Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
no it was in january, settlement was in march
Although I do have to laugh whenever I call a rumor news invariably happens a few weeks after my prediction
yeah i agree, we have to think about this rumor and who this rumor benefits and why, did nok put this out there, did idcc's people
amr, I respect your opinion but jagfn is a website that obviously has influence, when I post a rumor I influence not one share, they post a rumor and the stock has a mini blow up
well i am concerned if it is true, I don't believe it is, if it is not true then I think settlement is within weeks if not days, I remember before the ericy settlement there was a similar rumor in Jan
well on what basis does jag publish rumors, what criteria do they have
ok so what do you think is this good, bad, or not possible, what is your take, thanks
what's your take on this rumor
Hey man, I have heard zero since I posted my prediction for a settlement by election day, no info at all, which makes me think something is going down
oh shit, does anyone here believe that, do you believe that, that can't be good for us, can it
What's going on, is there a settlement, I don't see it on news
Jim, what the hell is going on, just checked in now
You are the one wrong and when the stock price busts through 5 dollars and then to 10 and beyond you can come here and admit I am the ultimate King in predicting, just because my choice of words was slightly off does not change anything, you still can't name the companies remaining on the lawsuit, and you really believe that a lawyer of that caliber is not going to be able to reinitiate claims against the remaining 75 companies or if they have to appeal to a higher court, nobody cares about a lower court ruling
but again what are you going to do when the stock goes to the OTCBB, when all the certs are mailed out and the transfer process is complete and people are no longer allowed to illegally short the stock because now when you buy the shares it has to be in your name, and then we get a positive news release, all of a sudden all of the shorters have to cover, all of the brokerage houses have to cover all of those illegal shorts that have no name attached to it and this stock will skyrocket
your presence here and on raging bull shows me positive signs as well, why are you posting about a stock that is 25 cents, why are there paid bashers and shorts talking about on raging bull, you have multiple aliases that post on all the same penny stocks, you have aliases that were born in the past couple of months all posting on the same penny stocks, all negative in every one of their posts, the presence of new bashers is always a great sign for a stock with impending good news or one that is ready to takeoff, the bashers either want to buy more shares for as cheap as possible, want to cover their short sales for as best a profit as possible
I don't care what you tell me, I don't believe anyone who claims they just post about a penny stock for the fun of it, not possible, and definitely not possible for over 50 to 100 aliases, especially since they all post on the same 10 or so stocks, and you especially would not post about a stock you had no money on and was a penny the amount of times the bashers do over at raging bull
i laugh at the whole situation, even if the remaining 75 or so cases get thrown out, the situation remains the same, no more naked shorting, shorts and brokerage houses will have to cover, and I will continue laughing
Yes, that is a good base to start with, I think it will reach higher based on future projections, look at xmsr, no way the current situation justifies a stock price that high
True but IDCC's float compared to most stocks is relatively small wouldn't you agree
well then every quote site should have a high and split adjusted high so that people understand who have not followed the stock
well that is my point the true high is 360, not 60, my problem is that when you say 60, that is not indicative of how high the stock really went
TASR's true high was over 120, don't forget they split earlier in the year
this time it is not on potential, now it will be on real news
first of all it was only half of the companies, only 70 out of 150 companies thrown out, secondly so they will re-initate the claims, it is a lower court ruling, no big deal either way
and besides I am not invested in this stock soley on that lawsuit, I am invested because now the stock can't be shorted illegally, so once it hits the OTCBB it will start to climb and the next positive news will send it skyrocketing, due to all of the illegal short positions
We are going to have a pre New Year's run that will rival the 99 run to 82, this is going to be special
well if it was fraud, maybe the RNC did not pay a couple of low level operatives well enough and 100,000 just might be incentive to talk
that is the only way you could change the election if there was fraud, to have a real live whistleblower with proof
Something is brewing with IDCC, new bashers emerging on Yahoo, that is always a good sign of impending news, classic pattern that is usually a bellweather indicator
in your opinion can the war be won, if we retake fallujah and mosul are we just applying a band aid to a huge and fatal wound or are we taking a major step to securing the country
