Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
“Let’s light this [VPLM] candle!”
How so? Who can force a CEO to change the terms of private employment contract? Please explain why Emil “didn’t have a choice.” Opinions are one thing, facts require proof!
Complete & utter BS! Since when does our government dictate the terms of an executive’s employment contract in a non-governmental industry?
What alleged “govt regulatory” body controls employment contracts? The Department of Boggie Menz? Now that’s some funny stuff.
———
“He is doing it under govt regulatory pressure!”
Apple loses mandamus request to transfer case out of Albright’s court in Koss case. Why is Apple so afraid of claims construction hearings in any court? Weird!
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/node/27309
And BTW...I’ve never been proven wrong that VPLM pps is STILL less than $ 0.14!
Hey DB...have you noticed...the price is STILL less than $ 0.14 per share. This kind of sucks for those who got in at those levels. LMFAO!
Be well...
For those who need refresher on ADR dates and why there was no “big” news by the end of March, see this post...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=162954005
New documents available in N CA Apple case.
> N CA Apple - Doc 76 Stipulation
> N CA Apple - Doc 76-1 Declaration of Modi
> N CA Apple - Doc 76-2 Proposed Order
You really should pay your secretary more in salary...she must be pretty good and on top of VPLM happenings!
Lol...secretary! You must be making more than Emil if you can afford a secretary!
Feels like this is true for many following VPLM..
“When one door of happiness closes, another opens, but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one that has been opened for us.” — Helen Keller
Not sure why anyone would think there would have been any news by the end of March when the first ADR is scheduled to go through this coming Friday which is 4/9. And the joint statement is due to be filed on or before 4/23. These dates are taken directly from the court docket ADR stipulation.
Does mean I’ve never been proven wrong about about the VPLM ADR? SMFH!
Sub penny? Na never going back. Besides the “always correct” price would be $ 0.14 per share. After all, why buy VPLM low when you can get in at such a great price! Lol!
One other point...VPLM had previously entered a consent statement to agree to dismiss all 4 cased in W. TX. Just caught that in the W TX dismissal.
No stays...cases against ATT & Verizon (Cellco) were dismissed in W TX. The only interesting thing about this order in Waco is that the motion was initiated by ATT & Verizon whereas in the Apple case, VPLM requested the dismissal. Kind of makes you wonder who is willing to discuss any settlement and who isn't. Remember, Apple approached VPLM to discuss the ADR route to end the lawsuits.
So, the only remaining cases in Waco are Amazon, Facebook, and Google.
Lol. Trust me grammar is NOT my strong point. If you’ve read any of my stuff you’ll see that.
As far as the negotiations, I agree that they could be talking and addressing ANYTHING in regards to the lawsuits & patents. Both sides would be foolish not to ask for the world in hopes agreeing to a mutually beneficial end result. What the “world” is for each party is certainly debatable however I don’t think anyone on this board knows for sure unless they are actually in on the meetings with the lawyers.
As I like to say, time will reveal how this ends.
Good Luck To All!
“Tough” sticking out? I don’t want to know...lol
Thinking you meant “tongue”. And yes, I am playing the grammar police today. ????
NBD. Everyone on both sides speculate on what they think will happen. All are entitled to our own opinions.
These questions are worse than the teasers on the 10’o’clock nightly news! ??
Yep...bottom paragraph of page 2 into page 3 states...
“On December 10, 2020, counsel for Apple contacted counsel for VoIP-Pal, seeking VoIP-Pal’s agreement to dismiss its case against Apple in the WDTX along with a covenant not to sue Apple concerning the...(page 3)... ‘606 and ’872 patents. See Declaration of Lewis E. Hudnell, III; Exhibit 1 (12/10/20 Letter of A. Modi to L. Hudnell).”
Only time will tell how the new VPLM case developments will turn out. Until we see the final joint statements from the parties...
“Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.”
— George Bernard Shaw
So are you saying that the Bigs won’t agree to dismissing all the cases & Koh will proceed with a fair trial? Talk about a dream world. We’ll see who’s right in time.
I’m impressed you know a rudiment but come on DB...it was worth at least a Triple Ratamacue damn it!
No dream...right in the court docs. When they dismiss this becomes reality.
One other point...with the documented claims of and perceived bias against VPLM by Koh in the last cases she dismissed prior to claims construction, would it be a wise career move for her to pull the same shenanigans again? No judge would want multiple claims of bias on their record if they have future aspirations of higher court appointments.
