Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I really hope thats the case. The company has alot of experience people and a hot product they just need a big name to take it to the next level .
I hope the short sellers dont bring the price down. The volume and pricing is the best I have seen in awhile .
Come on people thats get the bid price going .
Man the ticker is smoking on the stock come on baby thats go.
Good price and volume so far I hope it continues and closes in the green. I hope something good is coming with a pr release.
Come on people thats rally hear and get this stock going .
Great day for the stock I hope it continues tommarrow.
Great volume and price thats keep it going.
Everybody needs to stop posting about the negative there is alot of positive here with the company 3D is hot you see 3D tvs, mobile devices, movies, with the hard work already being done having a distribution outlet with Hello and Media Plasma. All they need now is a well known artist signed up and the negativity will go away very quickly I am sure.
There is no trial yet the court date is 2/22 with the motion to demurrer/dismiss if that gets denied by the judge then there will be a trial. We wont know anything until 2/22.
I just called the LA court house there is no court hearing tomarrow the next court hearing is 2/22/12 and that would be a motion to dismiss /demurre.
legal defination of Demurrer.
An assertion by the defendant that although the facts alleged by the plaintiff in the complaint may be true, they do not entitle the plaintiff to prevail in the lawsuit.
The pleadings of the parties to a lawsuit describe the dispute to be resolved. The plaintiff sets out the facts that support the claim made in the complaint, and the defendant then has an opportunity to respond in an answer.
A demurrer is a type of answer used in systems of Code Pleading, established by statute to replace the earlier common-law Forms of Action. While a demurrer admits the truth of the plaintiff's set of facts, it contends that those facts are insufficient to grant the complaint in favor of the plaintiff. A demurrer may further contend that the complaint does not set forth enough facts to justify legal relief or it may introduce additional facts that defeat the legal effectiveness of the plaintiff's complaint. A demurrer asserts that, even if the plaintiff's facts are correct, the defendant should not have to answer them or proceed with the case.
Under the modern rules of Pleading established by the rules of federal Civil Procedure and followed in a number of states, the demurrer has been abolished as a formal type of answer. The same argument against the plaintiff's Cause of Action can be, however, made by motion to dismiss the plaintiff's action on the ground that he or she has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Even where the formal demurrer is no longer used, lawyers and judges often use the old term for an argument of the same type.
Germanboy this is what I just found off the LA County superior court page. Wesnesday January 25th is just the motion to Demurrer until the February 22nd court date.
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Case Number: BC461550
GEORGE SHARP VS WRITERS GROUP FILM CORP ET AL
Filing Date: 05/16/2011
Case Type: Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Future Hearings
02/22/2012 at 08:31 am in department 34 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
DEMURRER (2) MTN TO STRIKE(cont fm 1-25-12 per stip))
03/06/2012 at 08:30 am in department 34 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Conference-Post Mediation Status (NO APPR REQ IF JOINT POST-MEDREPORT FILED BY 2-21-12MSC/FSC 4-20-11; TD 4-30-12 (7 J))
04/20/2012 at 08:30 am in department 34 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Final Status Conference (AND M.S.C.TD 4-30-12 (7 J))
04/30/2012 at 10:00 am in department 34 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Jury Trial (7 DAYS)
Case Summary
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Case Number: BC461550
GEORGE SHARP VS WRITERS GROUP FILM CORP ET AL
Filing Date: 05/16/2011
Case Type: Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Future Hearings
02/22/2012 at 08:31 am in department 34 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
DEMURRER (2) MTN TO STRIKE(cont fm 1-25-12 per stip))
03/06/2012 at 08:30 am in department 34 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Conference-Post Mediation Status (NO APPR REQ IF JOINT POST-MEDREPORT FILED BY 2-21-12MSC/FSC 4-20-11; TD 4-30-12 (7 J))
04/20/2012 at 08:30 am in department 34 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Final Status Conference (AND M.S.C.TD 4-30-12 (7 J))
04/30/2012 at 10:00 am in department 34 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Jury Trial (7 DAYS)
Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
01/13/2012 Stipulation and Order ((FILED BY WRITERS' GROUP FILM CORP) TO CONT DEMURRER fm 1-25-12 to 2-22-12)
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
01/10/2012 Amendment to Complaint
Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff In Pro Per
01/10/2012 Amendment to Complaint
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
09/30/2011 Motion to Strike
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
09/30/2011 Demurrer
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
09/16/2011 Substitution of Attorney
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
08/26/2011 Proof-Service/Summons
