Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I guarantee that the first word out on a fleet deal and PD, along with many others will be the first in line to purchase HLNT shares. IE:Post# 14761 "Make that .0078 average sell price. Net of just over .006 and a $48,276.00 day. I alway did wonder why posters ask why I post 15 messages a day. That's over $3000.00 per post and they tell me I need ta get a life. If they'd tell how it could get better I'd actually listen to these posters. The trade volume of HLNT is like a dream come true."
And that ladies and gentlemen, you can take to the bank !
I just enjoy the ride ! WEEEEEEEEEE! WEEEEEEEEE! This one's a great roller coaster.
Thanks Craigers, but I don't think I'll need any medicine for this trip. Great product, Great promotion, Great opportunity for enormous growth here and overseas. Just wish I had gotten in sooner. IMO
Newbie on board. Grabed some 1.15's and have fastened my safety belt. WEEEEEEEE, WEEEEEEE
Imin, I'll try to answer your question with my one alotted post. As always, the squeakest wheel or the biggest bucks gets all the attention in DC. Unfortunately, the current administration has much difficulty in dealing with today's problems. Electric vehicles are definitely the way of the future. IMO The problem is that even in 10 years, they will probably only make up 25% of the veicles on the road. Meantime, we all suffer with artificially inflated gasoline prices and unnecessary exhaust polution. Besides cars and trucks, there are so many other applications that would be of much benefit to our other industries. All this is being surpressed by those afraid they might lose control of our government and it's future policies. Hydrogen Technology is in definite need of a champion ( BIG BUCKS )to step forward. I'm afraid until that occurs, HTI along with others, will have an up hill battle. As far as you being "All Wet", please refer to Casaprop. He'll tell you like it is. Just another application that would benefit many TODAY, not 10 years from now. I'm afraid that we may all have to have learned Chinese by then. IMO
Tidbit for Today:
Thought this announcement today may be of some interest to you as investors. Even though funding was recently cut for hydrogen technology ( maybe because we're already there ) Ford has come out to give you realistic timelines and percentages for their electric cars. This relates to me that being invested in HTI is currently and for some time to come, "the right place to be " IMO
REUTERS
Ford Motor Co. will be slower to build electric-powered pickups and other larger vehicles because the batteries to power them are still extremely costly, Ford CEO Alan Mulally said on Tuesday.
The second-largest U.S. automaker is now electrifying the platforms used to build compact cars and mid-size sedans, a move that allows Ford to curb costs by building electric, hybrid and gas-powered versions of the same car on a single assembly line.
But for larger vehicles, “the electrical components are so much bigger and costlier,” Mulally said at a meeting with reporters in downtown Los Angeles. “So I think the migration to the bigger vehicles will be slower.”
Blog: Six months with the Nissan Leaf and Chevy Volt
More: This is the electric car battery’s worst enemy
Cost has been the major curb on sales of low-emission vehicles: The battery used in an all-electric vehicle such as the Focus Electric, Ford’s first all-electric passenger car, can cost between $12,000 and $15,000, Mulally said this week at a conference in Dana Point, California.
That would represent around a third of the Focus Electric’s overall price of around $39,000. At the conference, Mulally said the batteries used in hybrids cost around $2,000 while those in plug-in hybrids can be between $7,000 and $8,000.
Ford says American car buyers have increasingly focused on fuel economy since 2008 when gasoline prices shot past $4 a gallon. As a result, Ford has made improving fuel economy the centrepiece of its design strategy.
For now, Ford can better boost the fuel economy of its larger vehicles, which include the top-selling F-150 pickup truck, by lowering the vehicles’ weight by using lighter materials.
“The value of light-weighting in the bigger vehicles is so much bigger than on the smaller vehicles,” Mulally said.
Ford also forged a partnership with Toyota Motor Co last year to develop hybrid trucks and SUVs that will be ready to market by the end of the decade.
By 2020, Ford expects hybrids, plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles will comprise between 10 per cent and 25 per cent of its sales as oil prices rise and government standards on fuel economy and emissions grow stricter.
Building these types of cars alongside traditional gas-powered vehicles is one way Ford can maintain “reasonable margins” on those vehicles, Mulally said Tuesday.
“We’re not doing loss leaders to subsidize some other altruistic reason,” he said. “It has to make business sense otherwise we can’t keep investing.”
