Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Was that good enough for you Jayman?? You went silent all of a sudden.
SO - are you saying that you KNOW there is a problem with the FINRA application for name/ticker change or are you not saying that? Be clear - and don't redirect the issue to some other problem.
The post by Hi_Lo and others related to KNOWING there was a problem with the FINRA application - not that the ticker was fraught with problems when Sharp took it over - and you know that was his point. Yet, again, you and others try to duck and dodge when you make intentionally misleading comments here by saying "I wasn't referring specifically to the FINRA application, I was referring to the company in general." Come on already - give the nonsense a rest. We'll soon know if the FINRA application is accepted or not. But right now, you and others on both sides are just guessing.
You THINK there's a problem. You don't KNOW there's a problem. You may be right; you may be wrong - but by posting authoritatively that you KNOW this to be a fact, you're intentionally trying to mislead. I've said many times - this stock is a calculated gamble. Anyone who didn't know that going in shouldn't have invested. It's all risk vs. reward. But don't post things intended to mislead.
I suggest that you learn to read before you throw out accusations and defend your fearless leader - Hi_Lo, However, since I try to be nice to people with learning disabilities, I'll paste it again for you below.
"After 10 weeks (the time it took GOFF/WNFT's approval not including the court delay) it will definitely demonstrate that something went wrong with GVSI's SEC/FINRA approval of its corporate actions (even though FINRA's own documentation says that it usually takes 3 - 4 weeks - roughly the time it took SRNW to get approval).
I already know that there are problems but we'll have to wait one more week for everyone to know for sure."
Even Hi_Lo in his response said he KNOWS.
So what you're saying is that you THINK that's what's going to happen. However, by saying you "KNOW" that's what's going to happen you're just like pumpers that you attack so much. You substitute your opinion for fact. Get lost
Chiron like Louie De Palma from the famous "Taxi" episode (probably before most of your time) where Louie can't win a bet against his co-worker, Alex. Alex lets Louie pick whatever team he wants to bet on every single day, and then Alex bets on the opposing team. That's Chiron (a/k/a, Chicken Little); whatever he says, bet the other direction.
After 10 weeks (the time it took GOFF/WNFT's approval not including the court delay) it will definitely demonstrate that something went wrong with GVSI's SEC/FINRA approval of its corporate actions (even though FINRA's own documentation says that it usually takes 3 - 4 weeks - roughly the time it took SRNW to get approval).
I already know that there are problems but we'll have to wait one more week for everyone to know for sure.
And you complain about the pumpers making stuff up??!! What a joke you are. Tell us big guy - how do you "already know that there are problems." You have inside information? Or do you mean, "I really hope/want/think there are problems, so I'm going to word my post to deceive, as usual.
You’re 7 page cut and paste posts are intended to deceive others into believing that GVSI fate has been determined by the failures of prior management. That is your educated “guess” (and your sincere hope) - but not a fact and you know it. The fate of GVSI as a viable RM candidate will be determined by whether the name/ticker change is allowed. If it’s denied - the chances for success are virtually nil. If it’s approved, the chances for a RM are quite high. It’s as simple as that; you know I’m right; no one knows what FINRA is gonna do with this; and those are the real facts.
You still didn’t say - will you admit defeat and apologize if the name/ticker change is allowed or are you gonna disappear?!
Your reply was hilarious. Who cares if GVSI vacillates up/down, over a penny/under a penny unless you’re day trading it!!?? If you’re here for the potential RM, the day to day pps is meaningless. Again - you already know that; you’re just here to misinform and misdirect. The jury is out on GVSI. We’ll know whether it’s a success or failure once we hear if the name/ticker change goes through and if there’s a RM. I’ve posted this before - if GVSI fails I’ll be the first to post that Hi_Lo and his cohorts were right. But if it succeeds, will you post an apology to Sharp for all the nasty things you’ve said or will you just disappear? I think the latter.
Again - all of your misdirection is disregarded. HMBL/TSNP was a success to investors who sold within a reasonable time of the RM and the jury is still out on GVSI. Those are the facts. Your comments are pure misdirection.
HMBL/TSNP was a huge success if you were smart and got out reasonably early. As for GVSI, no judgement can be made until we see what happens with the FINRA application and RM. Certainly not a failure unless you were weak hands and sold for a loss. But you already know all of this - the actual truth/facts just don’t fit into your anti-sharp agenda.
