Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Gold~ Silver~ HUI~ XAU~ US$~ €uro~ Crude~Pd
Live Charts ~ Bookmark this page –
Refresh anytime during the day.
PoG
PoS
Pd
HUI
XAU
3day $US:
€uro
Crude
Futures (2) + World Indices
http:// ww.cme.com/dta/del/globex.htm
http://money.cnn.com/data/premarket/
World Indices (2) Mini Charts
Updates every 60sec ~ Watch the dates!!
http://www.wwfn.com/commentary/oscharts.html
http://www.allstocks.com/markets/World_Charts/Asian_Stock_Markets/asian_stock_markets.html
OT, out all day Thurs Dr Appt./e
Fed. 2day RP + 9.50B [All Giveth ]
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
OT: Up Next
This Sunday On 60 Minutes
May 22, 2008
(CBS) Sunday, May 25, 2008
A 26-YEAR SECRET - Bob Simon reports on two lawyers who, bound by the client-attorney privilege, kept the secret that their client had committed a murder while an innocent man went to jail for the crime and remained there for 26 years. Robert Anderson and Casey Morgan are the producers.
HOUSE OF CARDS - Steve Kroft reports on how the U.S. sub-prime mortgage meltdown, in which risky loans drove a housing boom that went bust, is now roiling capital markets worldwide. L. Franklin Devine and Jennifer MacDonald are the producers.
HERE COME THE MILLENNIALS - They are in their late teens to early twenties and have been coddled by their parents to the point of being ill prepared for a demanding workplace. Morley Safer reports on the generation called "Millennials." Katy Textor is the producer.
Fed. Ops: 36.75B Matures this week.
Wed:
20.00B 28day
11.75B 5day
Thu: 5.00B 14day
================================================
Temp Ops:
Perm Ops:
========================================================
Public Debt:
Limit ~ $9,815 T
5/22 ~~ $9,392 T
=========================================================
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
Mauldin: Whither the Price of Oil?
by John Mauldin
May 23, 2008
Why has the price of oil risen so much in the past few months? Is it a supply and demand issue as some believe; or is it because of an out-of-control futures market driven by the proliferation of commodity index funds and rampant speculation, as everyone tries to get in on the rise in commodity prices? This is a very complex issue, with a lot of emotion attached to it.
This week I try to give you an understanding of why oil prices have risen and whether they are likely to stay at such lofty heights or maybe even fall! And we look at a very odd statistic: where are all the tankers? There are some very unusual things happening in the oil patch. If you are currently exposed to the energy or commodity markets, or are thinking about it, I believe you will find this letter of interest. At the end of the letter, I also tell you how you can personally see that help gets to the victims of Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar. It is a desperately needy situation. There is a lot to cover, so we will get to the essay right after this quick note.
I have talked for the past few months about why I feel we may be in for a tough investment environment and a Muddle Through Economy. I think in this type of market cycle it is important to increase your portfolio allocation weighting to noncorrelating investment strategies. I work with Steve Blumenthal and his team at CMG to help investors find managers who can take smaller minimums and who have such alternative strategies. We are creating a platform of managers that you can access for your personal portfolio. I recently completed a special write-up on Eric Leake of Anchor Capital, an investment advisor I am particularly impressed with. For the last 12-1/2 months, he is up 16.77%, in comparison to the S&P 500 index that is down -2.08% (net of fees from April 30, 2007 through May 15, 2008). Equally impressive is that he has generated this return while being uncorrelated to the S&P, and with lower volatility than the market.
You can get this report and others I have written by going to https://cmgfunds.net/public/mauldin_questionnaire.asp and filling out the form. If you are a manager and would like to be considered for the platform, drop a note to PJ Grzywacz at pjg@cmgfunds.net. And if you are an investment advisor and would like to see the managers that are on our platform and determine whether they might fit into your client portfolios, we do have a program to work directly with you.
And as always, if you have a net worth of over $2 million, I strongly suggest you go to www.accreditedinvestor.ws and register there. My partners in the US (Altegris Investments), London (Absolute Return Partners) and South Africa (Plexus) are experts in alternative investment strategies, including hedge funds and commodity funds. We have a very strong selection of funds in a wide variety of styles to help you diversify your portfolio. (In this regard, I am president and a registered representative of Millennium Wave Securities, LLC, member FINRA.) And now, let's jump into the oil patch.
