Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Re: CDNC
Anyone here took a look at it after I posted the alert a while ago? It's finally moving.
Mike
Re: SDGL
I read the 10-Q last night, and it looks very good to me. The company is moving up fast (see revenue/net revenue for the last 3 years). No dilution since last year, as the OS remains stable at 137MM shares. Sooner or later the PPS will catch up with the revenue/net revenue trend. Price/Sales ratio is below 0.25 right now. Plenty of growth (on PPS) potential.
Mike
Someone was in need of some cash. That's all!
Mike
Re: "What's with this stock tumbling. I almost got in at .007. Glad i didn't. Most of this pennies are nothing but a tax write off."
Eddie, you might wish to reconsider (at least at this price).
Why is it where it is? Here's why. Thursday's shares decreased 48.57% to $0.0018 per share with a total of 46,839,192 shares traded. The company announced that a Listing Qualifications Panel (the "Panel") has determined the company's common stock is no longer eligible for quotation on the OTCBB because the company is not in compliance with the requirements of NASD Marketplace Rule 6530. The company is not in compliance with Rule 6530, as its Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 was incomplete due to the company's failure to obtain the consent of its former auditor, Weinberg & Company, P.A. ("Weinberg") to the inclusion in the 10-KSB of Weinberg's report on the previous fiscal year's financial statements. The company is working with Weinberg and its current auditor to obtain consent, but resolution of the issue has been delayed due to issues regarding the appropriate application of EITF 00-19 to accounting for the company's convertible debentures and preferred stock. Under the Panel's determination, the company's common stock will become ineligible for trading on the OTCBB at the start of business on November 17, 2006. The company expects that brokers will subsequently be able to post quotes for the company's stock on the Pink Sheets. The company is continuing to seek resolution of the accounting issues preventing it from receiving Weinberg's consent, and upon completion of the filing of its 10-KSB, intends to pursue re-authorization for quotation on the OTCBB. ClickableOil is committed to providing low-cost and efficient heating oil services, as it continues to grow along the East Coast through marketing efforts, promotions and acquisitions.
If you run a Google on Weinberg, you'll understand why the company is having problems now. With a new auditor, the filing of the revised 10-K, after getting back into OTC, and improved
results, you'll wish you've been loaded at this price, IMO. As always, do your own DD.
Mike
ST, Yes the chance to recovery is very good, IMO. Should the rate of growth (percentage wise) remain the same as for the last 12 months, the 06 annual report should post over $15MM revenue, and hopefully improved margins. In this case, yes, more than 0.03 (I would venture to say more than 0.05) should be possible by next spring, IMO. Enjoy the sale while it lasts, IMO. At least it's what I've been doing yesterday: bought some more starting at 0.0025, then a bounch more at below 0.002.
Mike
Posted on "Good Value Penny Bottoms:"
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=14879508
Mike
GDVI Alert: Based on today's news:
http://www.amtdrt.inlumen.com/bin/story?StoryId=Crv1b0bWbmZiXCdCWnJq
I believe this already profitable CA business (for the last 9 Q's!) should start moving, IMO. For more info on Proposition 1D see:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Bond+Measure+Proposition+1D+California+&a...
Do your DD:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13317662
Mike
CKEIE red alert: Good buying opp, IMO. The company has had problems with their auditors (see today's news), and will go pinkie starting tomorrow. The price is right now below 0.002, and I bet after they get rid of the "Weinberg" auditors (run a Google on them, and you'll find out many companies already got rid of them, and were doing well afterwards), and get back in OTC, the reward could be very high, IMO. Check them out, and decide for yourselves.
Mike
Being for a while as a pinky is not the end of this world, and I bet it won't be for too long. The first thing the company should (and I believe they will) is to get rid of those Weinberg & Company, P.A. well known troublemakers. To me, today's news, is good news: better some bad news than no news at all. FYI, I just bought some more @ 0.0025.
Mike
In regards to my previous post, likewise with any other penny stock, of course there's risk involved. The difference in my view is that in this case the reward/risk ratio is much better that that of most subpenny stocks.
Mike
"$348,787 in revenue for September, compared with $135,902 generated in September 2005, representing a 157% increase. 166,739 gallons of oil were sold, compared with 59,043 gallons sold in September 2005, for a 182% increase. Gross profit was $45,754 compared with $16,178 in September 2005, representing a 183% increase."
The good news is that (percentage wise) the gross profit/gross revenue increased from 11.9% in Sept 05 to 13.1% in Sept 06. This is still small, but the larger the gross income gets, usually the larger (percentage wise) the gross profit goes.
