Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The meeting is Feb 27, which is Tuesday. It seems unlikely that absolutely no one will show up with concerns, so I don't know how much clarity we will get from the meeting.
This video is pretty good, describing the tZero system being used for stock trading:
https://www.trunews.com/stream/ethereum-ico-architect-tzero-crytomarket-will-replace-the-nyse?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
What I still don't know is what is the function of the tokens whose ICO is taking place. Anyone?
The recent PR (quoted below) caught my eye. It seems they have something that can turn waste heat into usable energy, and that this technology has nothing in particular to do with cryptocurrency mining. I can think of two possible reasons to make the crypto connection. 1) Just to try to ride the crypto hype wave; or 2) they don't actually own the tech that converts energy, so they are trying to own its specific application to facilities that do crypto mining. Both possibilities seem sketchy. Any alternative theories?
--
Calverton, NY - Graphene 3D Lab Inc. (the "Company" or "Graphene") today announced that it has filed a patent application entitled "Method and System for Recovering and Utilizing Heat Energy Produced by Computer Hardware in Blockchain Mining Operations" with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The invention introduces a revolutionary new technology for recuperating the thermal energy produced in the computation and Blockchain operation, utilizing that recovered thermal energy in heating and/or refrigeration modules using graphene.
Ok, they have money to buy stuff because there are groups that buying into the company. I guess I already knew that, so the question should have been why are these groups doing that? I would think you would invest in a company in order to get a piece of what they already have, not in hopes that they will use your money to buy good stuff. Why not just buy the good stuff directly yourself? I actually can guess at some answers, but I still find this weird.
Yes, deals such as this apply to whoever holds the shares when the deal closes.
I don't understand how this company has money to make acquisitions. Do they have enough money to develop any of their currently held properties? Can someone explain what the strategy is here?
I agree with your math, but don't agree with how you phrase it. I would say that if the deal completes, then RAD shareholders would get approximately $2.50 per share of RAD. If a 5% discount is to be applied, that would relate to what the deal is worth to shareholders today, not what we would get if the deal does in fact go through. Regardless, that calculation is based on the implicit value that Albertson's applies to the new stock shares. The real question, of course, is how will the market value the shares, and I have no idea about that. One thought though is that Albertson's would probably prefer that people take shares rather than cash, and if this is the case then maybe the "real" value is somewhat higher.
So the 10-Q would be for the quarter ending December 31, (I assume). Given that, is there really any possibility that it will contain any surprising good news?
I probably should have made my comment in reply to the other guy. I don't know what the point is, but I think he is just yanking your chain.
I would say this conversation has outlived its usefulness, but did it ever have any?
What exactly would a no short option be - that your shares can't be loaned out to short sellers? I think the problem out there is naked shorting, i.e., selling short without actually borrowing the shares. As an aside, I recently got an email from Schwab asking if I wanted to loan out my shares in a certain stock in return for some sort of interest payment. This is the only time this has ever happened to me in 30 years. I had always assumed that your brokerage just lent out your shares without telling you.
$1.99, $2.99, $4.99 -- virtually the same. What else do they have to offer to persuade someone to move their account?
Did I miss something, or was the only real selling point here $2.99 trades? I currently pay $4.99 with Schwab, which I consider to be essentially 0. If there are other benefits they need to highlight them.
3333 shares executed on my order today, this time at the limit price of 0.001.
What you're saying sounds iffy. Here is a decent article on the gray/grey market: http://www.extraordinaryinvestor.com/grey-sheets.html . It says:
"No recent bid or ask quotes are available because no market makers share data or quote such stocks. There is no quoting system available to record and settle trades.
All Grey sheet trading is moderated by a broker and done between consenting individuals at a price they agree on. The only documentation that can be publicly found regarding the trades is when the last trade took place."
So there are no market makers per se. The question is what is the meaning of "moderated by a broker."
Okay, this is weird. I got a partial fill (16306 shares) on my 0.001 limit order, but it was executed at 0.0001.
Thanks. For some reason I had the idea that it was just a matter of running the blood through a fine mesh. As for your hope for a definitive answer to your lectin question, my guess is that over the coming years you will hear many definitive answers.
Here's a question for some informed scientist out there. Is the filtration based solely on the size of the particle or can it be more selective than that. If based only on size, is there a possibility that the system can't help but remove some things that need to be kept around?
I went by the address that E.digital lists on its website today, 16870 West Bernardo Drive, Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92127. A lot of people/businesses share that address. It looks like you rent an office and get the use of a shared reception desk, lobby, etc. Anyway, I was told that E.digital moved out about 3 months ago.
