Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That is a bald faced lie, acca. Try again.
Why don't you enlighten us, acca? Cite links.
It's a dead public company, wong. Who cares if they keep their Nevada charter current and what meaning do you read into that?
BTW, please post some of those "RR" stocks you claimed to have found. Any one of them available from a quote system?
Blue-that's not information, it's BS leaps of fancy by those that have zero understanding of the situation.
Is CMKXRR a NASDAQ national market stock, Blue? Try and look it up at NASDAQ.com.
Get back with us.
No matter how many times you tell it, jimmy, you are wrong. Stocks required to report and with shares registered under sec. 12 are SHO eligible. Why was cmkx revoked, jimmy.
Why is it so hard for you to read public information?
Tell you gump; you go through Frizzy's Task Farce update and reconcile the math for me. He directly contradicts himself.
Jimmy-odd that nobody but you and your fellow rumor mongers have claimed that the short is "proven". Why is that?
Why was it never on the SHO list, Jimmy?
Already posts going up about folks receiving the post card even though they already faxed in certs.
I wonder when it is going to dawn on folks that the 36,000 includes everybody, meaning there are only about 3,000 accounts not identified yet as having sent in certs.
Desperado-did you miss Frizzy's FOIA data and the absence of this stock from the SHO list?
There is no FTD. This whole farce is a futile exercise that only enriched Edwards TA to the tune of several hundred thousand.
Tell me. What if a fail were found? What would happen? Who has the legal authority to represent shareholders who hold the (mythical) fail? What action could that representative take?
Up-Paim doesn't trade on the pink sheets. It uses the pink sheet platform to post unsolicited offers to buy and sell. Big difference that you seem as yet unable to grasp.
And I have of course contracted the SEC and securities enforcement officials in larget states.
Simple fact is, jimmy, it can't be completed. If people are receiving their notices today, and many won't even read them if they read them at all until after work, what are the odds of them requesting certs from a broker and the broker getting that request to the TA by the 28th?
Why did they wait six months for a simple post card mass mailing, jimmy, and also use a 2005 nobo with probably 30% bad addresses at this point?
I'm still waiting for the answer as to why the task farce has the legal authority to do any of the things they have done. I doubt seriously that there is a contract with CMKX. Urbie doesn't like things in writing.
Yep, investorman, frizzy has his complete sucker list for TheOenersGroup Inc. scam pumping site.
Spell it out, e-z. What if a "naked short" were proved? What would the outcome be, particularly considering that there are no delivery requirements on a stock with a revoked registration.
Be specific. How will it make a difference?
Jim-one of these days I am going to do a sociogram. Maybe the DOJ could use it as the basis for a RICO investigation.
Blue-carquest is posting his usual BS. He doesn't have a clue of what valuation of a claim involves, none of which has been done.
And of course, CMKX no longer has any assets to value. Or is the Task Farce lying to you?
Jim-this is a new one on me. If it's already been posted I apologize:
http://www.offshorebusiness.com/message_board_detail.asp?id=18060&page=1
Then there are these little problem, melchiz, beyond the fact that PAIM is not a "foreigh private issuer":
d) The exemption provided by paragraph (b) of this rule shall not be available for the following securities:
(1) Securities of a foreign private issuer that has or has had during the prior eighteen months any securities registered under section 12 of the Act or a reporting obligation (suspended or active) under section 15(d) of the Act (other than arising solely by virtue of the use of Form F-7, F-8, F-9, F-10 or F-80);
(2) Securities of a foreign private issuer issued in a transaction (other than a transaction registered on Form F-8, F-9, F-10 or F-80) to acquire by merger, consolidation, exchange of securities or acquisition of assets, another issuer that had securities registered under section 12 of the Act or a reporting obligation (suspended or active) under section 15(d) of the Act; and
(3) Securities quoted in an ``automated inter-dealer quotation system'' or securities represented by American Depositary Receipts so quoted unless all the following conditions are met:
(i) Such securities were so quoted on October 5, 1983 and have been continuously traded since;
(ii) The issuer is in compliance with the exemption in paragraph (b) of this section on October 5, 1983 and has continuously maintained the exemption since; and
(iii) After January 2, 1986, the issuer is organized under the laws of any country except Canada or a political subdivision thereof.
