Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
hopefully that new cusip and name change will hit soon. Watch out shorts. This is gonna fly.
I'm in at .0002. Wouldn't buy for anything more. I'm el cheapo!!
I think I'm falling in love with chnw.
yeah a .0006 close????
might not but I'll continue to wait and keep my order in place.
trade, are you going to give us your take on yesterdays pr?
so far we are looking good.
any thoughts on the upcoming financials or is everyone pretty much clueless?
Per todays PR:
In positioning the company for a listing on the OTCBB exchange, iFinix has adopted policies of full disclosure and corporate transparency. 2006 annual financials are nearing completion and should be made publicly available within several weeks. At that time all itemized insider share positions, including restricted stock, will be stated. And recent corporate governance actions enacted to fully align management with shareholder interests will be disclosed.
I'm waiting for the .0002s
.0019
looks like this has the best potential to help my portfolio recover from sljb. Go INXR!! I can't wait for the otcbb listing. I look for that along with the financials and share structure to really help this take off not to mention the suite of products that are ready to roll. Man, this has a bright future. IMO anyone selling now is not thinking straight. This is a clear buy, not a sell.
Anyone have any guesses what the financials will look like??
yeah, you have to expect a retrace at some point. It can't just go up and up and up and never retrace. It's not healthy. A steady climb is nice and 20-30% days add up. Green is better than red and I'll take it anyday.
wow, in at .0002 eh? I didn't make it in till .0005 but still a nice multibagger so far.
dragon, you can update inxr up in the box. HOD is now .0021 I believe. Thanks for that pick.
dragon,
do you have a email list where you send out your picks?
same here, I'm a newb with 2.33 million shares at .0002 avg but hey, you got to start somewhere. I'm in for the long haul on this one. I like the look of the new ceo. IMO he means business.
i'll be a son of a gun. ameritrade now shows 4
That's how I have felt all along.
I just hope we can get to .006 so I can break even from that POS SLJB.
the shell would probably cost you more to buy into than just straight up buying chnw right now.
Did they use the word HUGE? I think many thought that the prezs message would get this moving but it didn't. If there is massive shorting going on even really HUGE news might only have a minimal effect and then only temporary. I can't wait for the cusip change. God I hope you're right and some news gets this thing going. I need it.
how do you know??
does anyone know if shorts can get around a name, CUSIP#, and ticker change? Any loopholes they can find or tricks they might be able to pull to not cover?
what in the world has happened to this stock??? anyone have a clue?
The key word in your post was "Forced"
Wow, thanks for the info. I hope you are right. .03 would be real sweet and fix a lot problems for me.
Are you talking of a buyout? If so, how do you know?
The reason why is because you apparently spend an enormous amount of time ensuring that companies are on the up and up. You make sure that every law is followed and no rules or broken or you're right on top of it never missing a beat. Would the same not apply for Gary Rennie or the OSC or is there no way that an illegal action could have happened here?? I'm wondering why would you now all of the sudden change your tactics or miss the fact that the affadavit might have have been illegally obtained. I would expect you of all people, based on your history, to look into this to find the cold hard truth. Just because Gary Rennie has the document doesn't as Jim says make it a public document, legally that is.
It strikes me as odd that when you obtained this info from your pal Gary, that you also wouldn't find out specifically who, from the OSC released it. For a woman of your stature one would think that would be a common or routine question so that you may present it before all the world to vindicate any possible alterior motives. After all, you do claim to play the role of detective, watchdog, or scambuster. This billing appears to fall well short of that IMO.
I would like to have the information contained in the affadavit, but only if it is obtained legally and if it was released legally. Otherwise, I might be putting myself in legal danger having obtained the affadavit in an unethical manner. Certainly you can understand that point of view.
Now Janice, there is no need to hurl accusations. I sense a hint of anger or malice in your writing as if I have upset you but that is not my intention and I'm sorry if that is what I have done. I assure you that I have the nerve. I only wish to understand your side of this issue along with JB to see exactly what has transpired concerning the release of the affadavit.
I know it was posted here, but what I'm talking about is obtaining the document from an official web site, such as the OSC, or being able to obtain the information from the source-the OSC. I guess what I'm saying is just because the document was posted here on IHUB doesn't mean that it should have been legitamitely or legeally posted, if, in fact it was never meant to have been publically released.
Furthermore, why does this info only seem privy to Gary, JB, and JS? I have seen this "public" info no where else. Maybe someone can help me look in the right direction. I can't obtain it from the OSC and it isn't on their web site. For info that seems so public, it appears to me as pretty private. All I need to be satisfied is the releasing OSC officials name and his/her confirmation that it is public info.
Jim,
This seems to be a touchy subject for you. I believe that it matters because many think that this has not been made public info by the OSC, in which case, the release of this info by Gary and/or yourself and/or Janice might need to be investigated. That's all. So if the name of the OSC official is given and indeed this info was rightfully publically released, end of story and case closed.
Wouldn't Gary know his name? After all, they did release it to Gary, right?
Yes Janice,
Since this was public info which you have admitted to, this should be no problem at all. If you and/or Gary won't release that info, it makes it appear that you have something to hide or cover up.
anyone have a guesstamite to when the new cusip will hit? are we talking days, weeks, months?
Let them have their fun and games shorting. They will get theirs soon enough when that new cusip hits. You would think that they would start covering. I tend to think now that shorting could be a problem here since Garr said they are not financing. He didn't specifically say they weren't financing (I believe).