Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Woof wasn't referring to and never mentioned Jabbour. He was referring to a post about Tomio Gotoh, who does have a resume similar to that of Dr Glass.
I think you are barking up the wrong tree if you expect the future for cell phones to be qdot. Samsung and LG are putting 12 billion into flexible OLEDs, and BOE, Japan Display and other Chinese firms are moving into OLEDs. The future of small displays is the flexible display, and right now that's oleds. Small form factor oleds don't have the high waste cost of the big screens which have allowed them to dominate the space. With Apple moving into them, and the billions being poured into OLED infrastructure, it's pretty clear cell phone makers expect OLEDs to be their display tech for the immediate future.
I think if you read back into the threads here you will see projections for Apple to put our dots in every product since the iphone 3. It wasn't happening then and it's not happening now.
Why would they be shouting from the rooftops?????
Would it make their stock price higher?? Nope, they are are a private concern.
Would it gain them customers??? They don't sell to consumers, they sell to major corporations who already know what they can provide.
How would shouting from the rooftops matter to them?? The people who need to know already know, hence they are currently making sales while we are changing regimes. Again.
I think you over do it when you refer to ND and us as having a "partnership". We did something for them a year and a half ago, we don't know if we have anything going on now. Someone posted a talk they had with Sri a month ago and he stated ND is working with lots of firms on different issues just like we are working with other film companies, which to me stated nothing major was in the pipeline with ND. I'd be surprised if they had any part in what is being shown.
Or he got a lead balloon, none of us know right now. What we do know is he got out.
This is just another instance of the rose colored glasses here. When Dr Glass was here, he was a genius who would bring LG on board. When he left he was a do nothing. Everyone here applauded when Sri was brought in, many others were happy SS was out. Now SS is the savior and Sri wasn't needed and the proxy was his idea. Sri has no financial background, I'd be stunned if he led the proxy and Delaware move, those are financials which are Lindberg's all the way. Just remember many here applauded the realism Sri brought to the company's statements, think of that when SS makes his next PR.
This isn't a crazy penny stock sell off. Any stock that loses multiple board members and a CEO who just signed on months earlier to unanimous applause would sell off, Sometimes this and other penny stocks sell off for no reason, but there is plenty of reason for this.
You have been calling that "opportunity for cheap shares" since this was at 40 cents. That's the best thing about QTMM, it's full of opportunities.
Both companies have, to date at least, been pretty miserable performers. Their charts, while they diverge at times, are quite similar. For the last two years both have peaked and valleyed with lower highs and lower lows.
https://finance.yahoo.com/chart/NANO.L#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%3D%3D
I'm not sure i'm misreading anyone. I didn't think of Friday as a "stink bomb", but if I had this morning would certainly have not placated me. If Friday was the sinking of the Titanic, all this morning was was the tossing of a life preserver so you can freeze to death instead of drown. A 400% watering down is about as bad as would have been imaginable on Friday, is it not??
If revenues were going to be large and fast, why would there be a need for the 9 million in financing just announced?? 9 million is a drop in the bucket compared to the hundreds of millions in revenues that are regularly projected here.
Sometimes this board is loony. There was all sorts of angst when this was announced on Friday, yet today's modifications seem to have placated many. Why? By saying they were limiting themselves to a 1-25 split and then reducing the share count by 6-1, they are still leaving room for a 400% watering down of the current shareholders. If you thought Friday was bad, this makes it better??? If you say that's a worst case scenario and this great company would never do that to us, then why was it so bad on Friday??
"If one is observant with the Saudis, they have been heavily investing in both "SOLAR AND WIND" So, Just where do they think that their long term outlook resides. "
Actually the Saudi's had been giving a lot of lip service to renewables, but spending relatively little on it. A couple months ago they admitted as much and announced major plans to increase the use of natural gas, intending to use oil and gas to account for 90% of the kingdom's energy needs by 2030. Given the financial constraints they are under for the foreseeable future, they won't be spending much on renewables.
You are new here so you don't know the history. I'm not making judgements one way or the other as my view of this is as it has always been, a longshot with a chance, but if you had read this board for the past five years you wouldn't scoff at the doubt. We are always just around the corner from exploding, the big sale will be announced in the next Q, and we can't say the big companies we are dealing with. We've had a last final sale on shares 100+ times in 5 years. We've had "dream teamers" take positions in the company only to leave and be called scrubs and be replaced by new "dream teamers" who later left too. We were going to provide power for the middle east, at least until the Saudi's changed their mind, and we would dominate the display arena, at least until that damn cadmium issue popped up. Maybe this time is different, or maybe history will repeat itself again.
As the share price falls we are also running out of contestants. A lot of posters are MIA which, as of right now at least, means they are smarter than the rest of us.
Maybe we can start a 4.5 cent contest. I pick December 7.
You forgot know what you own and dream team.
"hey were in prior 10k with NO subsequent event indicating selling so they had to start after sept of 2015. "
Even if you are correct, that still means they may have been selling for a year. I'm not even sure if you are correct though, because in the 10K it admits MKM has not reported anything since 2014 and told QTMM they were below 5% on 9/12/16. They could well have been selling since 2014 and never reported it since they have not reported anything anywhere, and only notified QTMM of it when they went below the magical 5% figure. In a perfect world we would know when and how MKM has been selling, since it is a non reporting entity it's pure conjecture.