I put in an order for 100k shares this morning at 0.051 and it got filled in pieces over the course of a half an hour or so. At the time of my order the bid was 0.050 and the ask was 0.054 (or maybe 0.055). The fact that it got filled so easily makes me wonder, but let's see what happens.
tZERO - I'm still not clear what role this plays in anything. I know OSTK wants to create a platform for stock trading. Would trades be in tZERO rather than dollars? Is the value of tZERO intended to be stable compared to the dollar, or to increase potentially?
That is puzzling, to say the least.
Unfortunately the shares are in an IRA, so there is no tax loss to be had. If it been in a regular account I would have sold it long ago. At this point it is just a low stakes game to see how good a price I can get.
The heyday of EDIG was late 1999 and early 2000. Looking at a chart for 2008 I don't see much excitement, but maybe the chart I'm looking at doesn't have enough detail.
A couple of people have misunderstood my last post, so I will try again. I own a few hundred dollars worth of the stock that I acquired way back when they were making money from licenses to Intel and the like. I basically forgot about it until recently when I started to become interested in penny stocks again (BTW, I consider that a bad omen for the market in general). Someone here kept saying they'd lose in court and that would be the end, and it sounded pretty reasonable since it didn't appear that anything else was going on for the company. So I was thinking I should sell (share price was around 1 cent), but never pulled the trigger. Then the verdict came and all fell out as predicted, so I kicked myself and declared that I knew this was going to happen! It seemed like that was the end for the company, and I wondered if I should just sell out before it drops any further. This time indecision was my friend and the appeal came along and brought the stock back to life. Now it's approaching one cent again. Will I have the discipline to bail out while it is relatively high, or will I hold on and shake my head in sorrow when it dumps again? Stay tuned!
The last of my 50000 share limit order at 0.002 filled finally. I put in a new order for 50000 shares at 0.001.
I still hold a few tens of thousands of shares from days of yore, and just recently started to pay attention again. Reading this board I felt like the warnings to sell were probably on target, but I didn't act. Going forward though, I think that the appeal could save me, and the further off in the future it is, the better. Until there is a final verdict, all kinds random rumors, hype etc can pop up and give us a run up.
Any theories about the reason for today's big drop?
I guess I don't really understand what this company is doing. It seems like they don't have a lot of cash, so if they are going to do some mining I would think they would need to conserve what they have so they can pay for mining expenses. Instead they are buying more property. Can some one explain?
Someone posted a snide comment about Woody Norris on the EDIG board, which got me to wondering what he is up to these days. I eventually found my way to Turtle Beach. Is he still affiliated with this company?
I was going to buy a MoviePass for someone for Christmas, but they wanted all kinds of personal info of the recipient, so I didn't feel comfortable doing it. In particular they wanted the email address. To those of you who have signed up, has there been any issue with spam etc. I don't recall, did they want a cell number as well?
I started to go through the motions to participate in the ICO, but it requires you to send a scan of your passport, and that scared me off. Is this how ICOs normally work?
Another 5000 shares traded at 0.000001 while my offer at 0.002 sits open. 5000 shares at 0.002 would be $10. Maybe it is someone whose brokerage charges more than $10 per trade, and this is a special way of dealing with such circumstances.
Regarding expired warrants, 1) it would have been nice if you would have made clear that your post is about NioCorp, not CleanTeQ; 2) as the warrants were priced out of the money (i.e. at a price higher than the current market price), it really isn't indicative of anything that they were allowed to expire.
Here's some more partial fills to my 50,000 shares at 0.002 order:
12/27/2017 10:48 3333 shares (what I already reported)
12/27/2017 3:58 35 shares
12/27/2017 3:58 10000 shares
12/29/2017 1:49 4820 shares
For cobalt I am in Clean Teq (CTEQF), (not based on any expert knowledge).
The thing I learned from the net neutrality debate is that a lot of people have only one available broadband provider, which seems like a problem. Is there a big opportunity for Viasat?
I just got partial execution (3333 shares) of my limit order at $0.002. The stock quote on E*Trade now reads Last Price 0.000, change -0.003 (-99.97%). If the previous close was 0.003 then -99.97% means 0.0000009.
Nice jump today, presumably due to the news that the stock will trade on the Toronto exchange. I wonder why this matters. I (an American) have bought shares via the symbol CTEQF, and that won't change. I assume Canadians could do the same thing. One odd note is that when I bought via my ETrade account, the commission is the normal $6.95. But when I bought via my Schwab account, the commission was $49.95, rather than the usual $4.95.
I didn't follow that. Are you saying that MGX technology would be built into the zinc battery? Also, is it weird that there is no mention of the terms of the acquisition?