Those Nasty Index Speculators
Are institutional investors in the form of large commodity index funds the reason behind the current rise not just in oil prices but in the prices of seemingly all commodities? Michael Masters, a long-short hedge fund manager, in testimony before the Congressional Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, said:
"You have asked the question 'Are Institutional Investors contributing to food and energy price inflation?' And my unequivocal answer is 'YES.' In this testimony I will explain that Institutional Investors are one of, if not the primary, factors affecting commodities prices today. Clearly, there are many factors that contribute to price determination in the commodities markets; I am here to expose a fast-growing yet virtually unnoticed factor, and one that presents a problem that can be expediently corrected through legislative policy action."
You can read the entire testimony at http://www.mcadforums.com/forums/files/michael_masters_written_testimony.pdf, but let's hear the basics of his argument:
"What we are experiencing is a demand shock coming from a new category of participant in the commodities futures markets: Institutional Investors. Specifically, these are Corporate and Government Pension Funds, Sovereign Wealth Funds, University Endowments and other Institutional Investors. Collectively, these investors now account on average for a larger share of outstanding commodities futures contracts than any other market participant.
"These parties, who I call Index Speculators, allocate a portion of their portfolios to "investments" in the commodities futures market, and behave very differently from the traditional speculators that have always existed in this marketplace. I refer to them as "Index" Speculators because of their investing strategy: they distribute their allocation of dollars across the 25 key commodities futures according to the popular indices - the Standard & Poors - Goldman Sachs Commodity Index and the Dow Jones - AIG Commodity Index."
These index funds are composed of a number of commodities. While oil is the biggest component of the various funds, they also have exposure to grains, base metals, precious metals, and livestock. When you buy one of these funds you are buying a basket of commodities.
Why would an investor want exposure to a long-only index of commodities? Perhaps for portfolio diversification, as commodities are uncorrelated with the rest of the portfolio, or as a way to play the growing demand for commodities of all sorts from emerging markets, as a hedge against inflation, and so on. Mainline investment consultants began to suggest a few years ago to their clients that they get into the commodity market on a buy and hold basis, just like they do with stocks and bonds.
And they have done so in a very large way. As the chart below shows, at the end of 2003 there was $13 billion in commodity index funds. By March of this year, that amount had grown 20 times, to $260 billion. Masters also shows that this corresponds with the stratospheric rise in commodity prices. In many commodity futures markets, index speculators are now the single largest participant.
John Mauldin - Commodity Index Investment
Is Correlation Causation?
There is no doubt that the rise in the investment in commodity indexes and the rise in prices correlate significantly. But does correlation necessarily mean that there is a direct cause and effect? Masters says it does. (Later we will look at arguments against this view.)
As an illustration, he shows that the rise in demand for oil from China in the past five years has been 920 million barrels of oil per year. But index demand (the word Masters uses) for oil has risen by 848 million barrels, almost as much as another China.
And Masters gives us facts that are interesting. There is enough wheat in the index speculator "stockpiles" in the US to feed every many, woman, and child all the bread, pasta, and baked goods they can eat for the next two years - about 1.3 billion bushels. Yet wheat has soared in price.
As the prices of the indexes have risen, the demand for the indexes has grown. And these indexes are not price sensitive. If a billion dollars is invested in a given week, the index funds simply buy whatever allocation of futures contracts is needed to make up their index, at whatever price is offered.
For the first 52 trading days of the year, demand for commodity index funds grew by more than $55 billion, or more than $1 billion a day. And as Masters points out, "There is a crucial distinction between Traditional Speculators and Index Speculators: Traditional Speculators provide liquidity by both buying and selling futures. Index Speculators buy futures and then roll their positions by buying calendar spreads. They never sell. Therefore, they consume liquidity and provide zero benefit to the futures markets.
"Index Speculators' trading strategies amount to virtual hoarding via the commodities futures markets. Institutional Investors are buying up essential items that exist in limited quantities for the sole purpose of reaping speculative profits."
And now we get inflammatory:
"Think about it this way: If Wall Street concocted a scheme whereby investors bought large amounts of pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices in order to profit from the resulting increase in prices, making these essential items unaffordable to sick and dying people, society would be justly outraged."
What about position limits? Aren't there real limits to the amount of a physical commodity that a fund or speculator can accumulate? Masters points out that there is, but the CFTC has given investment banks a loophole, in that they can sell unlimited size positions in the OTC swap markets if they hedge the positions.
So, a hedge fund could buy $500 million worth of wheat, which would be way beyond the actual market position limit, through a swap with a Wall Street bank, without having to worry about position limits. And there is no doubt that large purchases of any commodity will drive up prices, at least in the short term.