The problem with your thesis is that we don't know when MKM started selling. They last reported in 2014. We know they went below 5% in September, but they may have been slowly dumping for 2 years or just started this summer. If you check out their other holdings from their last report, none are falling like us. While i have no doubt some of the selling was from them, I'd guess some other holders are heading to the exit too.
" We need to see the next quarter report next month for confirmed revenue but it is thought that we are selling samples at least."
We have no reason to think that and no evidence of that. We've had lots of people state that they hope we are at least charging for samples, but nothing to date backs that hope up.
I will add that Sri's statement was a refreshingly honest view that has seldom been heard from the company or on this board. His statement that the reason that no product sales have been made was because the product has always been found lacking is something some of us have stated only to be slammed with best in class and dream team. This is still a long shot, yet at least now we seem to have competent leaders instead of pie in the sky dreamers.
This could be capitulation day, when a lot of people give up the dream, the stock falls big on huge volume and then begins to come back. Who knows?? One worrisome thought is we are now in an area where most of the longtermers bought. It's easy to hold a falling stock when in the green, it's more difficult when it shows up as a loss on your screen.
Exactly. If you read AV Forums for 10 days and believe everything you read, you will either give up on television because none of them work or you will try to buy a 10 year old plasma Panasonic Kuro Elite as that was by far the best TV ever made and can never be topped. If you could create the holo deck from Star Trek the people at AV Forums would complain they couldn't smell the flowers.
Who here bought the 196 shares at .098075???
You didn't have the extra 39.23008 cents to buy an even 200 shares??
It's also impossible to know when or if they started selling. QTMM's chart shows a pretty steady slide for 2 plus years now and it's impossible to blame that all on one seller. In my mind the problem is much more a lack of buyers, the volume has not increased even as the share price has sunk. There is just zero interest in this outside of the people already in it.
I'd be amazed if there was any tax loss selling going on yet. People always over estimate the effects of it anyway, but if it has any you won't see it until December. If a stock is way up you will sometimes supposedly see some selling in January from people wanting to hold their gains throughout the year, but again I think the fear of it way overrates the reality.
That's a huge advantage of QTMM in that you don't have to worry about taxable profits. I look to the left side of my screen and see a sea of green for my holding year over year and then I see the red -40% next to QTMM and then I thank god that's it's small sales that have dropped the price this much.
It was a pretty good bet the once Squires saw the door that others would be following. Hopefully we now will get a new marketing director whose major qualification for the position isn't pumping the stock. The door may still be revolving.
I said has anything changed on this board?? I can repost messages from 3 years ago and you couldn't tell the difference. And Jamis, last summer you were saying if you didn't see anything at CES 2016 you were out. There is no getting out of this stock. Once you are in this bizzaro world there is no escape.
Please, they could miss the 2017, 2118 and the 2019 shows and it would still be it will take the time it takes here. Has anything on this board changed in 5 years.
We are drifting much like the Titanic.
I have no doubt we have something to offer.
What I, and apparently the market judging by the share price, have doubts about is whether anyone is willing to pay for what we have to offer.
It's the Posners, they are the ones responsible for the 9 cent bids.
On the good news front, apparently the NDA we signed with uptick for our big announcement is working real well as there is no outside interest in buying this stock.
I'm guessing that a majority of us here would enjoy if we had this stock perform like that of that "other public company which as well has had a dismal SP as of late".
Every time LG comes out with another of these models we get this discussion. This is an IPS LCD screen, not a quantum dot display. Unlike Samsung, LG does not make small form factor OLEDs so they are forced to use these screens. They have been using the term quantum display since at least 2014 for cell phones and some large televisions. It's a marketing gimmick, and no deeper meaning should be inferred.
From a review of this spring's G5:
"LG equipped last year’s G4 with an all new 5.5-inch QHD display. Its IPS Quantum Display moniker was a bit misleading, however, because the panel did not use quantum dot technology or bring about a quantum leap in performance."
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10217/the-lg-g5-review/4
"LG announced they are shifting focus to QD and all others will continue to follow in their foot steps. Looking better every day :)"
Except they never said that. LG announced they will come out with some q dot displays next year, which we always knew would happen since they signed with Dow. We know Dow recently began shipments to LG because Nanoco is starting to receive royalties from them.
In the article where you claim LG is shifting focus to QD, LG states that OLED is the tv of the future and that 10 companies will announce OLED displays next year. That doesn't exactly sound like they are shifting focus.
Facts??
I answered a post stating they had a "commitment" and you said Steve would "prefer" and you say I should get my facts straight???
Maybe you should look up the words "preference" and "commitment" and see they are not even close to being the same.
Maybe it didn't excite you, but it must have excited some here as i seem to remember it being reposted once or 999 times in the past 6 months. A 10 cent stock talking about going on the Nasdaq is like the Cleveland Browns talking about selling Super Bowl tickets. It's a nice dream for the fans, but not realistic to plan for at this point.
"I think that their committment to get this shareprice as high as possible organically before any uplisting"
That's your commitment, not theirs. They never once stated that, that's why so many us brought up a reverse split as the only realistic way to see the Nasdaq. Clay as recently as a month or so ago was mentioning Nasdaq 2016, and there have not been any unexpected delays since then. The Nasdaq statement was pure fluff to excite the minions, and you have to give them credit as it certainly worked.
Don't worry about the share price, remember we will be on the Nasdaq in a couple months.
If their film product isn't ready until early 2017 and that is their only product for the display market, you can cross CES 2017 off your calendars too, there's no way any product would be close to market by then. Hopefully they have something besides the film for the display market.