Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
based on this article
http://www.laconiadailysun.com/BerlinPDF/2010/8/20B.pdf
a) does stock symbol LLEG Laidlaw have any involvement in the operations of the Berlin biomass plant
b) does stock symbol LLEG Laidlaw get any revenues when the Berlin biomas plant is operational
c) if the answer to both of these is no and shareholders of LLEG are not involved with these functions what will come to the shareholders directly from this transaction.
Thanks
you didn't post the comments....your post content is useless without it
you've come to this board posting your thoughts on something that no one else has the access to the data. It's reasonable to ask you to post the facts that you are basing your opinions on. Back your opinions with facts if you want any credibility from your posts.
you are posting thoughts not facts and you've done it 3x...I'm requesting you post facts to back your posts
why don't you post the exact words to back your post...
when I was w/fidelity you could buy at the bid and sell at the ask
most of the time..but I haven't seen that experience with a lot of these cheaper brokers.
ah ok thanks
I asked what broker you used
what broker? edit your post so you don't use another one
"who wrangled the CA company away from Anna"
how many shares did she own to begin with?
here we are on Thursday and what started out as something that looked like new information and disruptive earlier this week ended up being something we had all seen before (well those of us who took the time to dd) and didn't realize that what was mentioned before was in the process of hopefully being materialized now.
i thought you might be kidding but there was one to many lmao's in that message LOL!
what's so funny. it's down 0001 @ .0025. The bid is 0025/ask 0026. If it goes to 0026 it's even. If it goes to 0027 it's up 0001 which makes it green?
the ability to search the boards (all of them) for any stock to see if information has been put out recently could be the difference between running out of a stock because something that was intro'd you hadn't read about and staying in and blowing off the information because you read it before. You might want to consider a membership to Ihub if you want the ability to search. Like Level II it could pay for itself when you are making decisions to buy/sell/run from any stock because of new information out there. I wouldn't live without the ability to search or Level II when playing these otc's and pinksheets...
bottom line? research this board to see how much of what was confusing to folks has already been discussed on this board.
1) So far NewCo has
2) an intention of sale/leasebuyback
3) Laidlaw would operate the plant
think about it....why would they go in for a permit without a commitment to financing already in hand?
rich again
"Laidlaw is the applicant and will obtain the necessary permits and will operate the facility"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=49886487&txt2find=newco
rich sears posted in May about NewCo
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=49700901&txt2find=newco
to you and egrohs thank you. We need to figure out how NewCo is going to fit into the chart of % that's up in the ibox. But it was a good pickup on both your parts. BadGambler posted it in May also
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=49889059&txt2find=newco
1 trade for 38.5k and Nite moves back to 0027 on bid side
0028/0029 1 x 1
might be non reporting but for sure the media does a lot of reporting on Laidlaw's activities...
true...we have to wait for the company. They won't talk during negotiations. That's a kiss of death for any company and an historical behavior for most companies throughout decades.
TAP...here's information on sale/buyback. You need to wait out
and see if this is what he did. He PR'd his intentions to do that
early on.
"United States
A “sale/leaseback” or “sale and leaseback” is a transaction in which the owner of a property sells an asset, typically real estate[2], and then leases it back from the buyer. In this way the transaction functions as a loan, with payments taking the form of rent. Due to the lack of financing available in today’s market many American businesses are increasingly turning to Sale Leasebacks to provide quick capital.[3] In some arrangements, the current lessee will give the option to buy the asset back at the end of the lease. Typically if the original owner were to buy back the asset; it would take place at the end of the tax year, in case any party were to be audited by the IRS.[4]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaseback
" I use past tense because it appears that is no longer going to happen"
unless you understand how this works you won't understand
MBB already PR'd earlier about a sale/leasebuyback. I'm not going any further in my thinking than he is. This is standard in the industry. The investor wants protection for their investment. They get that with the LONG TERM power agreements. Companies like Laidlaw leaseback the business and get the financing they need. It's a win/win. So for me I don't tax my brain to think about other possibilites. I'll wait and see if this is what he said back in 12/09 would happen.
systematic dump....
shakeit...I was responding more to this
"I suspect there are many other shareholders who read this board without comment. My advice to the silent ones is to please begin posting your views. Your varied insight is valuable, and you may reap personal benefits out of the process."
stay on LLEG not other posters
TOU Reminders for Stock Specific Boards
You are posting to the Laidlaw Energy Group, Inc. (LLEG) board. Please keep your post about the stock and company. Do not post about other users or other stocks.
Your post may be removed if it contains off-topic or other content that violates the terms of the User Agreement.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These type things take posters in a direction away from the stock...they start telling you why they don't post and the board
goes chaotic.
folks if you have a question about a post follow the TOU rules. They apply to everyone across the board and are specific in the deleted post material on your page. Thanks.
shakeit...unless your post relates to LLEG it's off topic. Telling other folks to post or referring to adversaries/manipulators is not discussing LLEG. Please read the TOU beside your posting window. Any off topic or attack posts are removed acording to the TOU.
sorry I deleted it because I read it fast....the posts are on byte and chew.....google it and you'll see it
interesting observation Tap...and you are right. That actually was overlooked all day. Thanks for pointing that out.
price held up reasonably well....more than likely the folks here who were well aware of the sale/leaseback plans held their shares because unless MB says something different looks like it's going by the plans...we'll see
On another note I read the Byte & Chew. Ouch! I hope folks realize you just can't go out in 'your opinion' and post slanderous material about companies if all that isn't true....doesn't work that way in the legal system. OUCH!
I'm not sure that's the case. The intent was a sale/leaseback. That was made public as I posted earlier. We have no information to say that has changed. SALE->->->->LEASEBACK. As I posted in another document today the intent of these types of financing is to assure the investor who puts up the funds that they are secured and this is done by LONG TERM POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS. So far that appears to be in place still. Nothing may have changed here at all from the 12/09 (again posted earlier) information that was released on Laidlaw's presentation.
0029/0032
this is information on how solar plants are financed....transfer the information to the wood plants and you'll see that there is value in the project via the contract with power plants which Laidlaw has and that these arrangements are common
http://www.nacleanenergy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1129%3Acurrent-financing-of-distributed-solar-energy-projects&Itemid=115
you can see by this PR that these types of sale/leasebacks are already in existence
http://www.herrickco.com/article.php?article=2
same cast of characters that float around Laidlaw
here's another post where Laidlaw announced their plans to do a sale/leaseback....be careful to follow the companies because I think while the concept remains the companies might have changed....not sure
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=40866391&txt2find=leaseback
another post back in 2009 where we discussed the sale/lease buyback
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=41906525&txt2find=lease
I've been around here since 2001. Frequently it is discussed that when MOMO's pull out it's systematically so that panic doesn't set in. For me this is what's happening. MOMO folks don't hang around for questions...they slowly back out. Also for me this
is going as planned. All these stocks are a wait and see. If in fact nothing has changed then this could be considered a buying opportunity by many.