What does Masters think Congress should do? Prohibit pension funds from commodity index buying, close the swaps loophole on speculative positions, and make the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) provide more transparency as to who is buying commodities. That would stop those nasty index speculators from driving up food and energy prices. Prices would come back down and we could all go back to driving our SUVs without having to worry about the cost.
Well, then, maybe not. It is not that simple. While there is no doubt that excess demand in the form of index buying can have a very real effect -on prices, it is not the whole story.
What an index funds does is buy a futures contract for a given commodity when money is first invested. Say that contract is six months out. When the contract is one month from expiration or delivery, the index fund sells that contract and buys another contract six months out. They sell before the contract could have an effect on the cash price of the physical commodity. The cash price is determined by supply and demand.
Let's look at supply. Masters mentioned wheat. Yes, the index speculators have built up a large futures position. But that is not the same as a large physical position. With demand soaring abroad and droughts crimping supply, the world's wheat stockpiles have fallen to their lowest level in 30 years, and stocks in the United States have dropped to levels unseen since 1948. That could go a long way to explaining rising wheat prices.
Corn? The USDA is expected to report corn stocks for the year ending Aug. 31, 2009, to fall to 685 million bushels, according to analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters, down 47% from 1.283 billion bushels in 2008. The corn crop season ends on Aug. 31. (They expect wheat and soybean stocks to rise, for which we can be thankful.)
Bob Greer, executive vice president at PIMCO, rebuts Masters arguments in a very cogent paper recently sent to me. He argues that index funds do not affect the price but may contribute to volatility.
"Some market observers have tried to tie the level of inventories to index investment, most notably in crude oil. Their arguments take one of two forms:
"1) The indexer's act of selling the nearby and buying the distant contract forces the futures curve to be upward sloping (future price is higher than nearby price). This creates an incentive to own inventories and earn the "return to storage" represented by the slope of the futures curve. The act of increasing inventory keeps the commodity off the market, thus decreasing supply.
"2) A variation of the above argument is that the short seller, who takes the other side of the indexer's purchase, needs to protect their position by buying and holding the physical commodity.
"It would be nice if either of these arguments were true, in which case, the developed world would not be hostage to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Any time we needed to increase crude inventories, we need merely to bring in more indexers, and the inventory would appear. In fact, the explanation for inventory levels of any commodity is much simpler. If, in the cash markets, production exceeds demand, inventories will rise. Otherwise they will fall. That is why, in six of the last eight years, global wheat inventories fell, regardless of index investment (USDA). That is why from 2006 to 2008, crude oil inventories declined and the crude oil curve went from upward sloping to downward sloping, in spite of increasing index investment (EIA). Furthermore, the second argument above breaks down when applied to non-storable commodities such as live cattle."
Further, Greer shows a chart from Deutsche Bank which highlights the fact that many commodities which are not in the index fund portfolios have risen higher than exchange-traded commodities (rice, for instance). Look at the chart below:
John Mauldin - Price Appreciation of Exchange vs Non-Exchange Traded Commodities
Greer concludes with these important paragraphs:
"Regarding intrinsic value, commodity futures prices converge to cash prices, and cash prices are set by the level of demand to consume physical goods such as steak, gasoline, and Wheaties. The price setting mechanism is not based on possibly erroneous assessment of a financial statement, nor on irrational exuberance. In commodities there is an outside measure of intrinsic value--the cash market--that is not dominant in equity, real estate, or tulip bulb markets. As actual commodity prices go higher or lower, they reflect consumption requirements for actual products, many of which are not very storable.
"This is a sharp contrast from internet stocks or vacation condos, which are subject to speculative bubbles. Unfortunately, our conventional wisdom regarding factors that create bubbles is rooted in asset classes like stocks and real estate, asset classes that have fundamentally different characteristics than physical and futures markets.
"Coincidence is not the same thing as causality. It is a coincidence that commodity index investment has increased in the last few years just as commodity prices have increased. If there is any causality, it is the other way around. Rising commodity prices have caused an increased interest in commodity investment. And it is certainly causality that fundamental supply, demand and inventory factors have driven commodity prices in many markets higher, whether or not those are markets in which index investors participate. This is the same causality that has driven commodity prices both higher and lower for many decades."
Where Will Oil Prices Go?
So, let's look at the fundamentals for oil. While a large part of this week's rise in oil was short covering (you can tell that from open positions), the supply of oil was down 7% from last year, even with demand beginning to fall. But there is an interesting footnote to that statistic, which we will visit later. Look at the chart below from www.economy.com:
John Mauldin - Where is the Supply Response?