Regardless (just for the sake of a discussion), at this growth rate, assuming only 150% gross revenue growth over 2005 (all 2006 figures are larget than this, some - such as July - are much larger), the 2006 gross revenue will be at least $15M. Once this happens, I expect the PPS to jump at least 10 times today's level. Translation: whomever gets in at these prices today, has a good chance to realize a 1000% gain by say March. Not bad return for a 4 month investment!
Mike
Question to the board. Anyone knows why we have the "E?" I thought this was because of the 10K not being filled in time. With the 10K out, what other SEC reporting has the company failed to fill?
Mike
John (Re: CKEI), I do not think they are that stupid to go for a R/S. However, the fact that they didn't filled as yet the restated 10-K (which is why the "E" has been added), doesn't sound good, and neither the fact that they didn't release the September numbers. Most of all, I don't like the 3 forms 4, just released.
Let's hope it all ends well, although I start having some doubts myself. Any dead cat bounce (which might happen, as it usually does), and I'm out.
Mike
Time for a dead cat jump, IMO. Looking for at least a double.
Mike
***The best (free) PV status report you can find:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/solarreport/solar.html
Mike
SDGL - good news, check it out:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=10932891
Going back on positive net income teritory. With a price/sales of only 0.25 right now, this company has a lot of PPS growth to catch (e.g., 5 to 6 MOMO?)
Mike
FYI: The Oberweis report:
http://www.newsletters.forbes.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&Locale=en_US&...
In my experience, well chosen GVPB's (on average) is where the largest percentage gain comes from. Find them, diversify (a must), and you won't be sorry.
Mike
Re: "Is something not filed in accordance w/SEC rules..." imminent?"
The company is missing the 10-K, for which a NT was filled. That's all. If you recall, the "E" was also added for not filing the 10-Q in time, then removed.
Mike
$100+ Oil Still on the Horizon
http://www.energyandcapital.com/editorials.php?id=285
Does it make sense to you? It does to me.
Mike
Looking for and buying GVPB's indeed pays, and I'm surprised not seeing more people getting involved. I would encourage everyone reading this board to try finding them, and participate in our discussion.
My last good choice (GVIS), shows the potential of this approach. Bought it @ 0.0101, and sold it @ 0.028 2 days later.
Sorry I didn't brought it to your attention; expected it to drop a bit more, which did not happen.
Again, my strategy with such GVPB's is to buy some at what I believe is near the bottom, and buy more if it goes down. It works.
Looking right now at CDNC. You might wish to check it out.
Mike
John, (Re: EAGM) I do not trust any of these gold (or diamonds, etc.) companies that are promissing the moon, yes sitting at low subpenny levels. At this price level I would prefer companies such a CKEI, that at least have reported income, and despite the dilution induced low PPS are continuing to increase their numbers every month.
Mike
AF, was hard for me to swallow CTXI's childish story, so I did not get involved with. The other stock you brought to us (PDSC), at these levels (mid 0.002's), however, might be worth a gamble for an easy double or more, IMO. At least they have a credible story. I believe this should make its (dead cat) jump any day now.
Mike
"what u think about ckei its confuse me"
John, except for the lucky few that loaded yesterday, everyone else is in the red. So, I decided not to comment on it anymore. This should be an individual assesment of the risk vs the potential reward. The info is there for anyone to see. All I can say is that I believe I was one of the (if not the) most aggresive buyer below 0.006, especially in the low 0.005's range. Despite this (like most of the others - even after today's small gain), I'm still in the red, but getting close to the breakdown. Hope this week to see some green, and believe the September #-s will put most of us on the multiple MOMO curve.
Mike
I just run a Google search on "piggyback rights California construction school:" Apparently the piggyback rights are not easily obtained these days. Plenty of info to look at:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=piggyback+rights+California+construction+...
Got 2 run,
Mike
By: nsomniyak2, from RB
10 Oct 2006, 12:34 AM EDT
Msg. 10333 of 10334
(This msg. is a reply to 10332 by coop1104ct.)
The implication is that other school districts can buy GDVI products at fixed prices "off the shelf" without each having to go through a separate, distinct, lengthy, and uncertain bidding process (based on GDVI products in some way being 'certified" for such piggy-back buying).
In other words--we need portables, we have money, let's just buy them. We need some extra buildings, these designs meet our needs and ar ewithin our budget, let's just
If that is true, it is a nice advance for GDVI, as it makes it easier for customers to buy GDVI products--essentially "pre-approved". Also makes it hard for a competitor to undercut on price and then skimp on quality.
If you contact Paul K. please confirm this interpretation.
Piggyback Marketing
by Laurie Zuckerman
Whether you are a mature company trying to break into a new market or a new company just trying to break ground, co-marketing can help you capture market share on a shoestring. By piggybacking on the strength and positive associations of a partner's brand, startups can get their first, much-needed shot of validation. Companies that are more established can leverage the brand and market reach of a partner to help them very quickly pick up the credibility and awareness needed to play in new market segments.