Yes she could but the Bigs would still need to provide the data for their defense of non-infringement. Check out the schedule order dates.
I’m getting a lot of questions on July 21,2021 dismissal date. Here are a few of my thoughts on why. Purely speculation on my part but it sure feels like some are playing checkers while Hudnell is playing chess.
- July 21st is the day before the scheduled claims construction hearing. I think this is a brilliant move by Hudnell to squeeze the Bigs. Remember, the infringement cases were stayed pending the outcome of the Declaratory Judgement cases so if they don’t settle or get dismissed, all parties will need to provide their “evidence for” or “defense against” infringement PRIOR TO (ie April, May, June) the actual claims construction hearing on July 22nd. None of the Bigs want to “open their kimono” to this data. Especially Apple whose own expert accidentally admitted they are using VPLM technology at the PTAB trial...which contributed to Apple losing both IPR trials on the merits of the arguments.
- As I understand, VPLM & the Bigs are still holding the scheduled settlement conferences. The future date of dismissal in the shadow of the settlement meetings throws the Bigs the proverbial olive branch to play fair. If they are reasonable with VPLM, the cases will get dismissed. If not, VPLM can retract their dismissal motion and compel claims construction to proceed.
- Check out Document 61 Case Management Order in the N CA Apple case. It has the hearing dates listed for the case.
Might want to read the legal documents...
“VoIP-Pal’s covenant not to sue and its voluntary dismissal of the WDTX action divests the Court of jurisdiction over Apple’s claims of both noninfringement and invalidity.” This means Koh would lose her jurisdiction over the 606 & 872 lawsuits...so they would not be invalidated.
Keep in mind, the actual infringement cases have never been heard or proceeded yet. They were stayed pending the outcome of the Declaratory Judgement cases file by Apple et al.
If the Bigs had VPLM over a barrel and finally had a chance to crush VPLM, Why would they, the defendants (Apple et al), contact VPLM asking for them to dismiss the infringement lawsuits? Hmmm.....
NEW FILING --- VPLM dismissing all cases against Apple, Twitter, ATT, & Cellco in both N CA & W TX. Document 75 posted to my Google Drive. I only posted the Apple doc as the other 3 are basically a mirror image of the Apple doc.
Right...some call that line of thinking cognitive dissonance.
And that’s how we got the Fellowship of the Chairs!
Just a SWAG here but think I’m really close...
1) Couldn’t afford the office furniture any longer?
2) Their lease promised a clear view of Mt. Rainier everyday but have only seen it 3 times in all the years they’ve leased the office?
Good points V. Michael Dell started Dell Computers from a college dorm room, which was a temporary address.
I knew it...another Avatar cover up. Damn it. How did we miss it? The clues were right there for us all to see.
That’s it, I’m dumping all my shares tomorrow and investing in Squatty Potty instead. Wait, did I just say I’m dumping...
I did...BFD. Are you laughing because they don’t operate out of their physical office address? I’ve worked from my dining room table for the last 6 years and do quite well for myself. Does that mean I’m any less of a business man than the fools who have to trek to an office every day?
Anyone who’s ever had P&L responsibilities for a business knows the feign concern over virtual office is a big fat nothing burger. Again, why is this a big deal?
Again, this board cracks me up. I started & operated a successful real estate rental business set up as a single member LLC for over 10 years. I had multiple rental units and it was run completely from a PO Box l...there was no need for office space however because I was incorporated I had to have a physical office address for my assigned Corporate Agent.
This physical address is necessary for legal purposes only (ie filing/receiving legal documents,etc) and had absolutely zero bearing on how ran my business. Guess what...I chose to use a virtual office because it saved me a shit load on expenses.
For a company like VPLM that has software or intellectual property for sale and doesn’t require a bunch of floor space to operate, it makes financial sense to skimp on the real estate and find more effective ways to deploy their limited capital. Why is this such a big deal here?
But but but they’re desperate & forum shopping. LoFL!
VoIP PAL.com Inc.
7215 Bosque Boulevard
Suite 102
Waco, Texas 76710
Heard there was a Dr Pepper machine right outside the door.
And please check on the office furniture to ensure it arrived in good working order....in case you haven’t heard yet, there should be $12,000 worth! ROTFLMFAO!
Man, this board cracks my shit up. I sometimes wonder how many have any real life business experience or owned a business that was fighting to survive because their product was ripped off by others. I still can’t comprehend why there is such big effort to rip on VPLM for just trying to survive & protect their patent property rights! Should they just roll over and give up? WTF!