Notice that supplies turned down sharply this last month, while the momentum of falling supply had been dropping since January. That is to say, the change in crude oil stocks was a negative 10% in January and was a little over -4% a month ago, falling to -7% today. But this is in the face of demand slowing. Today we learned that gasoline usage was down 4.2%, as prices are finally changing American driving behavior.
Jakab Spencer noted in his always interesting Dow Jones column that there is a disconnect between the New York Stock Exchange and the New York Mercantile Exchange, just one mile apart. The NYSE is pricing in $75 oil in oil stocks, while the futures market is surging over $135, and there are calls for near-term $150-a-barrel oil. The stock market is telling us that oil, at least in futures terms, is in a bubble.
And frankly, if you listened to their testimony, and more importantly pay attention to their actions, oil company executives simply do not believe that the price of oil is going to be $135 a barrel for the next few years. If they did, they would be punching more holes in the ground in places where it might be expensive to get the oil to market - but at $135 a barrel it would be profitable.
And then there is an odd circumstance in the oil picture that I think may suggest that we could see a break, and perhaps a violent one, in the near term for the price of oil.
Where Are All the Tankers?
For a few weeks now, observers have noticed that Iran is leasing tankers and storing oil in them. At about $140,000 a week or so, that is expensive storage. At first, conspiracy theorists were wondering if they were preparing for some kind of war or attack. But more conventionally, it may be they are having problems selling their oil. Their oil is not very high-quality, and there are only a few places that can take it and refine it. India, China, and the US are among the countries with refineries that can take Iranian oil. (And yes, George Friedman of Stratfor tells me some of it does end up in the US from time to time.)
India's refiners are telling Iran they no longer want their oil, preferring the higher-quality oil that is readily available in the area. So Iran has to decide whether to send it to China or "repackage" it so that it can end up in the US, while they try to get refiners in India to change their minds. Thus, they are leasing tankers to store the oil they are pumping.
I called George about six this evening and asked him about the Iranian situation, as that is a lot of oil that could come on the market at some point, as well as a possible reason that oil supplies are down. George has analysts on top of this situation.
He told me, "John, it's more interesting than that. It is not just Iran. Today we started checking on how many tankers Iran had, and soon discovered that there is a serious tanker shortage. Lease prices have soared in the past few weeks. It is clear there are a lot of speculators betting that oil is going to rise to $150 or so and are willing to pay very high prices for keeping the oil on the seas waiting for higher prices. It is a speculative boom."
He then told me about flying into New York in the early '80s. Outside the harbor were 30 or so tankers just sitting, waiting for prices to continue to increase as they had been doing for some time. When they did not, they all tried to get into the harbor at the same time, and of course they couldn't. It was the top of the market. Prices dropped, and the owners of the oil had to go to the futures market to hedge what they could. I had heard that story, but George saw it with his own eyes.
Almost everyone (except the stock market) is convinced oil is going higher in the near term. As I noted above, this week's rally was partially due to short covering by large institutions and companies which had sold production far into the future at much lower prices. They finally threw in the towel and took off their hedges.
Is it 1980 All Over Again?
We may be getting ready to stage a very interesting economic experiment. Is Masters right that prices are driven by speculation, or is it supply and demand? Follow me on this one. I am not saying that this will happen, but it is an interesting scenario.
Many developing countries subsidize the price of oil to their citizens, so they do not feel the pain of higher oil prices. But the headline of today's Financial Times is that Asia is finally getting ready to cut their subsidies as oil rises to $135. The awareness that they need to allow market conditions to prevail is finally being acknowledged, as they cannot afford the subsidies. This is going to help drive down demand for oil over time.
As demand starts to fall, let's remember that the storage facilities for oil waiting to be refined are a finite item. If all those tankers end up needing to find a home at the same time, even as demand for oil is going down, you could see the price of oil go down rather quickly in the short term.
If you are leasing tankers to deliver oil that is already hedged in price, you want to get it to port as soon as possible so that your lease payments stop as soon as possible. You only hold it on the high seas if you think the price is going up by more than your carrying costs (the cost of money and leasing the tanker). If you start to lose money, you sell your oil on the futures market and get it to port as fast as you can.
Now, here is where it could get interesting. Oil is the biggest component of the commodity index funds. If oil drops and looks likely to go lower, then the massive buying of these funds we have seen in the past few months could dry up. As Dennis Gartman says, it takes a lot of buying to make the price of something to go up, but it only takes a lack of buying to make it go down. And if there is net selling?