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
08/25/2011 Notice of Continuance
Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff In Pro Per
08/25/2011 Notice
Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff In Pro Per
08/25/2011 Reply/Response
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
08/19/2011 Opposition Document (OPP TO DEFTS OPP )
Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff in Pro Per
08/19/2011 Opposition Document
Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff in Pro Per
08/18/2011 Proof-Service/Summons
Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff in Pro Per
08/12/2011 Statement-Case Management
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
08/11/2011 Notice
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
08/08/2011 Statement-Case Management
Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff In Pro Per
07/05/2011 General Denial
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
07/05/2011 Motion to Quash
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent
06/20/2011 Proof of Service
Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff In Pro Per
05/18/2011 Notice (errata )
Filed by Plaintiff & Plaintiff In Pro Per
05/18/2011 Notice-Case Management Conference
Filed by Clerk
05/16/2011 Complaint
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed
Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)
09/01/2011
I agree when this thing gets put to rest this week then I think a pr release with a big project will be annouced . I think writ is waiting until after the court case for the next PR release.
Ok thanks for the info I did not think the next court date was until like March or April.
Is the next court date this wesnesday.
Great day 1.3 million shares and up over 32% I hope the ball keeps moving the right direction. And I hope good news is coming soon.
Come on people help me out thats close this stock in the green today.
Somebody needs to kick the bid price up . Volume and asking price is good.
Nice to see another PR Release I hope they keep coming and start the ball rolling.
I agree 100% with you . I believe they will not do a pump and dump I believe there will be real news coming out the Lady Gaga deal could be the first one to start this rocket ship off the ground.
This has not been a great week for the stock I hope they release some good news pretty soon .
Looks like somebody slammed the brakes on the stock this week I hope some good news comes out soon.
Can anybody let me know when the next court date is.
I beleive news will be coming sooner then later before or after the court hearing I believe it will be before though. The distribution network is set up now then just need to sign a artist.
I hope that is the case . They should make the actual numbers of patients treated availble instead of being kinda vage on the info. I am hoping the new marketing/pr person gets the message out about CEYY and promotes it hard.
Not sure what happen with the whole Metallicca thing but I am not looking at the past but looking into the future and hold great hope. John along with the other listed on the web site have alot of experience in the entertainment industry and in the entertainment industry alot of it is in who you know to make deals happen. All this person did who brought on this lawsuit was to drive the stock price down and make writ spend alot of money on attorney fees. The person who brought on the law suit wont even say how much stock he bought or how much money he loss. Penny stocks are risky we all know that I am sure we all have made some quick money and I am sure we have all lost some quick money. I think after the lawsuit is behind or if not before we will see the stock rise to a decent price and hold firm.
Saturday, January 14, 2012Truth Is In The Eye of The Beholder
Truth Be Told-Part II
By Michael Osborn
I originally posted this article on January 12, 2012 with a copy of a letter written by George Sharp/Helischauer to an Orange County attorney. I was asked to hold off on posting the letter because George threw a bitch-fit about its contents being shared with the online world. I find it ironic how he can post half-truths about people and have NO problem with it but as soon as someone fires back at him with provable facts, he has a hissy fit. Well, based on the fact that George took a year of my life which drastically affected me and my family, I decided to clean up the content of my article and re-post the information without the attached George Sharp/Heischauer letter and I removed specific names until we receive formal written approval from all parties to post, which we will have in hand the week of the 16th . Happy reading.
Let Georges delusions continue…
On Tuesday, December 27, 2011, an email with an attached letter was sent from George Sharp/Helischauer to an attorney in Orange County.
According to the letter, the subject was Sharp v Cuba Beverage Company et al. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2011-0090093-CU-FR-CTL . After reviewing the complaint and the subsequent court filings, it is obvious that the case is without legal merit. I guess this lawsuit confirms that any joker with $125 bucks can file a lawsuit, with or without a legal foundation. If you have not had an opportunity to review the complaint (see above link), I suggest you carve out some time and get ready for some comedy. I will present the facts as I understand them to our readers and then let you decide.