Melchiz-Paim is not a foreign corporation. It is incorporated in Wyoming. That fact that it's "registered" with the Philippine "Exchange" for trading means no more than if it were registered with the DOMEX or with Pearl's other favorite site for her scams, the defunct Belize exchange.
Janice-curioser and curioser. Your distribution hypothesis makes sense, but it seems like he is accepting a lot of potential liability. Unless Urbie somehow compensated him and indemnified him.
Could be, Janice, although I wonder if the e-filing of the 2006 annual list automatically updates the directors and officers page in the database.
They list that new service as in beta:
https://esos.state.nv.us/corps/
Diamond Cat-perhaps I have a different SOS, but the 4/20 filing has no notes attached to it and doesn't mention Maheu. You didn't perchance muddle two sections together, did you?
Corporation Actions for "CMKM DIAMONDS INC."
Sort by File Date Document Number Action Type descendingascending order
1 - 16 of 16 actions
Actions\Amendments
Action Type: Annual List
Document Number: 20060250879-49 # of Pages: 1
File Date: 04/20/2006 Effective Date:
(No Notes for this action)
Damn-I missed the Maheu reference. What is he thinking?
Janice-somehow the RB sheep are trying to read deep meaning into the fact that CMKX diamonds complied with its annual Nevada requirements.
Gump-down to the wire? You mean Crsthr's horse is finally going to finish the ract?
Jim-is there a Canadian counterpart to a FOIA act? The actual facts behind the "naked shorting" would be interesting.
Did you read the link, billy? How did it compare to Patch's "reporting" of the events in question?
Right,diamond. And the tooth fairy will leave a settlement check under your pillow.
Do you guys ever do anything but engage in or pass on reckless and unfounded speculation with no basis whatsoever in fact?
Here is the IDAC, billy. Tell me how big of a deal the short selling part was:
http://www.ida.ca/Files/Media/MediaRelease/Hearings/MRH2006041801_en.pdf
Another characteristics of cults, penny, is that they develop a vastly overblown sense of their importance.
This an 800 billion share, busted penny pump and dump, not an epic struggle. The only thing it will lead to is civil and hopefully criminal charges against Urban and his criminal co-conspirators.
NSDM-like a typical cult. The more extravagant the lifestyles of the cult leaders, the more fanatic the devotion of the sheep, who believe that someday such riches will devolve to them.
Not that it will, but if it ever did 90 percent of them woud be like lottery winners and blow it all in a few years.
You appear to be correct, Jim. Some of those companies haven't filed in a long time, but were once filing. Some are even current, but are shells in look of a home.
I'll try and get a clarification from NASDAQ trader tomorrow on their "all OTC securities" statement last April.
The only team here, jimmy, is the folks who look for and post facts. Clearly you aren't on it, but you are welcome to join.
Melchizedek-Doesn't matter. It's a US corporation issuing shares to the public (and a lot of them, I'll wager). Plus, it was originally a spin-off of a company that traded on the Nasdaq back in the dot.gone days, and no exemption from registration has been claimed since that spin-off.
Janice/Jim-There is where PearlAsian originally came from: it was one of the scores of "spin-off's" from Adatom. Interestingly those spin-off's also included the bulk of the stocks that "traded" on the DOMEX. Adatom emerged in the late nineties as an RM of "First Canadian American Holding Corporation:
http://sec.edgar-online.com/1999/12/27/17/0000930413-99-001502/Section19.asp
ITEM 1: Changes in Control of Registrant:
None
ITEM 2: Acquisition or Disposition of Assets:
The Company spun-off 100% of the common and preferred shares of its wholly
owned
subsidiary listed below to the shareholders of the Company on the basis of
1 common share of the subsidiary for every 10,000 common shares held by the
shareholders of the Registrant
Preferred shares are to be distributed on the basis of 1 preferred share
for every 100,000 common shares held by the shareholders of the Registrant.
The record date for the spin-off of shares of the subsidiary is October 21,
2003.
The Registrant has requested CUSIP numbers to be assigned to the spun off
subsidiary.
The Company has set as the distribution date, November 1, 2003. The Company
anticipates that NASDAQ will set an ex-dividend date for this matter.