Vehicles built on the same platform typically have similar design and engineering characteristics and share parts.
Ford’s push to electrify platforms differs from the strategy adopted by Nissan Motor Co, which builds its Leaf electric car on a separate platform. By contrast, Ford is building its 2013 Focus Electric at an assembly plant in Wayne, Michigan alongside the gas-powered Focus.
" Buy my million shares at 19." "I'm hanging on to all my shares"
" The stock is going to .25 a share " "This company is run by scam artists" BLA, BLA, BLA, BLA, BLA ( SOS, DD ) Besides CASA, does anyone have anything beneficial to report ?
Iron1, I believe you missed my point. I don't always know how the company operates and I don't know their explanation for past failures to communicate. If I did, I would not have posted my opinion. And investing is not quite as simple as you profess. As for my criteria, it's quite simple: Be up-front and honest. If you can't tell me why, tell me why you can't. ( legal restaints or other )
"So what is management to do? Please shareholders by making forward looking statements, which at the time they are made, are reasonable, and then suffer the criticism when events occur that prevent the realization of those projections? Or do they go silent, working steadily, overcoming problems, and reporting nothing until after it has been fully realized (a strategy recommended to me by some, even in the knowledge that this can be discouraging to other shareholders who do want frequent updates)?"
I appreciate very much your legal interpretation of the NIR fiasco, but feel you might want to rethink your current position on defending HTI's management. As most here already know, I kiss no ones behind or take little BS from anyone. ( too old and too stubborn )
I see nothing wrong with asking the company questions regarding any public statements they have made. Granted, Swarm had a whole boat load (no pun Casa), but maybe if each were addressed at the time of occurance, the list might have contained only a couple items. I for one, am getting a bit tired of finding out pertinent company information after the fact. People who normally bring it to my attention, also have hidden agenda's that are set to harm HTI. Of course they always have to add their negative spin to make the picture look far worse than it really is. I believe in being up front with everyone. I expect HTI to do the same with it's investors. If they miss a deadline or make a mistake, so be it. Tell us why and move on. I believe most of the true investors here aren't looking for daily details, but only explanations for events that directly affect their investment. IMO
For those waiting for EPA approval. Below is just a sampling of what new mfg's have to go through for a stamp of approval. Seeing our President cut all funding for hydrogen new technology and only wants companies to pursue EV's, you may be holding your hand on your behind a long, long time for that stamp of approval. You see our government politics drives all "NEW" technologies introduced. The good news is that this will be done on the QT behind the scenes so that they will not be exposed. That means, they can't blatenly publicly prevent a product from being used unless it is proven harmful. ( ie: Pepsi using hydrogen boosters ) So my advice is not to get too caught up waiting for EPA approval, as it is not needed to actively use hydrogen boosters. IMO
Retrofit Technology In-use Testing Requirements
As retrofit technologies are introduced into the market and as states begin to rely on these technologies to improve their air quality and generate credits for their state implementation plans (SIP), it becomes increasingly important to verify the field performance of the products. The following in-use testing requirements are part of the OTAQ Verification Process and the responsibility of each retrofit manufacturer. Failure to prove acceptable in-use performance will result in loss of emission credits and removal from the Verified Technology List.
Phases
In-use testing is not required to begin until at least 500 units of a verified product have been introduced into commerce. Technology manufacturers will inform EPA, as part of their verification application, when they believe they will have introduced 500 units. There are two phases to the in-use testing program. In each phase, units in normal field operation must have reached a certain age prior to being tested. All testing is the responsibility of the retrofit technology manufacturer and shall begin within one month of an adequate number of engines becoming available for each phase, unless a previous agreement has been made with EPA.
Phase 1 - Test units aged to 25% of the designated durability testing period.
Phase 2 - Test units aged to 75% of the designated durability testing period.
Top of page
In-Use Test Methods
The actual test method to be used will depend upon the retrofit product. For all products it is important that identical, rigorous, repeatable test procedures be used in unmodified engine and with-retrofit-technology testing. For example, using a chassis dynamometer for the unmodified engine test and a mobile emissions detection system for the with-retrofit-technology test would be unacceptable. One must be able to compare the test results directly. It is also important to have OTAQ pre-approval of the in-use test method to be used.
After-Treatment Technologies (Catalysts, particulate filters and other technologies that may be removed for testing purposes.)