The money I have in GVSI is gambling money. My life doesn’t change in the slightest if GVSI goes to zero. You on the other hand are obsessed with this ticker. It’s really weird how you and several others’ lives seem to revolve around the outcome of this high risk/high reward stock. You guys really need to get a life.
So - do you really care? Are you here to save the world or make money? The answer is neither.
Yes, Yes Chicken Little. Everything is terrible. We’re all going to lose, the sky is falling - the sky is falling!!!!
You enjoy seeing the exact same information being posted every day for the past 3 months?! You call that DD? I think not.
The funniest part of your post is that you got a "like" from Hi_Lo. That must have made your day that your hero threw you a like.
Musicman99 and Airman_T just to name a few in the last few days and pumpers extraordinaire MrNormall and HokieHead flying the coop
Wow - you're a real hero!! Your barrage of relentless cut and paste posts have had such an enormous affect on the future of GVSI and have protected so many potential investors here at iHub from making a terrible mistake - LOL - what a bunch of nonsense.
See my reply to Chicken Little - you and I agree once again.
Well, I'd say we're both right. If the name/ticker change is rejected the stock price is going to plummet. If the name/ticker change is allowed and the RM is announced on the same date, the stock price will rise sharply. However, neither of these 2 options is actually going to occur. The name/ticker change will be allowed, but there is little to no chance that the RM will be announced simultaneously. My point is that you are here for one reason only - to attempt scare weak hands into selling by providing the worst possible case scenario for GVSI at every turn (although you have to be sharp enough to know that no one takes you seriously). That's why you should change your handle on iHub to "CHICKEN LITTLE." - Look it up if you're not familiar with it.
God help you bears if the name change and RM is announced at the same time. Chicken Little - you need to give it a rest; you're embarrassing yourself
"Might as well say this also, but I don't think he really cares about the share price over at $WNFT either. If he did (instead of, perhaps, "Beating Calasse!") he would have negotiated UPWARDS rather than DOWNWARDS and reached a settlement with Calasse long ago. Instead, the court case drags on and the pps turned to crap. (Well, that's actually a good thing if you want "cheap shares"). Hell, I also think that GS might not even care about the shareholders sometimes"
I totally agree with that statement. GS could've likely cut a reasonable deal early on and ended the WNFT fiasco long ago. But Pride is one of the seven deadly sins and I think it got the better of GS on the Calasse debacle. I happen to think when he made his "Promise Land" tweet, he did have a tentative deal in place (just my opinion) and ended up losing that RM deal due to the extended delay caused by the appeal - which he underestimated. Not sure that he doesn't care about the shareholders since he makes more money than we do on any RM deal; but I think his ego does get in the way of good business sense at times.
You think GS is going to be moved because a few small potatoes shareholders complain to him on Twitter or elsewhere that they're upset with the delays?! I'm optimistic on his trifecta (especially SRNW and GVSI), but I have seen enough of GS's banter to know he will not care one bit if people complain - he does what he wants to do at his own pace for his own reasons. I know that's frustrating for many, but that's just the reality here. Either accept it and find something else to focus on while we wait; or sell and never look at another GS shell again. The choice is really that simple.
His tweet actually said that WNFT had reached the promised land because it had shed it's GOFF persona to become WNFT (check it and tell me if I'm mistaken, but that's what I recall). So he did say within that tweet that the reason HE viewed it to be the promise land was because the name/ticker change had gone through. I think that was a miscalculation because clearly no one cares about the name/ticker change - they care about the RM and were hoping/assuming this meant the RM was imminent. By making that "miscalculation," I think you'll find that there will be very little pop in the pps when GVSI's name/ticker change goes through since most will have the WNFT experience to fall back on.
So, you want to turn this into a FORW discussion? I was commenting on his GVSI posts. The "I don't care about the share price" comments clearly did not mean long term - they meant short term - and we all know that. I understand your frustration with FORW. I may ultimately have the same frustration here if GVSI lingers indefinitely. But right now, the share price doesn't really matter unless your trading it day to day. Once the name/ticker change is completed/approved, if we still have no indication that he cares about the share price for 6 months, then I may come over to your camp - but not now.
