Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Absolutely amazing that one would assume they know whether or not vldi has any endpoints. After all, if the company is in stealth mode, wouldn't that indicate that nobody really has an understanding of what their level of Market penetration is?
Uh, I think we as a group will decide when we've spoken enough about Seeking Alpha. Talking about this moron called Karl43 and the veracity of the Seeking Alpha article and it's writer have actually been a nice break from the same old stuff we usually hear.
You haven't pointed out A SINGLE erroneous statement or disproven ANY truth claims of the article.
This forum has entered a quiet period
Preferably someone without an obvious axe to grind. My understanding is he was kicked out of the group.
It's there anyone here that has actually SEEN a working product.
Waiting. Whatcha got, gello? Seriously?
17728, paragraph 2. Everyone look before it's deleted.
Qoute:
"As far as going sub penny this stock has been there before and getting it there this time should happen fairly easy..."
Getting it there... AKA manipulate by influencing other investors to sell cheap.
Go ahead and delete this one too. You've deleted every other one of my posts that have pointed out the truth. Busted.
Well, best of luck "getting it there".
I think everyone should read post 17728, paragraph 2, with open eyes. It explains a lot.
There have been sales of failed products. So sales and revenues have nothing to do with whether VLDI has it or not. I find it interesting that you actually have put yourself in a position where having a failed product would be more satisfactory for you.
The nature of what Bruce is claiming can't possibly result in a sub-dollar price. He either has it or he doesn't. If he does, the acquisition would be NO LESS THAN 10 billion. The PPS is either 0 or $12 minimal.
Validian's technology makes any and all Validian-enabled applications and the data within those Validian-enabled environments immune to such attacks, including attacks via a zero-day vulnerability through any operating system or other means, immune to the ransomware attack itself and immune to any and all known and unknown forms of cyberattacks
IMMUNE: That is the strongest term from Bruce to date. No ambiguity
So the idea that Bruce will file the 10-q late again is the explanation for this stock doubling in price? I don't understand how that is even plausible.
So nobody has any sane ideas? I am seriously confused by why this would double in price in just one week. Especially when you consider that there has been no news. Strange.
I'm happy about it to be sure, but it sure has me scratching my head
No news and yet this thing continues to climb. Does anyone know or have any inkling what is going on?
So clients are lining up to resist implementation? Why? Does anyone know of a major or large corporation that is testing VP or in serious direct talks with Bruce?
Agreed. I'm guessing the are a number of large shareholders jumping ship. JMHO
Bold predictions unfulfilled equal a decimated reputation.
Quiet period.
Really? Since the words invention, invented, and the name Bruce Ben were used several times, it sure sounded like he was being criticized. On the other hand, I saw no mention of the words upper management
So..... Are we criticizing Bruce for his limited role in the development of Bluetooth?
Unquestionably. The best way for Bruce to alleviate that frustration is to show me the product. If it is true that we have the Valdian modules pumping out applications with validian protect as its primary security apparatus, name one. If we're pumping them out like an assembly line, naming one shouldn't be a problem.
I feel that he owes it to his investors to achieve a greater level of transparency and in helping us to believe his truth claims. If other investors have seen it in action, why do I deserve to see it in action any less? Maybe I don't have millions pumped into this thing, but I have good honest money pumped into this thing. It's entirely unfair and he is showing the little people on his investment dossier little to no respect.
Agreed, Pip. We need something real and tangible. News aimed at investors instead of inside baseball material aimed at industry insiders.
Either that or a web-based online demonstration of the product. Without one of those two things, the price will continue to crater and you will continue to see these "strong hands" letting go of Validian in a continued Mass Exodus
Ok..... Why do you believe that?
Exactly. The idea that there aren't a number of shareholders out there pushing the panic button and dumping their stock strikes me as inordinately stupid.
Bruce's inability or lack of desire to do any press releases that are targeted toward shareholders is causing a major hemorrhage of shareholders and a dumping of a massive amount of shares.
Scott trade shows. 071 bid .075 ask
That's better. So you agree that a very smart man who has been stockpiling validian shares is looking out for his best Financial interests. Looks like you're turning over a new Leaf.
That's better. So you agree that a very smart man who has been stockpiling validian shares is looking out for his best Financial interests. Looks like you're turning over a new Leaf.
Surwin is right. We should definitely not pay attention to the man behind the curtain. Especially one with ulterior motives. LOL
I've always enjoyed when a person makes a decision to break up the monotony by interjecting with some emotional maturity.
I don't know a single person invested in vldi that made the investment based on a solid strategy for a retirement future. The investment is simply taking a shot at a potential barn burner.
I think that's one of the things the Penny Preacher finds so frustrating about this forum. The detractors seem determined to adhere to traditional ways of thinking when it comes to investment. Investing in vldi or any other penny stock, you can throw traditional thinking built on technicals out the window. Even the traditional way of reading penny stocks, press releases, and progress has to be thrown out the window when you consider what is being? accomplished here. The business plan and the approach towards a potential buyout is anything but traditional as well.
I know I may receive some backlash and snarky comments from The Usual Suspects. I've always been amazed that it seems to be open season on some of us when it comes to insulting our intellect. I'm over it. There are two different schools of thought here. There are those of us that are taking a shot at a once-in-a-lifetime investment based on what we believe is transpiring. On the other hand, there are those that are technical traders that swing trade this stock which is also fine. However, I think that it is insulting to continuously pound on investors by calling the stock a POS. It does nothing to advance the conversation. Those that read this forum have read that particular phrase ad nauseam. Enough already. Let those of us Who are dreamer investors have our dream, and let those that swing trade on technicals have their fun as well. That is all.
What hype?? Lol, we get press releases about 6-8 weeks apart. They're always geared toward pipeline clients and never toward the investment community. If anything, there's a complete lack of hype. That's my chief complaint about Bruce and VLDI. MAYBE it's just not his style.
That's a good idea. I would buy at sub penny. Is anyone offering shares for less than a penny?
For Pete's sake, why? You've concluded that this is a scam and that Bruce is illegitimate as a CEO and that VLDI is destined for failure. What were you hoping to achieve by going through all that material?
The recent goldfish analysis leads me to believe that this group is having no trouble celebrating 420. Lol
I guess I'm confused. You said that you believe ganthet is a shell company based on the facts and due diligence of the group, but then you used the caveat "in my opinion". So is your assessment based on opinion or fact?
Why would a payment from ganthett cause any personal reassessment? If the facts indicate that Ganthet is a shell company, why would a payment cause any reassessment?
So are we asserting as a group that if the 10K shows a payment from ganthet, that it isn't really a shell company at all?
And if it is also the assertion that people are going to ride this all the way to zero, then the stock is in fact tightly held?
Just wondering
What do you base that on?