Once the sales and durability testing period requirements are met, after-treatment technologies are to be tested for in-use performance. The retrofit manufacturer is responsible for testing the technology using a system such as an engine dynamometer, chassis dynamometer, or a mobile emissions detection system for tests with the device installed and unmodified engine tests. All pollutants shall be measured during the in-use testing.
Control Strategy Upgrade Technologies (Replacement of mechanical fuel control with electronic fuel control is an example.)
Prior to installation of the retrofit technology, manufacturers of upgrade technologies must conduct unmodified engine tests; later these same engines will be tested again after some period of normal, in-use operation. An engine dynamometer, a chassis dynamometer, or a suitable mobile emissions detection system may be used for this testing. All pollutants shall be measured during the in-use testing.
One key to a successful in-use program for these types of retrofit technologies will be to choose and test enough engines. Unmodified engine tests must be completed on a population of engines large enough to reflect the inevitable loss (accidents, fires, etc.) of some engines over time so that there will be an adequate set of engines to draw from for required in-use testing, even if they run to their most extensive number. These requirements demand caution and careful planning on the part of upgrade technology manufacturer as one cannot “go back” and obtain suitable unmodified engine tests.
Top of page
Sampling Plan (This section applies to after-treatment technologies and control strategy upgrade technologies.)
The unmodified tested engines sample should be representative of the distribution of the technology across the various applications and uses to which it has been applied. Engines to be tested are to be selected randomly and the sample should include a mix of end-user entities as well as mileage accumulations. Additionally, manufacturers must include, along with the test results, a description of any unscheduled maintenance which may affect the emission results, and its expected emissions effect.
Test Cycles
While the retrofit manufacturer may propose which type of emissions testing equipment to use for in-use testing, the required test cycles and protocols for each of type of equipment are generally well defined. Highway engine dynamometer tests must be conducted over the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) transient test cycles. The Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) test cycle, or other pre-approved test cycle, is required for chassis dynamometer tests. Non-road engines, that are tested using the engine dynamometer, will be tested using the applicable non-road FTP test cycle. All tests using mobile emissions sampling systems must be conducted over conditions which reflect normal operation for the engine/truck/equipment being tested.
Testing
Initially, four engines must be selected for in-use testing. The engines must have mileage or hour accumulations greater than 25% (for Phase I) or 75% (for Phase II) of the minimum durability testing periods defined in the table to be developed.
At least four units must be tested: if all four pass, testing is complete. A unit passes if testing shows that it reduces emissions of the target pollutants by at least 75 percent of its original OTAQ Verification Process reduction. For testing beyond the initial four units, a 70 percent pass rate must be achieved. For each failed test, for which the cause can be attributed to the product and not to maintenance or other engine related problems, two or more additional units will be evaluated, up to a total of ten.
Failures
If the 70 percent success rate is not achieved in ten tests, then dynamometer testing would be required. The manufacturer may request an extension of the in-use testing program in order to achieve a 70 percent success rate in lieu of dynamometer testing. EPA would then determine at what point during the extension, dynamometer testing should be performed. If the manufacturer demonstrates a 70% success rate during the extension, in-use testing would cease. In the event dynamometer testing is required, the sampling plan would be repeated. Retrofit technologies that fail dynamometer testing will be removed from the Verified Technology List.
Test Results
Test results for all phases are to be submitted to EPA using the format provided. Note that test results provided electronically are normally much easier to process than paper submissions. The results will be submitted to EPA within three months of the completion of testing. Should EPA determine strong bias in testing, EPA may require corrective action, i.e., additional in-use testing of non-represented engines.
Top of page
For questions, technical assistance, or more information: Contact Us Area Navigation NCDC HomeBasic InformationGrants & Funding Emissions Reduction ProjectsTechnologies & OperationsVerificationTools & ResourcesQuantifierSector ProgramsPublicationsNewsroomE-mail Updates & Helpline Share
FacebookredditTwitterWhat is this?
Something is better than nothing. As I've said before, I'm far from satisfied with the marketing effort so far. At least by attending a few farm shows ( not sure why dealers in other parts of the country are not more involved ) the opportunity not only to promote the Wildcat to individuals, but also show off it's capabilities to other exhibitors. Who knows ? This may have lead to partnership talks or may lead to new agreements in the future. At this point in the game, any step forward is welcomed. IMO
Right Shrew, they list both in their newsletter. Can someone post the letter for all to see ? Thanks in advance
Thanks Shrew. Nice to see UPS attending a farm show.
