Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Now feel free to give us some rapid fire chicken little posts just for laughs.
You’ll always have your alter egos - Hi_Lo, Bruce, Marci, I-Glow - to hang out with on a boring Wednesday night!!
Well, if you think so, I mean it must be true - right?
Agree as to the price action not bothering me. I own enough and don’t intend to add more.
But if you knew that’s the reason why it went to .005, would you really care? Just means it’s being manipulated - not because of materiel events.
Clearly no agenda here. Tell us how you really feel
Love that you're 100% on that issue. Tells me all I need to know about your posts.
I'd love there to be news that moved the stock and allowed me to sell for a nice profit. However, the steady decline of the pps because there has not been news for 3 months does not really concern me. If we hear something telling us that FINRA is not greenlighting the name/ticker change, then I'll become negative on this stock (and likely won't be able to sell above .003), but the fact the stock has declined simply because Sharp hasn't updated us for 3 months really doesn't worry me at all. Heck - as I've said before, anyone who puts anything more than their speculation/gambling money into a ticker like this is making a terrible mistake. You should come into a ticker like this expecting that it's quite likely you'll lose it all - and then be happy and surprised if you don't. That way you don't crumble every day on the ups and downs of the trading.
My mistake - I stand corrected on that one.
Just because someone has only been on iHub since a certain date, does not mean they just bought GVSI on that date. I only came onto iHub several months ago, but I have had a position in all 3 of Sharp's shells for over a year and a half. I read the nonsense here for a year or so and finally decided I had to comment on occasion.
But you don't own it, don't like the stock, and are rooting for it to crash - you should be celebrating the meaningless trading and manipulating (IMO) that's occurring on non-material news.
It actually only seems to frustrate you. Longs don't care about the day to day pps movements that are unrelated to material events. If FINRA denies the name/ticker change, the stock likely goes to zero and longs are done. If FINRA green lights the name/ticker change and there's a subsequent RM, then the stock likely soars. Only you and Hi_Lo seem to care about the day to day stock price during this waiting period. Why is that?
You see - you are the one who doesn’t get it. I’m trying to quiet all the “noise” on both sides. You’re trying to add to the noise.
Market sentiment? Longs on GVSI should not care about market sentiment. Did market sentiment matter when GVSI shot up to nearly .07 in the early days of the custodianship?! No it did not. All that matters is the outcome of the ticker/name change and the RM. if it happens the stock will jump significantly; if it doesn’t happen it’s worthless. It’s really as simple as that.
Once again - I ask you to explain why the pps matters right now for this stock? Anyone holding is long and waiting for the name change, ticker change and reverse merger. Until then, the daily/weekly/monthly change in the pps is truly meaningless. I agree that if FINRA refuses to allow the name/ticker change, this stock becomes worthless. But until that outcome (whether it is good or bad), your “calling” it to go subpenny is totally meaningless. Explain why I’m wrong without your cut/paste standard responses.
Day to day pps fluctuations prior to name/ticker change, share cancellation and RM are only important to bashers like you and your cohorts. Speculators/investors have calculated the risk/reward here and don’t care what the pps does until these milestones occur. Will they definitely happen? Unlike you and your fellow BS artists, I’ll willingly say I don’t really know. But what I do know is that for me, the risk/reward makes it a no brainer to have a position here. If it fails, my life doesn’t change with this small loss. If it hits, it’s a nice score. Now shew you annoying gnats.
That is why the corporate actions that Sharp applied for weeks ago aren't being approved by the SEC/FINRA. It's been over 11 weeks now for a simple name and ticker change that usually takes 3 - 4 weeks.
There you go again. Losing all credibility making this a statement of fact when you have absolutely no idea if that’s the reason it hadn’t been green lighted yet by FINRA. Tell us Hi_Lo, how name and ticker changes have you personally filed with FINRA so as to know the exact timelines?? Misleading post as usual by you.
You do realize that you’ve missed the entire point here. Of course no company is merging here until they get their house cleaned up - meaning, FINRA allows name/ticker change and cancellations either go through or don’t. Until these events occur investors (as opposed to bashers) know the pps is meaningless to us. No one cares if the pps fluctuates between .005 and .015 as we wait for material events to occur. The only ones that are locked into the day to day pps while we await resolution of these material events are bashers like you, and day traders who buy/sell at their own peril. The rest of us are speculative traders/investors who accept the risk/reward presented here.
That being said, and knowing that the above is true, why in the world do you and your cronies continue with the daily chicken little posts!? Who are you aiming them to?? Senseless waste of time.
Wasn't it the character "Glum" from the New Adventures of Gulliver's Travels who always said "It'll never work - we're all doomed!" I think Chiron is part Glum and part Chicken Little (and yes, I must be old if I remember that).
Tell us your experience with filing for name and ticker changes with FINRA. How many times have you done it and what paperwork did you file? Stop the nonsense - just like many others on this board, you say things purporting to KNOW what you're talking about, but in reality have an agenda and are trying to mislead.
Tell us your experience with filing for name and ticker changes with FINRA. How many times have you done it and what paperwork did you file? Stop the nonsense - just like many others on this board, you say things purporting to KNOW what you're talking about, but in reality have an agenda and are trying to mislead.
Hard to know for sure what is really happening, but I do think the Calasse fiasco must have had an impact on Sharp and how he proceeds with his other shells. The Carlin position with GVSI is substantial - might require negotiation to resolve it. Of course, I am just making an educate guess here - I could be totally wrong.