No assurances can be made that the spun-off corporation will emerge as
successful companies.
At the record date of spin-off, the subsidiary had approximately 30,142,699
common shares outstanding and 30,142,699 preferred shares.
The Company spun-off 100% of the common and preferred shares of its wholly
owned subsidiary listed below to the shareholders of the Company on the
basis of 1 common share of the subsidiary for every 10,000 common shares
held by the shareholders of the Registrant and 1 preferred share of the
company listed below having preferred shares authorized, for every 100,000
common shares held by the shareholders of the Registrant:
PEARL ASIAN MINING INDUSTRIES INC.. -incorporated in Ontario, with
unlimited common shares authorized and unlimited preferred shares
authorized.
http://sec.freeedgar.com/displayText.asp?ID=2452128
A couple of problems with that analysis, blue. First, the DTCC is not the only source of shares. There may also be shares held at self clearing brokers and the Canadian clearing corporation.
Second, Frizzy directly contradicts himself in that update. On the one hand he states that they are trying to find out how 70k accounts became 30+k accounts, although we explained that to him long ago. On the other hand, he states that there are 36k accounts that have not sent in certs.
I suspect that his mailing is going to many accounts that exited this stock long ago, since he is using a 2005 NOBO list.
BTW, "desking" is another Balony Brigade myth. It is a practice that they simply made up, unless they are trying to hang another definition on an MM going short in the course of making a market, which of course could not occur with CMKX as there were no MM's.
up-then why are these non-reporting pinks on yesterday's sho list:
Symbol Security Name Market Category Reg SHO Threshold Flag
APHT APHTON CORP u 4
AURC Aurus Corp. Common Stock u 4
CCMI COMPLETE CARE MEDICAL, INC u 4
CLST CELLSTAR CORPORATION-NEW u 4
CMDI COMPREHENSIVE MED DIAGNOSTIC u 4
CTXI CENTREX INC (OK) NEW u 4
DFTS DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC u 4
ETLC ETELCHARGE.COM INC u 4
GLLC GLOBAL LINKS CORPORATION COM S u 4
GRSR GIRASOLAR INC COM STK u 4
HHDG HEAVENTLY HOT DOGS INC-NEW u 4
IAWK IASIAWORKS, INC u 4
IPHN IPHONE2, INC. u 4
IWNE IRWIN ENERGY INC NEW COM STK u 4
MAMT MEDICAL ASSET MGMT INC u 4
MRKL MARKLAND TECHNOLOGIES INC NEW u 4
NTCI NETCERT INC, INC. u 4
SMKG SMART CARD MARKETING SYSTEMS I u 4
SURE SUREBEAM CORPORATION u 4
TDYH TANDEM ENERGY HOLDINGS INC. u 4
TFTG TRIMFAST GROUP INC NEW u 4
TMRT 2THEMART.COM INC u 4
URMD UROMED CORP u 4
WTVN WI-FI TV, INC. NEW u 4
Good grief, wong. Are you naifs still obsessing about that recycled "RR" listing?
Renounceable rights are a secondary offering by a PUBLIC COMPANY used to raise capital.
What part of CMKX isn't public aren't you getting?
That quote is out of data, Up.
Additional OTC Securities subject to Regulation SHO for January 20, 2005 to April 13, 2005. Note: As of April 14, 2005, all OTC Securities have been included on the Threshold Security List.
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/aspx/regsho.aspx
And you are still wrong, up. As of April 2005 all otc securities have been SHO eligible. It was reporting requirements that originally determined SHO eligibility, not registration.
As to registration, are you saying that Pearl is dumping unregistered shares into the market?
I think she is, and given the SEC's more aggressive stance these days wouldn't be surprised at all to see a ten day suspension coupled with a revocation action.
Up-it's obvious to anybody who knows how stocks trade that this stock is being constantly diluted.
I'm curious as to why you think July 3 will make any difference whatsoever? It's FTD's, which are currently monitored through the SHO process that may indicate naked shorting. Do you think the mythical NSS'ers of a stock trading at five decimal points to the right are going to mark their sales as short? And if their is a "3 billion share naked short" as claimed by the paid to pump crowd at buyins, then why isn't PAIM currently on the SHO list?
Or do you not quite understand what is going to happen on July 3.