Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
R&G also hit 43-0 last year right? (including the cases argued before the United States Supreme Court)
Whatever you say Ram. LOL!
Yeah, right. Once again we agree to disagree.
Nope. Before the Microsoft settlement SFOR was down to its last $35K.
According to the last Q they had $360K left. No telling what cash flow has been since March 31 to now. You believe it has been anemic. I don't. Time will tell which of us is right.
"May have started there." No may about it! Jesse Livermore spent years learning his tradecraft in the bucket shops until he did so well so often they started to close their doors to him.
We agree then to disagree that the partners were or were not involved. As far as "bettter things they can be doing" is concerned the decision to commit their legal resources in such a robust way to defend SFOR IP would be their responsibility.
You haven't examined the CVs and experience of the partners, have you?
They are not the lightweights you imply!
Which was well over a year ago when conditions forced his hand to do so. Jan 2016 was the sea-change for SFOR with the Microoft settlement. But, thank you for the history lesson.
True, "bucket shops" is what he started out in. That was the 20th century equivalent of the OTC.
Not according to Jesse Livermore, the 20th century's greatest stock investor who stated "I made the most money doing nothing." and "Buy right, sit tight." Longs have done and shared their DD on SFOR. We do have patient capital invested here.
How long did the "heavyweight" partners spend researching SFOR's IP and the Phone Factor/Microsoft case before even accepting their defense? Do you honestly think the firm's partners were not involved?
Au contraire. As one example, review the CV of the R&G female lead attorney working on SFOR's behalf. With her MIT background before law school she has a debth and breadth of expertise and experience that is formidable. After reviewing the CVs of the other members of her entire team please inform us which are lightweights. Thank you!
Drag out the old R/S chestnut! Even though CEO Mark Kay has stated none is needed in the forseeable future. Guess I'm one of those die hard follower who believes in the man who has always been a straight arrow with me. Long & Strong SFOR!
With any NDAs or US Government Confidentiality Statements he legally would have to do so.
Yeah, thanks for finding and posting that! It bolsters my confidence in the TPG Strike Force buyout possibility.
Agreed. SFOR trades sideways in this current narrow channel until catalyst news hits the street. I can't wait for the June webinar to give up another peak behind the veil!
The TPG partner Bloomberg interviewed on TV last month confirmed that. When asked about acquisitions this year he stated "We will be acquiring small computer software companies in the cyber security landscape." SFOR fits that taget description very nicely IMHO.
Is it a technical mistake by Etrade to list SFOR on the NSDQ or what?
"Alverez and ACS are SFOR's fully vetted vendors to the US Government" is what was written because they are fully vetted Federal vendors!
Bingo! There it is MFA/OOBA use in CAC ALREADY! The only problem it's Gemalto's infringed enhancement based on SFOR IP. You wonder why Ropes and Gray are suing them? Can you imagine the amount of settlement or damages from this case alone? It staggers the mind!
Agree. "It this stuff doesn't grab ones attention, then one has to be 6 feet under or had a lobotomy." Also, I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy. Although they both achieve the smam thing, one permanently the other temporarily.
Folks, please read RDY2Rock's post # 161060 dated 5/5/17. Then follow the entire thread including contributions from: Gold49er, heartbreakinhitman, myself and WBC. This shoud resolve any question about US Government purchase of SFOR product after you verify the source material we all cite. Please keep in mind both Alverez and ACS are SFOR's fully vetted vendors to the US Government.
Did you bother reviewing RDY2Rock's post on selling to the DOD? There's your answer and you know it.
DISA has been looking to replace the cumbersome CAC system for a couple of years! Now you know why the ACS briefer stated they are working with both DISA and DARPA. Review RDY2Rock's post # 161060 dated 5/5/17 to complete your DD on selling to the DOD.
Yeah, just ignore the ACS briefer who stated they are working with both DISA and DARPA.
MSFT was stand alone. 7 infringers are in SFOR's lawyers sights now. The domino theory may come into play here.
Is it true Mark Kay is in robust health and staying on the job? Just a rumor...no facts.
"Downward sprial"? It closed green!
One case settled and silver land!
The Q stated SFOR had in excess of $360K left. That is ten times as much as the company had just prior to the Microsoft settlement! From the information cut off date, 3/31, that figure has not been static with both ongoing cash flow and expenses. How can you definitely say SFOR is "broke"?
What coud be the impacts on the common if that happened?
Yeah, a $9.7 million lump! That settlement money was desperateky needed by SFOR at the time. It was down to its last $35K in the bank. You LOL about it. I applaud it since SFOR survived to fight another day in court against 7 more infringers.
As along term investor I'm a patient man because I know what I own. I can wait until November but understand this does not meet others timeline.
The 2 million in volume indicates wait and see mode to me. Many people are waiting to see the details of those deals and what comes out in the courtrooms and US Patent Office. A prudent thing to do IMHO.
Welcome to the world's greatest casino, the stock market! Madames et Monsouirs, place your bets. I'm betting (speculating) on SFOR. Others are betting against its success. That's both our rights to do based on our respective DD. Opinions on the information just vary.
I guess as long as Markman Hearings are happening!
"First Data Corp owned by TPG" There it is again, that Texas Pacific Group outfit! Interesting connections: SFOR, ACS, First Data Corp., TPG.
Greenmail however is a possibility. Although Mark Kay stated the company was 2 years away (at the time of the interview) if TPG offfered even half a billion dollars it would be hard for him to turn down IMHO.
No PR "news" but Markman Hearing "news" from Pacer. You'll recall that is what motivated Microsoft to settle. SFOR lawyers have now pulled that legal gun! That is, in a way, newsworthy IMHO.
I can understand the need for Non Disclosure Agreements.