suddenly
is all very much ON TOPIC.
It is called DUE DILIGENCE. It is not hearsay. It is fact. Verify it and you'll actually be doing due diligence.
Uh huh and you just challenged me on Elite Trader and I gave you more detail BECAUSE YOU CAST DOUBT ON MY ASSERTION. OK? You brought forth greater detail. Take responsibility for it.
Bless you. That is real.
He owns the website. You don't believe him then you're just burying your head in the sand.
Look dude, I placed INXR on iHub. I placed them on EliteTrader. It was my advice that made every single ad happen. You dig?
So you don't get to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.
Elite Trader is a fine site. You want to suggest Baron is lying?
Chew on this then. I know the contract with Elite Trader was for one year's length. Do you see any iFinix ads still there? Well?
They were in rotation on the common pages of the website and had taken sponsorship of the Educational Resources forum page. Do you still see them there? No.
Keep pushing me to answer you if you really want to hear the truth.
What do you mean am I sure? Call Baron Robertson at Elite Trader, tell him you are a shareholder of INXR and ask him yourself. Of course I'm sure.
I don't think it will because it is incorporated in Nevada and from New York. But maybe they have additional Patriot Act criteria that would catch transfers of assets off shore. We'll see. I'll refer to it before every buy.
That is a good step. Like a scam database you can check before buying. Good idea. I want to see more work like that from the SEC.
Chill out Vega. Xeller was hardly a lead pumper on that stock. They chose to stick it out and are disappointed. Sure, they defended their stock, but they are not really your target. You guys should just drop it with each other.
How is giving you new information wrong? I spoke to Baron at Elite Trader. That is not redundant information. How is telling that hammering? You want facts? I gave you one.
Enjoy your taunts. I'm not taunting you. Collect the signatures. Good positive move. Those people you are referring to were not telling truth mostly, they were the iHub traders jumping in and out and changing their tune to suit their trading agenda. Big difference.
That is fine Bizzy. But those people were known iHub traders and so-called chartists who would flip flop day by day and week by week. My stance is very clear and not subject to trading motivations.
Nobody is knocking your petition. But you can drop the total rubbish about wanting cheap shares.
Posted by: in2lite
In reply to: TradeSwapper who wrote msg# 79233 Date:9/26/2007 1:06:24 PM
Post #of 79246
So let me get this right. You have no skin in the game, yet you find time to craft word excessive treatises about this pinkie scam........?
Don't you have other things to do, or has your investment results been so successful you can allocate hours to a stock message board foucsed on a stock you do not own?
Your calling here seems to be saving face given your initial failed faith based investment. and since you so determinely guided yourself and perhaps assisted others into INXR, your current diatribes seemingly immune from fact based disputes based on a single site visit no one can confirm or deny, are the sole basis on which you can assert the superiority of your "opinions" vs. the rest of the members on this board.
while i've respected your responsible and well reasoned (though often verbose) commentary in the past, your current stream is imo a pathological and repetitive pulse of mis-informed speculation.
Posted by: TradeSwapper
In reply to: in2lite who wrote msg# 79238 Date:9/26/2007 1:12:33 PM
Post #of 79244
I am self employed through investing. I had the time recently to post. I have no financial incentive regarding INXR for over half a year and will never ever touch a share of it again. That you would question why somebody would be compelled to tell the truth after giving it plenty of time to spike and give everyone an exit opportunity to be made whole says more about your values than mine. That I should wish to inform people of my viewpoint after giving it all the time in the world to prove me wrong is my prerogative. If you think a message board is only black and white and only pro vs. con. I won't lie about anything. I never have. When someone says there is no trademark application, I say there is. I call it as a I see it. If you are incapable of understanding that people don't need a financial incentive to tell the truth then that is your lacking in vision, not mine. If you think I'm lording it over people due a superiority complex then you are truly lacking in perspective. Sorry you don't get it. I've given you ample opportunity to comprehend the truth as I see it and my purpose in telling it. Your definition of pathology is pointless. You want sociopaths? Go look for them all over the pinksheet universe where people will lie to get anything they want and then get back to me.
I am self employed through investing. I had the time recently to post. I have no financial incentive regarding INXR for over half a year and will never ever touch a share of it again. That you would question why somebody would be compelled to tell the truth after giving it plenty of time to spike and give everyone an exit opportunity to be made whole says more about your values than mine. That I should wish to inform people of my viewpoint after giving it all the time in the world to prove me wrong is my prerogative. If you think a message board is only black and white and only pro vs. con. I won't lie about anything. I never have. When someone says there is no trademark application, I say there is. I call it as a I see it. If you are incapable of understanding that people don't need a financial incentive to tell the truth then that is your lacking in vision, not mine. If you think I'm lording it over people due a superiority complex then you are truly lacking in perspective. Sorry you don't get it. I've given you ample opportunity to comprehend the truth as I see it and my purpose in telling it. Your definition of pathology is pointless. You want sociopaths? Go look for them all over the pinksheet universe where people will lie to get anything they want and then get back to me.
Posted by: TradeSwapper
In reply to: in2lite who wrote msg# 79225
I've explained it a dozen times so why do you keep asking a dozen times what my agenda is? Reread these, tell me what you don't comprehend and then get back to me:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23154100
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23151178
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23151940
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23166639
I have zero "current" facts and my assertions are "dated" is not accurate. We all have plenty of current incomplete data to derive our judgments from. That you say it is incomplete and therefore should be left open-ended is hardly a compelling argument to deter people from constructing their own viewpoint with known facts and the vacuum from lack of performance and transparency.
What is your agenda for repeatedly asking me what my agenda is? I couldn't be more clear about it. Keep asking if you wish, but it makes no sense to me because I'll just give you what I have already.
I've explained it a dozen times so why do you keep asking a dozen times what my agenda is? Reread these, tell me what you don't comprehend and then get back to me:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23154100
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23151178
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23151940
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23166639
I have zero "current" facts and my assertions are "dated" is not accurate. We all have plenty of current incomplete data to derive our judgments from. That you say it is incomplete and therefore should be left open-ended is hardly a compelling argument to deter people from constructing their own viewpoint with known facts and the vacuum from lack of performance and transparency.
What is your agenda for repeatedly asking me what my agenda is? I couldn't be more clear about it. Keep asking if you wish, but it makes no sense to me because I'll just give you what I have already.
We just had a handful of high volume days. When the volume is lower the spread widens. Never worry about small sells dropping it a bit. The support shows itself as it did recently near $3. With AMEX any day now, we can easily be rebuilding new support levels higher and higher. In fact, if anybody did take out a short position on this stock they better cover now because they'll get a call from their broker as soon as this uplists if they haven't.
There is an iFinix Trademark application. But there are no patent applications under that name. Since INXR owns no proprietary value and Drew does you can sort through all the patents using his name. I didn't find anything.
RJC, ask them for a link to the patent application. If they applied it will be on the USPTO site. They've had over half a year to send in their submission. That is all it really boils down to now.