Speaking of reading your own words, could you please elaborate on your post# 14754.
"Does a .0077 sell avg with a days net profit of $42,900.00 sound like I don't love the MM's and HLNT? I think i can do even better over the next 7 tradin days. compare those HLNT buy and sell quantities and rethink your MM negative posts. Thse dudes are printing money."
Food for Thought #2 Some may think my selling for .0018 was pretty foolish. I raised the PPS over 5% which made the whole bunch of shares I'm holding worth $$$$ more. Heck, with a 5% increase, it might even bring in some new blood, which may buy in at the ask. Just goes to show that some activity may be a whole lot better than no activity.
Most do know Geneo, but some of the newbies get scared off very easily and even some of the old timers sometimes forget when they deal with pennies. IMO P.S. I'll be here long after most move on due to impatience.
Food for Thought I just sold 330,000 shares at .0018 just to show how easily this stock can be manipulated by unsavory characters. If you believe in the product and trust that the management is doing the correct things to grow the business, I suggest you not sell even when the PPS drops a bit. After hanging around for over 2 years, I've come to realize who is really attempting to destroy HTI. IMO
A mere mention of waiting another year and a snatch from weak hands. Wash, Rinse, and Repeat. LOL
JSW, Many of us feel the same way as you do. I realize that being patient is difficult when a few are attempting to sway your opinion of HTI. I try to sometimes rationalize their thinking, but with so much going on behind the scenes, without any pertinent information, it's damn near impossible. My thoughts are that the 10 fleet deals they had working in November are currently on hold due to the partnership announcement last month. Once this has been inked, I don't see any reason for us not being kept well informed. As for NIR, I see this going on for sometime and feel it will have less and less importance. There are too many with dirty hands that will continue to stall any court proceedings. I've been here for over 2 years and am willing to wait another year if needed to reap the harvest. IMO
Great update. Thanks Sparks
Cburg, I attempted to do that 2 years ago. ( see post # 7871 ) I contacted FEDEX at the same time and did not receive a reply from them.
Although this may make a few individuals unhappy, ( I can't mention any names or initials ) this recent discovery by Rain reaffirms to me that all the pieces are slowly falling into place for HTI to soar in the near future. IMO
Good Post Shrew. You just beat me to it. Thanks
So PD, you think I'm all wrong in my opinion as far as the potential of HTI. Gee, now I'm not sure what to do now. Maybe I should follow the advice you gave in post # 9755.
"If I put up a half a million bucks? What are ya talkin about dude? I'm an investor not a hedge fund. I could point em in the right direction if they need money though. Either you missed somethin in my posts or they did. I suggested a joint venture that would benifit all companies involved. They don't need a half mil ta get that off the ground. What they do need is somethin that brings media and investor attention to Highline. They also need an ECU. They do seem to understand the rotary ability to run on a gas opposted to liquid. Any fuel injected rotary runnin on hho would bring massive attention to this company if they were involved. I don't think the torque issue is a problem. The guys I'm talkin about have patented rotary engine technology related to air/fuel mgmt that produces plenty a torgue. Gen sets and fixed RPM applications are the easy place to start. Hoss comes into the pic as my City Car mfr. Just build a friggin simple prototype runnin hho in a rotary and this pps goes friggin haywire. It's news folks. No one could compete and there's huge interest both from the engine world and investor world. Get that project off the drawin board and at least two company pps's go 100 bagger fast. Take a look at the other companies product called the Xboard. Hoss could build that for em. It's beyond cool but pales to what the engine has in the way of potential. Just start with a simple joint venture and put some video on YouTube and then see if these posters think I'm out ta get em. We can get inta a hybrid fuels conversation soon. Try methane/hho in a green rotary, zero emissions and see if anyone takes notice."
By the way how's that cool old surf board company doing ? LOL
Not sure if this has been posted, but thought it was pretty interesting. At least we know the DOE is publicly recognizing HTI's technology and although it is awarding a competitor, I'm quite happy to see this public exposure. IMO
3 winners of DOE’s “America’s Next Top Energy Innovator”
US Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced three winning startup companies—based on a public vote and an expert review—out of the 14 participating in the US Department of Energy (DOE) “America’s Next Top Energy Innovator” challenge. (Earlier post.)