April 22, 2011: George Sharp sues Cuba Beverage claiming he lost money buying Cuba's stock. Unfortunately for him, he omits to state how many shares he bought, when he bought them, what he paid for them and how much he lost on this investment. Despite the judge ordering him, two times, to amend his complaint to be more specific, he refused to do so. According to an attorney close to the matter, when George was asked for the specific information, he told the defendants that they will only find out in discovery, which is obviously displaying suscpicious behavior. When a subpoena was served on TD Ameritrade, which is George Sharp's broker, he filed a motion to quash the subpoena. When the demand for production was due which required Sharp to provide copies of his confirmations, Sharp who has been acting In-Pro-Per, had his attorney file an anti-SLAPP motion to freeze discovery.
Our research has shown that the majority of George Sharp's lawsuits appear to be cookie-cutter. This includes the lawsuits filed against Cuba Beverage, Writers Group Film, Yasheng Eco Trade, and Arena Pharmaceuticals. In each lawsuit, George Sharp refuses to say who, how, when, where, and how much he lost on his investments. These facts are required to establish foundation surrounding the claim and are normal for the plaintiff to provide to support his complaint.
What is the reasonable conclusion? Why is Sharp withholding these simple foundational facts?
Based on the fact that George Sharp is not willing to provide this simple, yet required information, one can safely argue that George Sharp either never bought any stock of Cuba Beverage or that of any of the other companies he sued or if he did make a purchase, it was a miniscule amount. This supports our continued claim that George is a frivolous lawsuit filer and will soon be formally deemed a vexatious litigant with the California Supreme Court.
Because it is hard for me to believe that anyone could willfully be this devious and schrewdly waste the courts valuable time, I would love to be wrong about George buying stock in the companies he sues. Based on Georges own actions, I highly doubt I am wrong. One solution to prove me wrong would be for George to post on www.sharp-v-cubabev.info or www.sharp-v-writ.info ALL of his trade confirmations for Cuba Beverage and Writers Group Film. I will eat crow and issue a public apology to George if he can factually prove that he purchased a reasonable amount of stock that would merit his litigation. We all know that one thing Sharp is good at doing is posting on his webblogs, perhaps this time his post could actually be supported with factual information...we doubt it though!
George has no problem posting links to complaints he has filed which he knows will negativly impact the stock price nor does he have a problem posting personal information about the insiders of these public companies to scare the investment public and therefore depress the stock price even further. If George truly has no problem with full disclosure then why would he not be willing to post proof of his purchases and therefore his losses? He can even block out his account number and his address on the confirmations if it makes him feal better. No problem! Just prove us wrong!
If he does NOT post his confirms then there is only one reasonable and logical conclusion; George Sharp is a fake and his lawsuits are total frauds filed to manipulate the price of thinly traded micro-cap companies for his own financial benefit.
Alhough I would love to continue getting into the legal merits of the complaint (or lack thereof) and the viability of George being able to maneuver his way around a courtroom during an actual trial, I think I will leave the "lawyering" up to real attorneys and just focus on specific contents of his letter.
Unfortunately, in Georges letter, instead of spending time on his supposed subject of Cuba Beverage, he decided to devote most of his letter to slamming me, including discussing my ability to pay may legal bills. Now, I’m a big boy and have a thick skin especially after being imprisoned for a year while paying my "debt" to society, so I can take his self-indulgent rants. He tried to scare the Orange County attorney by inferring that one of my former in-house attorneys left the State of California because of his conduct based on how I manipulated him and his actions. The reality was that because of his religious beliefs and changes occurring in his family, moving was the option they felt was better suited for their lives and family. Georges attempt at an underlining scare-tactic is comical...at best!
My issue here is what does any of his rants about me have to do with Cuba Beverage?
