Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You're not reading the same one I am though it was easy as pie to follow as well as see why they will win lol
And you know very well had that been what really happened he would be in jail right now...c'mon you can't attempt to now be a private investigator or detective now too?lmao...again let's stick to the actual cold hard facts vs hearsay its not working anyway
The motion will be granted it's easy to see what happened
No he did not..post ur proof...and I'm quite aware how multiple companies work in own more than one...post the proof to back up that statement or you need to stop posting lies im.not the first to tell you this
For one he didn't take any money that was collected for payroll thts a pretty brave claim having zero actual knowledge of what happened....you can say it 1000 times but the facts and common sense,and knowledge of how tht works state otherwise....whts collected and what's due are two different amounts
If I were a CEO of a staffing company a brilliant move would possibly be to file late let the stock drop the buy even more up cheaper and cheaper before big news and a moonshot rise?IMO Go LTNC!
Good news thnks go DCAC!
Link please?
It also says essentially "if there are shares to convert" which there weren't...semantics don't matter they wouldn't want stock in a company you claim is in such horrible shape then and still now in the complaint so there goes that argument lol
I read it....funny how there's no exhibits showing they demanded payment in cash first? also funny how they STILL want stock for a company some say is tanking....he paid off hundreds of thousands on other notes why spend $3k + to fight a battle he can't win? Because there's more to the story...it doesn't matter anyway it's chump change but the takeaway is he thought he could make money through his DD meaning he felt the company is on the right track and I'm not underwater I'm way above water with my shares
I've read everything related to the case,you should read the agreement where it defines default etc...but again Prometheus demanded stock right away not payment...#1 that's backwards #2 why request stock of a company where they couldn't make any $$$
Interesting fact...Prometheus claims in the complaint they bought $15,000 of a note from Tailwind that totaled $106,000 dated July 8,2014...Ryan paid off Tailwind $106,000 from a note dated the same day recently among many other notes...and who would send an email requesting payment lol nobody who knows what they are doing it would be sent registered mail
I can sue you tomorrow for fraud it doesn't mean you committed fraud...if you read the lame complaint it says something very interesting in the very first paragraph Prometheus wanted LTNC to pay the $15,000 in the the form of STOCK! Why would they want stock vs Cash????because they know it will go up of they thought it was headed down to no bid they would never ever request stock just cash
Saying it every day won't make it happen and it won't happen CEO owns 2 billion shares people do you really think he's not going to protect that investment....bet with your brain not with your heart
Ask the guy who filed it????lol what do u think he will say he is going to be counter sued for the games he was trying to play...I could sue you tomorrow and win an injunction it doesn't mean ur guilty...this will never go to trial do u realize how few cases ever make it to trial for numerous reasons even when real actual hideous acts are committed????
I said "semi- hostile" which is a term I dubbed when other entities are trying to force a company to sell on their terms which is exactly what happened
Not false at all they tried to steal the company
http://www2.staffingindustry.com/Editorial/Daily-News/Labor-SMART-rejects-acquisition-deal-default-notice-in-dispute-34215
Exactly CEO'S don't purchase as many shares as Ryan just to throw it away...as well CCNI wouldn't have tried to do a semi hostile takeover of a company tht wasn't heading up and up
Not a train wreck at all if you know whts going on and understand business im locked and loaded and will buy more whenever I can and when the price warrants it before it shoots up
As always everything stated is factually incorrect just like when u said BK and RS months ago thts what's LOL funny...not going to happen
Remember any other $LTNC co-owners wanting to pursue damages against Prometheus Capital Solutions & Steve Maese, pls email legal@laborsmart.com....im also requesting to add defendants for libel as well
That teaser video was for an internal sales competition lol...nice try tho
It is when you get cash plus keep 55% of the revenues and still operate them under the labor smart name it actually brilliant
Agreed let's hope go DCAC!
I'm totally shocked this didn't move at least some before the deadline...but maybe they didn't want everyone getting in so they could issue to mostly those who have been long
But some of my shares then lol I'm trying to get rid of $1.7 mill in an old account and nobody buying at .0002's...going to hold the larger amount in my fidelity account tho
No I said sub penny as in if you have 2,500,000 at .002 vs 2,500,00 at .0002 (triple zero) you have a difference of $4500 LTNC has highest revenue of any aub-penny stock not all are triple zeros ...im looking forward to the revenues and I'm locked and loaded like the others who know what's going on here
No most revenues for a sub penny stock period to be exact
Wrong ask the CEO directly...and it was at .0001 and has moved up and held strong with most revenues on the OTC it's laughable to those who predict BK and RS etc
As always not true....They were employment taxes money was not stolen from employees and u have zero proof otherwise as well all we ever get is speculation and guesses vs facts and please let's not revisit the 1,000 posts about toxic etc etc etc the stock has went up and is holding strong when folks predicted BK and RS 4 months ago and months before that plus command center would never have tried to do a semi hostile takeover of a turd lmao?Really ROTFLMAO jeep trying it's worked soooooooo well so far right????
Lol they can decide who the mods are?seems fair right?lol what a joke
I've been holding a long time in your (opinion only)would u hold past Monday if this rockets up? I also own LTNC as well I've seen u there holding long there too
Lol right the IRS wouldn't go after millions if they thought it was stolen and there was proof the money was "spent" call then and tell then tht ROTFLMAO
That number is old math...What's simple is the fact that if the IRS thought he "stole" money they would nvr enter into a payment plan with him he'd been in jail...end of story
Right thanks guys i guess what I'm asking is if I own shares on Friday I get issued the preferred shares(that I get in may)but if I were to sell everything monday to take my profits(hypothetical if big run) I still own the preferred shares no matter what that mature 6 months from now?
So help me out please if this jumps up I can sell most of my shares monday and take my profits but since I was in before Friday I get issued the preferred stock anyway?
It is anytime you can get cash AND still retain 55% of revenues yeah
Exactly and there is no attorney on earth who would tell a client to go on twitter and ihub to "tell their side of the story" unless they just passed their bar exam or are an ambulance chaser... I mean tht literally made me lol when I saw that....all you need to know right there plus the twitter shot of the otcmarkets removing the "story" this guy is going to be in more legal trouble then ever before bank on it
Thanks I think this will run then