If we see money start to flow out of the index funds (and ETFs) because of momentum selling, that means the funds are not only selling their oil components, but also the grain and metal and meat. If the index funds are the key component in the rise of prices, we should see the price of all commodities go down in tandem and in sympathy. If oil is the only thing going down as index funds go down, then it is a supply-related issue.
But what if index funds continue to grow? If there is an abundance of oil, it will eventually show up in the spot price, as storage will be lacking, no matter what the longer-term futures prices do. The market will soon tell us whether index funds are a major factor. I tend to think that even while index fund buying is bullish, it is not the major factor that is the driver of commodity prices. And even if it is significant in the short term, in the long term fundamentals will drive the true price.
If it is simply index speculation, it will end in tears when the fundamentals catch up.
Let me say that I believe the long-term price of oil is going much higher. I was writing about $100 oil two years ago. $150 and $200 oil is in the cards at some point in the future. If you have not read the Outside the Box from last Monday, you should. My friend David Galland points out that Mexico, which supplies 14% of US oil, is likely to be a net importer of oil by the middle of the next decade, as their internal demand increases and production decreases. Iran will be a net importer within six years for the same reasons. Russia's oil exports are down this year, as are Mexico's. Energy costs are going to rise in the next decade, and maybe much sooner.
You can click on the following link to read the Outside the Box on where oil exports are headed in our future. And Casey Research does some top-notch analysis of energy investments (not just oil) in a very reasonably priced letter, if you are inclined to invest in individual stocks.
As for today, if I was in a long-only commodity index fund, unless my time horizon was very long I would be watching it closely and have some close stops. And I might wait until I saw what the price of oil was going to do. If you have some profits, then you might want to think about taking some off the table. Just a thought.
32.50B drain EDIT post # 29499
clic back reply
Fed. 5day RP + 11.75B [Net sm Drain 0.25B
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
Fed. (2) 1day RP + 12.00B [net Drain -32.00B sofar
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
Fed. 14day RP + 5.00B [ SoFar..away
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
Nice win Ray, again /e
Futures (2) + World Indices
http://www.cme.com/dta/del/globex.html
http://money.cnn.com/data/premarket/
World Indices (2) Mini Charts
Updates every 60sec ~ Watch the dates!!
http://www.wwfn.com/commentary/oscharts.html
http://www.allstocks.com/markets/World_Charts/Asian_Stock_Markets/asian_stock_markets.html
GG has now closed the gap /e ;)
Fed. 1day RP + 15.00B
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
W@G2 QQQQ 05/21/08 for a 05/23/08 close
48.50 bob3
48.00 rayrohn
C U have Crude front month already ;)
Fed receives 75 bidders for $75 bln TAF credit auction
10:00 AM ET, May 20, 2008 - By Greg Robb
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -
The Federal Reserve said Tuesday it received 75 bidders for its Monday auction of $75 billion in 28-day credit. The loans were being offered as part of a special term auction facility to help alleviate liquidity problems in global financial markets stemming from losses due to risk mortgage-based securities. Total propositions submitted reached $84.4 billion, or a bid/cover ratio of 1.13. The awarded loans will settle on Thursday.
Fed.(2) 28day Forward 20.00B
This repo operation has 1 collateral tranche
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
Fed. 2day RP + 4.00B [net add 0.75B SoFar
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
Fed to auction $75 bln 28-day loans under TAF program
10:18 AM ET, May 19, 2008 - By Greg Robb
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -
The Federal Reserve said Monday it will auction $75 billion of 28-day loans at a minimum bid rate of 1.99% under its new term-auction facility. The TAF program is designed to inject liquidity into the inter-bank funding markets. Banks have been relunctant to lend to each other as they need to shore up their balance sheets in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis. The auction will be held later Monday and the results will be announced on Tuesday
Fed. 1day RP + 7.00B [net Add + 3.25B ]
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
W@G1 QQQQ 05/19/08 for a 05/21/08 close
50.77 bob3
50.52 Farooq
49.13 frenchee
48.50 rayrohn
Futures (2) + World Indices
http://www.cme.com/dta/del/globex.html
http://money.cnn.com/data/premarket/
World Indices (2) Mini Charts
Updates every 60sec ~ Watch the dates!!
http://www.wwfn.com/commentary/oscharts.html
http://www.allstocks.com/markets/World_Charts/Asian_Stock_Markets/asian_stock_markets.html
Capstone Turbine (CPST - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr):
"This one is an interesting speculation. It's gone up a lot, but I like it."
[video] Lightning Round 6min into run with chart, should be good for a pop !!
Fed. Ops: 51.75B Matures this week.