Initially, 36 start-up companies elected to participate in this first-of-its-kind effort. Of those 36 companies, 14 signed option agreements allowing them to license advanced technologies developed and patented by one of the DOE 17 National Laboratories and the Y-12 National Security Complex. The three winning companies are:
•Umpqua Energy, a startup company based in Medford, Oregon, is using an Argonne National Laboratory technology to develop a system that allows a gasoline engine to operate in an extreme lean burn mode in order to increase gasoline mileage. One negative side effect of a lean burn engine, whether powered by gasoline or diesel fuel, is an increase in the amount of emissions released to the environment.
Umpqua Energy’s EVOPAC system combines an advanced hydrogen-injection system using a plasma reformer with a DeNOx Catalyst. The plasma reformer, installed into the engine compartment, convert fuel into hydrogen. The hydrogen is then injected into the combustion chambers and ignites the fuel earlier in the engine’s process, causing more power in the downward stroke. The hydrogen causes the fuel to burn more completely, resulting in greater fuel efficiency, less emissions, and more power.
The DeNOx Catalyst attaches to the tailpipe and has been proven to reduce NOx emissions by 85%. Combined with hydrogen injection, the complete EVOPAC system provides the most complete emission reduction system yet, according to Umpqua.
Tests have demonstrated reductions in fuel usage in hydrogen-injection systems compared with conventional combustion engines. The introduction of hydrogen into the engine virtually eliminates fuel emissions while greatly reducing the emissions of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide.
(see article for the other two winners )
Definitely like the list of exhibitors ( besides Cas ) Some big names attending this show.
Hope you're right Iron.
Great Job Cas !!
Nice ! Will you be attending, or any of your satisfied customers, that may be promoting the Wildcat ?
One of their dealers (Nelson )landed that contract. Corporate has supposedly 10 or more fleet deals of their own they've been working on prior to November. They once again missed the big farm shows in Wisconsin, Georgia and Texas, where they'd have gotten a lot more mileage on their dollar IMO. You are right about one thing, C'MON HTI. You've got the dealers in place. Start lighting some fires !!!! caa5000, wait another 6 months and you may feel the way I do today. IMO
HI folks, Just stopped by to see if anything has changed in the past 3 weeks since I left for sunny Florida. Sparks, thanks for your continued support. HTI should have you on payroll (if they don't already have) If you go away, I'm right behind you. I see everything at HTI is same old, same old. Still skipping major farm shows and sending dealers to the less attended. I realize they are on a tight budget, but damn, I believe they need to start thinking a bit bigger. I also see corprorate hasn't been able to sign a single fleet deal in + 4 months. Thank goodness for their dealers like Joe and Cas. Well the farming season is kicking in next month, let's hope the Ag part picks up. As for the fleet deals, I stick to my theory that waithing for EPA approval is not necessary. If Pepsi didn't have to wait, why should any other trucker ? Disappointed in progress ? You betcha. I still see the light at the end of the tunnel, I just hope it's not a train coming our way. GLTA
Thanks Josey and Sparks. I might have jumped the gun on this one, but I still find it hard to believe that the Pink Sheets can post a warning without first notifying the company. This kind of posting can be quite damaging to a company's reputation. IMO
Josey, are you saying that they were not given notice of this warning in advance ? This is the kind of crap that drives the longs crazy. Great product, inept management practices. IMO
HTI should be on this, like white on rice. What an opportunity to have The "Chuck Truck" stop in Valdosta and slap on a wildcat and thus become The "Green Chuck Truck". By the time he reaches Florida, the whole nation would be aware of this "WIN, WIN Situation " IMO
Santorum Surge in Iowa Puts Chrysler’s Ram Pickup Center Stage
January 04, 2012, 2:11 AM EST
(For more election news, see ELECT <GO>.)
Jan. 3 (Bloomberg) -- As poll numbers surged in Rick Santorum’s bid for the Republican presidential nomination, more attention has fallen to his wheels.
While candidates such as former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich are crisscrossing Iowa in large buses with their names on the sides, Santorum has been riding in a Ram 1500 pickup lovingly called the “Chuck Truck,” named after Chuck Laudner, his campaign aide.