He further whines on about the disposability of my attorneys and names my formal criminal lawyer Evan Ginsburg. He states that "I throw my attorneys under the bus after I no longer find them useful". It truly amazes me how George believes his own delusional bullshit. You see, Evan Ginsburg who represented me in my criminal trial, became my attorney in January, 2010. While acting as my attorney in my on-going criminal trial (which included George Sharp as one of the States proposed witnesses) Mr. Ginsburg assigned a third-party judgment in favor of Mr. Ginsburg over to George to go collect. At that time, Mr. Ginsburg had both a legal and ethical responsibility to recuse himself as my attorney but neglected to do so. Mr. David Harter, as Georges attorney in both the criminal matter and the assignment of the judgment also had an ethical responsibility to notify all of the parties of this conflict. At the very least, David Harter is guilty of culpable negligence. The statement “he has a tendency to throw his attorneys under the bus” is not entirely factual. How would you have felt about such a collaboration? With that being said, I did make sure to protect my legal rights and “toss” a formal complaint regarding this matter into the California Bar Association and the American Bar Association.
Again, I wonder...what does this have to do with Cuba Beverage?
George continues his “know-it-all” attitude by admonishing the Orange County attorney saying, “Finally, you seem to think that you have made the discovery of some great conspiracy in naming me with an AKA of George Helischauer. If you wish to list the name properly, you need to list it as an FKA, as my name was legally and properly changed within the courts in 1997 and is listed as George Sharp with the Social Security Department, DMV and other authorities.” For starters, who the hell is the Social Security Department? Did he mean the Social Security Administration? You can tell that in the following line, he uses his words very carefully “you need to list it as an FKA, as my name was legally and properly changed within the courts in 1997” What does the phrase “within the courts” mean? Does he mean his name change was formally accepted and decreed by the courts? Well, we have gone through every civil and criminal document available through Pacer and WestLaw as well as hired a private detective and based on our research, there is no such document publicly listed proving his name change “within the courts” . The following is the report we received referring to his California Department of Motor Vehicles Report and Consumer Report from our Private Detective:
It's peculiar because in 1997, George lived in California and according to the California Courts, Judicial Branch of California, he would have had to follow several specific steps including a public announcement of his proposed name change and a formal hearing on the matter. If the name change was approved then the court would give him a decree finalizing his name change. According to the Pacer case locator, our thorough search of every national court record resulted in NO such specific steps ever being documented.
Could he have tried to do a common-law name change? According to Wiki “In California the "usage method" (changing the name at will under common law) is sufficient to change the name. Not all jurisdictions require that the new name be used exclusively.[13] Any fraudulent use or intent, such as changing the name to the same name as another person's name, may invalidate this type of name change.
Specifically in California, Code of Civil Procedure § 1279.5 and Family Code § 2082 regulate common law and court decreed name changes. Code of Civil Procedure § 1279.5 (a) reads, "Except as provided in subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (e), nothing in this title shall be construed to abrogate the common law right of any person to change his or her name." Subdivisions b through e preclude one from changing their name by common law if they are in state prison, on probation, on parole, or been a convicted sex offender. If a person is not in any of these categories, then a common law name change is allowed. Family Code § 2082 also specifically states, "Nothing in this code shall be construed to abrogate the common law right of any person to change one's name."
Official Registration
A legal name change is merely the first step in the name-change process. A person must officially register the new name with the appropriate authorities like the Social Security Administration,whether the change was made as a result of a court order, marriage, divorce, adoption, or any of the other methods described above. The process includes notifying various government agencies, each of which may require legal proof of the name change and that may or may not charge a fee. Important government agencies to be notified include the Social Security Administration,[14] Bureau of Consular Affairs[15] (for passports), the United States Postal Service,[16] and the Department of Motor Vehicles (for a new driver's license or state identification card). Additionally the new name must be registered with other institutions such as employers, banks, doctors, mortgage, insurance and credit card companies. Online services are available to assist in this process either through direct legal assistance or automated form processing.
If George is claiming the “Usage Method”, then why in 1997 did he register a new Delaware corporation under the apropos name, George A. Helischauer, Inc.?
Further, why in November of 2006, did he have a Federal Tax Lien in the amount of $85,277.00 in favor of creditor the “Internal Revenue Service” attached to the name George Helischauer, not George Sharp?
If in fact George is unilaterally operating under his statement of “my name was legally and properly changed within the courts in 1997” then why in 1991, did he register Select Database Corporation, a California company and list the officer of the corporation as George A. Helischauer? According to Dun and Bradstreet he was listed in this position through March 2006. Was George operating as both George Helischauer and George Sharp at the same time?