Mon: 3.75B 3day
Wed: 20.00B 28day
Thu:
5.00B 14day
25.00B 7day
================================================
Temp Ops:
Perm Ops:
========================================================
Public Debt:
Limit ~ $9,815 T
5/15 ~~ $9,352 T
=========================================================
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
Fed. Ops: 51.75B Matures this week.
Mon: 3.75B 3day
Wed: 20.00B 28day
Thu:
5.00B 14day
25.00B 7day
================================================
Temp Ops:
Perm Ops:
========================================================
Public Debt:
Limit ~ $9,815 T
5/15 ~~ $9,352 T
=========================================================
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
Ray wins again, nice job!!~
Real-Time Forex Streamers (2)
http://www.netdania.com/QuoteList.asp
http://www.forex-markets.com/quotes.htm
Gold~ Silver~ HUI~ XAU~ US$~ €uro~ Crude~Pd
Live Charts ~ Bookmark this page –
Refresh anytime during the day.
PoG
PoS
Pd
HUI
XAU
3day $US:
€uro
Crude
Fed. 3day RP + 3.75B [NetDrain -6.50B ]
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
Fed's Direct Loans to Banks Climb to Record Level
(Update2)
By Christopher Anstey and Steve Matthews
May 15 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve's direct loans of cash to commercial banks climbed to the highest level on record in the past week as money-losing lenders increasingly turn to the central bank for funds.
Funds provided through the so-called discount window for banks rose by $2.8 billion to a daily average of $14.4 billion in the week to May 14, the central bank said today in Washington. Separately, the Fed's loans to Wall Street bond dealers rose by $75 million to $16.6 billion.
Policy makers have increased the attractiveness of direct loans as they seek to alleviate the impact of the credit crunch. Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said two days ago that while markets have improved, they remain ``far from normal,' adding that the central bank is prepared to increase its twice monthly auctions of funds to banks.
``The Fed is providing an extraordinary amount of liquidity through various mechanisms,' said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at RBS Greenwich Capital in Greenwich, Connecticut. While ``credit markets are showing signs of improvement' there is ``a long way to go,' he said.
Fed officials have reduced the cost of direct loans to a quarter-point above the benchmark overnight lending rate between banks. In March, they extended the term of the loans to commercial banks to 90 days. The discount rate is now 2.25 percent, compared with the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate for the dollar of 2.72 percent.
`Good Sign'
``The fact that banks are willing to take advantage of it may be a good sign for the market,' said Louis Crandall, chief economist at Wrightson ICAP LLC in Jersey City, New Jersey. ``They're willing to take advantage of cheap money and' lend it on to customers, he said.
Bernanke today urged banks to raise more capital to help limit damage to the economy. Banks and securities companies have raised about $244 billion of capital since July, after writedowns and credit losses in excess of $333 billion.
Fed policy makers in March created the Primary Dealer Credit Facility to offer direct loans to the 20 brokers that trade Treasury securities directly with the New York Fed. The resource allows Wall Street banks to borrow money at the discount rate overnight.
As of May 14, there was $14.5 billion of loans outstanding in the primary-dealer program, while commercial banks had $13.4 billion of discount-window loans, the Fed reported.
Bear Stearns
The central bank doesn't disclose who is borrowing from the discount window or other facilities. Bear Stearns Cos. had borrowed $32.5 billion from the Fed as of March 21, according to a JPMorgan Chase & Co. regulatory filing on April 11. The Fed provided $29 billion of financing to secure JPMorgan's takeover of the investment bank in March.
Bank of America Corp. Chief Executive Officer Kenneth Lewis urged policy makers today to choose between bailing out Wall Street investment banks or letting the ``hotbeds of risky financial innovation' fail as the market dictates.
``I understand the argument for opening up the Fed's discount window to investment banks in this environment,' Lewis said in a speech today at New York University's Stern School of Business. ``But I'd also say that providing a public backstop to an inherently risky business that is not required to backstop itself is a tough sell for taxpayers.'
Fed holdings of U.S. Treasury securities fell $22.3 billion for a daily average of $520.1 billion. The central bank had about $713 billion of Treasuries two months ago.
Net Miss
There was one net miss, on May 14, the Fed said. A net miss occurs when the actual reserve level in the banking system diverges from the Fed's projections for a day by $2 billion or more. If the level is outside expectations, the federal funds rate can deviate from target.
The central bank also reported that the M2 measure of money supply rose by $1.1 billion in the week ended May 5. That left M2 growing at an annual rate of 6.7 percent for the past 52 weeks, above the target of 5 percent the Fed once set for maximum growth. The Fed no longer has a formal target.