Your co-marketing relationship may or may not be part of a strategic relationship. It can be as simple as flaunting the name of your investors on your Web site or as involved as embarking in a relationship where one company manufactures a product and the other markets it.
The possibilities for piggybacking on a partner's marketing and sales channels are endless. You can share space with a partner at a trade show. Sponsor an event together. Include fliers in each other's shipments. Cross-link your Web sites. Share the costs of direct mail or e-mail campaigns. Author articles together. Send out joint press releases. Gather together products and services that complement each other and promote them as a package (for example, a Dell with "intel inside").
Some industry giants such as Sun Microsystems and IBM offer extensive co-marketing programs designed to help their partners reach sales prospects. Sun Microsystems, for example, includes elements such as free listings in its product catalogs, advertisements on its Web sites, certifications, a go-to-market roadmap and more.
Whatever path you choose, don't pursue a relationship out of simple convenience - make sure you have specific goals in mind for your co-marketing partnership. As you negotiate, be upfront about the exact results you would like to see. What market segment are you trying to break into? What brand attributes do you want to associate yourself with? What brand attributes do you want to avoid associating yourself with?
At the same time, to negotiate favorable deals, you need to be prepared to explain why your business will appeal to your co-marketing partner. Be prepared to articulate the specific advantages that your product, your brand, your marketing vehicles or your sales channels could bring to your partner. And have a strategy in place to address the weaknesses in your company that may be of concern.
The simple fact is that co-marketing is not risk free. When you align your organization with the brand of another, you get all the good along with all the bad. Branding is a discipline that extends far beyond a pretty logo and sexy advertising. It is about creating an association in the minds of your audience and building an emotional connection to your organization.
On the positive side, strong brand equity - whether it is your own or the one you linking with - can bring customer loyalty and increased market share. But the flip side is that if one partner falters, the co-marketed partner may share in the punch. Linking with the wrong partners can easily damage brands.
The lesson learned? Be prudent and do your homework. It is critical to be confident in your partner's staying power. And be sure to ask yourself the right questions. Is your partner willing to devote the necessary resources to make the co-marketing program a reality? Do you trust the person assigned to the project? Is he/she ready to move as quickly as necessary?
As well, be diligent in checking for fit. Make sure that your brand promise doesn't substantially differ from your prospective partner's. Naturally, there can and will be variances, but the value system of your partner should not be a completely different paradigm. For example, if you want to position your business as nimble and on the very cutting edge of technology, you might want to avoid linking with the brand of a larger company know for slow, bureaucratic processes.
Whatever your co-marketing agreement, since your partner's brand reflects on you almost as much as it reflects on your partner, be sure you are vigilant in monitoring how your brand is used and in what context. Also, keep tabs on the competitive landscape and always continue to evaluate if the partnership still makes sense. Change is a constant. Successful brand managers know that when it comes to sharpening a competitive edge - amidst shifting markets, new and newly merged players and new technologies - you cannot afford to grow complacent.
Global Diversified Industries, Inc. Announces Winning Key Piggyback Rights, Making it Easier to Sell New Products to California School Districts
CHOWCHILLA, Calif., Oct 09, 2006 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- Global Diversified Industries, Inc. (GDVI : global diversified inds inc com
7:44am 10/10/2006
GDVI0.07, +0.00, +2.1%) , focused on the modular building industry with emphasis on the education market ( http://www.gdvi.net) , today announced that in a public bidding process it won a contract with a Southern California School District which has "piggyback rights" that allows Global Diversified to sell its new Aurora product line to school districts throughout California in a much simpler manner, at a fixed price, that avoids lengthy public bidding.
"This is absolutely crucial for the continued growth of our Company. We are delighted with this success and believe it will result in significant new business for Global Diversified Industries," said Phil Hamilton, CEO.
"Our Aurora products are very popular for California school districts, and, combined with these new piggyback rights, we believe we are headed in the right direction for success for the Company and its shareholders," Global Diversified Industries CEO said.
0.0063/0.0064
Mike
That's right. As Brian have said: "Not only have you (my version, some CKEI shareholders) been duped... but you also have been played for a sucker."
Mike
The next oil spike has officially begun!
Source: Brian Hicks
Publisher, Green Chip Stocks
I happen to agree with Brian. Any other opinion?
Mike
---------------------------------
Dear reader:
I hate to tell you this, but somebody has to.
You've been duped!
That's right. Not only have you been duped... but you also have been played for a sucker.
That's because today's price of gasoline is nothing but a mirage. A temporary sedative that's now allowing OPEC to do exactly what they've always done - manipulate the price at the expense of their number one customer...and their #1 enemy!
It's no secret that OPEC nations are nothing more than a who's who of anti-Western forces.
