Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No subscription needed. Just click on the poster's name.
-ach
Angry Asian,
How does this recent topic of discussion brought about by Oily mesh with your sources? Have you heard of any involvement with Shell and the Drillship Pathfinder?
-ach
Oily,
Manti posed this question to you:
"So does this mean Addax or just conoil is being eaten? Or perhaps erhe? Or all of the above?"
Your response was:
"1.find the path for the major answer 2.(yes)"
Yes to what? All of the above? Could you please clarify this? Thank you.
-ach
OK, so now Oily is looking for redemption. Once again I will believe it when I see it. However, take a look at the following posts for an interesting retrospective:
#50982
#50987
#41766
If the Pathfinder ends up coming from Shell to our blocks I will send a box of candies to Oily. Or maybe a case of some of Andy Capp's finest hotfries.
-ach
This talk is crazy as all get out. Have patience and your worries will be over in a new york minute.
How's that?
-ach
crazy,
Just making a prediction that I know will come true. It will give Oily something to look forward to over the next couple of months. And, oh my, will he be excited when it comes to fruition. Twizzlers for all, or Skittles, or M&M's, or ......
-ach
Oilphant,
10/31
The sweets will flow
For once Oily, I don't think you could be much clearer. Tuesday it is. I hope it works out for you. I however, expect us to be between 0.40 - 0.42 at the close on Tuesday.
-ach
Could he simply be referencing Chrome's orginal buyin of a stake in ERHE?
-ach
Here is Anadarkos investor relation response to what they have planned for the Belford Dolphin.
-ach
xxxxx:
We are remaining flexible on our deployment of the Belford Dolphin at this time. There are several options available to us at this time.
JMC
Everybody has become very bored.
In regards to the drilling schedule. This is another horse that has been beaten to death. We all know there is a shortage of rigs and expect drilling somewhere in one of our blocks to occur by sometime in 2007. Anything earlier will be a treat.
I have grown tired of all this lets look at both sides nonsense. Everyone here understands both sides. And delays happen. What are you going to do about it? If the negatives outweigh the positives inthis stock I personally recommend those people sell all of their shares.
That is my rant for the day. Carry on.
-ach
Yup. Good eye, Rocky.
MBA,
You were right on that PM. It didn't taken long for the similarities to appear. LOL
-ach
AA,
Do you have thoughts on Oily's claim that the Centurion deal was part of a larger deal that involves ERHC?
GLTY
-ach
Oily,
How would Centurion be part of a 5 part deal that has something to do with the PRC? Sinopec is not involved in Block 4 and Centurion in not involved in Block 2.
-ach
Timing on these other "2" parts? Better yet, what do these 2 parts involve? What of the 8/9 prediction? It seems as though nothing of substance happened.
-ach
Angry,
Do you have that update yet or are you still working on it?
-ach
Do we have any ideas regarding what drillship will be used to drill these additional test wells in Block 1? I believe Deepwater Discovery will be in Total's possession.
**Disclaimer**
Please do not read this next section if you are against conspiracy theories
How about this? The wells are already drilled and CVX/XOM are setting up for the final announcement on BLock 1 drilling. It would make Oily look like a hero and verify that Obo 2 & 3 exist. Certainly a stretch. But we are dealing with professionals.
-ach
I wonder too. LOL
iwonder,
wait until happy hour on Friday and send AA a private message then.
-ach
Some light reading since you are going
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan
-ach
AA,
I would like to reiterate MAD's post #68972. You have always been up front about your positions whether they pan out or not, which I find sincere. I am interested in what you have to say. Keep me clued in. Thanks.
GLTY,
-ach
If Oilphant is for "real". He would have to work for someone in Block 1. How else would he be in a position to TRY to predict when press releases are coming from CVX or the amount of oil struck/number of wells in Block 1? Further, how would he know if XOM or CVX sat down with the SEC to discuss ERHC unless specifically associated with XOM or CVX.
Now having said that, how is someone associated with a company in Block 1 going to know about negotiations with ERHE that supposedly involve Sinopec?
The only sceario where I can see that Oilphant is legit, is if there were multi-party negotiations going on between Block 1 & Bloc 2 participants (unitization?), with Oily being a part of the Block 1 group - hence his quote that the dealS (plural) have been completed on Monday.
This is quite a scenario and I refuse to hold my breath that any of this is true. If something was inked, we may know about it come Monday. I choose to wait for first oil. Something is bound to happen between now and then.
In the interim, those that do not expect anything are never disapointed.
-ach
Kownski,
The SEC subpoena was served on May 9. Oilphants post regarding XOM/CVX meeting with the SEC was around June 17.
-ach
Maybe he was captured for use in the circus. Or one of the local zoos.
-ach
The real question is who is going to volunteer to walk behind him with the shovel?
-ach
3rd base
Nos,
This makes sense. We know ERHC had a folder in the office dedicated to a move to AMEX, while Oily has rumored AIM. What is your opinion on either move? Do your sources have any information leaning towards one or the other?
-ach
Umbra,
You can be awfully cheeky at times. Subject dropped. Just thought I would ask for old times sake. I don't think any harm was done. Agree?
Now, were you a private consultant working for a governmental agency? Just kidding. Third degree is over.
-ach
Umbra,
How did you know the specifics behind WB's incentive scheme, which in your own words were not made "public". As well as the fact that his contract was developed under his terms (especially since you claim to not personally know WB). Surely the reasons that prevented you from stating this in the past are no longer an issue?
Come on. Play along, throw us a bone here (not a reference to your last thread).
-ach
I think that point has been discussed with no conclusion formulated. Why don't you tell us your theory? Also, don't leave out your theory as to why ERHE put themselves back IN Block 6.
-ach
That's good to here. I though it might be someone unstable.
-ach
Thanks Mark,
Who is IOCC? Isn't Sahara associated with GEECF? Do you know who the operator of this block will be? It is interesting that Block 5 is proceeding since this is the block where we have a signature bonus payment due. I would have thought Block 6 would have been ahead of 5. It seems to me like there is going to be some more juicy information that comes out on this before the PSC's have been signed that make things like signature bonus payments non-issues.....I hope.
-ach
The smile was what he originally posted. It looks like he has edited it to a more disturbed facial expression.
-ach
I agree Mark, Oily does not get any credit for predicting the shareholder's letter. If that is what he was expecting, he did a horrible job with his cryptic posts.
-ach
I got cha
-ach
Cardinal,
please expand
-ach
Gang board, or Gang plank. (Naut.) (a) A board or plank, with cleats for steps, forming a bridge by which to enter or leave a vessel. (b) A plank within or without the bulwarks of a vessel's waist, for the sentinel to walk on.
N/M,
Why are we not allowed to pay Feltang? What are you implying? Why can't we pay money to bring SNP to the table? I don't care what the Addax deal says, they are two different circumstances. Why are our hands dirty regarding this? So far you have not provided any specifics regarding this matter. Let's be specific so we can end these little subtleties.
-ach
AA,
I would like to congratulate you on successfully predicting that nothing would happen yesterday or today. LOL
AA =1 Oily =0
GLTY,
ach