In December 2003, George signed a Service Agreement with Victory Capital Holdings Corp. now known as Victory Energy, as a contractor to act in various CEO roles for the company and its affiliates. Victory Capital is a public company that I helped form and sat on the Board of Directors of for several years. George stated when counsel was preparing the agreement he had to be a contractor because he was not a US citizen. According to his agreement with the company, he never disclosed under Reg. FD an AKA or FKA regarding his alleged 1997 name change. To act in an executive role of a public company that is fully reporting to the SEC, one would think that the executives AKA or FKA would be an important disclosure requirement prior to executing an agreement.
The true acid test for George Sharp/Helischauer will be to produce a true and legal copy of his Passport to the court (which we will be requesting). Last week, I have forwarded Georges letter which offered an explanation regarding his name change to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in a hope that they can shed some light on this overly confusing matter.
Finally, in his letter, Geroge complains about how we obtained his credit report, as if we did some illegal deed. First, it is a matter of public record and stamped by the court as discovery in the eviction action filed by Ms. Aniko Kaye against George. Also as a matter of public record are all of his 2006 Wells Fargo bank records. These records are stamped as evidence as well by the court and made for a very interesting read. Ironically, he used these records to support his alleged sham claim to the court that he had to move from the slums of Beverly Hills/Los Angeles to La Jolla and because of this move, his rent jumped to $2,000.00 a month at 7660 Fay Avenue, Suite H122 La Jolla CA 92037 (which the court now knows was and is nothing more than a UPS store). Is UPS charging a lot more these days or is someone trying to manipulate the court and play more games with peoples lives? Hmmm...
So after reading Georges letter, I can safely say that it had very little, if anything at all to do with Cuba Beverage and was more about his fixation with me, Michael Osborn aka Michael Osborn Ison. The fictitious world that George has spent so much time creating now appears to be crumbling around him. As my friend continues to tell me, far too often, people lie when the truth fits so much better.
You live by the sword, you die by the sword.
Posted by Abuse of Law at Saturday, January 14, 2012 Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: abuseoflaw.org, cuba bev, drudge report, drudgereport.com, FBI, george helischauer, George Sharp, IRS, SEC, stock fraud, stock promoter, usag, writers group film
I wish the court date could get moved up so this thing can get tossed out sooner.
GREAT Post everybody please read the letter and get a insight why this lawsuit wont go anywhere. Thanks for posting j19156.
To begin with my post yesterday was a mistype I ment to say good post so cool your engines down. Number two I call it as I see it I am not always negative on here about CEYY just getting inpatient and I have alot of money tied up with this company. Its frusterating they have a great idea but they release news slowly. I have never called the company a scam or say they were not going to make it.
They just need to sign up one big name and then the company will take off. Nobody can deny 3D is hot right now with 3D tv,s 3D movies and now 3D mobile devices. I think John Diaz has done alot of the work already getting the distribution figured out with signed deals now they just need a big name to sign a deal with to take this to the $1.00 mark or higher.
Could post I hope your right about the future.
Well said.
I agree but still its good that you see more big name groups showing more interest in doing 3D Concerts.
Metalicca 3D Project is offcial press release from there web site is posted below.
Metallica in 3D?
January 6, 2012
Happy New Year!!! As you know, we generally make it a policy not to comment on gossip or rumors, but we also pride ourselves on being first with 'Tallica news. So, with that said, the more astute of you may have noticed a couple of mentions in trade publications, and most recently in the new issue of Rolling Stone, that a Metallica 3D movie is in the works. We're here to tell you that, yes, there is indeed a 3D project in the very early stages of production! We wish we could tell you more right now, but we don't have all the finer points nailed down just yet. What we can tell you is that we are planning on being in a theatre near you sometime in 2013 and as you hear us say ever so often, this will be the space for all the details as we finalize them.
Welcome to 2012... we're pretty psyched about the year ahead!
They need to act like they care about the stockholders and get off there behinds . What they need is a long overdue PR Release they need to atleast write a letter on there web site to the shareholders outlining there plans for 2012. Its to bad its a great idea and the company just dont give a hoot they dont understand if they do a pr release keep people informed they can get people back on board and generate some money for the company . Doing what they did last year saying nothing wont work again or this stock will be a sub penny stock real soon.
2012 should be a good year for the company.
This is the power of the future