"So what is management to do? Please shareholders by making forward looking statements, which at the time they are made, are reasonable, and then suffer the criticism when events occur that prevent the realization of those projections? Or do they go silent, working steadily, overcoming problems, and reporting nothing until after it has been fully realized (a strategy recommended to me by some, even in the knowledge that this can be discouraging to other shareholders who do want frequent updates)?"
I appreciate very much your legal interpretation of the NIR fiasco, but feel you might want to rethink your current position on defending HTI's management. As most here already know, I kiss no ones behind or take little BS from anyone. ( too old and too stubborn )
I see nothing wrong with asking the company questions regarding any public statements they have made. Granted, Swarm had a whole boat load (no pun Casa), but maybe if each were addressed at the time of occurance, the list might have contained only a couple items. I for one, am getting a bit tired of finding out pertinent company information after the fact. People who normally bring it to my attention, also have hidden agenda's that are set to harm HTI. Of course they always have to add their negative spin to make the picture look far worse than it really is. I believe in being up front with everyone. I expect HTI to do the same with it's investors. If they miss a deadline or make a mistake, so be it. Tell us why and move on. I believe most of the true investors here aren't looking for daily details, but only explanations for events that directly affect their investment. IMO