Your daily chicken little posts are amusing, but if you're not day trading GVSI and are here for the potential of a reverse merger, why do you care about the fluctuations in the day to day prices? If you are day trading it, then you act at your own peril.
You must remember, filing the proof of service might trigger the court setting a hearing date. It’s plausible that Sharp is trying to negotiate with Carlin to avoid a Calasse 2.0 with GVSI and therefore is intentionally not yet filing the proof of service. Not saying I know this to be a fact, but it is a reasonable interpretation of the situation.
Ok Ok - I logged back in today to read the posts (I know I said I was done with this board). Yolo - you seem like a very bright guy and I mean that. You know that just because Sharp has not filed a proof of service with the court and requested a hearing on the Carlin shares it does NOT mean that service by publication hasn't been completed yet. There are reasons why he might not choose to file proof of service and request a hearing. Perhaps he's negotiating with Carlin an agreed number of shares to cancel/let Carlin retain. Sharp presumably learned a little something from the Calasse fiasco at WNFT and we'd assume he'd want to avoid that kind of litigation with GVSI. I may not be right, but I think that dovetails with the corporate filings saying everyone was served.
As someone previously mentioned today - NONE OF US KNOWS what is really happening. We're all making educated guesses based on the information. To present it as "FACT" is misleading.
It was good interacting with many of you here - I am being very careful with the wording here, but I will no longer be posting on this board.
Is Chiron really a basher or just a public nuisance?!
None of us can be POSITIVE in either direction. Anyone who says that is not being honest. I happen to believe that name/ticker change will go through, but I have posted many times that I could end up being wrong, and if I am wrong, I'll be the first on here to congratulate the bears/bashers. I doubt any of them will do the same if the shoe is on the other foot. This is gambling money for me. I know the risks and I accept them. My life will not change in any measurable fashion if GVSI goes to zero. However, my life will change is a very measurable fashion if GVSI jumps up significantly. That's why I'm invested here and posting on this board. If you don't own GVSI, why are you on this board?
George can’t even get a simple ticker change complete
I'm sure you are very knowledgable about the process required to get the name/ticker change through. Tell us all - how many times have you done this through FINRA
Maybe I shouldn't have grouped you with Hi_Lo and his buddies who all claim that the name/ticker change cannot be done based on the prior FINRA/SEC denials of prior management.
The problem is that Hi_Lo, Jayman, Banner, Chiron, etc., will all disappear never to be heard from again if the name/ticker changes go through. They'll all crawl under their rocks and hide, then create new identities and post about the merger never happening or being with a no revenue start up. It's the same Baloney from them over and over again.
Wow - he hates you almost as much as he hates me. These guys don't ever want to be challenged. They feel more than free to ridicule others, but if you dare make fun of them they lose their minds. Bottom line - we'll know in the next few weeks who's right and who's wrong (none of us really know anything - we're all just making educated guesses). And as I've posted several times, I'll be the first one to post that I was wrong and they were right if it turns out that the name/ticker change is denied. What are the odds that we ever hear from any of them again if the name/ticker change goes through?? I say nil.
Something tells me that outside of this board, there’s very little happening in your world.
Took you whole 24 hours to come up with that lame response. Time will tell who’s right and who’s wrong here. I’ll be here regardless of which way it goes. You’ll be long gone with your tail between your legs if the name/ticker change gets approved. You and your buddy chicken little (a/k/a Marjorie Taylor Greene).
Chicken Little - your fellow bashers don’t even want to be associated with your idiotic posts. You’re kinda like the Marjorie Taylor Greene of the bashers here.
It’s Baaaaack!!!
I'm happy to agree to disagree and move on. I hold no animosity towards you (some of the others, perhaps). My point was that his 10 week time period for the rest of us peons "knowing" what he supposedly already "knows" to be a fact was based on the GOFF/WNFT time frame he set forth in the prior paragraph. Thus, he was saying he already "knows" it to be a fact; not that he believes it to be a fact, but that he "knows" it.
Enough though - I agree. We're both trying to rationalize the statement of a irrational poster in different ways.
Now - let's be real here and look at Hi_Lo's post in context to what he was saying at that time. I'll copy and paste it AGAIN below:
"After 10 weeks (the time it took GOFF/WNFT's approval not including the court delay) it will definitely demonstrate that something went wrong with GVSI's SEC/FINRA approval of its corporate actions (even though FINRA's own documentation says that it usually takes 3 - 4 weeks - roughly the time it took SRNW to get approval).
I already know that there are problems but we'll have to wait one more week for everyone to know for sure."
His final statement that he "already know(s) that there are problems" was directly related to the prior paragraph where he is saying that it only took WNFT ten weeks in total to get the name/ticker changes through FINRA, so in "one more week" everyone else will know what he already "knows" about the supposed GVSI FINRA rejection.
You guys just can't ever take a loss and come back to fight another day. Look at the Cowboys, Ravens, Jaguars, etc., yesterday - sometimes you lose, admit you lost and come back for the next fight. I'll be the first on here to post that all of you bears were right and I was wrong if the name/ticker change gets rejected. I won't run and hide.
You didn't answer the question (big shocker there). Are you saying that you KNOW there is a problem with the FINRA application; OR ...... are you saying that is your educated guess? There is a very big difference between those two positions and you bears/bashers clearly don't want to be straight about it.
I'm waiting Marcis - what's your response?