The Fed reports two measures of the money supply each week. M1 includes all currency held by consumers and companies for spending, money held in checking accounts and travelers checks. M2, the more widely followed, adds savings and private holdings in money market mutual funds.
During the latest reporting week, M1 fell by $7 billion. Over the past 52 weeks, M1 declined 0.1 percent. The Fed no longer publishes figures for M3.
To contact the reporter on this story: Chris Anstey at canstey@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: May 15, 2008 18:04 EDT
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=aur2QcWbKf2U&refer=economy
Great call chichi2 again, patient pays!
Edit Volker: We Can't Handle the Truth?
14 May 2008
Paul Volcker was providing testimony to Congress this morning, and it was being covered by Bloomberg television.
Volcker started to 'tell it like it is' and basically laid out the US economic situation in plain and simple terms. We wish we had recorded it. It was 'scathing' to say the least.
To paraphrase, the mathematicians took over with opaque and complex models. The regulators failed. No one likes regulators when times are good, and when times go bad they get all the blame. We had a system fueled by outrageously high compensation, and so the Wall Street firms did not care what they created as long as they could sell it to someone else.
It was starting to get interesting, and then... Bloomberg television cut away so that Betty Liu could tell us how well the stock market was doing, and they never came back.
CNBC was not covering Volcker's testimony. Neither were the C-Spans. CNN? Forget about it.
A friend who was traveling in Europe the past two weeks emailed with the news that 'things are much worse over there and talk of the financial crisis is all over the front pages and people are talking about it." We are in much better shape because no one is talking about it here.
If we had a financial crash and everyone pretended not to notice would it still have happened? We think there are some central planners in the States that would give a resounding 'No.'
So now that Volcker has spoken out, expect the corporate shills and stooges to make snide remarks, and attempt to smear him. This is what they do.
The Consumer Price Index number this morning was a complete fabrication, a farce.
Its time to start noticing, time to stop going with the flow. The flow is heading into madness.
We found a video link to Volcker's presentation
Go to this link on Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a1ODhNdXi8Mw&refer=home
Go to the top right of the page and you will see "Related Video and Graphics"
Click on the link titled Volcker Says Solution to Credit Crisis Goes Beyond US
Bloomberg TV cut away just before minute 6 of this excerpt.
Volcker Says Fed Interventions Risk Political Battles
By Craig Torres
May 14 (Bloomberg) -- Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker warned that Ben S. Bernanke's interventions in securities markets opened the door to political interference that may threaten the Fed's independence in setting interest rates.
``Intervention in a broad range of credit-market instruments may imply official support for a particular sector of the market or the economy,' Volcker said in testimony to the congressional Joint Economic Committee in Washington today. Support for specific markets ``throws them into political battles,' he said in an interview, referring to the Fed.
Volcker's comments are his most detailed warning yet about the consequences of the Fed's rescue of Bear Stearns Cos. and taking on mortgage securities from bond dealers. He joins former Fed chief Alan Greenspan in anticipating greater meddling with the central bank at a time of rising inflation pressures.
``Independence is integral to the central responsibility of the Federal Reserve' for ``the conduct of monetary policy,' said Volcker, 80, who served as Fed chairman from 1979 to 1987, and is credited with halting runaway inflation. He was succeeded by Greenspan, who retired in January 2006.
Greenspan, 82, wrote in his book ``The Age of Turbulence,' published before the Fed's credit-market actions, that ``the dysfunctional state of American politics does not give me great confidence in the short run' and there may be ``a return of populist, anti-Fed rhetoric.'
Like Early '70s
Volcker, who engineered a surge in interest rates to 20 percent when battling consumer price gains 18 years ago, said ``there is some resemblance to where we are now in the inflation picture to the early 1970s.' The Fed failed to contain a pickup in prices at that time, spurring the acceleration of inflation later that decade, he said. (The Fed was acting the role of Nixon's whoreboy is more accurate. - Jesse)
``If we lose confidence in the ability and the willingness of the Federal Reserve to deal with inflationary pressures' and buttress the dollar, ``we will be in real trouble,' Volcker said. ``That has to be very much in the forefront of our thinking. If we lose that we are back in the 1970s or worse.' (Benny and Cheney assure W we can lie our way out of this one too. No dress. Know what we mean? - Jesse)
Consumer prices rose 3.9 percent in April from a year before, compared with an average rate of 2.7 percent over the past decade, a Commerce Department report showed today. Volcker said there's ``a lot more inflation' than reflected in government figures.