right now i have a pessimistic view of Iraq while praying for the success and safety of our soldiers, just don't know how much is going to change even with retaking those cities, seems like they can car bomb us to death for 20 years, and the minute we pull out there will be a civil war
imo the only thing that will work is a 3 state federation, kurds in the north, sunnis in the center, shia in the south
what is your opinion and your thoughts on all of my questions
ok i'm really tired, can you explain that metaphor
easy, he said the dicator thing as a joke, yes it is radical and wrong to take us to war in iraq, although possibility still exists that he did the war because he believed the intelligence and thought best way to stop terrorism was a democracy in the middle east, yes they are withholding parts of the 9/11 report but it will eventually come out, they have not burned the pages, don't know the tank story but I have seen plenty of protests in this country the past 4 years and no tanks have shown up, whose freedom of speech has been taken away, no proof of whistleblowers being killed
no actually if you want to win the war going into fallujah is the right thing to do, however imo we can't win, because the insurgency can last for years, but there are people who believe we can still win it and they are trying their best, I wouldn't exactly call it bombing the shit, we could have done that and not risked our troops, but we are actually fighting house to house
well if my president was Hussein I might actually welcome an invasion, or at least keep quiet about it until it was over,
yes the use of fake terror warnings is radical and should be investigated
who knows if we allowed that to happen there might not have been a 9/11
don't forget the Senate authorized that war only 51 to 47, although even without the Senate I'm sure the President would have found a way to go to war
yes but I still believe there are some wars worth fighing for, like World War II and in Afghanistan if it was done correctly and we destroyed Bin Laden, of course Vietnam was a waste
the first gulf war probably had to be fought, couldn't be sure if Saddam would have rolled over the whole middle east, although would rather have him in saudi arabia than the pigs we got now, at least he wouldn't pretend like he was our friend and of course he would still have sold us oil
I do realize, but radical to me is different than your radical, to me radical is trying to privatize social security, etc etc
easy you misunderstood, I actually thought it was funny and cool, and serious at the same time, even though I go crazy and rip on you and f6, I have a soft spot in my heart for alternative thinkers, I just think that some of the thoughts are unrealistic
hey have some compassion, I like that taunt though it made me laugh, you are so right if it were to happen, I wouldn't know what to do, I'm all for fighting to defend my country, but don't want to die for corruption and so that some companies can make millions
Yes but I have studied those darker times, obviously don't have the same personal experience as you, but still I have a general understanding, look I have an open mind, but you must admit you are proposing some radical and extreme ideas, I like to think out of the box too, but that is out there
Well if it happens then I will be worried because I fall far under that age cutoff, you know if the iraq war had been a success and their predictions had come true then I would agree another attack could happen, but I just don't see them convincing enough people that we have the political capital as Bush calls it to get it done
Anybody know the age cutoff for this draft if it were to happen
why do I need sources, I am not talking about change, for me to be right nothing needs to happen, I am going by my experience of following politics for my short life and various things I have read, and I was not referring to the draft that easy had to get sworn testimony, I was talking about all of the accusations from that website
just out of curiosity what would be the cutoff age for a draft
First of all that guy was debunked on dailykos, I believe he was anyway I might be mistaking him for somebody else, but anyway I never said anything about a bombing of Iran, they definitely could bomb the nuclear reactors which would be a good thing and they should do that today, but as far as an invasion, no way
if there is a draft, this country will go into chaos, the people will protest, it will be mass confusion, it just ain't happening
Both of those are not easy pickings by the way. The media, country, and people are not going to stand for another war, they are lucky they got away with this one, the president barely got reelected because he was able to lie and convince enough people people the war in iraq was the war on terror
but the media knows it was duped or lazy or too compliant and they will be out for blood
There is more of a chance the Bush administration will go down in a Watergate like scandal then an invasion of any country
you sure are convinced they will, no I don't think you want them to happen, but if that is what the President wants then why wouldn't he try, so when he doesn't try it should be obvious to you that is was all baloney
I guarantee you there will not be an attack on iran over the next four years