I've said before that the "promise land" tweet was terrible and I think GS knows it. Clearly, he miscalculated on the duration and impact of the Calasse litigation on WNFT. However, that does not mean that many here aren't completely twisting and taking out of context many of George's other comments (and it would be nice if one of you self-respecting bears would at least admit that).
Complete nonsense. Do you think that GS meant that he doesn't care about the share price - period; OR that he meant, I don't care about the day to day fluctuations in the share price caused by traders?? We all know that you knew which one he meant but, as usual, twisted it to fit your agenda.
Yes - I'm sure that's the most reasonable explanation. He's spending lots of money and time hiring attorneys/CPA's to pursue the share cancellation process and the FINRA name/ticker change because he doesn't care about GVSI anymore. OR - the ticker/name change time period has not been long enough to warrant any concern; and there is some issue with the share cancellation process that is being worked on and not yet being disclosed. I'll take option 2
Now that's at least a reasonably response. I don't agree with everything you state, but it's not without merit. I do NOT think 2 months waiting for a response from FINRA is a long time or that it signifies there is a problem. Could there be a problem with FINRA - of course. But there could also be no problem at all - 2 months is not a long time to wait. I happen to agree with you that there should have been some explanation from GS as to what is happening with the share cancellation process. SRNW got its hearing scheduled quickly and resolved the cancellations. GVSI has provided essentially no guidance or updates as to what's going on with that. So I think your criticism there is valid (although I don't think the share cancellations were of such great significance, but the lack of updates is wrong by GS).
"Absolute nonsense, First, it’s been 9 weeks since George submitted the ticker change request. In my opinion, something is wrong. Either Finra outright denied or had follow up questions, or there is an appeal happening."
So long as you feel it "powerfully" it must be true. Come on man - give the nonsense a rest. At least Hi_Lo gives his cut and paste nonsense analysis over and over. The least you could do is be a bit creative in your bashing.
There you go again with your nonsense twisting. Only you would describe Hi_Lo's barrage of posts (I'm guessing 5 to 10 per day) of his cut and paste attacks on GVSI as "pointing out flaws" - as if it's intended to be constructive criticism. The guy is clearly a basher. It's his right to do so, but let's be real here.
Yes yes Chicken Little. We’ve heard you on that issue.
Crickets from Hi_Lo. I guess that means he won't be able to accept/handle it and admit he was wrong if the name/ticket change is approved (as most of us expect it will be). Hi_Lo, it takes a bigger person to admit when he's wrong - no shame in doing that
Hi_Lo - you didn't answer whether you'll congratulate all of the bulls here and admit you were wrong if GVSI gets its name/ticker change approved and has its RM prior to WNFT
Understood. Time will tell who is right and who is wrong on the points you raise in this post. What I can tell you is that I'll be very happy if WNFT ends up being successful and will congratulate you on being right. Will you do the same for me if GVSI's name and ticker change are approved by FINRA?
I can't help you; you clearly don't understand what I was saying in those prior posts. I simply don't have the time or the inclination to explain or educate you - especially since you seem to be here with the same agenda that you compatriots (Chiron, HiLo, Starlost, Banner, etc.) have. Not worth the time it would require for me to make you understand. Wish you well in life, hope you make money somewhere, but done with you.
I'm well aware of George's "promise land" post - that's why I referred to it. George has been mocked for referring to the GOFF name change as the "promise land." The reality is that the name change might have lead to the real promise land (the RM) had the GOFF/WNFT litigation with Calasse not continued. In GVSI's case, if they get the name/ticker change though, there is no KNOWN litigation on the horizon. Doesn't mean litigation won't pop up, just nothing we are aware of yet from those share cancellation actions.
You're delusional. I quoted one of your posts in which you twisted another post in such a manner that you knew wasn't intended in order to make it appear to be an attack on GS. It fits your pattern. Done with you.
see my post #145464.
You’re losing it. I couldn’t care less what you think of me. I own all 3 tickers. They’re all gambles. I view WNFT as the longest shot of the 3 right now but would still be ecstatic if it hit - just don't expect much from it for awhile. As far as you and your posts - can’t remember if I replied to you or one of the others like you (banner, starlost, Chiron, etc) with an example of your “twist and turn.” When I get a chance I’ll look and find it. You’re all a bunch of whiners who live and die for posting relentless nonsense on this board in an effort to try to convince others to sell. Not sure if you do it because of personal hatred towards GS or to steer people to another ticker. Don’t know and don’t care.