By "Interesting" we sure hope you mean profitable!

HNY!

C

How can the entire OTC be down if it's only "some" of the investors who are dumping stock to secure tax advantages? With few exceptions the entire pink sheet platform stinks and is best exited, if possible, at a company's earliest convenience, to the QB or the QX at a minimum if they can't qualify for a senior exchange...

Dude make up your mind...Are you in or out??? You flip back and forth more often than a tennis ball at the US Open

C

Who authorized this? Nick? JPBlackwell?? And if so, why???

The sale of T-shirts pumping a company with designs on becoming a globally integrated conglomerate has a cheesy, fluff and puff feel to me that I don't like at all...I mean, did Tesla or Berkshire Hathaway--the two companies JPB compared ILUS to as an inspiration for investors--ever resort to T-shirt advertising at any stage of their development? I could be wrong but I doubt it...

Disgusted,
C

Granted--as you've already said--all pink sheet stocks have innate risk. With that in mind, I won't take it as investment advice but do you think Genesis Electronics is one of the best risks in the OTC over the next 12 to 18 months?

C

Thanks for this!

C

Perhaps this is a naive question but unless those figures appear officially on audited financials, how much do they really mean?

C

Thanks so much for this article...After reading it it's hard to suppress enthusiasm for a concept so broadly innovative and sweeping in its projected consequences for the freight industry as the Genesis model appears to be. As an investor I always try to keep an ear to the ground for competitors--particularly those with deep pockets and large institutional connections...I hope I'm wrong, but my gut feeling is that a startup like Genesis may end up flapping its wings for quite a while without every really getting aloft. So many things would have to go right for this company--or any other early stage business--to become a significant commercial success...Though I guess I can view it as a lottery ticket--as I do most pink sheet stocks...

C

Okay thanks for that explanation. I'm early to this investment. Do you think that a prototype would cost considerably more than a couple of million dollars?
The idea sounds like pure genius...It would solve a lot of vocational issues besides making owners and shareholders alike quite a bit of money if things ever get off the ground and it catches the eye of institutional investors someday...

Just curious,
C

The H and the J are adjacent keys on the keyboard....Anyway I hope that's the reason...Typing faster than he can think but not proofreading afterwards

Do you really think that appealing to reason or decency with him will work?!?

That's Right, Dwight...

You'd be surprised....

Or perhaps not...

I'm inclined to agree with you and Tasher...You don't ring the dinner bell when the food's still in the oven...only after supper's on the table, n'est-ce-pas?...

While I'm guardedly optimistic about our prospects I'm still mildly worried at the same time, if that makes sense...

C

Ok thanks for the clarification...I got scared for a moment there!
C

"SEC filing confirms that there will be NO transparency..."

What are you talking about? There ought to be more transparency with ILUS now than there has been at any former time, no?

C

Buy when others are fearful and sell like Hell when they're confident...That's Warren Buffet's main investing tenet from what I've heard, and judging from his multi-billion dollar portfolio I think it's fair to say that his philosophy has some merit

C

I thought you were out?!!@?!@!!

It reflects current value, yes...

Of course, much depends on the law firm resolving the aforementioned issues but let's see how the market rates Cyberlux when and if major contracts get signed and institutional investors begin looking at this stock...That's really all that matters...

C

There's really no way to authenticate that--maybe there were moles and maybe there weren't.. But if our CEO had been more circumspect about who he trusted to take care of OTC-related details this would all be moot...

In his video Mark admitted that because he was so busy taking care of other company issues this year he handed the responsibility for fixing the Yield sign and Pink Current problems to individuals he hadn't vetted thoroughly...To me my observation is hardly a matter of hindsight; it's a matter of common sense, and not doing so was foolish--or at least shortsighted. It would have been a lot wiser in my opinion for the CEO of a business with ties to the Pentagon and other sectors of the military-industrial complex to take a little extra time to ensure that those entrusted with the responsibility of assuring compliance with notoriously stringent OTC rules and regs were well qualified to do so...In the weeks ahead I have to think that we'll get better results from the law firm Mark's assigned to address the same tasks...

Time will tell...It always does...
C

Perhaps someone whose initial begins with an "M"?

That's because Mark Schmidt foolishly delegated responsibility to underlings who weren't equipped to get the issue resolved...Now that he has a law firm in place to handle dealings with the OTC let's see if he's as good as his word going forward...

A new CEO whose first order of business might be to authorize a MASSIVE reverse split and f*ck investors out of a lot of money??!?

THINK again, dude...
C

I don't know (or care) whether Mick agrees with your reasoning or not, but I sure do...

C

I've been loading up on Cyberlux shares every single day via TD Ameritrade from the very first day that the Caveat Emptor designation was applied...Granted, that may change at any moment, but until it does I intend to treat the current price drop as an ongoing lottery ticket...

C

Right. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is an executive department of the U.S. state of California--not a federal agency, so I misspoke. But the department is part of the cabinet-level California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA)--and it's massive...

Appeal to authority fallacy? What the f*ck are you talking about??? You still leave unanswered why any legitimate agency would overlook the many flaws in DO's company and still turn to them for technology that can save (or lose) lives...

As for the larger (institutional) investment world, because this is a pink shit company languishing in the OTC, there aren't many eyes on it to begin with but even if there were, corporations, pension funds and asset management firms like Vanguard and Fidelity or Black Rock aren't allowed to look at them from what I've been told...

Whatever you had for breakfast this morning I want some of!

Won't ownership in the reformed company (for DPLS shareholders) amount to a reverse split with greatly reduced shares?

Curious and frankly worried,
C

Investors here ought to Tweet BJ back insisting on something REAL for a change...

If there's anything of substance to reveal, that is...

But I'm not betting on it...

C

Agreed...

It's not just the lack of a working prototype for the next six months--or more--that gives me pause...It's the lack of infrastructure to transition loads from the proposed intermodal freight carrier on rail to pavement and vice versa...As things stand, freight travels entirely on paved thoroughfares or else entirely on rail...Maybe I'm missing something here but for this innovation to work in any city or state--much less nationwide--it seems to me that a good deal of construction would have to take place first...and that usually entails a considerable amount of bureaucratic (and often political) red tape--not to mention funding challenges--doesn't it?

Thoughts?

C

You got in when this stock was trading in the trips...Those, like myself, who didn't learn about DPLS until early this year aren't in nearly the same position...But I'm genuinely happy for you...

C

If that's ratio for apportionment...But my Inner Cynic is inclined to think the compensation may be more like 1:500...or worse...

Thoughts?

You know the solution...

Cut your losses and seek greener pastures elsewhere if there are any...

Gd' luck...It's tough sledding almost everywhere

Right Said, Fred!

In that case, have you dumped most (or all) of your holdings Bunda Buddy?

Good Lord, that's no different than a 1:100 reverse split...

But is it spelled out clearly how shares in the re-formed company will be apportioned to DPLS investors?

More than curious...
C

WOW!!

Thanks Sponge

C