Lawmakers' Pressure
Congressional lawmakers pressed the Fed in March and April to widen the collateral it accepts for loans from securities dealers to include debt backed by student loans. The central bank did extend its Term Securities Lending Facility to add asset-backed securities on May 2.
The Fed's recent actions ``will invite greater scrutiny,' said David Jones, a former Fed economist who has written books on the central bank. ``The Fed could not be at a more delicate moment, and to the extent that Congress does try to lean on the Fed, it will impinge on its independence at a critical juncture.'
The Fed has created three new instruments since December to alleviate credit strains, including direct loans to nonbanks for the first time since the Great Depression.
Bernanke, 54, said yesterday that financial markets remain unsettled and the central bank will increase its auctions of cash to banks as needed.
`Far From Normal'
While markets have improved, they remain ``far from normal,' Bernanke said in a speech to an Atlanta Fed conference at Sea Island, Georgia. ``We stand ready to increase the size of the auctions if further warranted by financial developments.'
The flight from risk since August has made financial institutions reluctant to lend to each other, driving up banks' borrowing costs. That has increased the threat to economic growth already posed by the worst housing recession in a quarter-century by making banks more reluctant to extend credit.
``The Federal Reserve as other central banks is obviously taking onto its balance sheet a lot of mortgages these days,' Volcker said. ``Well, the creators of the Federal Reserve system would be rolling over in their graves if they knew the Federal Reserve is buying mortgages.' (We'd like to think they are roasting in hell but that's just us - Jesse)
Volcker blamed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government- chartered companies that are the biggest sources of financing for U.S. housing, for failing to take a stronger role in the crisis. (Give me a break Paul, they are practically bankrupt - Jesse)
``Where are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?' Volcker asked. ``These are two congressionally created agencies with the specific responsibility' of supporting the mortgage market, he said.
Tighter Regulation
Volcker said the Fed's rescue of Bear Stearns and its loans to investment banks now mean both officials and market participants will assume the central bank will intervene similarly in the future. That means tighter regulation of investment banks is critical, he said. (That's the moral hazard element, and the banks must be restrained now more than ever. Duh - Jesse)
``Systemically important investment banking institutions should be regulated and supervised along at least the basic lines appropriate for commercial banks,' the former Fed chairman said.
Volcker also urged an overhaul of the central bank's internal organization, with a senior official designated by law to take charge of ``administrative responsibility.'
Democratic Senator Charles Schumer of New York, who chairs the congressional panel, said a new single regulator is needed to oversee financial regulation. (How about funding the one that we have once in a while Chuck - Jesse)
Main Focus
While the Securities and Exchange Commission was charged with overseeing Bear Stearns, its main focus is on disclosures to investors, Schumer said in an interview with Bloomberg Television before the hearing. The Fed, which in March pledged $29 billion of financing to secure the takeover by JPMorgan, had no jurisdiction, the senator said.
The Fed ``had to do what they had to do, but they're on tricky ground because the regulatory structure is so ossified,' Schumer said. He predicted that a wider effort to change U.S. financial regulations would take some time and probably awaits a new presidential administration after January.
Volcker called on lawmakers not to pressure the Fed to intervene on behalf of specific institutions or credit markets. Such political interference ``is the way to destroy the Federal Reserve in the long run.'
To contact the reporters on this story: Craig Torres in Washington at ctorres3@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: May 14, 2008 14:32 EDT
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2008/05/we-cant-handle-truth.html
yeah they manage the news, yesterday paul volker was cut off in the middle of his opinion.
chichi2, not getting the traction on this large
re-po pile $$ esp considering the 7day, l agree dowdiva gotta be something else or we would be up much more...jmho
Fed.(2)3) 7day RP + 25.00B [Net Giveth + 32.25B ]
Fed. (3) 1day RP + 10.25B
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
Fed.(2)3) 7day RP + 25.00B [Net Giveth + 32.25B ]
Fed. (3) 1day RP + 10.25B
http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
The Slosh Report:
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
Gold~ Silver~ HUI~ XAU~ US$~ €uro~ Crude~Pd
Live Charts ~ Bookmark this page –
Refresh anytime during the day.
PoG
PoS
Pd
HUI
XAU
3day $US:
€uro
Crude
Gold~ Silver~ HUI~ XAU~ US$~ €uro~ Crude~Pd
Live Charts ~ Bookmark this page –
Refresh anytime during the day.
PoG
PoS
Pd
HUI
XAU
3day $US:
€uro
Crude