And now that the price of oil has dropped more than 25% in the past 19 weeks - they're aligning their forces once again.
The first order of business - cut production... and cut it fast!!!
While consumers happily pay $2.30 at the pump, OPEC has already lit the powder keg.
Take a look...
Friday, September 29, 2006 - Venezuela announced it will reduce oil output by 50,000 barrels a day, and Nigeria announced a 5% cut in its oil exports.
Sunday, October 1, 2006 - Iran tells the world that it will support any effort by OPEC members to solidify the oil market and 'return prices to acceptable and logical levels'.
Tuesday, October 3, 2006 - OPEC President calls on OPEC countries to make deeper output cuts.
Wednesday, October 4, 2006 - Kuwait announces that it's considering following Venezuela and Nigeria in cutting production, and Saudi Arabia revealed that it would "work with OPEC to bring oil prices to a 'reasonable level'."
Thursday, October 5, 2006 - OPEC's president announces that the group is now considering an emergency meeting to discuss the possibility of cutting output. The same day, Saudi Arabia agrees to lower production by 300,000 barrels per day in order to help 'prop up prices'.
Oil prices are going right back up to where they were this past spring. OPEC will see to that!
And when they do, you're going to see yet another influx of select alternative energy stocks that'll soar in the wake of OPEC's output cuts.
You see, those who cashed out of many of these stocks before the correction...with huge gains, are quietly moving their millions right back to where they were before the price of oil plummeted.
In fact, one stock in particular...an engineering firm that's developed an alternative engine 600% more powerful than today's 4-stroke engine and uses 30% less fuel, is looking to be the first 'alternative energy' stock to reap the rewards of the soon-to-be escalating oil prices.
The company's already got automotive companies salivating over this technology.
And because the Pentagon is now being forced to cut its petroleum usage by 20% (due to Executive Order 13149), the military is currently testing this company's new motor for its Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV).
Now 3 days ago, the company announced that it had completed the necessary modifications and tests that will allow it to move on to final testing. And word from management is that before the end of October - the company will release a press release that we believe will push the stock even higher.
I can't give you all the details here, but if you'd like to learn more about this company...and more importantly, why the price of this thing could nearly double by the end of the year, click here.
Oil prices are getting ready to shoot right back up to the $70 range. You can believe that.
Might as well make a few bucks in the process!!!
Sincerely,
Brian Hicks
Publisher, Green Chip Stocks
http://www.angelnexus.com/hub/11
Oops, forgot to add the site, didn't I:
http://www.ultimateuploads.com/audio/view.php?play=4df42849f3e12a9379065276bbea8c3d
Mike
FYI: Interesting recording - instructive listening to.
Mike
Re: PDSC - after (and based on) the last 2 PR's (Oct. 3, and Oct. 4), at this price (low 0.003's), a fast in & out gamble should work just fine, IMO. B4 the news I sold my position @ 0.0045. After the 2 PR's, got back with some yesterday, and a few more today. Expecting an easy double.
Again, if you do it, do not be too greedy. Take your gain and run away.
Mike
SDGL Alert @ 0.055
If you like the finances of this little known Co:
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/RevenueEPSSummary.aspx?mode=&kind=&timeframe=&intraday=&c...
You might want to do some more DD on it:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=10932891
Very good prospects on this one, IMO.
Mike
AF, I was looking everywhere for info on PDSC, and (in fact) the most important info was readily available in the Company info in the pink sheets (just found it a while ago):
For the last 3 years:
1. shs decreased by 1 for 1000 split
Ex-Date:
Record Date:
Pay Date: 2005-06-27
2. Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 100 split. Effective date=1-28-04
3. Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 800 split. Pay date=09/11/2003.
After the recent dumping they might go for a 2006 R/S, IMO.
Too risky right now, IMO. I just set to sell (@ 0.0045) my few shares (only 550K) that I bought @ 0.0042 yesterday. Already got about 1/2 filled.
Mike
John, Re: PDSC, PUPS, & CKEI
Re: PDSC, I only bought some @ 0.0042 yesterday, but after doing some more DD on it last night, quite skeptical of its prospects. Did not get as yet any answer from Australia. Shall see what it does today.
Re: PUPS, according to the presentation we should get good news any day now. Tried to buy more yesterday @ 0.0081, but only got 10K. Might have to raise the bid.
Re: CKEI, going down again on low volume? That's strange! If it goes below 0.007, I'll buy more (already have plenty @ 0.0085 average).
Mike
AF, checked it out @ I do not like CTXI. Might do some fast in and out gambling on it should it go to 0.001.
Mike
Alert SDGL: Good buying opp (@0.05's), IMO. Check out the finances, and a P/S of only about 0.2. This will not stay here for long, IMO. Brought down somehow w/o news today.
Mike