Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Your statement is not verifiable by anything other than updated filings and you have none so the statement isn't verifiable at all.
Ask the one who was in "constant contact" with IR for months on end about verifiable info that comes from the company and it's "team". LOL
"Where did you get your info, or did you just make it up again, why make this kind of a statement, without any proof."
It's his opinion, the board is full of them. The same questions can be asked of this statement:
"There has not been any shares sold, the O/S remains the same."
There is no proof that this is true either- it's opinion only.
Naw, no one's on the run here IMO. The company is watching what they say IMO the SEC let's them be and assumes that adults can make decisions based on due diligence and their warnings and hope that people don't buy into crap like "10000% increase on the way" and the like.
It really reminds me of the late 90's when people didn't know any better. Sad that people still try and sucker people in though.
Are those the same market makers that must have naked shorted Pillay's WMDH into the ground as well? lol
Yup, testing completed with no problems but instead of a PR, they call a shareholder out of the blue to tell them. LOL
Not that I doubt Banana, I really do think that this is representative of who's behind the wheel of this rolling pile of dung.
Or perhaps someone is simply pulling his leg.
Indeedy the "no reason to cover yet" claim has been refuted since it became a standard here.
"do proper DD!!"
Now that's no fun. lol Proper DD might lead one to wonder where the new CEO is- or the divy or the filings.
Over a year ago there was no mention that those things had anything to do with the testing. Now it seems that the testing PRs were supposed to divert attention from the failure to deliver on this stuff. Textbook.
But yep, this one's diferent. Notice those market makers clamoring to cover their short positions...LOL
I deleted one, Admin deleted the other. The one I deleted was a personal remark regarding another poster thus the deletion. You may appeal to admin if you feel it was deleted unfairly.
Perhaps they are but that has nothing to do with whether or not their claims have been valid.
No announced CEO, no divy, no filing. Not valid.
" If they were not actully testing anything, the SEC would jump on them"
Interesting. You thinking that maybe the SEC sends their spies to all of the test facilities looking out for Flushaway tests? Or maybe they make periodic calls to Hands to make sure he's still saying that testing in underway.
If so I bet you're into something there...
Probably before the holidays even.
Simple example: filings weren't out when the company said they would be therefore that information was not valid.
"...don't want to bother us with the small stuff."
No doubt. Perhaps more companies should take their lead. Announce a CEO taking over and a dividend then not acting on it for well over year.
It would do wonders for other companies should they not bother shareholders with that sort of stuff.
Well, Hands and shareholders both know that info that's been released hasn't been valid.
I'm seems Hands is used to that when it comes to Flushaway though so it probably doesn't bother him one bit.
True, but a reputable, truly independent IR firm would have bailed already IMO. Tom is a bigger part of this than he lets on IMO and has been for some time.
Any decent IR company would have distanced themselves from this PYCT a long time ago. Actually, any real IR firm wouldn't go near them in the first place.
"...they are their only revenue source."
Oh, they must have more than that- after all Pillay claims that PYCT is a profitable company. LOL
"doesn't seem logicial to me"
He plans on letting 25% of his original position ride... what's so difficult to understand?
Yup- Cali, BC, Arizona, China... who knows where else. Yet they can't name the new CEO or provide filings when promised.
Definitely a legitimate company that's set to do business with all the mass market retailers. LOL
Oops, don't forget Mr. Chen's random phone calls...
The product is a flushable pad. There are others out there, period.
No pun intended.
"PYCT is the only one with this product"
PYCT is the only one with flushable pads?? LOL That's simply not true. Please be truthful.
"stay with current stuff and not rumors"
Rumors like there's a massive short position that's going to have to be covered? I agree- people should really stop trying to keep that rumor alive.
No, I didn't leave that out. That falls under the fact that PYCT is an unsolicited stock.
"can youprove this or is it just another rumor"
Which part? That they are unsolicited or that they do not file financials on a regular basis? Those are both undisputed facts.
Or do you believe that they're a listed company and have filed secretly? lol
"i have called the co"
You called the company or you called Tom Hands at Sandfire Capital? There' a big difference.
If, of course, you only talked to the IR company, then that speaks for itself.
Right, because that's just the thing that will do it.
1400 shares means so much to so many people... LOL
Eww, not good. Companies that believe in their products don't need promotion companies. Wonder why Flushaway feels the need to do this?
Ahh yes... Winnick would make a great new CEO.
"Unless they have a gun to their head (are forced to cover) they will do nothing."
But according to you they are doing something- they're currently shorting every day. lol They're going to ruin their publically traded company (speaking of Knight here) over a pinksheet-quoted company. Every day they dig themselves in a bigger hole by supposedly shorting more and more... right?
Explain again why they're doing that?
Common sense says they're not. All the all-caps posts aren't going to change that.
Market making firms exist to make money. They don't short at the lowest and sell at the highest because you say so. And they certainly aren't going to be a victim of the genius Lawson Pillay who has a super-secret plan to make them pay. LOL The only thing he's proven he can do is run a company into the ground and make empty promises.
What I said was simple to understand. I did not say they have sold shares this year- I said there is no way to know if they've sold shares or not when there have not been any updated filings.
Tough to say they haven't sold one share when we haven't seen any filings that details of what's gone on since the end of last year.
Filings count- PRs don't- not for this company anyway, they've proven that they can't be trusted. Pillay's still the CEO so you can't use the "new management" card.
I didn't misread- he stated that they "will vanish like they always do".
They can't possibly "always be vanishing" when they've been here 24/7 for 5 years.
In any event, we must stay on the topic of PYCT and not self-contradicting posts of some. Do forgive.
"I learned 5 years ago, it's not worth it to read any press release from this company."
Agreed, but some may think there's something to them and let this run a bit.
They vanish? How can they vanish when they've supposedly been here 24/7 for the past 5 years? LOL
Can't be both. Which claim is true?
"From the pr I am estimating "
Unfortunately from the PRs we're estimating that the filing would be out, the CEO would be announced and the divy would be done. lol
All that was supposed to be done long ago. I know though....who cares, right?
Best of luck.
I wouldn't necessarily consider eliminating a long term note a "fee" for the deal closing. Nor would I consider IR fees a closing cost.
Have a good night.
Could be. The IBox needs some new news.
Stating that the OS has changed is not painting a bad picture it's simply the truth. Saying that the OS hasn't change is a lie. It hasn't changed since the last increase to 19,850,000. That would be the truth.
Glad we cleared that up and you won't be making that claim anymore.
It can only be put to rest if people stop posting untruths about the OS not increasing.
My point has been made, I'm correct, so I have no issues moving on. I suggest others do the same.
"YA SO WHAT"
Ya, so let's tell the truth from now on.
The OS increased by 2.7 billion or so therefore you are dead wrong when you say that it has stayed the same.
You cannot dispute that.