Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
But you always mention it on this board, no?
Groovy. Our blimp can use whatever applications are out there and perform any application.
If you had to guess, what exactly Is happening to the argus. Being actively tested. In the hanger waiting? Or in a box?
You keep mentioning review periods, what does that mean?
The only thing that sounds familiar to that is the period when insiders cannot trade their shares because of forthcoming news.
Cool,
So far, all evidence suggests that such a product is not practible. There are many current alternatives. Maybe a Strat would be different with it's ability to cover more area, I don't know. But just from my little research and from defense news posted here, the military is happy with the flying UMVs.
So whatever hope I had for a HUGE payoff is gone. I don't think the company can survive long enough to produce a Strat unless revenue from either GSAT operations or capital from someone who believes, to pay-off debt.
The last few times I ordered shares "all or none" the oders were not placed. Someone here suggested that I not click that box.
Because it's in the contract that he would receive it?
You have to scroll down to see it.
I for one feel management has done well.
The SP is where it is, I think, because of the lack of contracts and the uncertainty of the airship. How is that management's fault?
And they work.
Eh, I been saying for years, but nobody cares.
For border patrol, proven teathered areostats are sufficient.
And it seems that the military is enamored with winged unmanned ships.
Their most recent comment tells me that's it's doing nothing.
So let it be written.
The value is fair. There are no items on plus side in determining its FMV to be more than what it is. If the company cannot produce it's own revenues soon it will be gone. Not my opinion.
I for one do understand. TAO's ship been flying for ten years and I don't think he ever sold one.
And deny the faithful their forum to compliment management?
Please keep the comments coming.
He did say it was a story.
$5 by August
Someone needs to get the facts correct, but good try. Thank you.
And considering that parent company World Surveillance Group Inc. produces a variety of unmanned, lighter-than-air UAVs that can carry the hardware necessary to provide satellite communications most anywhere, it's clear they had the right set of offerings to provide services that found themselves very much in demand
It's irrelevant. We need our own costomers/contracts. we use their system. It's not the other way around.
I am burdened by the weight of this paltryness and doldrums
How much time is there?
With the SP at this level they may blow thru the number of authorized shares soon and may have to ask for more. Will they get it this time?
Other than three or four, you will soon find more people venting their frustration.
Unless there is a note in the financials describing the revenue, only being privy to the books could someone ascertain whether the revenue is revenue from sales or an accounting entry.
Run
I'm pretty swamped right now to delve into it deeply, but it’s still a POS. They converted some debt into capital, hip hip hoorah!
Where’s the revenue? At this time all this fiscal and monetary transactions is just good fodder for the board. It’s show time mide. Clap your hands on the improvements, but they need revenue before the shares run out.
Me too. But still not counting on it.
I don't believe I'm missing the point. And there is nothing other than faith that you can use to prove your point. So I have no time to waist on your TA board, sorry.
Run
The more sane explanation being that at 4 cents it's not worth the risk.
Koplin can make airships. What good did that do.
The issue is whether there is a market for them. Time will tell.
There are a lot worse cases.
How many spokes can our wheel hold?
You can take that off the opinion page.
Why would they buy it if they been using others, from approved vendors, for years? Look at Nils post about the recent contract.
I know that you think it should be on the border, but that thought is not in the minds of those that make those decisions.
There are already many proven aerostats that could handle this job. For border control, I don't know why the Gov't would need a free flying airship. I think our hopes should be more focused on military applications.
I posted a while ago that the persistent links and references to Globalstar recent advances mean nothing to GTC. GTC uses their network, not the other way around. If GTC became huge, it would be good for Globalstar.
Such doldrums and paltryness. We need an irrelevant link or reference to brighten up the day
Too bad we do things in 0s.
It's fun to draw random dots on paper and connect them any way you wish.
GLTAL,
run
Do you have any data, any data at all, to have such a opinion?
"likely to have"
But that's two spring fishing seasons that you'll miss on your new boat!
Aeroastro may be a competitor of GTC?
I wonder if they have revenue.
I have no idea what these liabilities are.