Laudner, former executive director of the Republican Party of Iowa, purchased the four-door pickup in late 2006, he said in an interview in Newton, Iowa, yesterday while his candidate addressed more than 100 people inside a pizza restaurant.
The pickup has become a prop in the campaign for Santorum, who frequently mentions it to audiences. His efforts to visit all 99 of Iowa’s counties and hold more than 370 town hall meetings have helped propel him in the latest polls of likely Iowa caucus-goers who begin the 2012 presidential nomination process tonight.
Santorum, the former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, rose to third place in the most closely watched Iowa poll released on Dec. 31. The Des Moines Register Iowa Poll showed Santorum backed by 15 percent of likely Republican caucus-goers, after a surge in the final two days of sampling. Ahead of him were Romney, at 24 percent, and U.S. Representative Ron Paul of Texas at 22 percent.
Cameras Swarm
The “Chuck Truck” when purchased when the Ram was produced by DaimlerChrysler AG. Daimler AG divested control of Chrysler in 2007. Chrysler Group LLC, majority owned by Fiat SpA, emerged from a U.S.-backed bankruptcy in 2009.
In the final days on the campaign trail, Santorum is often swarmed by television cameras as he hops into the gray truck for his next stop as he was during a visit to a pizza restaurant in Boone yesterday.
A line that often draws laughter on the campaign trail is when Santorum starts talking about a graphic the New York Times ran that showed how the candidates were traveling.
“All of these people and all of these buses and then me -- with a Ram pickup truck and one person,” he said to laughter in Sioux City on Jan. 1.
The truck has become part of Santorum’s narrative that he’s hardworking and spent the time to travel across the state.
“I didn’t have the money to compete here,” Santorum said. “But we were able to do it. Why? Because money doesn’t buy Iowa -- hard work, good ideas, strong principles” do.
Many Miles
Santorum isn’t the first candidate to get attention for his truck. Fred Thompson, the former U.S. senator from Tennessee who sought the Republican presidential nomination in 2008, used to campaign in a red pickup that drew media attention as did Janet Reno when running for governor of Florida.
While Laudner’s truck has more than 178,000 miles on it, he said he’s not planning a replacement anytime soon. He has a second Ram with more than 300,000 miles, he said.
The campaign never intended the truck to become a prop in the campaign, Laudner said.
“It was just him jumping in with me,” Laudner said. “I was going out and doing intros for him.”
When Chrysler and General Motors Co. have come up during this campaign season, it’s often because of the U.S. bailouts that kept them from liquidation in 2009.
While not “a big fan” of the bailouts, “This is what I drive,” Laudner said. “I’m not going to swap out vehicles for a political statement.”
--With assistance from Albert Hunt in Washington. Editors: Bill Koenig, John Lear
To contact the reporter on this story: Tim Higgins in Detroit at thiggins21@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Silva at msilva34@bloomberg.net
Arnie did get one thing right Lajet. He was the first public figure I know, that drove around in a vehicle ( Scorpion ) equiped with a hydrogen booster.
Nice to see the PPS regain it's composure. Isn't it remarkable, with very little volume, how quickly this can go up and down. Such is the life of a Penny. I hope all you nervous nellies have recovered from this past weeks manipulation. I'd say we were in good hands, even with the mild sell off. Why, because there were enough longs standing in line to buy back those shares. I hope we all have learned something from this last attack on the PPS. I witnessed the same thing happen over a year ago. That's when PD claimed he made a whole bunch of money on this stock. I am really looking forward to the coming year. Many good things ahead. IMO GLTA
Monty, I wish I could, but alas, I've drained my account buying Christmas presents for my 9 grandkids. Nothing left to do but pop open a cold frosty and enjoy some fine cheese. I sure the hell don't need any more whine. Kinda funny how all the ASSumers know exactly what is currently going on with the company. Sure wish I was privy to all their excellent DD. And I still can't quite make out what that writing on the wall is. Better have my eyes checked over the holidays. GLTA who believe. LOL or HO HO HO !!
What writng is that Josey ?
As long as you keep posting, I have confidence the company will be successful. Your fear is my reward. (see post 48494 )
Paul, why do you think Dongfeng needs to wait for our EPA approval ? They've already received HTI's go ahead. They could be manufacturing and selling right now anywhere else in the world. IMO